Re: Firefox on zLinux

2019-03-13 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 at 20:13, Mark Post  wrote:
>
> On 3/13/19 11:39 AM, Adolph Kahan wrote:
> > I am trying to get Firefox running on Linux on z and I keep getting 
> > Segmentation fault (core dumped). I have tried it on Clefos 7.5 and Ubuntu 
> > 18.10. Any ideas?
>

May I ask why you want to run firefox? Normally one would use ssh,
port forward and use a web-browser on a local machine to access things
on the remote's localhost to web-browse things.

--
Regards,

Dimitri.

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390


Re: /proc/sysinfo on other architectures?

2018-03-28 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 26 March 2018 at 15:45, Michael MacIsaac  wrote:
> Dan,
>
> Thanks, that's helpful too.
>
> So I try "systemd-detect-virt" on a zLinux and get only get "zvm", which is
> a start but not too helpful.
>
> What I'm learning is that /proc/sysinfo (and thus STSI) is arguably a
> treasure trove of information, because (along with vmcp) can determine the
> hierarchy of hardware and hipervisors as such:
>
> └── systems
> ├── CEC:0FF28
> │   ├── LPAR:VM23
> │   │   └── zVM:VM23
> │   │   ├── SSIcluster:none
> │   │   ├── devices
> │   │   ├── virtualMachine:LNXADM32
>
> I'm hoping dmidecode will provide the equivalent on Lintel.
>

Let me put this in a different perspective, as a millennial using a z
system for the first time less than 3 years ago...

I was shocked when I discovered /proc/sysinfo on a z system, and that
even inside KVM machine it exposes the LPAR, z/VM, KVM information.

And that this information is stored, is nested, and is passed through
to inner layers. I found it extremely insecure, as typically I expect
privilege separation after each layer of virtualization - as in a
public cloud guest user, should not be able to introspect the
underlying virtualisation middle layers (e.g. xen) or the bare metal.

I expect a typical bare-metal -> virtualization -> containerization
deployment will not have the same sysadmin managing / supervising each
of those layers. I expect datacentre remote-hands sysadmin; devops;
developers to have segregated access to these things.

However, after working with z systems a bit more, I realized that the
physical security and access modeling is very different. In effect,
one typically has a very limited number of people accessing the
mainframe, whilst sharing many hats. Hence the mindset that this is
sensitive information to expose from one context to a nested one is
simply not there.

I do agree that /proc/sysinfo is useful and nice. But also something
to _not_ be extended, and to _not_ be ported to other architectures.
Can't really be removed, or change output, cause it is ABI
effectively.

(There are inverse examples too, for better or worse, e.g. UEFI access
is more open and API accessible from userspace than HMC is from LPAR)

Regards,

Dimitri.

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
--
For more information on Linux on System z, visit
http://wiki.linuxvm.org/


Re: Up-to-date cargo & rustc on s390x

2018-02-06 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Hello,

On 6 February 2018 at 16:54, Neale Ferguson  wrote:
>
> Cargo 0.21 and Rust 1.20 are in the ClefOS EPEL repo:
> http://download.sinenomine.net/epel/epel-7/s390x/
>

Thanks. Up to that point, I do have cargo and rust as well. Do you
have anything newer? rustc 1.23 & cargo 0.23 ?

Regards,

Dimitri.


> For a list/description of the 38k+ packages available see:
> http://www.sinenomine.net/products/linux/clefos/packages
>
> On 2/6/18, 9:12 AM, "Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Dimitri John Ledkov"
>  wrote:
>
> >Hello,
> >
> >cargo and rustc on s390x are no longer building in either Debian or
> >Ubuntu.
> >
> >cargo itself used to build, but fail all of its tests and it looks like it
> >no longer builds at all. Which has caused rustc to drop out as well.
> >
> >Has anybody attempted to build / maintain / fix cargo & rustc on s390x?
> >and/or maintains uptodate bootstrapped builds?
>

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
--
For more information on Linux on System z, visit
http://wiki.linuxvm.org/


Up-to-date cargo & rustc on s390x

2018-02-06 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Hello,

cargo and rustc on s390x are no longer building in either Debian or Ubuntu.

cargo itself used to build, but fail all of its tests and it looks like it
no longer builds at all. Which has caused rustc to drop out as well.

