Re: [PATCH] i2c-imx.c: Synthesize end of transaction events without idle interrupts

2021-02-01 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 11:48:50AM -0800, Kevin Paul Herbert wrote:
> Only the Layerscape SoCs have interrupts on bus idle, which facilitate
> sending events which complete slave bus transactions.
> 
> Add support for synthesizing missing events. If we see a master request,
> or a newly addressed slave request, if the last event sent to the backend
> was I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED, send the backend a I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED
> followed by I2C_SLAVE_STOP. For all other events, send an I2C_SLAVE_STOP.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Paul Herbert 

Applied to for-next, thanks!



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [PATCH] i2c-imx.c: Synthesize end of transaction events without idle interrupts

2021-01-28 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 05:27:11PM -0800, Kevin Herbert wrote:
> The loop sends either one or two events to the slave driver. If the
> state is I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED, we synthesize the
> I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED event, and then our state becomes
> I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED. In all other states, we transition to
> I2C_SLAVE_STOP and exit the loop.
> 
> It is not a busy loop at all. It is calling the callback handler (that
> already expects to be in IRQ context) one or two times, and then it
> exits the loop.

Oleksij, does this answer your question?



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [PATCH] i2c-imx.c: Synthesize end of transaction events without idle interrupts

2021-01-14 Thread Kevin Herbert
The loop sends either one or two events to the slave driver. If the
state is I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED, we synthesize the
I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED event, and then our state becomes
I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED. In all other states, we transition to
I2C_SLAVE_STOP and exit the loop.

It is not a busy loop at all. It is calling the callback handler (that
already expects to be in IRQ context) one or two times, and then it
exits the loop.

Kevin


On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 12:05 AM Oleksij Rempel  wrote:
>
> Hi Kevin Paul,
>
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 11:48:50AM -0800, Kevin Paul Herbert wrote:
> > Only the Layerscape SoCs have interrupts on bus idle, which facilitate
> > sending events which complete slave bus transactions.
> >
> > Add support for synthesizing missing events. If we see a master request,
> > or a newly addressed slave request, if the last event sent to the backend
> > was I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED, send the backend a I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED
> > followed by I2C_SLAVE_STOP. For all other events, send an I2C_SLAVE_STOP.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kevin Paul Herbert 
> > ---
> >  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c | 59 +++-
> >  1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c
> > index b444fbf1a262..b3e2a6a7fc19 100644
> > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c
> > @@ -209,6 +209,7 @@ struct imx_i2c_struct {
> >
> >   struct imx_i2c_dma  *dma;
> >   struct i2c_client   *slave;
> > + enum i2c_slave_event last_slave_event;
> >  };
> >
> >  static const struct imx_i2c_hwdata imx1_i2c_hwdata = {
> > @@ -662,6 +663,36 @@ static void i2c_imx_enable_bus_idle(struct 
> > imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx)
> >   }
> >  }
> >
> > +static void i2c_imx_slave_event(struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx,
> > + enum i2c_slave_event event, u8 *val)
> > +{
> > + i2c_slave_event(i2c_imx->slave, event, val);
> > + i2c_imx->last_slave_event = event;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void i2c_imx_slave_finish_op(struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx)
> > +{
> > + u8 val;
> > +
> > + while (i2c_imx->last_slave_event != I2C_SLAVE_STOP) {
> > + switch (i2c_imx->last_slave_event) {
> > + case I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED:
> > + i2c_imx_slave_event(i2c_imx, I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED,
> > + );
> > + break;
> > +
> > + case I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_REQUESTED:
> > + case I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED:
> > + case I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_RECEIVED:
> > + i2c_imx_slave_event(i2c_imx, I2C_SLAVE_STOP, );
> > + break;
> > +
> > + case I2C_SLAVE_STOP:
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +}
>
> Is it really working code?
>
> The i2c_imx_slave_finish_op() is a waiting busy loop withing an IRQ! And
> it is waiting for an event, which is updated in the same IRQ callback.
> Or am i missing some thing?
>
> Regards,
> Oleksij
>
> >  static irqreturn_t i2c_imx_slave_isr(struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx,
> >unsigned int status, unsigned int ctl)
> >  {
> > @@ -674,9 +705,11 @@ static irqreturn_t i2c_imx_slave_isr(struct 
> > imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx,
> >   }
> >
> >   if (status & I2SR_IAAS) { /* Addressed as a slave */
> > + i2c_imx_slave_finish_op(i2c_imx);
> >   if (status & I2SR_SRW) { /* Master wants to read from us*/
> >   dev_dbg(_imx->adapter.dev, "read requested");
> > - i2c_slave_event(i2c_imx->slave, 
> > I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED, );
> > + i2c_imx_slave_event(i2c_imx,
> > + I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED, );
> >
> >   /* Slave transmit */
> >   ctl |= I2CR_MTX;
> > @@ -686,7 +719,8 @@ static irqreturn_t i2c_imx_slave_isr(struct 
> > imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx,
> >   imx_i2c_write_reg(value, i2c_imx, IMX_I2C_I2DR);
> >   } else { /* Master wants to write to us */
> >   dev_dbg(_imx->adapter.dev, "write requested");
> > - i2c_slave_event(i2c_imx->slave, 
> > I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_REQUESTED, );
> > + i2c_imx_slave_event(i2c_imx,
> > + I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_REQUESTED, 
> > );
> >
> >   /* Slave receive */
> >   ctl &= ~I2CR_MTX;
> > @@ -697,17 +731,20 @@ static irqreturn_t i2c_imx_slave_isr(struct 
> > imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx,
> >   } else if (!(ctl & I2CR_MTX)) { /* Receive mode */
> >   if (status & I2SR_IBB) { /* No STOP signal detected */
> >   value = imx_i2c_read_reg(i2c_imx, IMX_I2C_I2DR);
> > - i2c_slave_event(i2c_imx->slave, 
> > I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_RECEIVED, );
> > +   

