Re: ufs on linux question/problem
> > You need support of Solaris disklabels. isn't that what CONFIG_SOLARIS_X86_PARTITION is? > And UFS patches that are in > -ac. Then you can get more or less safe r/o mounts. r/w is hopeless > at that stage. that's ok, i only need to read. -Tony .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. Anthony J. Biacco Network Administrator/Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Intergrafix Internet Services "Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today" http://www.asteroid-b612.orghttp://www.intergrafix.net .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
ufs on linux question/problem
Trying to mount a solaris x86 drive under linux. kernel 2.4.5, ufs support and x86 partition support compiled in (no module) On boot, linux recognizes the drive, but shows no solaris partitions on it. Below, linux drive is hda, solaris is hdb. Jul 2 19:57:56 stevenjude2 kernel: PIIX4: chipset revision 2 Jul 2 19:57:56 stevenjude2 kernel: PIIX4: not 100%% native mode: will probe irqs later Jul 2 19:57:56 stevenjude2 kernel: ide0: BM-DMA at 0xffa0-0xffa7, BIOS settings: hda:DMA, hdb:pio Jul 2 19:57:56 stevenjude2 kernel: ide1: BM-DMA at 0xffa8-0xffaf, BIOS settings: hdc:DMA, hdd:pio Jul 2 19:57:56 stevenjude2 kernel: hda: WDC AC26400B, ATA DISK drive Jul 2 19:57:56 stevenjude2 kernel: hdb: QUANTUM FIREBALL ST3.2A, ATA DISK driveJul 2 19:57:56 stevenjude2 kernel: hdc: SAMSUNG SC-140B, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM driveJul 2 19:57:56 stevenjude2 kernel: ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14 Jul 2 19:57:56 stevenjude2 kernel: ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15 Jul 2 19:57:56 stevenjude2 kernel: hda: 12594960 sectors (6449 MB) w/512KiB Cache, CHS=784/255/63, UDMA(33) Jul 2 19:57:56 stevenjude2 kernel: hdb: 6306048 sectors (3229 MB) w/81KiB Cache, CHS=6256/16/63, UDMA(33) Jul 2 19:57:56 stevenjude2 kernel: Partition check: Jul 2 19:57:56 stevenjude2 kernel: hda: hda1 hda2 hda3 < hda5 > Jul 2 19:57:56 stevenjude2 kernel: hdb: Tried to mount from the command line with: mount -r -t ufs -o ufstype=sunx86,ro /dev/hdb /mnt mount -r -t ufs -o ufstype=sunx86,ro /dev/hdb1 /mnt All failed. Only relevant log message i saw was: Jul 2 22:04:02 stevenjude2 kernel: ufs_read_super: bad magic number a fdisk on /dev/hdb shows no partitions. could the drive or partitions be corrupted or something? if so, is data salvage likely? Thanx, -Tony .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. Anthony J. Biacco Network Administrator/Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Intergrafix Internet Services "Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today" http://www.asteroid-b612.orghttp://www.intergrafix.net .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH] User chroot
On 27 Jun 2001, David Wagner wrote: > > Why is it useless? It sounds useful to me, on first glance. If I want > to run a user-level network daemon I don't trust (for instance, fingerd), > isolating it in a chroot area sounds pretty nice: If there is a buffer > overrun in the daemon, you can get some protection [*] against the rest > of your system being trashed. Am I missing something obvious? > if you don't mind running fingerd on a non-privleged (>1024) port. -Tony .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. Anthony J. Biacco Network Administrator/Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Intergrafix Internet Services "Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today" http://www.asteroid-b612.orghttp://www.intergrafix.net .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
memory problems?