Has anybody attempted to build / maintain / fix cargo & rustc on s390x?
and/or maintains uptodate bootstrapped builds?

--
Regards,

Dimitri.

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
--
For more information on Linux on System z, visit
http://wiki.linuxvm.org/


Re: TERM=linux instead of TERM=dumb

2017-10-20 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Hi,

On 18 October 2017 at 21:51, Dell Harris  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to figure out why TERM is being set to linux instead of dumb on 
> the GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT in the /etc/default/grub line of a system-z 
> guest on install of SLES 12 SP2.   TERM=dumb is set in the parmfile but after 
> the install it's set to linux.   Does anyone know of a way to get it to set 
> TERM=dumb on install?
>

Why do you want to use TERM=dumb instead of Linux?

I have proposed upstream systemd to not use color by default on z/VM,
as it seems that the most recent HMC does strips escape codes
correctly in the operating systems messages window. The HMC ascii
terminal displays everything correct, and so does QEMU/KVM terminals.
So far I believe it's just z/VM that fails to render dmsg [ ] and
strip escape codes.

I've tried proposing to systemd to not use color in LPAR/ZVM modes,
but that was rejected see
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/3025/files &
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/3025 &
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/3115 and
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/32391275c02715f76232128c49b19bb619cd9463

Ideally this stuff should work correctly automagically.

Thus maybe we should be extending
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/b139c95bc42dd67e4b8f804fd8f3e248e5127600/src/basic/terminal-util.c#L790
to set things to dumb on s390 for LPAR & z/VM?

-- 
Regards,

Dimitri.

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
--
For more information on Linux on System z, visit
http://wiki.linuxvm.org/


Re: Some General Linux on z questions

2017-03-08 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 15 February 2017 at 11:41, גדי בן אבי  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am starting to experiment with linux on z, and I have some questions.
>
> I currently have Ubuntu installed in an LPAR.
> I have added kvm to this installation, and I can install guest operating 
> systems.
>
> I also have the KVM for z, which I downloaded from ShopzSeries.
>
> Is there any advantage or disadvantage of using IBM KVM for z?

Note the Important News on
http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/solutions/virtualization/kvm/ and the
related newly published FAQs
https://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/cgi-bin/ssialias?htmlfid=ZSQ03110USEN&;

IBM KVM for z is being retired, in favor of using a regular linux
distribution to access the KVM technology, such as Ubuntu 16.04 LTS.

The announcement date is March 7, 2017. The last day to order KVM for
IBM z Systems from IBM is August 28, 2017 and the End of Service date
is March 31, 2018.

-- 
Regards,

Dimitri.

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
--
For more information on Linux on System z, visit
http://wiki.linuxvm.org/


Re: Some General Linux on z questions

2017-02-15 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Hello,

On 15 February 2017 at 11:41, גדי בן אבי  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am starting to experiment with linux on z, and I have some questions.
>
> I currently have Ubuntu installed in an LPAR.
> I have added kvm to this installation, and I can install guest operating 
> systems.
>
> I also have the KVM for z, which I downloaded from ShopzSeries.
>
> Is there any advantage or disadvantage of using IBM KVM for z?
>

IBM KVM for z has slightly newer qemu and related kernel patches.
However, over time this will be made available in 16.04 LTS as well:
- qemu in zesty (17.04) is on par feature wise with IBM KVM for z, and
will be available on 16.04 LTS via Ubuntu Cloud Archive.
- linux in zesty (17.04) is expected to ship with v4.10 kernel which
has all the kernel/qemu features that are present in IBM KVM for z,
the updated kernel will be available on 16.04 LTS via linux-hwe kernel
in the 16.04.3 point release.

