Re: [PATCH] ipc/sem.c: Couple of spelling fixes
On Sat, 20 Mar 2021, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote: s/purpuse/purpose/ s/seperately/separately/ Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury Acked-by: Randy Dunlap --- ipc/sem.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/ipc/sem.c b/ipc/sem.c index f6c30a85dadf..780d75eff8c6 100644 --- a/ipc/sem.c +++ b/ipc/sem.c @@ -786,7 +786,7 @@ static inline void wake_up_sem_queue_prepare(struct sem_queue *q, int error, { get_task_struct(q->sleeper); - /* see SEM_BARRIER_2 for purpuse/pairing */ + /* see SEM_BARRIER_2 for purpose/pairing */ smp_store_release(&q->status, error); wake_q_add_safe(wake_q, q->sleeper); @@ -821,7 +821,7 @@ static inline int check_restart(struct sem_array *sma, struct sem_queue *q) /* It is impossible that someone waits for the new value: * - complex operations always restart. -* - wait-for-zero are handled seperately. +* - wait-for-zero are handled separately. * - q is a previously sleeping simple operation that * altered the array. It must be a decrement, because * simple increments never sleep. -- 2.26.2
[PATCH] ipc/sem.c: Couple of spelling fixes
s/purpuse/purpose/ s/seperately/separately/ Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury --- ipc/sem.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/ipc/sem.c b/ipc/sem.c index f6c30a85dadf..780d75eff8c6 100644 --- a/ipc/sem.c +++ b/ipc/sem.c @@ -786,7 +786,7 @@ static inline void wake_up_sem_queue_prepare(struct sem_queue *q, int error, { get_task_struct(q->sleeper); - /* see SEM_BARRIER_2 for purpuse/pairing */ + /* see SEM_BARRIER_2 for purpose/pairing */ smp_store_release(&q->status, error); wake_q_add_safe(wake_q, q->sleeper); @@ -821,7 +821,7 @@ static inline int check_restart(struct sem_array *sma, struct sem_queue *q) /* It is impossible that someone waits for the new value: * - complex operations always restart. -* - wait-for-zero are handled seperately. +* - wait-for-zero are handled separately. * - q is a previously sleeping simple operation that * altered the array. It must be a decrement, because * simple increments never sleep. -- 2.26.2