I'm running 2.4.2ac23 (can't run 2.4.3, messes up my quota system) glibc 2.1.3, intel providence PR440FX mobo, intel etherexpress 100B onboard, RAM is 128MBx3. Started getting the following errors: VM: bad swap entry 2000 Unused swap offset entry in swap_dup 2000 memory.c:84: bad pmd 2000. got multiples of all of the above. also got a bunch of eth0: Transmit timed out: status f048 at 387774/387804 command 0001a000. and i also got some programs segfaulting. Swap is 128MB. "free" does not show system using any swap. Thanx, -Tony .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. Anthony J. Biacco Network Administrator/Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Intergrafix Internet Services "Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today" http://www.asteroid-b612.orghttp://www.intergrafix.net .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
quota problems 2.4.2->2.4.3
Hi, WHen i upgrade from 2.2 to 2.4, my first version was 2.4.1, in which i upgraded my quota utils to 3.00 and then converted to the new quota formats for 2.4. my last 2.4 upgrade was 2.4.2ac23, quotas work fine on that. but when i run 2.4.3 they dont. quota -v on a user shows just blank space next to the user name, edquota shows the quota numbers, but that's it, changing them and redoing quota -v is the same. everything puts the users over quota. doing a quotacheck shows the quota files corrupted..yet boot back to 2.4.2ac23 and they work fine again. did something change in 2.4.3? or does quota utils need to be upgraded again? if so, where can i can them (i forget where i got them last time) Thanx, -Tony .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. Anthony J. Biacco Network Administrator/Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Intergrafix Internet Services "Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today" http://www.asteroid-b612.orghttp://www.intergrafix.net .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
aic7xxx TCQ settings?
I'm using 2.4.3 vanilla with aic7xxx (aic7880 onboard) I set the max # of TCQ commands per device setting to 50..what's a really good setting for this, just the default of 253? In /proc/scsi/aic7xxx/0 i see for my drives these numbers: Commands Queued 14 Commands Active 0 Command Openings 253 Max Tagged Openings 253 and the Queued number keeps increasing, never decreasing. is it supposed to do this? Sometimes Commands Active is at 50, but mostly 0 Thanx, -Tony .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. Anthony J. Biacco Network Administrator/Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Intergrafix Internet Services "Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today" http://www.asteroid-b612.orghttp://www.intergrafix.net .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Linux 2.4.2-ac21
> > > >It was causing SMP boxes to crash mysteriously after > >several hours or days. Quite a lot of them. Nobody > >was able to explain why, so it was turned off. > > I know why it was turned off by default. The annoying this is that now > the *only* way to activate the watchdog is via a boot command. It is > not possible to compile a standard debugging kernel with this option > turned on, you have to rely on every user setting the boot options for > every kernel. If it is going to be off by default there should be a > way to patch the kernel to make it on by default. > i'm troubled by that fact that something the would be used to debug the kernel, is something that actually causes crashes. doesn't that kind of defeat the purpose..and introduce just another unstable element to the problem/crash at hand? -Tony .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. Anthony J. Biacco Network Administrator/Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Intergrafix Internet Services "Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today" http://www.asteroid-b612.orghttp://www.intergrafix.net .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
NMI messages - 2.4.1-ac13