Please note that Ubuntu is a complete distribution, and you will find
out of the box support for a lot of software; IBM KVM for z product is
by intent only a single/limited purpose distribution.

All features present in IBM KVM for z have been contributed upstream.
Most of them are already in Ubuntu, and the outstanding bugfixes and
features will be available in due course.

The support timeframe for Ubuntu 16.04 LTS is until April 2021. I do
not know what the support/upgrade time frames for IBM KVM for z are,
e.g. maybe ask your IBM reps until when IBM KVM for z will be
supported.
You can find a few Ubuntu and IBM KVM for z developers on
#ubuntu-s390x on freenode as well if you have more technical questions
to discuss.

> I am looking for gui  tools to help me remotely administrate linux.
>
> Can anyone recommend some tools?
>

In terms of lightweight graphical tools, I personally use virt-manager
on my Ubuntu desktop and connect to libvirt daemon via ssh running on
Ubuntu s390x. For a heavyweight solution, one can also deploy
Openstack and use Ubuntu cloud images for a more web-browser/API
public cloud experience.

I do not know if Kimchi can be deployed onto Ubuntu for s390x
http://kimchi-project.github.io/kimchi/ it looks kind of cool.

-- 
Regards,

Dimitri.

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
--
For more information on Linux on System z, visit
http://wiki.linuxvm.org/


Re: systemd-analyze

2016-10-27 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 27 October 2016 at 15:32, Michael MacIsaac  wrote:
> I heard about this new cool command and tried it, but it did not work:
>
> # systemd-analyze time
> Bootup is not yet finished. Please try again later.
>
> How would I analyze systemd to know why 'bootup is not yet finished'? This
> is SLES 12 SP1.
>

Generic / architecture independent systemd commands to try:

$ systemctl list-units --failed

Should show some culprits.

Also look at full output of $ systemctl list-units

and grep/look for things that are activating or waiting. Hopefully
this should give you enough hints to figure out what components are
not ready yet, to class system as started.

Ideally, at the end of the boot you should be able to see that system
is in running state:

$ systemctl is-system-running
running

It is for me on machines that I maintain. Loads of things can make
systemd believe things are degraded - e.g. when optional services are
required or wanted by accident and similar.

--
Regards,

Dimitri.

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
--
For more information on Linux on System z, visit
http://wiki.linuxvm.org/


s390-tools on github

2016-09-08 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Hello,

powerpc-utils are available from github.

are s390-tools available there too?

If not, could IBM please host and/or mirror s390-tools there?

--
Regards,

Dimitri.

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
--
For more information on Linux on System z, visit
http://wiki.linuxvm.org/


Re: SLES 12 - to btrfs or not to btrfs

2016-08-16 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Hello,

On 16 August 2016 at 19:45, Marcy Cortes  wrote:
> Was wondering what other people have decided to do for their file systems in 
> SLES 12.
> Stable tried and try ext3 or new function (and more space) with btrfs.   Any 
> use of xfs?
>

It is a different kind of pokemon.

Do you have software that will take advantage of it?

Are you happy with degrading over time performance?

Can you afford downtime / reduced performance for rebalancing?

--
Regards,

Dimitri.

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
--
For more information on Linux on System z, visit
http://wiki.linuxvm.org/


Re: LinuxONE Community Cloud??

2016-07-18 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Hello,

On 18 July 2016 at 17:36, John McKown  wrote:
> I would like to "mess around" with Linux on z. I'm a z/OS sysprog &
> Linux/Intel "power" user (I use Fedora). I can see where I can get a "120
> day free trial". But not one word on how much it is thereafter. Really,
> IBM. I do _not_ respond well to lack of basic information. If it is more
> than what I pay to GitHub ($7/month), I'm not likely to bother wasting my
> time. I'm just a poor, old, z/OS person.
>

LinuxONE community cloud is an educational / demo tool hosted at
Marist college. It is not a public cloud / pay-as-you-go model.
At the end of the trial the instance is simply shutdown, and there is
an extremely limited amount of cloudy things one can do there.
Note "the instance" above, as one really gets a quota of just a single
instance for the duration of the trial.

