Re: WWN change

2016-10-31 Thread Alan Altmark
On Friday, 10/28/2016 at 06:05 GMT, Christer Solskogen 
 wrote:
> But we are changing the target SAN disks as well. And new SAN switches.

Let me emphasize what Steffen said.  Assuming guest Linux A uses two NPIV 
FCP subchannels (zWWPN_A1, zWWPN_A2) and every storage server has two FC 
ports (sWWPN1 and sWWPN2), and Linux guest A has two LUNs on that storage 
server (LUN_A1, LUN_A2), the following relationships exist for EACH guest:

One the SAN switch(es):
- SAN_zone(zWWPN_A1, sWWPN1)
- SAN_zone(zWWPN_A1, sWWPN2)
- SAN_zone(zWWPN_A2, sWWPN1)
- SAN_zone(zWWPN_A2, sWWPN2)

On the storage server
- LUN_mask(zWWPN_A1, LUN_A1)
- LUN_mask(zWWPN_A2, LUN_A1)
- LUN_mask(zWWPN_A1, LUN_A2)
- LUN_mask(zWWPN_A2, LUN_A2)

In Linux
- LUN_define(sWWPN1, LUN_A1)  (could be WWID or LUN #)
- LUN_define(sWWPN2, LUN_A1)
- LUN_define(sWWPN1, LUN_A2)
- LUN_define(sWWPN2, LUN_A2)

If you change the z WWPNs, you have to update 8 relationships per guest. 
If you change the storage WWPNs, you have to change another 8 per guest. 
And if you are actually migrating data to a new storage server and get new 
WWIDs, then the process of migration is more involved..  But if the Linux, 
SAN and storage admin teams are willing, go for it!  :-)

Alan Altmark

Senior Managing z/VM and Linux Consultant
Lab Services System z Delivery Practice
IBM Systems & Technology Group
ibm.com/systems/services/labservices
office: 607.429.3323
mobile; 607.321.7556
alan_altm...@us.ibm.com
IBM Endicott

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
--
For more information on Linux on System z, visit
http://wiki.linuxvm.org/


Re: WWN change

2016-10-30 Thread Rob van der Heij
And it almost feels like cheating to use ECKD devices on FICON where you
only configure in one place 😊

On Oct 30, 2016 11:56 AM, "Christer Solskogen" 
wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Steffen Maier 
> wrote:
> < a lot>
>
> This was *really* helpful. Thanks!
>
> --
> chs
>
> --
> For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or
> visit
> http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
> --
> For more information on Linux on System z, visit
> http://wiki.linuxvm.org/
>

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
--
For more information on Linux on System z, visit
http://wiki.linuxvm.org/


Re: WWN change

2016-10-30 Thread Christer Solskogen
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Steffen Maier 
wrote:
< a lot>

This was *really* helpful. Thanks!

--
chs

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
--
For more information on Linux on System z, visit
http://wiki.linuxvm.org/


Re: WWN change

2016-10-28 Thread Steffen Maier

On 10/28/2016 08:04 AM, Christer Solskogen wrote:

On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 6:55 PM, Alan Altmark 
wrote:


On Thursday, 10/27/2016 at 02:32 GMT, "Cohen, Sam" 
wrote:

If you're not replacing the target SAN disks, then there are no changes

to z/VM or a Linux

connections (as long as the IOADDRS are unchanged).  Your SAN fabric has

to change for the new

WWPNS on the z.


The z13 includes support to retain the NPIV WWPNs during an upgrade.  Look
for the "Update I/O World Wide Port Number" task.  (Read it as "Update I/O
Serial Number Portion of WWPNs".)  This was previously an RPQ.

To the extent you keep the same IOCDS definitions and PCHID assignments,
you can keep the same NPIV WWPNs.



But we are changing the target SAN disks as well. And new SAN switches.


Since you seem to be changing both the initiator as well as the target 
side, there are two aspects (changing the switches is more or less 
transparent except for having to migrate the config of the old switches 
over to the new ones, and recabling of course):


Changing the initiator (mainframe) influences SAN switch zoning and 
host-mapping/LUN-masking on the storage target side. Alan's suggestion 
is to minimize the influences or even make it completely transparent.

See also slides 20, 22, and 48 in [1].

Changing the target (storage) influences SAN switch zoning and path 
configuration in Linux. I don't know if storages have similar 
possibilities to carry over old storage HBA port WWPNs as described for 
the mainframe above; if so it would be transparent.

Else:
If you use zfcp automatic LUN scanning then it would be transparent but 
only regarding path detection [1, slides 33 and 38].
Otherwise I would probably recommend to teach your Linuxes the 
information for all new (post-storage-migration) paths before doing the 
migration [1, slides 35 or 37] so it knows both old and new; just make 
sure e.g. via zoning that Linux only ever sees either the old or the new 
storage.


