Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] vsock: add support for SIOCOUTQ ioctl for all vsock socket types.
Hi Luigi,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on 50b70845fc5c22cf7e7d25b57d57b3dca1725aa5]
url:
https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Luigi-Leonardi-via-B4-Relay/vsock-add-support-for-SIOCOUTQ-ioctl-for-all-vsock-socket-types/20240627-023902
base: 50b70845fc5c22cf7e7d25b57d57b3dca1725aa5
patch link:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240626-ioctl_next-v3-1-63be5bf19a40%40outlook.com
patch subject: [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] vsock: add support for SIOCOUTQ ioctl
for all vsock socket types.
config: i386-randconfig-141-20240628
(https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240628/202406282144.dxr5kwiu-...@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-8 (Ubuntu 8.4.0-3ubuntu2) 8.4.0
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot
| Closes:
https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202406282144.dxr5kwiu-...@intel.com/
smatch warnings:
net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c:1321 vsock_do_ioctl() warn: unsigned 'n_bytes' is
never less than zero.
vim +/n_bytes +1321 net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
1295
1296 static int vsock_do_ioctl(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd,
1297int __user *arg)
1298 {
1299 struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
1300 struct vsock_sock *vsk;
1301 int retval;
1302
1303 vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
1304
1305 switch (cmd) {
1306 case SIOCOUTQ: {
1307 size_t n_bytes;
1308
1309 if (!vsk->transport || !vsk->transport->unsent_bytes) {
1310 retval = -EOPNOTSUPP;
1311 break;
1312 }
1313
1314 if (vsk->transport->unsent_bytes) {
1315 if (sock_type_connectible(sk->sk_type) &&
sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN) {
1316 retval = -EINVAL;
1317 break;
1318 }
1319
1320 n_bytes = vsk->transport->unsent_bytes(vsk);
> 1321 if (n_bytes < 0) {
1322 retval = n_bytes;
1323 break;
1324 }
1325
1326 retval = put_user(n_bytes, arg);
1327 }
1328 break;
1329 }
1330 default:
1331 retval = -ENOIOCTLCMD;
1332 }
1333
1334 return retval;
1335 }
1336
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] vsock: add support for SIOCOUTQ ioctl for all vsock socket types.
nit: in theory in this patch we don't support it for any of the
transports, so I wouldn't confuse and take that part out of the title.
WDYT with someting like:
vsock: add support for SIOCOUTQ ioctl
On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 02:08:35PM GMT, Luigi Leonardi via B4 Relay
wrote:
From: Luigi Leonardi
Add support for ioctl(s) for SOCK_STREAM SOCK_SEQPACKET and SOCK_DGRAM
in AF_VSOCK.
The only ioctl available is SIOCOUTQ/TIOCOUTQ, which returns the number
of unsent bytes in the socket. This information is transport-specific
and is delegated to them using a callback.
Suggested-by: Daan De Meyer
Signed-off-by: Luigi Leonardi
---
include/net/af_vsock.h | 3 +++
net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 60 +---
2 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/af_vsock.h b/include/net/af_vsock.h
index 535701efc1e5..7b5375ae7827 100644
--- a/include/net/af_vsock.h
+++ b/include/net/af_vsock.h
@@ -169,6 +169,9 @@ struct vsock_transport {
void (*notify_buffer_size)(struct vsock_sock *, u64 *);
int (*notify_set_rcvlowat)(struct vsock_sock *vsk, int val);
+ /* SIOCOUTQ ioctl */
+ size_t (*unsent_bytes)(struct vsock_sock *vsk);
If you want to return also errors, maybe better returning ssize_t.
This should fix one of the error reported by kernel bots.
+
/* Shutdown. */
int (*shutdown)(struct vsock_sock *, int);
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
index 4b040285aa78..d6140d73d122 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
@@ -112,6 +112,7 @@
#include
#include
#include
+#include
static int __vsock_bind(struct sock *sk, struct sockaddr_vm *addr);
static void vsock_sk_destruct(struct sock *sk);
@@ -1292,6 +1293,59 @@ int vsock_dgram_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct
msghdr *msg,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vsock_dgram_recvmsg);
+static int vsock_do_ioctl(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd,
+ int __user *arg)
+{
+ struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
+ struct vsock_sock *vsk;
+ int retval;
+
+ vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
+
+ switch (cmd) {
+ case SIOCOUTQ: {
+ size_t n_bytes;
+
+ if (!vsk->transport || !vsk->transport->unsent_bytes) {
+ retval = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ if (vsk->transport->unsent_bytes) {
This if is not necessary after the check we did earlier, right?
Removing it should fix the other issue reported by the bot.