You should try contacting them with your needs and requests. Some open
source projects got instances for a longer period of time, but it's
still no guarantees / gratis service.

Regards,

Dimitri.

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
--
For more information on Linux on System z, visit
http://wiki.linuxvm.org/


Re: UBUNTU on HERCULES

2016-06-23 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Hello,

On 23 June 2016 at 23:01, Tom Huegel  wrote:
> Thanks Mark,
> I'm telling Hercules it is s z13 (2964 N30) but I don't know that Hercules
> does anything with that other than reflect it in the STSI instruction...
> How does UBUNTU determine the hardware level?
>

There is no special ways to determine the hardware levels. There is no
checking of CPU ids etc. Simply the compiler default architecture is
set to zEC12 across the board, meaning that glibc, kernel, and most
binaries rely on zEC12 only instructions. I do not believe these are
at all available, in full, on non zEC12 hardware.

In other words it's not possible to "fake" CPU id in Hercules / zPDT /
z/VM / z/KVM, as things simply segfault / fail with illegal
instructions at runtime. If future revisions of those virtual machines
implement zEC12 instructions, on pre-zEC12 hardware, one would be able
run Ubuntu 16.04 there.

Regards,

Dimitri.


> Tom
>
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Mark Post  wrote:
>
>> >>> On 6/23/2016 at 04:42 PM, Tom Huegel  wrote:
>> > I am having a problem trying to install UBUNTU s390x on Hercules.
>> > Hercules is 3.11 on OpenSuse LEAP 42.x 64-bit.
>> > The error I get is "The Linux kernel requires more recent processor
>> > hardware."
>> > HHCCP011I CPU: Disabled wait state
>> > PSW=0002 8000 BAD
>> >
>> > Is there a minimum Hercules requirement?
>> > Or is it something I might find in the Hercules config file? I have
>> z/ARCH
>> > specified.
>>
>> I don't think it's a Hercules requirement, necessarily.  Ubuntu requires a
>> zEC12 or later machine to run.  If you can get Hercules to report that,
>> then you should be OK.
>>
>>
>> Mark Post
>>
>> --
>> For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>> send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or
>> visit
>> http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
>> --
>> For more information on Linux on System z, visit
>> http://wiki.linuxvm.org/
>>
>
> --
> For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
> http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
> --
> For more information on Linux on System z, visit
> http://wiki.linuxvm.org/

--
Regards,

Dimitri.

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
--
For more information on Linux on System z, visit
http://wiki.linuxvm.org/


Re: How to unformat a dasd drive?

2016-05-19 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 19 May 2016 at 21:51, Mark Post  wrote:
 On 5/19/2016 at 04:41 PM, Alan Altmark  wrote:
>
>> I did.  Unfortunately, being ignorant of script writing on Linux, I don't
>> know any more than I did before I read it.  :-)
>
> Ah, well...  In that case, I check to see if there's 1 or 3 numbers separated 
> by periods specified for the device.  So, 0123 versus 0.0.0123.  If one 
> number, then I pre-pend 0.0. to it, otherwise I leave it alone, other than to 
> make sure the first two "levels" are a single digit each.  Then I look in 
> /sys/bus/ccw/devices/ to see if that busid exists.  If not, bail out.
>
> There are other sanity checks, but in essence, I already did what you 
> suggested when I first wrote the script.  I just didn't allow 0.0123 as a 
> valid input.
>

leading zeros can be ignored. E.g. with chzdev - 200, 0200, 0.0.0200
are all valid...

Funnily enough "0.0200" is not valid, although it is stable id too.

-- 
Regards,

Dimitri.

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
--
For more information on Linux on System z, visit
http://wiki.linuxvm.org/


How to unformat a dasd drive?