I got some NMI messages I have never seen before. In fact i've never seen a NMI message before. This is kernel 2.4.1-ac13. Got them while running X (4.0.2) and KDE (2.1). After 15 mins the system froze hard. PR440FX mobo, dual ppro 200s, 256MB RAM, aic7xxx, no power management at all. I've never had ram problems on this machine (3 1/2 years old). Kernel messages attached Mar 8 11:15:52 athena kernel: Uhhuh. NMI received. Dazed and confused, but trying to continue Mar 8 11:15:52 athena kernel: You probably have a hardware problem with your RAM chips Mar 8 11:15:52 athena kernel: NMI: IOCK error (debug interrupt?) Mar 8 11:15:52 athena kernel: CPU:1 Mar 8 11:15:52 athena kernel: EIP:0023:[<0824cd1c>] Mar 8 11:15:52 athena kernel: EFLAGS: 3296 Mar 8 11:15:52 athena kernel: eax: 000f ebx: 08251f38 ecx: 03c0 edx: 73d8 Mar 8 11:15:52 athena kernel: esi: 08264bc0 edi: 000f73d8 ebp: b114 esp: b0d4 Mar 8 11:15:52 athena kernel: ds: 002b es: 002b ss: 002b Mar 8 11:15:52 athena kernel: Process X (pid: 8832, stackpage=ccf17000) Mar 8 11:21:17 athena kernel: Uhhuh. NMI received. Dazed and confused, but trying to continue Mar 8 11:21:17 athena kernel: You probably have a hardware problem with your RAM chips Mar 8 11:21:17 athena kernel: NMI: IOCK error (debug interrupt?) Mar 8 11:21:17 athena kernel: CPU:1 Mar 8 11:21:17 athena kernel: EIP:0010:[] Mar 8 11:21:17 athena kernel: EFLAGS: 3246 Mar 8 11:21:17 athena kernel: eax: ebx: c0107170 ecx: c15fe000 edx: c15fe000 Mar 8 11:21:17 athena kernel: esi: c15fe000 edi: c0107170 ebp: esp: c15fffb0 Mar 8 11:21:17 athena kernel: ds: 0018 es: 0018 ss: 0018 Mar 8 11:21:17 athena kernel: Process swapper (pid: 0, stackpage=c15ff000) Mar 8 11:21:17 athena kernel: Stack: c0107202 c027d2ba c1445000 c02e8460 Mar 8 11:21:17 athena kernel:c01c2ac7 000d c018d60e c1445000 Mar 8 11:21:17 athena kernel:0001 c02e840a Mar 8 11:21:17 athena kernel: Call Trace: [] [] [] Mar 8 11:21:17 athena kernel: Mar 8 11:21:17 athena kernel: Code: c3 8d 76 00 fb c3 89 f6 fb ba 00 e0 ff ff 21 e2 b8 ff ff ff Mar 8 11:25:19 athena kernel: Uhhuh. NMI received. Dazed and confused, but trying to continue Mar 8 11:25:19 athena kernel: You probably have a hardware problem with your RAM chips Mar 8 11:25:19 athena kernel: NMI: IOCK error (debug interrupt?) Mar 8 11:25:19 athena kernel: CPU:1 Mar 8 11:25:19 athena kernel: EIP:0010:[] Mar 8 11:25:19 athena kernel: EFLAGS: 3246 Mar 8 11:25:19 athena kernel: eax: ebx: c0107170 ecx: c15fe000 edx: c15fe000 Mar 8 11:25:19 athena kernel: esi: c15fe000 edi: c0107170 ebp: esp: c15fffb0 Mar 8 11:25:19 athena kernel: ds: 0018 es: 0018 ss: 0018 Mar 8 11:25:19 athena kernel: Process swapper (pid: 0, stackpage=c15ff000) Mar 8 11:25:19 athena kernel: Stack: c0107202 c027d2ba c1445000 c02e8460 Mar 8 11:25:19 athena kernel:c01c2ac7 000d c018d60e c1445000 Mar 8 11:25:19 athena kernel:0001 c02e840a Mar 8 11:25:19 athena kernel: Call Trace: [] [] [] Mar 8 11:25:19 athena kernel: Mar 8 11:25:19 athena kernel: Code: c3 8d 76 00 fb c3 89 f6 fb ba 00 e0 ff ff 21 e2 b8 ff ff ff Mar 8 11:26:56 athena kernel: Uhhuh. NMI received. Dazed and confused, but trying to continue Mar 8 11:26:56 athena kernel: You probably have a hardware problem with your RAM chips Mar 8 11:26:56 athena kernel: NMI: IOCK error (debug interrupt?) Mar 8 11:26:56 athena kernel: CPU:0 Mar 8 11:26:56 athena kernel: EIP:0010:[] Mar 8 11:26:56 athena kernel: EFLAGS: 3246 Mar 8 11:26:56 athena kernel: eax: ebx: c0107170 ecx: c0276000 edx: c0276000 Mar 8 11:26:56 athena kernel: esi: c0276000 edi: c0107170 ebp: 0008e000 esp: c0277fdc Mar 8 11:26:56 athena kernel: ds: 0018 es: 0018 ss: 0018 Mar 8 11:26:56 athena kernel: Process swapper (pid: 0, stackpage=c0277000) Mar 8 11:26:56 athena kernel: Stack: c0107202 0001 c0276000 c0105000 c02788d2 0009e000 c02ab600 Mar 8 11:26:56 athena kernel:c01001cf Mar 8 11:26:56 athena kernel: Call Trace: [] [] [] Mar 8 11:26:56 athena kernel: Mar 8 11:26:56 athena kernel: Code: c3 8d 76 00 fb c3 89 f6 fb ba 00 e0 ff ff 21 e2 b8 ff ff ff dmesg: Mar 08 11:46:59 athena syslog-ng[129]: syslog-ng version 1.4.8 starting Mar 8 11:46:59 athena kernel: klogd 1.4-0, log source = /proc/kmsg started. Mar 8 11:47:00 athena kernel: Cannot find map file. Mar 8 11:47:00 athena kernel: No module symbols loaded. Mar 8 11:47:00 athena kernel: Linux version 2.4.1-ac13 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 (release)) #1 SMP Wed Feb 14 11:49:05 EST 2001 Mar 8 11:47:00 athena kernel: BIOS-
gids in kernel
