Re: Some Doubts
If the RPM name has noarch in it, it means it does not contain any binary files specific to a particular architecture. If it has i386, s390x, or anything like that, it is almost guaranteed to not run on any architecture other than the one specified. You might get lucky if someone made a mistake and didn't mark something as noarch when they should have, but I wouldn't count it working. If you don't use RPM to install something, RPM will *not* know about it. So, no surprise there. If you want to install something that SUSE doesn't provide, create a SRPM for it, and build a "binary" RPM from it. Mark Post -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yu Safin Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 6:39 PM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Some Doubts Some doubts: (cross posted with the OpenSuSE forum) 1) I am not clear as to why some rpm's are named i386 and some noarch. eg) perl-libwww-perl-5.801-8.noarch.rpm perl-GDTextUtil-0.86-8.i386.rpm I suspect the i386 means Intel but when I install a perl i386 rpm on my Mainframe z890 it works (under Linux). 2) when I install some perl RPM's on my SuSe 9.3 from rpmpam I had no problems. However, when I go into CPAN (perl -MCPAN -e shell), I find that the rpm's for the perl modules are not showing up when I do an "i" on the name (e.g. perl-AnyData-xxx.rpm was installed and then under CPAN, "i AnyData"). is this normal? I am trying to avoid using CPAN because I have been burned before when I install and module that I need to remove later on. CPAN won't allow me. Another problem with CPAN is that I need to do it with me present, I can't just automate the installation of a bunch of RPM's for new servers. Any suggestions will be appreciated. -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
Some Doubts
Some doubts: (cross posted with the OpenSuSE forum) 1) I am not clear as to why some rpm's are named i386 and some noarch. eg) perl-libwww-perl-5.801-8.noarch.rpm perl-GDTextUtil-0.86-8.i386.rpm I suspect the i386 means Intel but when I install a perl i386 rpm on my Mainframe z890 it works (under Linux). 2) when I install some perl RPM's on my SuSe 9.3 from rpmpam I had no problems. However, when I go into CPAN (perl -MCPAN -e shell), I find that the rpm's for the perl modules are not showing up when I do an "i" on the name (e.g. perl-AnyData-xxx.rpm was installed and then under CPAN, "i AnyData"). is this normal? I am trying to avoid using CPAN because I have been burned before when I install and module that I need to remove later on. CPAN won't allow me. Another problem with CPAN is that I need to do it with me present, I can't just automate the installation of a bunch of RPM's for new servers. Any suggestions will be appreciated. -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
Re: S390 Suse FTP installation - IP address question.
On 1/11/06, MOEUR TIM C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here's how I did this. The reason Mike did his mksles9root script to prepare the file tree is that this way you install the latest versions from the service pack rather than the older base levels. This way you avoid creating a system that does not run because of missing fixes, save yourself a lot of time because avoiding the upgrade, avoid trouble because of massive upgrade with YOU. That's why I recommend following that route (there's still enough service beyond SP2 that will show you how the upgrade works). Rob -- Rob van der Heij rvdheij @ gmail.com Velocity Software, Inc -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
Re: [2.6 patch] arch/s390/Makefile: remove -finline-limit=10000
From: Martin Schwidefsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:21:20 +0100 > On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 21:57 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > -finline-limit might have been required for older compilers, but > > nowadays it does no longer make sense. > > I didn't check the effects of reverting to the default inline-limit, did > you find any negative impacts? I'm thinking about the critical code > paths e.g. minor faults. There better should not be an additional > function call that would have been inlined with the bigger inline limit, > since function calls are quite expensive on s390. You need to be careful now that -Os is specified by default in 2.6.x The inline-limit GCC option is interpreted differently in gcc-4.x when -Os is given vs. when it is not. On Sparc this caused schedule() to be inlined (I'm not kidding) which caused all kinds of troubles. I highly recommed you don't specify it and let the compiler make the decisions, and add inline tags to places where you think it is hyper-important for inlining to occur. -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
Re: S390 Suse FTP installation - IP address question.
