Re: fingering notation alternative
On 7 May 2018 at 23:59, Thomas Morleywrote: > 2018-05-07 23:35 GMT+02:00 Gianmaria Lari : > > > > > I tried to write alternative fingering putting fingering numbers on a > > column. This is what I did: > > > > { c' \finger \markup \center-column {2 3}} > > > > But the distance between numbers is a bit too large. Does exist a better > > way? > > > > Thank you, g. > > > Multiple fingerings are possible. See: > > { c'-2-3 c'-3-2 } > oh sure!!! I forgot it, thank you > Or adjust baseline-skip: > { c' \finger \markup \override #'(baseline-skip . 1.5) \center-column { 2 > 3 } } > This will be useful in the future, thank you also for this. > Btw, please add space around curly braces. Otherwise errors may occur. See: > tst = {\override TextScript.color = #red} > {\tst c'-"xy"} > Yes, I periodically make this mistake... thank you to remind it! Regards, g. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: fingering notation alternative
2018-05-07 23:35 GMT+02:00 Gianmaria Lari: > > I tried to write alternative fingering putting fingering numbers on a > column. This is what I did: > > { c' \finger \markup \center-column {2 3}} > > But the distance between numbers is a bit too large. Does exist a better > way? > > Thank you, g. Multiple fingerings are possible. See: { c'-2-3 c'-3-2 } Or adjust baseline-skip: { c' \finger \markup \override #'(baseline-skip . 1.5) \center-column { 2 3 } } Btw, please add space around curly braces. Otherwise errors may occur. See: tst = {\override TextScript.color = #red} {\tst c'-"xy"} Cheers, Harm ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: fingering notation alternative
On 5 May 2018 at 22:37, Gianmaria Lariwrote: > > On 5 May 2018 at 17:18, Malte Meyn wrote: > >> >> >> Am 05.05.2018 um 16:33 schrieb Gianmaria Lari: >> >>> This is more a notation question than a lilypond question. >>> >>> Does exist a standard fingering notation to indicate that a note can be >>> played for example with 2 or 3? >>> >> >> I agree with David and Ralph: put them on top of each other or at >> oppisite sides of the staff. The latter might not always be possible or >> reasonable, italic numbers can help here. See also >> https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5074/ >> >> In some rare cases, I’ve seen both fingerings separated by a horizontal >> line, especially in piano music, where there are multiple fingers at the >> same time, f. e. >> >> 5 4 5 4 3 >> 1 2 1 2 1 >> - >> 5 4 3 5 4 >> 3 2 1 3 2 >> >> for descending thirds. >> >> ___ >> lilypond-user mailing list >> lilypond-user@gnu.org >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user >> > > > Thank you to all for the suggestions!! > g. > I tried to write alternative fingering putting fingering numbers on a column. This is what I did: { c' \finger \markup \center-column {2 3}} But the distance between numbers is a bit too large. Does exist a better way? Thank you, g. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: fingering notation alternative
On 5 May 2018 at 17:18, Malte Meynwrote: > > > Am 05.05.2018 um 16:33 schrieb Gianmaria Lari: > >> This is more a notation question than a lilypond question. >> >> Does exist a standard fingering notation to indicate that a note can be >> played for example with 2 or 3? >> > > I agree with David and Ralph: put them on top of each other or at oppisite > sides of the staff. The latter might not always be possible or reasonable, > italic numbers can help here. See also https://sourceforge.net/p/test > lilyissues/issues/5074/ > > In some rare cases, I’ve seen both fingerings separated by a horizontal > line, especially in piano music, where there are multiple fingers at the > same time, f. e. > > 5 4 5 4 3 > 1 2 1 2 1 > - > 5 4 3 5 4 > 3 2 1 3 2 > > for descending thirds. > > ___ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > Thank you to all for the suggestions!! g. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: fingering notation alternative
Am 05.05.2018 um 16:33 schrieb Gianmaria Lari: This is more a notation question than a lilypond question. Does exist a standard fingering notation to indicate that a note can be played for example with 2 or 3? I agree with David and Ralph: put them on top of each other or at oppisite sides of the staff. The latter might not always be possible or reasonable, italic numbers can help here. See also https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5074/ In some rare cases, I’ve seen both fingerings separated by a horizontal line, especially in piano music, where there are multiple fingers at the same time, f. e. 5 4 5 4 3 1 2 1 2 1 - 5 4 3 5 4 3 2 1 3 2 for descending thirds. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: fingering notation alternative
On Sat, May 5, 2018, 7:35 AM Gianmaria Lariwrote: > This is more a notation question than a lilypond question. > > Does exist a standard fingering notation to indicate that a note can be > played for example with 2 or 3? I normally write > > \finger "2(3)" > > or > > \finger "2/3" > > > but I'm not sure this is correct. > I think I've usually seen, for a single note, the "primary", or preferred, fingering on top, with the second fingering directly below : 2 3 That's what I've seen, especially in exercise and etude books, and what I've used in transcribing them. I've also seen, for a single note, one fingering above the staff and another below the staff. HTH, Ralph Ralph Palmer Brattleboro, VT USA ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: fingering notation alternative
Gianmaria Lariwrites: > This is more a notation question than a lilypond question. > > Does exist a standard fingering notation to indicate that a note can be > played for example with 2 or 3? I normally write > > \finger "2(3)" > > or > > \finger "2/3" > > > but I'm not sure this is correct. The usual I know from some violin editions is to write the better fingering above and the easier fingering (typically avoiding 2nd/4th position) below, sometimes in a different font (italic?). -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
fingering notation alternative
This is more a notation question than a lilypond question. Does exist a standard fingering notation to indicate that a note can be played for example with 2 or 3? I normally write \finger "2(3)" or \finger "2/3" but I'm not sure this is correct. Thank you, g. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user