apache documentation states: # NOTE that some kernels refuse to setgid(Group) or semctl(IPC_SET) # when the value of (unsigned)Group is above 6; # don't use Group nobody on these systems! does this apply to linux in either the 2.2 or 2.4 kernels? i'd like to use a block of uids from maybe 63000-65000, with gids of the same number, for web domains, and want to know if i'll have any problems. Thanx, -Tony .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. Anthony J. Biacco Network Administrator/Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Intergrafix Internet Services "Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today" http://www.asteroid-b612.orghttp://www.intergrafix.net .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
2.4 VFS message
got this message spewed on my console this morning: VFS: dqduplicate(): Locked quota to be duplicated! SMP 2.4.1-ac9 quota is used on 1 ext2 FS, converted from the old quota format with the new quota utils quota-3.00 Thanx, -Tony .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. Anthony J. Biacco Network Administrator/Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Intergrafix Internet Services "Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today" http://www.asteroid-b612.orghttp://www.intergrafix.net .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Journaled FS on RAID stability..2.4?
Can anyone give testimonials on a journaled FS on software-raid? I'd like to raid-0 2 SCSI 18Gers, adaptec 2940 u2w controller, kernel 2.4.x. Also pros and cons for reiser-fs/ext3 on this solution would be appreciated Thanx, -Tony .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. Anthony J. Biacco Network Administrator/Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Intergrafix Internet Services "Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today" http://www.asteroid-b612.orghttp://www.intergrafix.net .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
shared memory problem
I've been using the 2.2.x series successfully, latest i used was 2.2.19pre7. Today i upgraded to 2.4.1-ac9 and noticed that shared memory shows 0. I searched the list archive briefly and someone said the stats have been broken since sometime in 2.3, but my system also shows my swap being used up a great deal (100MB whereas i'm rarely using more than 5MB (and that only at loaded times, which this isn't)) this server is dedicated for apache web serving, and CONFIG_TMPFS is not configured in/any shm fs mounted. I didn't have this in 2.2 either. here's my /proc/meminfo and ipcs info..any help or advice is appreciated. total:used:free: shared: buffers: cached: Mem: 327745536 319848448 78970880 17149952 199004160 Swap: 133885952 108236800 25649152 MemTotal: 320064 kB MemFree: 7712 kB MemShared: 0 kB Buffers: 16748 kB Cached: 194340 kB Active: 159896 kB Inact_dirty: 48692 kB Inact_clean: 2500 kB Inact_target: 252 kB HighTotal: 0 kB HighFree:0 kB LowTotal: 320064 kB LowFree: 7712 kB SwapTotal: 130748 kB SwapFree:25048 kB ipcs -lm -- Shared Memory Limits max number of segments = 4096 max seg size (kbytes) = 32768 max total shared memory (kbytes) = 8388608 min seg size (bytes) = 1 ipcs -m shows many segments used by apache servers. -- Shared Memory Segments shmid owner perms bytes nattchstatus 0 young-w 600 46084 3 dest 32769 nobody600 46084 6 dest -Tony .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. Anthony J. Biacco Network Administrator/Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Intergrafix Internet Services "Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today" http://www.asteroid-b612.orghttp://www.intergrafix.net .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://vger.kernel.org/lkml/
Re: rlim_t and DNS?
Yep, it is libc5. i have 1 glibc system and they both have the files you've mentioned. :( either i'll have to upgrade to glibc (no small task) or use 8.2.3 for now..the previous 8.2.2 series was compiling ok for me. Unless someone has a workaround i might try for 9? -Tony .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. Anthony J. Biacco Network Administrator/Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Intergrafix Internet Services "Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today" http://www.asteroid-b612.orghttp://www.intergrafix.net .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Peter Samuelson wrote: > > [Admin Mailing Lists] > > i have no bits directory > > Really? What version of libc, and on what Linux distro? I thought all > versions of glibc2 had /usr/include/bits/. > > If you are using libc4 or libc5, it is not surprising if the BIND > people didn't notice the problem -- they probably didn't try it. > > Peter > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: rlim_t and DNS?