Ted, Here's how I did this. Instead of 3 (FTP) I used 1 NFS. BUT FIRST, you need to do some stuff. - Before you choose NFS find a nearby Linux desktop machine that is on your network. - Make a copy of CD #1 (or you can take it out of the HMC, but two copies are easier). - Put CD #1 in the drive on the desktop machine. - Configure your desktop machine to use NFS, and export the cd directory. It was /media/cdrom in my case. I had have to read up on NFS, exportfs to get that all straight. - Back on the HMC, now select 1) NFS - The installation dialog will then ask for the nfs server address and directory where it can find the installation disk. Answer with your desktop machine and /media/cdrom You still have to then log on to the installation Linux machine and start YaST, but hopefully this will get you past the unusual "where's the installation media?" problem. Here's how I did this -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted Keesey Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 1:22 PM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: S390 Suse FTP installation - IP address question. Hello, I have begun installing s390 Suse Linux into a Mainframe LPAR. I am installing the boot code from CD #1 (from the HMC). I have successfully set up my network parameters. I am now at the point of choosing the installation source. Here is the message : Please specify the installation source: 1) NFS 2) SAMBA 3) FTP 4) Abort I chose option 3 (FTP) The response is the following: Please enter IP-Number of the host providing the installation It is here that I am stuck. I have been unable to find the FTP IP address for Novell's FTP site for S390. Does anyone know how I should proceed from here? Are there mirror sites? If it does exist, is it anonymous? Thanks for any help you can provide. Ted. -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
Re: S390 Suse FTP installation - IP address question.
The quickest way is to have a FTP server... The question I like to know , do you have a LINUX machine running else where and allow FTP. You might need this server to ssh You can then create a directory and account(userid) on that server... i.e. . mkdir /SuSE9CD . useradd suse9inst-d /SuSE9CD . passwd <- set the password . cp -dpR /media/cdrom /SuSE9CD,<-- do these two step for all 6 CDs . eject . chown suse9inst:users -R /SuSE9CD . ifconfig <- get the IP address of the server Go back to HMC and you need the IP address of the FTP server, the userid and the password. the directory path is "../SuSE9CD You will then need to "ssh" into Mainframe(your mainframe IP address) then "yast" Ted Keesey <[EMAIL PROTECTED] an.com>To Sent by: Linux on LINUX-390@vm.marist.edu 390 Port cc <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ist.edu> Subject S390 Suse FTP installation - IP address question. 01/11/2006 03:21 PM Please respond to Linux on 390 Port <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ist.edu> Hello, I have begun installing s390 Suse Linux into a Mainframe LPAR. I am installing the boot code from CD #1 (from the HMC). I have successfully set up my network parameters. I am now at the point of choosing the installation source. Here is the message : Please specify the installation source: 1) NFS 2) SAMBA 3) FTP 4) Abort I chose option 3 (FTP) The response is the following: Please enter IP-Number of the host providing the installation It is here that I am stuck. I have been unable to find the FTP IP address for Novell's FTP site for S390. Does anyone know how I should proceed from here? Are there mirror sites? If it does exist, is it anonymous? Thanks for any help you can provide. Ted. -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 - This message and its attachments may contain privileged and confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), you are prohibited from printing, forwarding, saving or copying this email. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete this e-mail and its attachments from your computer. -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
Re: S390 Suse FTP installation - IP address question.
On 1/11/06, Ted Keesey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It is here that I am stuck. I have been unable to find the > FTP IP address for Novell's FTP site for S390. Does anyone > know how I should proceed from here? Are there mirror sites? > If it does exist, is it anonymous? You'll have to provide your own ftp server loaded with stuff from the CD's you got from Novell. Recommended to use Mike MacIsaac's mksles9root program to build the proper structures. I believe you can even boot the first CD on a PC to get a working Linux with ftp server. Rob -- Rob van der Heij rvdheij @ gmail.com -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
S390 Suse FTP installation - IP address question.
Hello, I have begun installing s390 Suse Linux into a Mainframe LPAR. I am installing the boot code from CD #1 (from the HMC). I have successfully set up my network parameters. I am now at the point of choosing the installation source. Here is the message : Please specify the installation source: 1) NFS 2) SAMBA 3) FTP 4) Abort I chose option 3 (FTP) The response is the following: Please enter IP-Number of the host providing the installation It is here that I am stuck. I have been unable to find the FTP IP address for Novell's FTP site for S390. Does anyone know how I should proceed from here? Are there mirror sites? If it does exist, is it anonymous? Thanks for any help you can provide. Ted. -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
Re: Very interesting article!