Re: [PATCH] i2c-imx.c: Synthesize end of transaction events without idle interrupts

2021-01-08 Thread Oleksij Rempel
Hi Kevin Paul,

On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 11:48:50AM -0800, Kevin Paul Herbert wrote:
> Only the Layerscape SoCs have interrupts on bus idle, which facilitate
> sending events which complete slave bus transactions.
> 
> Add support for synthesizing missing events. If we see a master request,
> or a newly addressed slave request, if the last event sent to the backend
> was I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED, send the backend a I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED
> followed by I2C_SLAVE_STOP. For all other events, send an I2C_SLAVE_STOP.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Paul Herbert 
> ---
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c | 59 +++-
>  1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c
> index b444fbf1a262..b3e2a6a7fc19 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c
> @@ -209,6 +209,7 @@ struct imx_i2c_struct {
>  
>   struct imx_i2c_dma  *dma;
>   struct i2c_client   *slave;
> + enum i2c_slave_event last_slave_event;
>  };
>  
>  static const struct imx_i2c_hwdata imx1_i2c_hwdata = {
> @@ -662,6 +663,36 @@ static void i2c_imx_enable_bus_idle(struct 
> imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx)
>   }
>  }
>  
> +static void i2c_imx_slave_event(struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx,
> + enum i2c_slave_event event, u8 *val)
> +{
> + i2c_slave_event(i2c_imx->slave, event, val);
> + i2c_imx->last_slave_event = event;
> +}
> +
> +static void i2c_imx_slave_finish_op(struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx)
> +{
> + u8 val;
> +
> + while (i2c_imx->last_slave_event != I2C_SLAVE_STOP) {
> + switch (i2c_imx->last_slave_event) {
> + case I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED:
> + i2c_imx_slave_event(i2c_imx, I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED,
> + );
> + break;
> +
> + case I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_REQUESTED:
> + case I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED:
> + case I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_RECEIVED:
> + i2c_imx_slave_event(i2c_imx, I2C_SLAVE_STOP, );
> + break;
> +
> + case I2C_SLAVE_STOP:
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +}

Is it really working code?

The i2c_imx_slave_finish_op() is a waiting busy loop withing an IRQ! And
it is waiting for an event, which is updated in the same IRQ callback.
Or am i missing some thing?

