Re: [LAD] Integrate LASH into Jack
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 11:48:11AM +0100, Gerald Mwangi wrote: Hi, this is a part of a previous mail,but with catchier Subject I think LASH should be integrated into Jack, to make it mandatory for linux audio apps. The missing LASH support is one of the main issues disturbing me, when working with linux audio. Now I've said it, ha. I'm thinking of having Jack require a Load/Save callback, prior to activating the client. How feasible is that? What do you think? Gerald i think this: http://hochstrom.endofinternet.org/cgit/jack.git/tree/jack/session.h?h=jack-session2 -- torben Hohn ___ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Re: [LAD] Integrate LASH into Jack
On Friday 05 March 2010 11:48:11 Gerald Mwangi wrote: Hi, this is a part of a previous mail,but with catchier Subject I think LASH should be integrated into Jack, to make it mandatory for linux audio apps. The missing LASH support is one of the main issues disturbing me, when working with linux audio. Now I've said it, ha. I'm thinking of having Jack require a Load/Save callback, prior to activating the client. How feasible is that? I also think that Qt should be linked into jack because most audio apps are missing a nice gui... irony off LASH is dead. Session-handling in jack is the future. Thats why there is currently a big discussion going on about using jacks own ipc for the session handling of clients. You might want to read the archives of the last days of this list and the jack developers list... Have fun, Arnold signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Re: [LAD] Integrate LASH into Jack
Ah cool, is it already in the current jack release? Too lazy to look. Gerald On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 12:06 +0100, torbenh wrote: On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 11:48:11AM +0100, Gerald Mwangi wrote: Hi, this is a part of a previous mail,but with catchier Subject I think LASH should be integrated into Jack, to make it mandatory for linux audio apps. The missing LASH support is one of the main issues disturbing me, when working with linux audio. Now I've said it, ha. I'm thinking of having Jack require a Load/Save callback, prior to activating the client. How feasible is that? What do you think? Gerald i think this: http://hochstrom.endofinternet.org/cgit/jack.git/tree/jack/session.h?h=jack-session2 ___ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Re: [LAD] Integrate LASH into Jack
Ok ok, I'm not always on track. Making music+ Family+ TerminatorX+ PhD application, there's hardly time to follow the list. By 'Integrating LASH into jack', I really ment session handling into jack. Sorry On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 12:51 +0100, Arnold Krille wrote: On Friday 05 March 2010 11:48:11 Gerald Mwangi wrote: Hi, this is a part of a previous mail,but with catchier Subject I think LASH should be integrated into Jack, to make it mandatory for linux audio apps. The missing LASH support is one of the main issues disturbing me, when working with linux audio. Now I've said it, ha. I'm thinking of having Jack require a Load/Save callback, prior to activating the client. How feasible is that? I also think that Qt should be linked into jack because most audio apps are missing a nice gui... irony off LASH is dead. Session-handling in jack is the future. Thats why there is currently a big discussion going on about using jacks own ipc for the session handling of clients. You might want to read the archives of the last days of this list and the jack developers list... Have fun, Arnold ___ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev ___ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Re: [LAD] Integrate LASH into Jack
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Arnold Krille arn...@arnoldarts.de wrote: LASH is dead. Session-handling in jack is the future. Thats why there is currently a big discussion going on about using jacks own ipc for the session handling of clients. You might want to read the archives of the last days of this list and the jack developers list... Does any substantive Linux audio development discussion actually happen on LAD any more? I've only just discovered (because of your email and another pointer to the list from LAU) that any of this session management stuff was being discussed on jack-devel. I don't think I've ever been subscribed to that list, at least since it moved from SourceForge -- after all, I'm not a JACK developer. But I am interested in session management. I've just subscribed to it, and it looks like I have rather a lot to catch up on. Hm. Chris ___ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Re: [LAD] Integrate LASH into Jack
Hi Chris, On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, Chris Cannam wrote: Does any substantive Linux audio development discussion actually happen on LAD any more? Yes. :-) I've only just discovered (because of your email and another pointer to the list from LAU) that any of this session management stuff was being discussed on jack-devel. Well, when you're talking about changes to the JACK API, that discussion belongs on Jack-Devel, doesn't it? I don't think I've ever been subscribed to that list, at least since it moved from SourceForge -- after all, I'm not a JACK developer. But I am interested in session management. I've just subscribed to it, and it looks like I have rather a lot to catch up on. The JACK site[1] says, If you're doing anything with jack, you need to be on this list. -gabriel [1] http://jackaudio.org/email ___ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Re: [LAD] Integrate LASH into Jack
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Gabriel M. Beddingfield gabrb...@gmail.com wrote: I've only just discovered (because of your email and another pointer to the list from LAU) that any of this session management stuff was being discussed on jack-devel. Well, when you're talking about changes to the JACK API, that discussion belongs on Jack-Devel, doesn't it? Yes. But the subject really is session management for Linux audio applications. The fact that JACK is involved is (waves hand dismissively in manner of a Paris waiter) an implementation detail. The JACK site[1] says, If you're doing anything with jack, you need to be on this list. True enough. Though I've been doing things with JACK for many years without ever having read that page before. And -devel lists are usually for developers of whatever it is they're about, not users of it. Anyway -- really I'm just cross about missing things through my own inertia. I suspect the real reason I'm not on that list is that I never got around to moving my subscription there, having previously been subscribed to the now defunct jackit-de...@lists.sourceforge.net. This is the first time I've really been aware that the new list was any more active than the old! Chris ___ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