I fear the volumes on the new storage will get different WWIDs so they 
won't be added to the same path groups as the corresponding old volumes, 
so you might either need additional alias entries in multipath.conf or 
adapt fstab and kernel parameters to get to know the new multipath 
device names [1, slide 25]. If so, I think this must be disruptive, i.e. 
Linux shutdown before switchover and Linux boot after switchover (you 
need that Linux disruption likely anyway because you also change the 
mainframe unless you use something like live guest migration). Linux 
multipathing should detect and automatically use the new paths [1, slide 
30 and 32]. If you would like to clean up, you could start dynamically 
removing the old path information from your Linuxes [1, same slides as 
for adding path information above].


It's unfortunately tricky, so I'd recommend to practice this at least 
once with a small test environment.

Having the root-fs on DASD makes it at least a bit easier.

[1] 
http://www-05.ibm.com/de/events/linux-on-z/pdf/day2/4_Steffen_Maier_zfcp-best-practices-2015.pdf


--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards
Steffen Maier

Linux on z Systems Development

IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
Vorsitzende des Aufsichtsrats: Martina Koederitz
Geschaeftsfuehrung: Dirk Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Boeblingen
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
--
For more information on Linux on System z, visit
http://wiki.linuxvm.org/


Re: WWN change

2016-10-27 Thread Christer Solskogen
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 6:55 PM, Alan Altmark 
wrote:

> On Thursday, 10/27/2016 at 02:32 GMT, "Cohen, Sam" 
> wrote:
> > If you're not replacing the target SAN disks, then there are no changes
> to z/VM or a Linux
> > connections (as long as the IOADDRS are unchanged).  Your SAN fabric has
> to change for the new
> > WWPNS on the z.
>
> The z13 includes support to retain the NPIV WWPNs during an upgrade.  Look
> for the "Update I/O World Wide Port Number" task.  (Read it as "Update I/O
> Serial Number Portion of WWPNs".)  This was previously an RPQ.
>
> To the extent you keep the same IOCDS definitions and PCHID assignments,
> you can keep the same NPIV WWPNs.
>
>
But we are changing the target SAN disks as well. And new SAN switches.

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
--
For more information on Linux on System z, visit
http://wiki.linuxvm.org/


Re: WWN change

2016-10-27 Thread Alan Altmark
On Thursday, 10/27/2016 at 02:32 GMT, "Cohen, Sam"  
wrote:
> If you're not replacing the target SAN disks, then there are no changes 
to z/VM or a Linux
> connections (as long as the IOADDRS are unchanged).  Your SAN fabric has 
to change for the new
> WWPNS on the z.

The z13 includes support to retain the NPIV WWPNs during an upgrade.  Look 
for the "Update I/O World Wide Port Number" task.  (Read it as "Update I/O 
Serial Number Portion of WWPNs".)  This was previously an RPQ.

To the extent you keep the same IOCDS definitions and PCHID assignments, 
you can keep the same NPIV WWPNs.

Alan Altmark

Senior Managing z/VM and Linux Consultant
Lab Services System z Delivery Practice
IBM Systems & Technology Group
ibm.com/systems/services/labservices
office: 607.429.3323
mobile; 607.321.7556
alan_altm...@us.ibm.com
IBM Endicott

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
--
For more information on Linux on System z, visit
http://wiki.linuxvm.org/


Re: WWN change

2016-10-27 Thread Cohen, Sam
Chris,

If you're not replacing the target SAN disks, then there are no changes to z/VM 
or a Linux connections (as long as the IOADDRS are unchanged).  Your SAN fabric 
has to change for the new WWPNS on the z.

Sam

Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone


 Original message 
From: Christer Solskogen 
Date: 10/27/16 07:23 (GMT-07:00)
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: WWN change

Hi!

We are in the process of moving our z/VMs and all of the linux systems over
to z13 from a zEC12.
And just to make it even more complicated we are moving. That also means
that the disk system is also moved (DS8870). The disk system is somehow in
sync with the old system, I'm no storage guy so I'm not sure how this work.
I only know that it works ;-)

But after the move the wwn is going to change (I guess it would have
changed anyways?) - Is there an easy way or do I have to add the luns
manually for every server once the linux system is running on z13?

Linux system disks are on 3390, but data is on SAN / zfcp.

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
--
For more information on Linux on System z, visit
http://wiki.linuxvm.org/

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
--
For more information on Linux on System z, visit
http://wiki.linuxvm.org/


WWN change

2016-10-27 Thread Christer Solskogen
Hi!

We are in the process of moving our z/VMs and all of the linux systems over
to z13 from a zEC12.
And just to make it even more complicated we are moving. That also means
that the disk system is also moved (DS8870). The disk system is somehow in
sync with the old system, I'm no storage guy so I'm not sure how this work.
I only know that it works ;-)

But after the move the wwn is going to change (I guess it would have
changed anyways?) - Is there an easy way or do I have to add the luns
manually for every server once the linux system is running on z13?

Linux system disks are on 3390, but data is on SAN / zfcp.

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
--
For more information on Linux on System z, visit
http://wiki.linuxvm.org/