[PATCH] btrfs-progs: use local btrfs-image in leaf corruption test

2015-04-08 Thread WorMzy Tykashi
Currently this test uses the system btrfs-image. If there isn't a
btrfs-image on $PATH, the test fails. The test should be using the
locally compiled btrfs-image, not the system one.
---

diff --git a/tests/fsck-tests/012-leaf-corruption/test.sh
b/tests/fsck-tests/012-leaf-corruption/test.sh
index 4db4710..98e3185 100755
--- a/tests/fsck-tests/012-leaf-corruption/test.sh
+++ b/tests/fsck-tests/012-leaf-corruption/test.sh
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ generate_leaf_corrupt_no_data_ext()
 echo "generating leaf_corrupt_no_data_ext.btrfs-image" >> $RESULTS
 tar xJf ./no_data_extent.tar.xz || \
 _fail "failed to extract leaf_corrupt_no_data_ext.btrfs-image"
-btrfs-image -r test.img.btrfs-image $dest || \
+$TOP/btrfs-image -r test.img.btrfs-image $dest || \
 _fail "failed to extract leaf_corrupt_no_data_ext.btrfs-image"

 # leaf at 20832256 contains no regular data extent, clear its csum to
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: use local btrfs-image in leaf corruption test

2015-04-09 Thread David Sterba
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 03:50:04PM +0100, WorMzy Tykashi wrote:
> Currently this test uses the system btrfs-image. If there isn't a
> btrfs-image on $PATH, the test fails. The test should be using the
> locally compiled btrfs-image, not the system one.

Added your sign-off and applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: use local btrfs-image in leaf corruption test

2015-04-08 Thread Qu Wenruo

Currently this test uses the system btrfs-image. If there isn't a
btrfs-image on $PATH, the test fails. The test should be using the
locally compiled btrfs-image, not the system one.

Good catch.

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo 

Thanks,
Qu

---

diff --git a/tests/fsck-tests/012-leaf-corruption/test.sh
b/tests/fsck-tests/012-leaf-corruption/test.sh
index 4db4710..98e3185 100755
--- a/tests/fsck-tests/012-leaf-corruption/test.sh
+++ b/tests/fsck-tests/012-leaf-corruption/test.sh
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ generate_leaf_corrupt_no_data_ext()
  echo "generating leaf_corrupt_no_data_ext.btrfs-image" >> $RESULTS
  tar xJf ./no_data_extent.tar.xz || \
  _fail "failed to extract leaf_corrupt_no_data_ext.btrfs-image"
-btrfs-image -r test.img.btrfs-image $dest || \
+$TOP/btrfs-image -r test.img.btrfs-image $dest || \
  _fail "failed to extract leaf_corrupt_no_data_ext.btrfs-image"

  # leaf at 20832256 contains no regular data extent, clear its csum to
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html