2016-05-16 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Hello,

Is it possible to "unformat" a dasd drive such that on Linux it
appears as "n/f" in lsdasd output?

--
Regards,

Dimitri.

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
--
For more information on Linux on System z, visit
http://wiki.linuxvm.org/


Re: chzdev in SLES?

2016-05-04 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 4 May 2016 at 11:27, Mark Post  wrote:
 On 5/4/2016 at 08:46 AM, Peter Oberparleiter 
> wrote:
>> Please note that the zdev tools (chzdev, lszdev) included in s390-tools
>> 1.33 are the result of a full rework. I'm confident that all major
>> issues of earlier versions have been resolved by this new version.
>
> When I glanced at the source code yesterday, and saw your name as the author 
> on all of them, I pretty much came to the same conclusion.
>
> Sigh.  Too late to start using it with SLES12 SP2.  If I'd known this was 
> included earlier we might have been able to integrate it.  As it stands, 
> they'll be in the package, because there's no reason to exclude them.  We 
> just won't be exploiting them ourselves just yet.
>

In Ubuntu, we have switch to lszdev / chzdev tooling late in the 16.04
LTS development cycle both for the installer and the installed system
management of devices.

I like that it can [de-]serialize and persistent and manages
cio_ignore too. And one can enable devices ahead of time too (e.g.
when said device does not exist on the system yet).

It's really good, and scales well, during development cycle we saw
races and bugs with older hwup/down tooling, which chzdev complete
replaces, by generating efficient rock solid modern udev rules.

I see that lszdev/chzdev is really cross-platform tooling for device
management for all Linux on z systems.

-- 
Regards,

Dimitri.

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
--
For more information on Linux on System z, visit
http://wiki.linuxvm.org/


Re: Debian install using LVM

2016-04-12 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Hello,

On 12 April 2016 at 16:22, Martha McConaghy  wrote:
> Mark,
>
> I've been using the installer, so I don't get to see the underlying config
> files.  I'll try it again and see if I can get to /etc/zipl.conf.  The
> installer doesn't say why it can't write out ZIPL, just that it cannot.  I
> tried partitioning /boot and formatting it ext2 (which is the way we do
> SLES12), then partitioning the rest of the volume as /.  It doesn't seem to
> like that either.
>
> It is at least comforting to know I'm not the only one who has run into this
> issue.
>

I think we really should do stable release uploads in Debian of the
fixes to have LVM working on jessie for the next point release.

Because clearly there are users after it like yourself =)

Regards,

Dimitri.


> Martha
>
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 17:25:05 -0600 Mark Post said:
> On 4/11/2016 at 07:00 PM, Martha McConaghy  wrote:
>>> I've been fighting with a Debian install all day and wonder if anyone else
>>> has run into the same problem. I wanted to use LVM for the root filesystem,
>>> so created a /boot partition and an LVM for the rest.  Everything works fine
>>> until it comes to the step where it tries to write out ZIPL.  That step
>>> fails.
>>
>>By "that step" do you mean something the installer is doing that you can't 
>>tell
>>exactly what is happening?  Or is it a command you're running yourself?
>>
>>> I tried all sorts of combinations, but the only that actually works is
>>> creating 1 partition for / with no LVM at all.  Something is not right.
>>
>>While I don't personally care for this kind of setup, it should be fairly
>>straightforward.  /boot needs to be mounted at the time zipl is run.  It needs
>>to have a file system of ext*, xfs, reiserfs, etc. on it, not something like
>>btrfs.
>>
>>What do the contents of /etc/zipl.conf look like?  What are the messages 
>>you're
>>getting back that indicate failure?
>>
>>
>>Mark Post
>>
>>--
>>For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>>send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
>>http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
>>--
>>For more information on Linux on System z, visit
>>http://wiki.linuxvm.org/
>
> --
> For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
> http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
> --
> For more information on Linux on System z, visit
> http://wiki.linuxvm.org/



--
Regards,

Dimitri.

