Re: looking for sources for beagle u-boot/u-boot SPL for 1201 images
On 21 February 2012 20:55, John Rigby john.ri...@linaro.org wrote: Forwarding to all after I realized my answer only went to Peter: That manifest entry points to the u-boot-tools package which is userland package containing mkimage so not really what you want. Your email reminds me we need to do this better like we now do for the kernel. But that does not help you. Given the date of that hwpack I would guess that the u-boot was last months release: http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=boot/u-boot-linaro-stable.git;a=commit;h=a7aebf03597d9661ad0e5241c12e448e980800b4 Thanks. With the aid of those sources I was able to determine that the bug I was looking at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu-linaro/+bug/928580 seems to be a u-boot bug. get_board_mem_timings() doesn't recognise the Beagle C4 + Micron 0xba NAND combo[*] and so falls into the xM case for 512MB RAM. Since that's twice as much RAM as we actually have things quickly go pear-shaped. [*] not just a qemu-ism, there's a boot of real hardware with that part here: http://osdir.com/ml/beagleboard/2011-09/msg00604.html Where should I report this? Thanks -- PMM ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
Re: looking for sources for beagle u-boot/u-boot SPL for 1201 images
Added u-boot-linaro to existing bug. Marked the qemu bug invalid. Will fix soon. On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 6:21 AM, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote: On 21 February 2012 20:55, John Rigby john.ri...@linaro.org wrote: Forwarding to all after I realized my answer only went to Peter: That manifest entry points to the u-boot-tools package which is userland package containing mkimage so not really what you want. Your email reminds me we need to do this better like we now do for the kernel. But that does not help you. Given the date of that hwpack I would guess that the u-boot was last months release: http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=boot/u-boot-linaro-stable.git;a=commit;h=a7aebf03597d9661ad0e5241c12e448e980800b4 Thanks. With the aid of those sources I was able to determine that the bug I was looking at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu-linaro/+bug/928580 seems to be a u-boot bug. get_board_mem_timings() doesn't recognise the Beagle C4 + Micron 0xba NAND combo[*] and so falls into the xM case for 512MB RAM. Since that's twice as much RAM as we actually have things quickly go pear-shaped. [*] not just a qemu-ism, there's a boot of real hardware with that part here: http://osdir.com/ml/beagleboard/2011-09/msg00604.html Where should I report this? Thanks -- PMM ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
Re: looking for sources for beagle u-boot/u-boot SPL for 1201 images
Forwarding to all after I realized my answer only went to Peter: That manifest entry points to the u-boot-tools package which is userland package containing mkimage so not really what you want. Your email reminds me we need to do this better like we now do for the kernel. But that does not help you. Given the date of that hwpack I would guess that the u-boot was last months release: http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=boot/u-boot-linaro-stable.git;a=commit;h=a7aebf03597d9661ad0e5241c12e448e980800b4 Thanks for pointing this out. We will eliminate the guessing next time. On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote: Hi. I'm trying to track down the sources that made the U-Boot and U-Boot SPL for the beagle 1201 release image: http://releases.linaro.org/images/12.01/oneiric/nano/ sources.txt says that's this hwpack: http://releases.linaro.org/12.01/ubuntu/oneiric-hwpacks/ but the manifest.txt there: http://releases.linaro.org/12.01/ubuntu/oneiric-hwpacks/hwpack_linaro-omap3_20120123-1_armel_supported.manifest.txt only says: u-boot-tools=2011.06-3ubuntu1 and doesn't say where I should find this version of the package. I guessed that it might be the u-boot package 2011.06-3ubuntu1 from oneiric, but that does not seem to contain the SPL code, so I'm guessing it's the wrong one. (Also U-Boot announces itself as U-Boot 2011.12 (Jan 22 2012 - 00:52:03) so that manifest is clearly a load of rubbish...) Can anybody help? thanks in advance -- PMM ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