Regards,
Oleksij

>  static irqreturn_t i2c_imx_slave_isr(struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx,
>unsigned int status, unsigned int ctl)
>  {
> @@ -674,9 +705,11 @@ static irqreturn_t i2c_imx_slave_isr(struct 
> imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx,
>   }
>  
>   if (status & I2SR_IAAS) { /* Addressed as a slave */
> + i2c_imx_slave_finish_op(i2c_imx);
>   if (status & I2SR_SRW) { /* Master wants to read from us*/
>   dev_dbg(_imx->adapter.dev, "read requested");
> - i2c_slave_event(i2c_imx->slave, 
> I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED, );
> + i2c_imx_slave_event(i2c_imx,
> + I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED, );
>  
>   /* Slave transmit */
>   ctl |= I2CR_MTX;
> @@ -686,7 +719,8 @@ static irqreturn_t i2c_imx_slave_isr(struct 
> imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx,
>   imx_i2c_write_reg(value, i2c_imx, IMX_I2C_I2DR);
>   } else { /* Master wants to write to us */
>   dev_dbg(_imx->adapter.dev, "write requested");
> - i2c_slave_event(i2c_imx->slave, 
> I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_REQUESTED, );
> + i2c_imx_slave_event(i2c_imx,
> + I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_REQUESTED, );
>  
>   /* Slave receive */
>   ctl &= ~I2CR_MTX;
> @@ -697,17 +731,20 @@ static irqreturn_t i2c_imx_slave_isr(struct 
> imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx,
>   } else if (!(ctl & I2CR_MTX)) { /* Receive mode */
>   if (status & I2SR_IBB) { /* No STOP signal detected */
>   value = imx_i2c_read_reg(i2c_imx, IMX_I2C_I2DR);
> - i2c_slave_event(i2c_imx->slave, 
> I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_RECEIVED, );
> + i2c_imx_slave_event(i2c_imx,
> + I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_RECEIVED, );
>   } else { /* STOP signal is detected */
>   dev_dbg(_imx->adapter.dev,
>   "STOP signal detected");
> - i2c_slave_event(i2c_imx->slave, I2C_SLAVE_STOP, );
> + i2c_imx_slave_event(i2c_imx,
> + I2C_SLAVE_STOP, );
>   }
>   } else if (!(status & I2SR_RXAK)) { /* Transmit mode received ACK */
>   ctl |= I2CR_MTX;
>   imx_i2c_write_reg(ctl, i2c_imx, IMX_I2C_I2CR);
>  
> - 

[PATCH] i2c-imx.c: Synthesize end of transaction events without idle interrupts

2020-12-22 Thread Kevin Paul Herbert
Only the Layerscape SoCs have interrupts on bus idle, which facilitate
sending events which complete slave bus transactions.

Add support for synthesizing missing events. If we see a master request,
or a newly addressed slave request, if the last event sent to the backend
was I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED, send the backend a I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED
followed by I2C_SLAVE_STOP. For all other events, send an I2C_SLAVE_STOP.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Paul Herbert 
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c | 59 +++-
 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c
index b444fbf1a262..b3e2a6a7fc19 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c
@@ -209,6 +209,7 @@ struct imx_i2c_struct {
 
struct imx_i2c_dma  *dma;
struct i2c_client   *slave;
+   enum i2c_slave_event last_slave_event;
 };
 
 static const struct imx_i2c_hwdata imx1_i2c_hwdata = {
@@ -662,6 +663,36 @@ static void i2c_imx_enable_bus_idle(struct imx_i2c_struct 
*i2c_imx)
}
 }
 
+static void i2c_imx_slave_event(struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx,
+   enum i2c_slave_event event, u8 *val)
+{
+   i2c_slave_event(i2c_imx->slave, event, val);
+   i2c_imx->last_slave_event = event;
+}
+
+static void i2c_imx_slave_finish_op(struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx)
+{
+   u8 val;
+
+   while (i2c_imx->last_slave_event != I2C_SLAVE_STOP) {
+   switch (i2c_imx->last_slave_event) {
+   case I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED:
+   i2c_imx_slave_event(i2c_imx, I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED,
+   );
+   break;
+
+   case I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_REQUESTED:
+   case I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED:
+   case I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_RECEIVED:
+   i2c_imx_slave_event(i2c_imx, I2C_SLAVE_STOP, );
+   break;
+
+   case I2C_SLAVE_STOP:
+   break;
+   }
+   }
+}
+
 static irqreturn_t i2c_imx_slave_isr(struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx,
 unsigned int status, unsigned int ctl)
 {
@@ -674,9 +705,11 @@ static irqreturn_t i2c_imx_slave_isr(struct imx_i2c_struct 
*i2c_imx,
}
 
if (status & I2SR_IAAS) { /* Addressed as a slave */
+   i2c_imx_slave_finish_op(i2c_imx);
if (status & I2SR_SRW) { /* Master wants to read from us*/
dev_dbg(_imx->adapter.dev, "read requested");
-   i2c_slave_event(i2c_imx->slave, 
I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED, );
+   i2c_imx_slave_event(i2c_imx,
+   I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED, );
 