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
--
For more information on Linux on System z, visit
http://wiki.linuxvm.org/


Re: Debian install using LVM

2016-04-11 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Hello,

On 12 April 2016 at 00:00, Martha McConaghy  wrote:
> I've been fighting with a Debian install all day and wonder if anyone else
> has run into the same problem. I wanted to use LVM for the root filesystem,
> so created a /boot partition and an LVM for the rest.  Everything works fine
> until it comes to the step where it tries to write out ZIPL.  That step fails.
> I tried all sorts of combinations, but the only that actually works is
> creating 1 partition for / with no LVM at all.  Something is not right.
>
> The timestamp on the install files I'm using is April 2, so they are pretty
> new.  The level of Debian is jessie.
>

I recommend to try testing aka stretch. There were LVM fixes uploaded
there. As usual do attach /var/log/syslog from the d-i to help
debugging what's going wrong.

Note there is also Debian specific mailing debian-s390:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-s390/

Regards,

Dimitri.

> Has anyone run into this?
>
> Martha
>
> Martha McConaghy
> System Architect/Technical Lead
> Marist College
>
> --
> For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
> http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
> --
> For more information on Linux on System z, visit
> http://wiki.linuxvm.org/



--
Regards,

Dimitri.

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
--
For more information on Linux on System z, visit
http://wiki.linuxvm.org/


Re: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS Beta for IBM LinuxONE and z Systems

2016-04-04 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Hello,

On 4 April 2016 at 17:15, Dave Jones  wrote:
> Hi, Tito.
>
> That is what my environment here is, too; a laptop zPDT box with the
> latest version of the z1090 code.:
>>
>> z1090, version 1-6.49.17, build date - 12/07/15 for Linux on SuSE 64bit
>
> How could we get Canonical Ltd. to update the code to support the zPDT,
> I wonder?
>

I have no access to zPDT and I do not know if zPDT is at all
supported, but I can inquire IBM about this combination.

The cpuinfo flags look reasonable, same as I see on a z/VM.

Regards,

Dimitri.


> DJ
>
>
> On 04/04/2016 10:51 AM, Tito Garrido wrote:
>>
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> My parmfile is clear... this is what I get during the installation IPL:
>> The Linux kernel requires more recent processor hardware
>> HCPGIR450W CP entered; disabled wait PSW 0002 8000 
>> 0BAD
>>
>>
>> I am running the latest version of zPDT so it should be a z13.
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Dave Jones 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Tito, what is in your PARMFILE UBUNTU file?
>>>
>>> Have a good one.
>>>
>>> DJ
>>>
>>>
>>> On 04/03/2016 04:11 PM, Tito Garrido wrote:
>>>
 When I tried to install it on a zPDT it complained about my processor
 (says
 that it is not supported), is it an zPDT issue or ubuntu is not
 recognizing
 the machine type 1090?


>>> --
>>> Dave Jones
>>> V/Soft Software
>>> www.vsoft-software.com
>>> Houston, TX
>>> 281.578.7544
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>>> send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or
>>> visit
>>> http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
>>> --
>>> For more information on Linux on System z, visit
>>> http://wiki.linuxvm.org/
>>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Dave Jones
> V/Soft Software
> www.vsoft-software.com
> Houston, TX
> 281.578.7544
>
> --
> For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or
> visit
> http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
> --
> For more information on Linux on System z, visit
> http://wiki.linuxvm.org/

--
Regards,

Dimitri.

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
--
For more information on Linux on System z, visit
http://wiki.linuxvm.org/


Re: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS Beta for IBM LinuxONE and z Systems

2016-03-31 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 31 March 2016 at 14:57, Ray Mansell  wrote:
> I downloaded and expanded the CD image, and started to install it.
> However, I'm now stuck looking for an FTP server from which to perform
> the bulk of the installation.
>
> On the "Select your location" screen, I choose USA.
> The next screen "Choose a mirror..." supplies "enter information
> manually" as the only choice.
> Selecting that gets me to the "Choose a mirror..." screen, which invites
> me to enter the mirror's hostname.
> And that would be what? (pointing it to my local FTP server where I
> downloaded the ISO doesn't help - it just fails with "Bad archive mirror")
>
> Can you point me to the appropriate installation mirror, please?
>

Darn, I thought i have fixed that. Anyway:

us.ports.ubuntu.com

ports.ubuntu.com

Should work as hostnames, with no further protocol/ports/etc. It would
complete install over HTTP, using default port, on either ipv4 or
ipv6.