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Bruce Harada wrote: > > The C file says BSD/OS is the only OS they found not to have rlim_t. > > Am I missing something? > > Where can i find this in linux? I looked in all the include > > files, including resource.h > > Are you sure you looked in ALL the include files? I seem to have it as: > > /usr/include/bits/resource.h:typedef __rlim_t rlim_t; > > where __rlim_t is > > /usr/include/bits/types.h:typedef long int __rlim_t; > i have no bits directory, but those definitions are not in my resource.h or types.h. I know this is crude, but: grep rlim_t /usr/include/*.h /usr/include/*/*.h /usr/include/*/*/*.h /usr/include/*/*/*/*.h returns nothing. /usr/include/linux does link to the linux source too. Ditto on SYS_capset. when bind can't find SYS_capset, it does do #define SYS_capset __NR_capset the compilation returns that __NR_capset is undeclared. the only __NR defines i can find are in /usr/include/asm/unistd.h and capset isn't in there. *shrug* -Tony .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. Anthony J. Biacco Network Administrator/Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Intergrafix Internet Services "Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today" http://www.asteroid-b612.orghttp://www.intergrafix.net .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. > so you could try including those two in the appropriate places. > > > For now i jsut typedefed it as a long. > > > > Also, it's looking for a setting for SYS_capset to pass to syscall() > > and can't that either. Again, I looked in the include files without > > success. > > I have this: > > /usr/include/bits/syscall.h:#define SYS_capset __NR_capset > > Hope that helps (although l-k probably isn't the best place for this...) > > -- > Bruce Harada > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
rlim_t and DNS?
Trying to compile bind 9.1.0 here. Kernel is 2.2.18, gcc 2.7.2.1. It failed trying to find the type for rlim_t. The C file says BSD/OS is the only OS they found not to have rlim_t. Am I missing something? Where can i find this in linux? I looked in all the include files, including resource.h For now i jsut typedefed it as a long. Also, it's looking for a setting for SYS_capset to pass to syscall() and can't that either. Again, I looked in the include files without success. Thanx, -Tony .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. Anthony J. Biacco Network Administrator/Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Intergrafix Internet Services "Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today" http://www.asteroid-b612.orghttp://www.intergrafix.net .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [OT?] Coding Style
> > Please don't listen to this. The only place you really want comments is > > a) at the top of files, describing the point of the file; > b) at the top of functions, if the purpose of the function is not obvious; > c) in line, when the code is not obvious. > > If you are writing code that requires a comment for every line, you are > writing bad, obscure, unobvious code and no amount of commenting will fix > it. > or 1) your code-viewing audience is a bunch of 5 year olds 2) the person reading the code isn't a 'qualified' programmer. If they were, they'd most likely be able to understand the code without hand-holding of that magnitude. We don't write code for idiots. -Tony .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. Anthony J. Biacco Network Administrator/Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Intergrafix Internet Services "Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today" http://www.asteroid-b612.orghttp://www.intergrafix.net .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [OT?] Coding Style
well, i watched monty python and the holy grail once (had to find out what everyone was all excited about) couldn't get into it, watched maybe 1/2 of it. -Tony .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. Anthony J. Biacco Network Administrator/Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Intergrafix Internet Services "Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today" http://www.asteroid-b612.orghttp://www.intergrafix.net .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. On Sun, 21 Jan 2001, Mo McKinlay wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Today, Admin Mailing Lists ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > And the lord spake, saying, "First shalt thou write thy holy code. Indenting > > > shalt thou count to three, no more, no less. Three shalt be the spaces thou > > > shalt count, and the number of the counting shalt be three. Four shalt thou > > > not count, nor count thou two, excepting that thou then proceedeth to three. > > > Eight is right out. Once the number three, being the third number be > > > reached, shalt thou move towards indenting thy next line .. > > > now I know why I never read the bible. > > ..or Monty Python... > > - -- > Mo McKinlay > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > - - > GnuPG/PGP Key: pub 1024D/76A275F9 2000-07-22 > > > > > > > > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org > > iEYEARECAAYFAjprZWUACgkQRcGgB3aidfnz0gCgqOGt7dg3cZH/uDz0Vpe/P9Fe > ALsAn2y2L/D9e1QRWTb6jDSM+kvsrShr > =3D28 > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [OT?] Coding Style