/* Slave transmit */
ctl |= I2CR_MTX;
@@ -686,7 +719,8 @@ static irqreturn_t i2c_imx_slave_isr(struct imx_i2c_struct 
*i2c_imx,
imx_i2c_write_reg(value, i2c_imx, IMX_I2C_I2DR);
} else { /* Master wants to write to us */
dev_dbg(_imx->adapter.dev, "write requested");
-   i2c_slave_event(i2c_imx->slave, 
I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_REQUESTED, );
+   i2c_imx_slave_event(i2c_imx,
+   I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_REQUESTED, );
 
/* Slave receive */
ctl &= ~I2CR_MTX;
@@ -697,17 +731,20 @@ static irqreturn_t i2c_imx_slave_isr(struct 
imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx,
} else if (!(ctl & I2CR_MTX)) { /* Receive mode */
if (status & I2SR_IBB) { /* No STOP signal detected */
value = imx_i2c_read_reg(i2c_imx, IMX_I2C_I2DR);
-   i2c_slave_event(i2c_imx->slave, 
I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_RECEIVED, );
+   i2c_imx_slave_event(i2c_imx,
+   I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_RECEIVED, );
} else { /* STOP signal is detected */
dev_dbg(_imx->adapter.dev,
"STOP signal detected");
-   i2c_slave_event(i2c_imx->slave, I2C_SLAVE_STOP, );
+   i2c_imx_slave_event(i2c_imx,
+   I2C_SLAVE_STOP, );
}
} else if (!(status & I2SR_RXAK)) { /* Transmit mode received ACK */
ctl |= I2CR_MTX;
imx_i2c_write_reg(ctl, i2c_imx, IMX_I2C_I2CR);
 
-   i2c_slave_event(i2c_imx->slave, I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED, 
);
+   i2c_imx_slave_event(i2c_imx,
+   I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED, );
 
imx_i2c_write_reg(value, i2c_imx, IMX_I2C_I2DR);
} else { /* Transmit mode received NAK */
@@ -748,6 +785,7 @@ static int i2c_imx_reg_slave(struct i2c_client *client)
return -EBUSY;
 
i2c_imx->slave = 

Re: [PATCH] i2c-imx.c: Synthesize end of transaction events without idle interrupts

2020-12-19 Thread Fabio Estevam
Hi Kevin,

On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 2:53 PM Kevin Herbert  wrote:
>
> From feaf638fb9b9a483c0d6090b277f34db21160885 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Kevin Paul Herbert 
> Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 16:50:34 -0800
> Subject: [PATCH] i2c-imx.c: Synthesize end of transaction events without idle
>  interrupts

Your patch is corrupted. Please use 'git send-mail' and submit it again.

Thanks


[PATCH] i2c-imx.c: Synthesize end of transaction events without idle interrupts

2020-12-18 Thread Kevin Herbert
>From feaf638fb9b9a483c0d6090b277f34db21160885 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kevin Paul Herbert 
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 16:50:34 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] i2c-imx.c: Synthesize end of transaction events without idle
 interrupts

Only the Layerscape SoCs have interrupts on bus idle, which facilitate
sending events which complete slave bus transactions.

Add support for synthesizing missing events. If we see a master request,
or a newly addressed slave request, if the last event sent to the backend
was I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED, send the backend a I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED
followed by I2C_SLAVE_STOP. For all other events, send an I2C_SLAVE_STOP.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Paul Herbert 
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c | 59 +++-
 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c
index 7137bae770ea..7255e1dabde4 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c
@@ -211,6 +211,7 @@ struct imx_i2c_struct {

  struct imx_i2c_dma *dma;
  struct i2c_client *slave;
+ enum i2c_slave_event last_slave_event;
 };

 static const struct imx_i2c_hwdata imx1_i2c_hwdata = {
@@ -637,6 +638,36 @@ static void i2c_imx_enable_bus_idle(struct
imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx)
  }
 }