Regards,

Dimitri.

> Thank you,
> Ray
>
>
> On 3/31/2016 07:12, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Last week Ubuntu 16.04 LTS Beta was shipped, with final expected on
>> 21st of April.
>>
>> This release includes a port of Ubuntu to s390x architecture (zEC12 and
>> up).
>>
>> I hope you find this post relevant, and if you have any questions do
>> not hesitate to ask, I'll try to answer everything as best as I can.
>>
>> = Downloads =
>> http://www.ubuntu.com/download/server/linuxone
>>
>> = IRC =
>> #ubuntu-s390x on freenode
>>
>> irc://irc.freenode.net/ubuntu-s390x
>>
>> Say hello to xnox (me) upon joining =)
>>
>> = Mailing List =
>> http://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-s390x
>>
>> = Wiki =
>> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/S390X
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>>
>> Dimitri.
>>
>> --
>> For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>> send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or
>> visit
>> http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
>> --
>> For more information on Linux on System z, visit
>> http://wiki.linuxvm.org/
>>
>
> --
> For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or
> visit
> http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
> --
> For more information on Linux on System z, visit
> http://wiki.linuxvm.org/

--
Regards,

Dimitri.

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
--
For more information on Linux on System z, visit
http://wiki.linuxvm.org/


Re: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS Beta for IBM LinuxONE and z Systems

2016-03-31 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 31 March 2016 at 13:47, Michael MacIsaac  wrote:
> Dmitri,
>
> Thanks.
>
> Is there an MD5SUM or other checksum file?
>

GPG signed checksum files (md5, sha1, sha256) are available as usual
with all Ubuntu ISO downloads.

On the thank you page, after the form completion there is a link to
full downloads with all check sums and GPG signatures.

Look for "If it doesn’t, or for alternative options ***visit the
download page***". Click there to access check-sums & GPG signatures.

Regards,

Dimitri.

> -Mike MacIsaac
>
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 7:12 AM, Dimitri John Ledkov 
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Last week Ubuntu 16.04 LTS Beta was shipped, with final expected on
>> 21st of April.
>>
>> This release includes a port of Ubuntu to s390x architecture (zEC12 and
>> up).
>>
>> I hope you find this post relevant, and if you have any questions do
>> not hesitate to ask, I'll try to answer everything as best as I can.
>>
>> = Downloads =
>> http://www.ubuntu.com/download/server/linuxone
>>
>> = IRC =
>> #ubuntu-s390x on freenode
>>
>> irc://irc.freenode.net/ubuntu-s390x
>>
>> Say hello to xnox (me) upon joining =)
>>
>> = Mailing List =
>> http://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-s390x
>>
>> = Wiki =
>> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/S390X
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>>
>> Dimitri.
>>
>> --
>> For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>> send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or
>> visit
>> http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
>> --
>> For more information on Linux on System z, visit
>> http://wiki.linuxvm.org/
>>
>
> --
> For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
> http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
> --
> For more information on Linux on System z, visit
> http://wiki.linuxvm.org/



-- 
Regards,

Dimitri.

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
--
For more information on Linux on System z, visit
http://wiki.linuxvm.org/


Ubuntu 16.04 LTS Beta for IBM LinuxONE and z Systems

2016-03-31 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Hello,

Last week Ubuntu 16.04 LTS Beta was shipped, with final expected on
21st of April.

This release includes a port of Ubuntu to s390x architecture (zEC12 and up).

