Re: [PATCH V4 1/3] cpufreq: handle calls to ->target_index() in separate routine
On 27 May 2014 04:51, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > I guess I can take this one without the rest of the series? Yes. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH V4 1/3] cpufreq: handle calls to ->target_index() in separate routine
On Wednesday, May 21, 2014 02:29:29 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Handling calls to ->target_index() has got complex over time and might become
> more complex. So, its better to take target_index() bits out in another
> routine
> __target_index() for better code readability. Shouldn't have any functional
> impact.
>
> Tested-by: Stephen Warren
> Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar
I guess I can take this one without the rest of the series?
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 56
> ---
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index a05c921..ae11dd5 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -1816,12 +1816,43 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpufreq_unregister_notifier);
> * GOVERNORS*
> */
>
> +static int __target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> + struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table, int index)
> +{
> + struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
> + int retval = -EINVAL;
> + bool notify;
> +
> + notify = !(cpufreq_driver->flags & CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION);
> +
> + if (notify) {
> + freqs.old = policy->cur;
> + freqs.new = freq_table[index].frequency;
> + freqs.flags = 0;
> +
> + pr_debug("%s: cpu: %d, oldfreq: %u, new freq: %u\n",
> + __func__, policy->cpu, freqs.old, freqs.new);
> +
> + cpufreq_freq_transition_begin(policy, );
> + }
> +
> + retval = cpufreq_driver->target_index(policy, index);
> + if (retval)
> + pr_err("%s: Failed to change cpu frequency: %d\n", __func__,
> +retval);
> +
> + if (notify)
> + cpufreq_freq_transition_end(policy, , retval);
> +
> + return retval;
> +}
> +
> int __cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> unsigned int target_freq,
> unsigned int relation)
> {
> - int retval = -EINVAL;
> unsigned int old_target_freq = target_freq;
> + int retval = -EINVAL;
>
> if (cpufreq_disabled())
> return -ENODEV;
> @@ -1848,8 +1879,6 @@ int __cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy
> *policy,
> retval = cpufreq_driver->target(policy, target_freq, relation);
> else if (cpufreq_driver->target_index) {
> struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table;
> - struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
> - bool notify;
> int index;
>
> freq_table = cpufreq_frequency_get_table(policy->cpu);
> @@ -1870,26 +1899,7 @@ int __cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy
> *policy,
> goto out;
> }
>
> - notify = !(cpufreq_driver->flags & CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION);
> -
> - if (notify) {
> - freqs.old = policy->cur;
> - freqs.new = freq_table[index].frequency;
> - freqs.flags = 0;
> -
> - pr_debug("%s: cpu: %d, oldfreq: %u, new freq: %u\n",
> - __func__, policy->cpu, freqs.old, freqs.new);
> -
> - cpufreq_freq_transition_begin(policy, );
> - }
> -
> - retval = cpufreq_driver->target_index(policy, index);
> - if (retval)
> - pr_err("%s: Failed to change cpu frequency: %d\n",
> -__func__, retval);
> -
> - if (notify)
> - cpufreq_freq_transition_end(policy, , retval);
> + retval = __target_index(policy, freq_table, index);
> }
>
> out:
>
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH V4 1/3] cpufreq: handle calls to -target_index() in separate routine
On Wednesday, May 21, 2014 02:29:29 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
Handling calls to -target_index() has got complex over time and might become
more complex. So, its better to take target_index() bits out in another
routine
__target_index() for better code readability. Shouldn't have any functional
impact.
Tested-by: Stephen Warren swar...@nvidia.com
Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
I guess I can take this one without the rest of the series?
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 56
---
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index a05c921..ae11dd5 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1816,12 +1816,43 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpufreq_unregister_notifier);
* GOVERNORS*
*/
+static int __target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
+ struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table, int index)
+{
+ struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
+ int retval = -EINVAL;
+ bool notify;
+
+ notify = !(cpufreq_driver-flags CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION);
+
+ if (notify) {
+ freqs.old = policy-cur;
+ freqs.new = freq_table[index].frequency;
+ freqs.flags = 0;
+
+ pr_debug(%s: cpu: %d, oldfreq: %u, new freq: %u\n,
+ __func__, policy-cpu, freqs.old, freqs.new);
+
+ cpufreq_freq_transition_begin(policy, freqs);
+ }
+
+ retval = cpufreq_driver-target_index(policy, index);
+ if (retval)
+ pr_err(%s: Failed to change cpu frequency: %d\n, __func__,
+retval);
+
+ if (notify)
+ cpufreq_freq_transition_end(policy, freqs, retval);
+
+ return retval;
+}
+
int __cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int target_freq,
unsigned int relation)
{
- int retval = -EINVAL;
unsigned int old_target_freq = target_freq;
+ int retval = -EINVAL;
if (cpufreq_disabled())
return -ENODEV;
@@ -1848,8 +1879,6 @@ int __cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy
*policy,
retval = cpufreq_driver-target(policy, target_freq, relation);
else if (cpufreq_driver-target_index) {
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table;
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
- bool notify;
int index;
freq_table = cpufreq_frequency_get_table(policy-cpu);
@@ -1870,26 +1899,7 @@ int __cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy
*policy,
goto out;
}
- notify = !(cpufreq_driver-flags CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION);
-
- if (notify) {
- freqs.old = policy-cur;
- freqs.new = freq_table[index].frequency;
- freqs.flags = 0;
-
- pr_debug(%s: cpu: %d, oldfreq: %u, new freq: %u\n,
- __func__, policy-cpu, freqs.old, freqs.new);
-
- cpufreq_freq_transition_begin(policy, freqs);
- }
-
- retval = cpufreq_driver-target_index(policy, index);
- if (retval)
- pr_err(%s: Failed to change cpu frequency: %d\n,
-__func__, retval);
-
- if (notify)
- cpufreq_freq_transition_end(policy, freqs, retval);
+ retval = __target_index(policy, freq_table, index);
}
out:
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH V4 1/3] cpufreq: handle calls to -target_index() in separate routine
On 27 May 2014 04:51, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@rjwysocki.net wrote: I guess I can take this one without the rest of the series? Yes. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[PATCH V4 1/3] cpufreq: handle calls to ->target_index() in separate routine
Handling calls to ->target_index() has got complex over time and might become
more complex. So, its better to take target_index() bits out in another routine
__target_index() for better code readability. Shouldn't have any functional
impact.