+static void i2c_imx_slave_event(struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx,
+ enum i2c_slave_event event, u8 *val)
+{
+ i2c_slave_event(i2c_imx->slave, event, val);
+ i2c_imx->last_slave_event = event;
+}
+
+static void i2c_imx_slave_finish_op(struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx)
+{
+ u8 val;
+
+ while (i2c_imx->last_slave_event != I2C_SLAVE_STOP) {
+ switch (i2c_imx->last_slave_event) {
+ case I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED:
+ i2c_imx_slave_event(i2c_imx, I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED,
+ );
+ break;
+
+ case I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_REQUESTED:
+ case I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED:
+ case I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_RECEIVED:
+ i2c_imx_slave_event(i2c_imx, I2C_SLAVE_STOP, );
+ break;
+
+ case I2C_SLAVE_STOP:
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+}
+
 static irqreturn_t i2c_imx_slave_isr(struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx,
   unsigned int status, unsigned int ctl)
 {
@@ -649,9 +680,11 @@ static irqreturn_t i2c_imx_slave_isr(struct
imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx,
  }

  if (status & I2SR_IAAS) { /* Addressed as a slave */
+ i2c_imx_slave_finish_op(i2c_imx);
  if (status & I2SR_SRW) { /* Master wants to read from us*/
  dev_dbg(_imx->adapter.dev, "read requested");
- i2c_slave_event(i2c_imx->slave, I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED, );
+ i2c_imx_slave_event(i2c_imx,
+ I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED, );

  /* Slave transmit */
  ctl |= I2CR_MTX;
@@ -661,7 +694,8 @@ static irqreturn_t i2c_imx_slave_isr(struct
imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx,
  imx_i2c_write_reg(value, i2c_imx, IMX_I2C_I2DR);
  } else { /* Master wants to write to us */
  dev_dbg(_imx->adapter.dev, "write requested");
- i2c_slave_event(i2c_imx->slave, I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_REQUESTED, );
+ i2c_imx_slave_event(i2c_imx,
+ I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_REQUESTED, );

  /* Slave receive */
  ctl &= ~I2CR_MTX;
@@ -672,17 +706,20 @@ static irqreturn_t i2c_imx_slave_isr(struct
imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx,
  } else if (!(ctl & I2CR_MTX)) { /* Receive mode */
  if (status & I2SR_IBB) { /* No STOP signal detected */
  value = imx_i2c_read_reg(i2c_imx, IMX_I2C_I2DR);
- i2c_slave_event(i2c_imx->slave, I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_RECEIVED, );
+ i2c_imx_slave_event(i2c_imx,
+ I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_RECEIVED, );
  } else { /* STOP signal is detected */
  dev_dbg(_imx->adapter.dev,
  "STOP signal detected");
- i2c_slave_event(i2c_imx->slave, I2C_SLAVE_STOP, );
+ i2c_imx_slave_event(i2c_imx,
+ I2C_SLAVE_STOP, );
  }
  } else if (!(status & I2SR_RXAK)) { /* Transmit mode received ACK */
  ctl |= I2CR_MTX;
  imx_i2c_write_reg(ctl, i2c_imx, IMX_I2C_I2CR);

- i2c_slave_event(i2c_imx->slave, I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED, );
+ i2c_imx_slave_event(i2c_imx,
+ I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED, );

  imx_i2c_write_reg(value, i2c_imx, IMX_I2C_I2DR);
  } else { /* Transmit mode received NAK */
@@ -723,6 +760,7 @@ static int i2c_imx_reg_slave(struct i2c_client *client)
  return -EBUSY;

  i2c_imx->slave = client;
+ i2c_imx->last_slave_event = I2C_SLAVE_STOP;

  /* Resume */
  ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(i2c_imx->adapter.dev.parent);
@@ -775,10 +813,17 @@ static irqreturn_t i2c_imx_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)

  status = imx_i2c_read_reg(i2c_imx, IMX_I2C_I2SR);
  ctl = imx_i2c_read_reg(i2c_imx, IMX_I2C_I2CR);
+
  if (status & I2SR_IIF) {
  i2c_imx_clear_irq(i2c_imx, I2SR_IIF);
- if (i2c_imx->slave && !(ctl & I2CR_MSTA))
- return i2c_imx_slave_isr(i2c_imx, status, ctl);
+ if (i2c_imx->slave) {
+ if (!(ctl & I2CR_MSTA)) {
+ return i2c_imx_slave_isr(i2c_imx, status, ctl);
+ } else if (i2c_imx->last_slave_event !=
+I2C_SLAVE_STOP) {
+ i2c_imx_slave_finish_op(i2c_imx);
+ }
+ }
  return i2c_imx_master_isr(i2c_imx, status);
  }

-- 
2.25.1