People often make the mistake of comparing Linux to Windows. I know one is a serious operating system - multi-user, multi-tasking and the other is not. I still can not run multiple isolated sessions or login as different users concurrently. There is a place for Windows and a place for Linux. I do not see one dislodging the other. In fact they co-exist very well thanks to the standards. Good job EFF and IETF and other standards bodies. Without you we would have had no choice. Linux is the greatest fruit anarchy has yielded. The organized anarchy is an amazing phenomenon of the last two decades. McKown, John wrote: "Linux is Not Windows" Granted, more oriented towards the desktop crowd, but hopefully on-topic enough. If not, I apologize. The only thing that I see wrong with it is that the author does not get "libre" != "gratis". He states that FOSS is free. He states that there is no monetary benefit to the developer with FOSS as there is with proprietary software. I don't think this is entirely true. But I guess it is more so than with proprietary (even shareware). http://linux.oneandoneis2.org/LNW.htm -- John McKown Senior Systems Programmer UICI Insurance Center Information Technology This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and its content is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this transmission, or taking any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 -- __ Ranga Nathan Work: 714-442-7591 -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 begin:vcard fn:Ranga Nathan n:Nathan;Ranga email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] tel;work:714-442-7591 version:2.1 end:vcard
Re: glibc compilation error
I added the include for to linux-2.6.14.3/include/asm-s390/sigcontext.h and that did resolve the undefined errors. Do you think we can get that fix sent upstream? Thanks, Mark Post -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter 1 Oberparleiter Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 8:15 AM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: glibc compilation error Mark Post <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 11.01.2006 08:09:58: > I'm trying to compile glibc 2.3.6 using linux 2.6.14.3 headers. I'm getting > this error: [...] > Apparently, __user isn't being defined anywhere in the chain of header files > being pulled in. Does anyone know where it _should_ be defined, and > how ../nptl/sysdeps/s390/tcb-offsets.sym should be modified to include > that file? I recently came across a possibly related bug report on the SUSE bugzilla database that suggested that "asm/sigcontext.h" is missing an "#include " statement which leads to "__user" being undefined. Maybe try adding that statement to the file and retry. Regards, Peter Oberparleiter -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
[PATCH] arch/s390/kernel/setup.c: fix compilation on UP
CC arch/s390/kernel/setup.o
arch/s390/kernel/setup.c: In function `do_machine_restart_nonsmp':
arch/s390/kernel/setup.c:271: error: too few arguments to function `__cpcmd'
arch/s390/kernel/setup.c: In function `do_machine_halt_nonsmp':
arch/s390/kernel/setup.c:279: error: too few arguments to function `__cpcmd'
arch/s390/kernel/setup.c: In function `do_machine_power_off_nonsmp':
arch/s390/kernel/setup.c:286: error: too few arguments to function `__cpcmd'
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/s390/kernel/setup.c |6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c
@@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ static void do_machine_restart_nonsmp(ch
reipl_diag();
if (MACHINE_IS_VM)
- cpcmd ("IPL", NULL, 0);
+ cpcmd ("IPL", NULL, 0, NULL);
else
reipl (0x1 | S390_lowcore.ipl_device);
}
@@ -276,14 +276,14 @@ static void do_machine_restart_nonsmp(ch
static void do_machine_halt_nonsmp(void)
{
if (MACHINE_IS_VM && strlen(vmhalt_cmd) > 0)
-cpcmd(vmhalt_cmd, NULL, 0);
+cpcmd(vmhalt_cmd, NULL, 0, NULL);
signal_processor(smp_processor_id(), sigp_stop_and_store_status);
}
static void do_machine_power_off_nonsmp(void)
{
if (MACHINE_IS_VM && strlen(vmpoff_cmd) > 0)
-cpcmd(vmpoff_cmd, NULL, 0);
+cpcmd(vmpoff_cmd, NULL, 0, NULL);
signal_processor(smp_processor_id(), sigp_stop_and_store_status);
}
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
Re: What size memory footprint does the kernel take
My current SLES9 definition would look like this: 0154 SUS90244 NSS 016M 0 00011 EW A 0 OMITTED NO 00100 003E1 SR 00400 0045E EW 00800 00985 EW That means potentiall 737 pages to be shared. If you're talking about Linux virtual machines of 2GB, then being able to share 2MB of it is not an obvious winner. When you run a lot of small virtual machines it becomes more appealing. Some benefit is in having the kernel pages shared because page faults on those typically block the entire virtual machine. And I believe there still is the side effect of CP being reluctant to page out the EW portion (static kernel variables, so also good to keep resident - but less fun for the initrd at 00800). The documentation on the VM pages for creating the NSS are not correct anymore. The current SuSE kernel comes with the option enabled by default, so you should be able to use an NSS without having to compile it yourself (and lose support). There's some options to simplify this process with the latest version of zipl. When I can't find useful documentation of that I will post the intructions one of these days. We're currently in the process of repeating the measurements on Linux memory usage and the possible savings of NSS and DCSS facilities for current releases. Watch this space on how your favorite performance monitor will guide you in this. Rob -- Rob van der Heij rvdheij @ gmail.com Velocity Software, Inc -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