Tested-by: Stephen Warren
Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 56 ---
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index a05c921..ae11dd5 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1816,12 +1816,43 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpufreq_unregister_notifier);
* GOVERNORS*
*/
+static int __target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
+ struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table, int index)
+{
+ struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
+ int retval = -EINVAL;
+ bool notify;
+
+ notify = !(cpufreq_driver->flags & CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION);
+
+ if (notify) {
+ freqs.old = policy->cur;
+ freqs.new = freq_table[index].frequency;
+ freqs.flags = 0;
+
+ pr_debug("%s: cpu: %d, oldfreq: %u, new freq: %u\n",
+__func__, policy->cpu, freqs.old, freqs.new);
+
+ cpufreq_freq_transition_begin(policy, );
+ }
+
+ retval = cpufreq_driver->target_index(policy, index);
+ if (retval)
+ pr_err("%s: Failed to change cpu frequency: %d\n", __func__,
+ retval);
+
+ if (notify)
+ cpufreq_freq_transition_end(policy, , retval);
+
+ return retval;
+}
+
int __cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int target_freq,
unsigned int relation)
{
- int retval = -EINVAL;
unsigned int old_target_freq = target_freq;
+ int retval = -EINVAL;
if (cpufreq_disabled())
return -ENODEV;
@@ -1848,8 +1879,6 @@ int __cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
retval = cpufreq_driver->target(policy, target_freq, relation);
else if (cpufreq_driver->target_index) {
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table;
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
- bool notify;
int index;
freq_table = cpufreq_frequency_get_table(policy->cpu);
@@ -1870,26 +1899,7 @@ int __cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy
*policy,
goto out;
}
- notify = !(cpufreq_driver->flags & CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION);
-
- if (notify) {
- freqs.old = policy->cur;
- freqs.new = freq_table[index].frequency;
- freqs.flags = 0;
-
- pr_debug("%s: cpu: %d, oldfreq: %u, new freq: %u\n",
-__func__, policy->cpu, freqs.old, freqs.new);
-
- cpufreq_freq_transition_begin(policy, );
- }
-
- retval = cpufreq_driver->target_index(policy, index);
- if (retval)
- pr_err("%s: Failed to change cpu frequency: %d\n",
- __func__, retval);
-
- if (notify)
- cpufreq_freq_transition_end(policy, , retval);
+ retval = __target_index(policy, freq_table, index);
}
out:
--
2.0.0.rc2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[PATCH V4 1/3] cpufreq: handle calls to -target_index() in separate routine
Handling calls to -target_index() has got complex over time and might become
more complex. So, its better to take target_index() bits out in another routine
__target_index() for better code readability. Shouldn't have any functional
impact.
Tested-by: Stephen Warren swar...@nvidia.com
Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 56 ---
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index a05c921..ae11dd5 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1816,12 +1816,43 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpufreq_unregister_notifier);
* GOVERNORS*
*/
+static int __target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
+ struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table, int index)
+{
+ struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
+ int retval = -EINVAL;
+ bool notify;
+
+ notify = !(cpufreq_driver-flags CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION);
+
+ if (notify) {
+ freqs.old = policy-cur;
+ freqs.new = freq_table[index].frequency;
+ freqs.flags = 0;
+
+ pr_debug(%s: cpu: %d, oldfreq: %u, new freq: %u\n,
+__func__, policy-cpu, freqs.old, freqs.new);
+
+ cpufreq_freq_transition_begin(policy, freqs);
+ }
+
+ retval = cpufreq_driver-target_index(policy, index);
+ if (retval)
+ pr_err(%s: Failed to change cpu frequency: %d\n, __func__,
+ retval);
+
+ if (notify)
+ cpufreq_freq_transition_end(policy, freqs, retval);
+
+ return retval;
+}
+
int __cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int target_freq,
unsigned int relation)
{
- int retval = -EINVAL;
unsigned int old_target_freq = target_freq;
+ int retval = -EINVAL;
if (cpufreq_disabled())
return -ENODEV;
@@ -1848,8 +1879,6 @@ int __cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
retval = cpufreq_driver-target(policy, target_freq, relation);
else if (cpufreq_driver-target_index) {
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table;
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
- bool notify;
int index;
freq_table = cpufreq_frequency_get_table(policy-cpu);
@@ -1870,26 +1899,7 @@ int __cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy
*policy,
goto out;
}
- notify = !(cpufreq_driver-flags CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION);
-
- if (notify) {
- freqs.old = policy-cur;
- freqs.new = freq_table[index].frequency;
- freqs.flags = 0;
-
- pr_debug(%s: cpu: %d, oldfreq: %u, new freq: %u\n,
-__func__, policy-cpu, freqs.old, freqs.new);
-
- cpufreq_freq_transition_begin(policy, freqs);
- }
-
- retval = cpufreq_driver-target_index(policy, index);
- if (retval)
- pr_err(%s: Failed to change cpu frequency: %d\n,
- __func__, retval);
-
- if (notify)
- cpufreq_freq_transition_end(policy, freqs, retval);
+ retval = __target_index(policy, freq_table, index);
}
out:
--
2.0.0.rc2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