On Sun, 21 Jan 2001, Ragnar Hojland Espinosa wrote: > On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 05:19:17PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I just wanted to say that Linus´ CodingStyle is the ONLY SANE style of > > writing code in bigger projects. At university we are forced to use exactly the > > And the lord spake, saying, "First shalt thou write thy holy code. Indenting > shalt thou count to three, no more, no less. Three shalt be the spaces thou > shalt count, and the number of the counting shalt be three. Four shalt thou > not count, nor count thou two, excepting that thou then proceedeth to three. > Eight is right out. Once the number three, being the third number be > reached, shalt thou move towards indenting thy next line .. > now I know why I never read the bible. people jsut dont know how old cryptography really is ;-) -Tony .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. Anthony J. Biacco Network Administrator/Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Intergrafix Internet Services "Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today" http://www.asteroid-b612.orghttp://www.intergrafix.net .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: reiserfs patch for 2.4.0-final
thanx everybody -Tony .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. Anthony J. Biacco Network Administrator/Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Intergrafix Internet Services "Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today" http://www.asteroid-b612.orghttp://www.intergrafix.net .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > > Is ext2 upgradable to reiserfs or ext3? > > You can live up and downgrade between ext2 and ext3. For ext2->reiser and back > you need to backup/restore or use a new partition currently - unless someone > has tools I've not seen > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: reiserfs patch for 2.4.0-final
Is ext2 upgradable to reiserfs or ext3? If so, is it transparent..or like a umount, convert, mount..or do you like have to import to a whole new partition? Pointers to any docs of this sort would work for an answer Thanx, -Tony .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. Anthony J. Biacco Network Administrator/Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Intergrafix Internet Services "Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today" http://www.asteroid-b612.orghttp://www.intergrafix.net .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Rik van Riel wrote: > On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Chris Evans wrote: > > On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Chris Mason wrote: > > > > > > Could someone create one single patch for the 2.4.0 ? > > > > > > > I put all the code into CVS, and Yura is making the official patch now. > > > > Since 2.4.0 final should fix a few i/o performance issues > > (particuarly under heavy write loads), a quick few ext2 vs. > > reiserfs benchmarks would make very interesting reading ;-) > > An easy way to gain a performance edge on ext2 would > be to do proper write clustering in the reiserfs > ->writepage() function... > > regards, > > Rik > -- > Virtual memory is like a game you can't win; > However, without VM there's truly nothing to loose... > > http://www.surriel.com/ > http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com.br/ > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
system locks HARD on KDE start
Hi, I'm trying to get kde2 running and i'm not positive if it's a KDE problem, or a kernel thing. Whenever I start kde, the kde startup gets so far and the system freezes. Sometimes it does it at "Loading the panel" sometimes it'll get to "100% KDE is up and running" and do it. When it does it the hard drive light stays on. I can't see if the kernel is oopsing because it's stuck in graphics mode. Alt-SysRq to sync/unmount disks doesn't seem to work, because i reset and all the drives go into fsck. I've tried the following combinations: kde 2.0 (final and pres)/qt 2.2.1/xfree 3.3.6/kernel 2.2.15pre18|2.2.18pre20 kde 2.0.1/qt 2.2.2/xfree 4.0.1|3.3.6/kernel 2.2.15pre18|2.2.18pre20 All are compiled from source. X runs fine with just tvm. glibc is 2.1.3. gcc is 2.95.2 I used to run libc5, and kde 2.0 would startup fine, but i had many SEGV/ABRTs making it unusable, which is why i upgraded to 2.1.3. libc5 is still around just for existing apps. Nothing fancy compiled in kernel..no I2C, USB, sound, or power management. Running PR440FX mobo with dual ppro 200s, SCSI drives (i've also tried a new hard drive), 384MB ram, Diamond Stealth 2000 Any help is appreciated, -Tony .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. Anthony J. Biacco Network Administrator/Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Intergrafix Internet Services "Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today" http://www.asteroid-b612.orghttp://www.intergrafix.net .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
eepro100 timeout errors - 2.2.18pre20
Was running 2.2.15pre18 with no eepro problems. Upgraded to 2.2.18pre20 and started experiencing transmit timed out errors a day into the boot. eth0 was unresponsive in/out. down/uping the interface had no effect. System was not under any big network load. See attached text file for related kernel messages. System is Intel PR440FX mobo, SMP, glibc 2.1.3, gcc 2.95.2 Thanx, -Tony .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. Anthony J. Biacco Network Administrator/Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Intergrafix Internet Services "Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today" http://www.asteroid-b612.orghttp://www.intergrafix.net .