What size memory footprint does the kernel take
In an active running system, using the default SuSE kernel, what is the footprint in memory? I am being directed to put the Linux kernel in a name-save-segment in VM to share it. While I agree that this is goodness from a memory standpoint, I would have to have at least 2 of them (prod and test) and I've only got mebbe 4 prod systems and 6 test systems to begin with? Secondly, is there a comprehensive document on sharing the kernel among systems? And lastly what are the best candidates to take advantage of the execute in place file system? -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
Re: glibc compilation error
Mark Post <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 11.01.2006 08:09:58: > I'm trying to compile glibc 2.3.6 using linux 2.6.14.3 headers. I'm getting > this error: [...] > Apparently, __user isn't being defined anywhere in the chain of header files > being pulled in. Does anyone know where it _should_ be defined, and how > ../nptl/sysdeps/s390/tcb-offsets.sym should be modified to include that > file? I recently came across a possibly related bug report on the SUSE bugzilla database that suggested that "asm/sigcontext.h" is missing an "#include " statement which leads to "__user" being undefined. Maybe try adding that statement to the file and retry. Regards, Peter Oberparleiter -- Peter Oberparleiter Linux on zSeries Development IBM Development Lab, Boeblingen/Germany -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
Re: Secure file transfers: thoughts on zLinux as server for MVS sysplex?
We use FDR/Upstream here to move data between z/OS and MainFrameLinux using hipersockets. On the MFL image, we then encrypt the data using PGP and FTP it. The reverse works quite nicely too. What we like about Upstream is that we use CA-7 to schedule the job on the z/OS image and Upstreams agent monitors the job on both the z/OS and MFL image. At 03:47 PM 1/9/2006, you wrote: MVS access: that's where the question of practicality arises. One can ftp the file to the Linux image and if it heads across a hipersocket it can't be sniffed therefore it needs not be encrypted. That leaves the authentication issue to be dealt with, but I admit I haven't given that a great deal of thought. Once the file is there a scheduler agent or something similar can initiate the transfer from Linux to the final location. One can reverse the flow and the situation is changed very little, the agent lets the MVS system know to retrieve the file once it arrives at the Linux image. OpenSSH on MVS uses OpenSSL software encryption routines and can consume a lot of cycles. That workload would likely be less expensive out of the sysplex where it would not inflate all the related yet totally uninvolved software license fees. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To ST.EDULINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU cc 01/09/2006 15:10 Subject Re: Secure file transfers: thoughts on zLinux as server for MVS Please respond to sysplex? [EMAIL PROTECTED] ST.EDU I don't understand how installing a Linux/390 system running SSH is going to allow your MVS systems to access the data. Besides, if running SSH on your Linux system is good enough, why isn't running SSH on your MVS systems good enough? Mark Post -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Ambros Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 3:01 PM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Secure file transfers: thoughts on zLinux as server for MVS sysplex? We are looking to eliminate password authentication and, probably, encrypt all production file transfers on our internal network. Our Unix engineers are loathe to install SSL enabled ftp clients but instead wish to exploit OpenSSH. As a matter of fact, all our new Unix machines will be built with ftp disabled. OpenSSH is not the best solution for our MVS installation, so we look at alternatives. One thought is to implement a zLinux image and use it as an ssh server for the MVS sysplex. Is this a practical idea? How are others approaching this issue, if one is unable to influence the Unix engineers to install an SSL enabled ftp client? Thanks... -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 *** This communication may contain privileged and/or confidential information. It is intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you are strictly prohibited from disclosing, copying, distributing or using any of this information. If you received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy. This communication may contain nonpublic information about individuals and businesses subject to the restrictions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. You may not directly or indirectly reuse or redisclose such information for any purpose other than to provide the services for which you are receiving the information. 