I hope you find this post relevant, and if you have any questions do
not hesitate to ask, I'll try to answer everything as best as I can.

= Downloads =
http://www.ubuntu.com/download/server/linuxone

= IRC =
#ubuntu-s390x on freenode

irc://irc.freenode.net/ubuntu-s390x

Say hello to xnox (me) upon joining =)

= Mailing List =
http://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-s390x

= Wiki =
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/S390X

--
Regards,

Dimitri.

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
--
For more information on Linux on System z, visit
http://wiki.linuxvm.org/


Re: OpenMainframeProject

2016-01-14 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Hello,

On 12 December 2015 at 14:08, Phil Tully  wrote:
> Yes I am involved with the Linux Foundation Open Mainframe Project. We have a 
> Technical Steering Committee which set the project direction.  We expect to 
> have focus on projects that will benefit running open software on the 
> mainframe.
> Phil
>

Is the EU meetup cancelled?
https://www.openmainframeproject.org/news/events/2016-01-26/open-mainframe-project-eu-meetup
is no longer accessible. I was hoping to attend.

--
Regards,

Dimitri.

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
--
For more information on Linux on System z, visit
http://wiki.linuxvm.org/


Re: OpenMainframeProject

2015-12-11 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
I think the question is about Linux Foundation Open Mainframe Project
in partnership with a bunch of people.

http://www.linuxfoundation.org/news-media/announcements/2015/08/linux-foundation-brings-together-industry-heavyweights-advance

https://www.openmainframeproject.org/

Regards,

Dimitri.

On 12 December 2015 at 01:27, John Campbell  wrote:
> Hmmm...
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_mainframe
>
> That's entirely different from what I thought it was.
>
> Neverr Minnn
>
> -soup
>
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 8:23 PM, John Campbell  wrote:
>
>> Open Mainframe?  News to me.
>>
>> Mainframes require three criteria:
>>
>> 1) Maximum *reliable* single-thread performance (see the "Linux on S/390"
>> redbook "Appendix A" for how reliability is tricked out);
>> 2) Maximum I/O throughput; and
>> 3) Maximum I/O connectivity.
>>
>> Admittedly, criterion 3 is kind of undercut by SAN technology.
>>
>> Additionally, the instruction set need not mimic the zSeries to be a
>> mainframe.  We already know that handling memory access faults in IBM's SS
>> instructions for virtual machine functionality that much harder to pull
>> off...
>>
>> Now you've all just added to my reading list.
>>
>> (laughs maniacally)
>>
>> "You are the MS-DOS of Evil...   Only 640K... Not EVIL Enough!"
>>
>> -soup
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 6:39 PM, Christer Solskogen <
>> christer.solsko...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I haven't seen that been discussed here. Are any of you guys involved
>>> somehow?
>>>
>>> --
>>> chs
>>>
>>> --
>>> For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>>> send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or
>>> visit
>>> http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
>>> --
>>> For more information on Linux on System z, visit
>>> http://wiki.linuxvm.org/
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> John R. Campbell Speaker to Machines  souperb at gmail dot
>> com
>> MacOS X proved it was easier to make Unix user-friendly than to fix Windows
>> "It doesn't matter how well-crafted a system is to eliminate errors;
>> Regardless
>>  of any and all checks and balances in place, all systems will fail
>> because,
>>  somewhere, there is meat in the loop." - me
>>
>
>
>
> --
> John R. Campbell Speaker to Machines  souperb at gmail dot
> com
> MacOS X proved it was easier to make Unix user-friendly than to fix Windows
> "It doesn't matter how well-crafted a system is to eliminate errors;
> Regardless
>  of any and all checks and balances in place, all systems will fail because,
>  somewhere, there is meat in the loop." - me
>
> --
> For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
> http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
> --
> For more information on Linux on System z, visit
> http://wiki.linuxvm.org/



--
Regards,

Dimitri.

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
--
For more information on Linux on System z, visit
http://wiki.linuxvm.org/