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. Nov 13 09:49:31 athena kernel: eepro100.c:v1.09j-t 9/29/99 Donald Becker http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/eepro100.html Nov 13 09:49:31 athena kernel: eepro100.c: $Revision: 1.20.2.10 $ 2000/05/31 Modified by Andrey V. Savochkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and others Nov 13 09:49:31 athena kernel: eth0: Intel PCI EtherExpress Pro100 82557, 00:A0:C9:60:53:02, I/O at 0xff40, IRQ 15. Nov 13 09:49:31 athena kernel: Board assembly 645520-034, Physical connectors present: RJ45 Nov 13 09:49:31 athena kernel: Primary interface chip DP83840 PHY #1. Nov 13 09:49:31 athena kernel: DP83840 specific setup, setting register 23 to 8462. Nov 13 09:49:31 athena kernel: General self-test: passed. Nov 13 09:49:31 athena kernel: Serial sub-system self-test: passed. Nov 13 09:49:31 athena kernel: Internal registers self-test: passed. Nov 13 09:49:31 athena kernel: ROM checksum self-test: passed (0x49caa8d6). Nov 13 09:49:31 athena kernel: Receiver lock-up workaround activated. Nov 13 09:49:31 athena kernel: eepro100.c:v1.09j-t 9/29/99 Donald Becker http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/eepro100.html Nov 13 09:49:31 athena kernel: eepro100.c: $Revision: 1.20.2.10 $ 2000/05/31 Modified by Andrey V. Savochkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and others Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0: Transmit timed out: status f048 at 10954312/10954343 command 200ca000. Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0: Tx ring dump, Tx queue 10954343 / 10954312: Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0: 0 200ca000. Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0: 1 000ca000. Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0: 2 000ca000. Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0: 3 000ca000. Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0: 4 0003a000. Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0: 5 0003a000. Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0: 6 4003a000. Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0: = 7 000ca000. Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0: * 8 200ca000. Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0: 9 000ca000. Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0:10 000ca000. Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0:11 000ca000. Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0:12 000ca000. Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0:13 000ca000. Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0:14 000ca000. Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0:15 000ca000. Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0:16 200ca000. Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0:17 000ca000. Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0:18 000ca000. Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0:19 000ca000. Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0:20 000ca000. Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0:21 000ca000. Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0:22 000ca000. Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0:23 000ca000. Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0:24 0003a000. Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0:25 000ca000. Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0:26 000ca000. Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0:27 000ca000. Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0:28 000ca000. Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0:29 000ca000. Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0:30 0003a000. Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0:31 000ca000. Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0: Printing Rx ring (next to receive into 10621863, dirty index 10621863). Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0: 0 a020. Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0: 1 a020. Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0: 2 a020. Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0: 3 a020. Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0: 4 a020. Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0: 5 a020. Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0: l 6 c000a020. Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0: *= 7 a020. Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0: 8 a020. Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0: 9 a020. Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0:10 a020. Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0:11 a020. Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0:12 a020. Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0:13 a020. Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0:14 a020. Nov 14 15:33:21 athena kernel: eth0:15 a020. Nov 14 15:33:21 athena k
[OT] linux article with kernel references
http://www.osopinion.com/Opinions/MontyManley/MontyManley15.html good article, several unfortunate truths within. -Tony .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. Anthony J. Biacco Network Administrator/Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Intergrafix Internet Services "Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today" http://www.asteroid-b612.orghttp://www.intergrafix.net .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Where to obtain the latest test kernels
i thought they were versus 2.2.17pre20 ? -Tony .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. Anthony J. Biacco Network Administrator/Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Intergrafix Internet Services "Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today" http://www.asteroid-b612.orghttp://www.intergrafix.net .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, Alan Cox wrote: > > I am interested in testing the 2.2.18pre12 kernel. Where do I > > find the source code. Checking ftp.kernel.org, it only goes to 2.2.17, > > the latest stable release. Following several mirror sites gave only the > > same. > > ftp://ftp.*.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/... > > Each patch is versus 2.2.17 so you only need the latest one > > Alan > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Socket Interface