127 Public Square, Cleveland, OH 44114 *** If you prefer not to receive future e-mail offers for products or services from Key send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'No Promotional E-mails' in the SUBJECT line. -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 Brian W. France Systems Administrator (Mainframe) Pennsylvania State University Administrative Information Services - Infrastructure/Sysarc Rm 25 Shields Bldg., University Park, Pa. 16802 814-863-4739 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECT
Re: [2.6 patch] arch/s390/Makefile: remove -finline-limit=10000
On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 21:57 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > -finline-limit might have been required for older compilers, but > nowadays it does no longer make sense. I didn't check the effects of reverting to the default inline-limit, did you find any negative impacts? I'm thinking about the critical code paths e.g. minor faults. There better should not be an additional function call that would have been inlined with the bigger inline limit, since function calls are quite expensive on s390. -- blue skies, Martin Martin Schwidefsky Linux for zSeries Development & Services IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
glibc compilation error
I'm trying to compile glibc 2.3.6 using linux 2.6.14.3 headers. I'm getting
this error:
make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/glibc-2.3.6/csu'
gawk -f ../scripts/gen-as-const.awk ../nptl/sysdeps/s390/tcb-offsets.sym \
| s390x-slackware-linux-gcc -S -o
/tmp/glibc-2.3.6/build-glibc-2.3.6/tcb-offsets.hT3 -std=gnu99 -O3 -Wall -Win
line -Wstrict-prototypes -Wwrite-strings -g -I../include -I. -I/tmp/gli
bc-2.3.6/build-glibc-2.3.6/csu -I.. -I../libio -I../nptl -I/tmp/glibc-2.3.6/
build-glibc-2.3.6 -I../sysdeps/s390/s390-64/elf -I../libidn/sysdeps/unix -I.
./nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/s390/s390-64 -I../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linu
x/s390 -I../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux -I../nptl/sysdeps/pthread -I../sysd
eps/pthread -I../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv -I../nptl/sysdeps/unix -I../nptl/sys
deps/s390 -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/s390/s390-64 -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv/l
inux/wordsize-64 -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/s390 -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv/li
nux -I../sysdeps/gnu -I../sysdeps/unix/common -I../sysdeps/unix/mman -I../sy
sdeps/unix/inet -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv -I../sysdeps/unix -I../sysdeps/posix
-I../sysdeps/s390/s390-64 -I../sysdeps/wordsize-64 -I../sysdeps/s390/fpu -I.
./sysdeps/s390 -I../sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64 -I../sysdeps/ieee754/flt-32 -I../
sysdeps/ieee754 -I../sysdeps/generic/elf -I../sysdeps/generic -nostdinc -isy
stem /usr/lib/gcc-lib/s390x-slackware-linux/3.3.4/include -isystem
/usr/src/linux-2.6.14.3/include -D_LIBC_REENTRANT -D_LIBC_REENTRANT -include
../include/libc-symbols.h -DHAVE_INITFINI -x c - \
-MD -MP -MF /tmp/glibc-2.3.6/build-glibc-2.3.6/tcb-offsets.h.dT -MT
'/tmp/glibc-2.3.6/build-glibc-2.3.6/tcb-offsets.h.d
/tmp/glibc-2.3.6/build-glibc-2.3.6/tcb-offsets.h'
In file included from ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/bits/sigcontext.h:28,
from ../signal/signal.h:333,
from ../include/signal.h:5,
from ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/s390/sys/ucontext.h:26,
from ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/s390/sys/procfs.h:35,
from ../nptl_db/thread_db.h:29,
from ../nptl/descr.h:33,
from ../nptl/sysdeps/s390/tls.h:77,
from ../include/tls.h:6,
from :2:
/usr/src/linux-2.6.14.3/include/asm/sigcontext.h:64: error: parse error
before '*' token
make[2]: *** [/tmp/glibc-2.3.6/build-glibc-2.3.6/tcb-offsets.h] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/glibc-2.3.6/csu'
The offending definition is this:
struct sigcontext
{
unsigned long oldmask[_SIGCONTEXT_NSIG_WORDS];
_sigregs__user *sregs;
};
Apparently, __user isn't being defined anywhere in the chain of header files
being pulled in. Does anyone know where it _should_ be defined, and how
../nptl/sysdeps/s390/tcb-offsets.sym should be modified to include that
file?
The output of the gawk command is this:
#include
#include
void dummy(void) {
asm ("@@@name@@@MULTIPLE_THREADS_OFFSET@@@value@@@%0@@@end@@@" : : "i"
(offsetof (tcbhead_t, multiple_threads)));
asm ("@@@name@@@PID@@@value@@@%0@@@end@@@" : : "i" (offsetof (struct
pthread, pid)));
asm ("@@@name@@@TID@@@value@@@%0@@@end@@@" : : "i" (offsetof (struct
pthread, tid)));
}
Thanks,
Mark Post
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