+ if (sock_type_connectible(sk->sk_type) && sk->sk_state
== TCP_LISTEN) {
+ retval = -EINVAL;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ n_bytes = vsk->transport->unsent_bytes(vsk);
+ if (n_bytes < 0) {
+ retval = n_bytes;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ retval = put_user(n_bytes, arg);
+ }
+ break;
+ }
+ default:
+ retval = -ENOIOCTLCMD;
+ }
+
+ return retval;
+}
+
+static int vsock_ioctl(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd,
+ unsigned long arg)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ lock_sock(sock->sk);
+ ret = vsock_do_ioctl(sock, cmd, (int __user *)arg);
+ release_sock(sock->sk);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
static const struct proto_ops vsock_dgram_ops = {
.family = PF_VSOCK,
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
@@ -1302,7 +1356,7 @@ static const struct proto_ops vsock_dgram_ops = {
.accept = sock_no_accept,
.getname = vsock_getname,
.poll = vsock_poll,
- .ioctl = sock_no_ioctl,
+ .ioctl = vsock_ioctl,
.listen = sock_no_listen,
.shutdown = vsock_shutdown,
.sendmsg = vsock_dgram_sendmsg,
@@ -2286,7 +2340,7 @@ static const struct proto_ops vsock_stream_ops = {
.accept = vsock_accept,
.getname = vsock_getname,
.poll = vsock_poll,
- .ioctl = sock_no_ioctl,
+ .ioctl = vsock_ioctl,
.listen = vsock_listen,
.shutdown = vsock_shutdown,
.setsockopt = vsock_connectible_setsockopt,
@@ -2308,7 +2362,7 @@ static const struct proto_ops vsock_seqpacket_ops = {
.accept = vsock_accept,
.getname = vsock_getname,
.poll = vsock_poll,
- .ioctl = sock_no_ioctl,
+ .ioctl = vsock_ioctl,
.listen = vsock_listen,
.shutdown = vsock_shutdown,
.setsockopt = vsock_connectible_setsockopt,
--
2.45.2
Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] vsock: add support for SIOCOUTQ ioctl for all vsock socket types.
Hi Luigi,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on 50b70845fc5c22cf7e7d25b57d57b3dca1725aa5]
url:
https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Luigi-Leonardi-via-B4-Relay/vsock-add-support-for-SIOCOUTQ-ioctl-for-all-vsock-socket-types/20240627-023902
base: 50b70845fc5c22cf7e7d25b57d57b3dca1725aa5
patch link:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240626-ioctl_next-v3-1-63be5bf19a40%40outlook.com
patch subject: [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] vsock: add support for SIOCOUTQ ioctl
for all vsock socket types.
config: i386-randconfig-141-20240628
(https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240628/202406281355.d1jnvgbc-...@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-8 (Ubuntu 8.4.0-3ubuntu2) 8.4.0
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot
| Closes:
https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202406281355.d1jnvgbc-...@intel.com/
smatch warnings:
net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c:1321 vsock_do_ioctl() warn: unsigned 'n_bytes' is
never less than zero.
vim +/n_bytes +1321 net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
1295
1296 static int vsock_do_ioctl(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd,
1297int __user *arg)
1298 {
1299 struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
1300 struct vsock_sock *vsk;
1301 int retval;
1302
1303 vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
1304
1305 switch (cmd) {
1306 case SIOCOUTQ: {
1307 size_t n_bytes;
1308
1309 if (!vsk->transport || !vsk->transport->unsent_bytes) {
1310 retval = -EOPNOTSUPP;
1311 break;
1312 }
1313
1314 if (vsk->transport->unsent_bytes) {
1315 if (sock_type_connectible(sk->sk_type) &&
sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN) {
1316 retval = -EINVAL;
1317 break;
1318 }
1319
1320 n_bytes = vsk->transport->unsent_bytes(vsk);
> 1321 if (n_bytes < 0) {
1322 retval = n_bytes;
1323 break;
1324 }
1325
1326 retval = put_user(n_bytes, arg);
1327 }
1328 break;
1329 }
1330 default:
1331 retval = -ENOIOCTLCMD;
1332 }
1333
1334 return retval;
1335 }
1336
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] vsock: add support for SIOCOUTQ ioctl for all vsock socket types.
Hi Luigi,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on 50b70845fc5c22cf7e7d25b57d57b3dca1725aa5]
url:
https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Luigi-Leonardi-via-B4-Relay/vsock-add-support-for-SIOCOUTQ-ioctl-for-all-vsock-socket-types/20240627-023902
base: 50b70845fc5c22cf7e7d25b57d57b3dca1725aa5
patch link:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240626-ioctl_next-v3-1-63be5bf19a40%40outlook.com
patch subject: [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] vsock: add support for SIOCOUTQ ioctl
for all vsock socket types.
config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-001-20240627
(https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240627/202406271827.aq9zylch-...@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 18.1.5 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project
617a15a9eac96088ae5e9134248d8236e34b91b1)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
(https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240627/202406271827.aq9zylch-...@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot
| Closes:
https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202406271827.aq9zylch-...@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c:1314:7: warning: variable 'retval' is used
>> uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is false [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
1314 | if (vsk->transport->unsent_bytes) {
| ^~~~
net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c:1334:9: note: uninitialized use occurs here
1334 | return retval;
|^~
net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c:1314:3: note: remove the 'if' if its condition is
always true
1314 | if (vsk->transport->unsent_bytes) {
| ^
net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c:1301:12: note: initialize the variable 'retval' to
silence this warning
1301 | int retval;
| ^
|= 0
1 warning generated.