> > > Note that I deliberately ignored my assumption when replying -- I gave > > instructions for Debian derivations, even though I don't know of any > > Debian-derived distribution with a version number 6.2. > > There are dozens of similarly different (or differently similar - as your > prefer) Linux based O/Ses distributions around the world and some have had > 6.x versionning when RedHat was also 6.x (SuSe for example). > Is linux in whole though just represented by the kernel? Or is it represented by the kernel AND a subset of applications? In any case, the point of the post was not this, and it wasn't even on-topic. for what it's worth, I recommend any of the W. Richard Stevens books. UNIX Network Programming, Volume 1: Networking APIs - Sockets and XTI by W. Richard Stevens 2 edition Vol 1 (October 17, 1997) Prentice Hall; ISBN: 013490012X -Tony .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. Anthony J. Biacco Network Administrator/Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Intergrafix Internet Services "Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today" http://www.asteroid-b612.orghttp://www.intergrafix.net .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4
ditto..i patched 2.2.16 with 2.2.17pre20 fine. then patched that with 2.2.18pre4 and got this: can't find file to patch at input line 4697 Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? The text leading up to this was: -- |diff -u --new-file --recursive --exclude-from /usr/src/exclude linux.vanilla/arch/i386/vmlinux.lds linux.18p4/arch/i386/vmlinux.lds |--- linux.vanilla/arch/i386/vmlinux.ldsWed May 3 21:22:13 2000 |+++ linux.18p4/arch/i386/vmlinux.lds Sun Sep 10 15:25:11 2000 -- File to patch: looking, arch/i386/vmlinux.lds doesn't exist -Cygnus .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. Anthony J. Biacco Network Administrator/Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Intergrafix Internet Services "Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today" http://www.asteroid-b612.orghttp://www.intergrafix.net .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. On Sun, 10 Sep 2000, Jeff Hittman wrote: > Alan - > > What is PRE4 applied against? I'm seeing errors patching up from either > 17pre20 or 2.2.17 final. > >| Begathon, n.: A multi-day event on public >Jeff Hittman | television, used to raise money so you won't have > [EMAIL PROTECTED] | to watch commercials. >| > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Linux/MANOS Kernel Debugger
On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > > Actually, the solution I think would be to use the MSDOS loader to boot > linux. I will look at grabbing the ELF code in Linux and loading Linux > from MSDOS -- if this can be accomplished you're there -- with an added > benfit. When I am debugging MANOS, the source files and OS actually > load from another NetWare server over a DOS connection (pretty slick) so > in my setup the files are always remote, though they could just as well > reside on a local fat partiton. Having DOS resident underneath gives > you all kinds of cool stuff you can do (you will note that while MANOS > is active in memory, DOS is still resident underneath and accessible). > > Perhaps the way to do this unobtrusively would be a different loader for > Linux (a DOS loader) that will run the debugger underneath. The > debugger in MANOS is self contained, and you will note has few > dependencies on the OS code of any kind -- it was developed this way > intentionally. We just take the MANOS loader, rip out the kernel, load > Linux from LLOADER.386, and the debugger is there! > since you'd be using DOS, wouldn't you need a MS license then for every kernel debugger you put out there? -Cygnus .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. Anthony J. Biacco Network Administrator/Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Intergrafix Internet Services "Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today" http://www.asteroid-b612.orghttp://www.intergrafix.net .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: eepro100 trouble
On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Andrey Savochkin wrote: > Hello, > > On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 02:57:54PM -0300, Cesar Eduardo Barros wrote: > > > > I'm having endless problem with an eepro100 here. After some trying found out > > that doing a soft reset (ctrl+alt+del) fixed the problem, and that a power > > cycle made it happen again. > > > > Kernel version is 2.2.17pre20 > > The problem you faced is a known one. > But I expected 2.2.17pre20 to work, it contains a work-around which helped > all other people complaining about the same things. is it fixed in 2.2.17 final or any of the 2.2.18 releases? My eepro100 has been working fine (i'm in 2.2.15pre18) and i'm planning to upgarde to 2.2.17. Wondering if it's a longstanding problem or a NEW one. -Cygnus .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. Anthony J. Biacco Network Administrator/Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Intergrafix Internet Services "Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today" http://www.asteroid-b612.orghttp://www.intergrafix.net .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