vim +1314 net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
1295
1296 static int vsock_do_ioctl(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd,
1297int __user *arg)
1298 {
1299 struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
1300 struct vsock_sock *vsk;
1301 int retval;
1302
1303 vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
1304
1305 switch (cmd) {
1306 case SIOCOUTQ: {
1307 size_t n_bytes;
1308
1309 if (!vsk->transport || !vsk->transport->unsent_bytes) {
1310 retval = -EOPNOTSUPP;
1311 break;
1312 }
1313
> 1314 if (vsk->transport->unsent_bytes) {
1315 if (sock_type_connectible(sk->sk_type) &&
sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN) {
1316 retval = -EINVAL;
1317 break;
1318 }
1319
1320 n_bytes = vsk->transport->unsent_bytes(vsk);
1321 if (n_bytes < 0) {
1322 retval = n_bytes;
1323 break;
1324 }
1325
1326 retval = put_user(n_bytes, arg);
1327 }
1328 break;
1329 }
1330 default:
1331 retval = -ENOIOCTLCMD;
1332 }
1333
1334 return retval;
1335 }
1336
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
[PATCH net-next v3 1/3] vsock: add support for SIOCOUTQ ioctl for all vsock socket types.
From: Luigi Leonardi
Add support for ioctl(s) for SOCK_STREAM SOCK_SEQPACKET and SOCK_DGRAM
in AF_VSOCK.
The only ioctl available is SIOCOUTQ/TIOCOUTQ, which returns the number
of unsent bytes in the socket. This information is transport-specific
and is delegated to them using a callback.
Suggested-by: Daan De Meyer
Signed-off-by: Luigi Leonardi
---
include/net/af_vsock.h | 3 +++
net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 60 +---
2 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/af_vsock.h b/include/net/af_vsock.h
index 535701efc1e5..7b5375ae7827 100644
--- a/include/net/af_vsock.h
+++ b/include/net/af_vsock.h
@@ -169,6 +169,9 @@ struct vsock_transport {
void (*notify_buffer_size)(struct vsock_sock *, u64 *);
int (*notify_set_rcvlowat)(struct vsock_sock *vsk, int val);
+ /* SIOCOUTQ ioctl */
+ size_t (*unsent_bytes)(struct vsock_sock *vsk);
+
/* Shutdown. */
int (*shutdown)(struct vsock_sock *, int);
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
index 4b040285aa78..d6140d73d122 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
@@ -112,6 +112,7 @@
#include
#include
#include
+#include
static int __vsock_bind(struct sock *sk, struct sockaddr_vm *addr);
static void vsock_sk_destruct(struct sock *sk);
@@ -1292,6 +1293,59 @@ int vsock_dgram_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct
msghdr *msg,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vsock_dgram_recvmsg);
+static int vsock_do_ioctl(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd,
+ int __user *arg)
+{
+ struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
+ struct vsock_sock *vsk;
+ int retval;
+
+ vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
+
+ switch (cmd) {
+ case SIOCOUTQ: {
+ size_t n_bytes;
+
+ if (!vsk->transport || !vsk->transport->unsent_bytes) {
+ retval = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ if (vsk->transport->unsent_bytes) {
+ if (sock_type_connectible(sk->sk_type) && sk->sk_state
== TCP_LISTEN) {
+ retval = -EINVAL;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ n_bytes = vsk->transport->unsent_bytes(vsk);
+ if (n_bytes < 0) {
+ retval = n_bytes;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ retval = put_user(n_bytes, arg);
+ }
+ break;
+ }
+ default:
+ retval = -ENOIOCTLCMD;
+ }
+
+ return retval;
+}
+
+static int vsock_ioctl(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd,
+ unsigned long arg)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ lock_sock(sock->sk);
+ ret = vsock_do_ioctl(sock, cmd, (int __user *)arg);
+ release_sock(sock->sk);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
static const struct proto_ops vsock_dgram_ops = {
.family = PF_VSOCK,
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
@@ -1302,7 +1356,7 @@ static const struct proto_ops vsock_dgram_ops = {
.accept = sock_no_accept,
.getname = vsock_getname,
.poll = vsock_poll,
- .ioctl = sock_no_ioctl,
+ .ioctl = vsock_ioctl,
.listen = sock_no_listen,
.shutdown = vsock_shutdown,
.sendmsg = vsock_dgram_sendmsg,
@@ -2286,7 +2340,7 @@ static const struct proto_ops vsock_stream_ops = {
.accept = vsock_accept,
.getname = vsock_getname,
.poll = vsock_poll,
- .ioctl = sock_no_ioctl,
+ .ioctl = vsock_ioctl,
.listen = vsock_listen,
.shutdown = vsock_shutdown,
.setsockopt = vsock_connectible_setsockopt,
@@ -2308,7 +2362,7 @@ static const struct proto_ops vsock_seqpacket_ops = {
.accept = vsock_accept,
.getname = vsock_getname,
.poll = vsock_poll,
- .ioctl = sock_no_ioctl,
+ .ioctl = vsock_ioctl,
.listen = vsock_listen,
.shutdown = vsock_shutdown,
.setsockopt = vsock_connectible_setsockopt,
--
2.45.2
