Re: [PATCH v2] clk: bcm2835: Do not use prediv with bcm2711's PLLs

2020-08-03 Thread Stephen Boyd
Quoting Nicolas Saenz Julienne (2020-07-30 11:26:19)
> Contrary to previous SoCs, bcm2711 doesn't have a prescaler in the PLL
> feedback loop. Bypass it by zeroing fb_prediv_mask when running on
> bcm2711.
> 
> Note that, since the prediv configuration bits were re-purposed, this
> was triggering miscalculations on all clocks hanging from the VPU clock,
> notably the aux UART, making its output unintelligible.
> 
> Fixes: 42de9ad400af ("clk: bcm2835: Add BCM2711_CLOCK_EMMC2 support")
> Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor 
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne 
> ---

Applied to clk-next


Re: [PATCH v2] clk: bcm2835: Do not use prediv with bcm2711's PLLs

2020-07-30 Thread Florian Fainelli



On 7/30/2020 11:26 AM, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> Contrary to previous SoCs, bcm2711 doesn't have a prescaler in the PLL
> feedback loop. Bypass it by zeroing fb_prediv_mask when running on
> bcm2711.
> 
> Note that, since the prediv configuration bits were re-purposed, this
> was triggering miscalculations on all clocks hanging from the VPU clock,
> notably the aux UART, making its output unintelligible.
> 
> Fixes: 42de9ad400af ("clk: bcm2835: Add BCM2711_CLOCK_EMMC2 support")
> Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor 
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne 

Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli 
-- 
Florian


Re: [PATCH v2] clk: bcm2835: Do not use prediv with bcm2711's PLLs

2020-07-30 Thread Nathan Chancellor
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 08:26:19PM +0200, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> Contrary to previous SoCs, bcm2711 doesn't have a prescaler in the PLL
> feedback loop. Bypass it by zeroing fb_prediv_mask when running on
> bcm2711.
> 
> Note that, since the prediv configuration bits were re-purposed, this
> was triggering miscalculations on all clocks hanging from the VPU clock,
> notably the aux UART, making its output unintelligible.
> 
> Fixes: 42de9ad400af ("clk: bcm2835: Add BCM2711_CLOCK_EMMC2 support")
> Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor 
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne 

I updated to the latest version of the firmware
(668419cb9876474053574b2b1dc20ca996e14cc8) and my serial console
works :) thank you for the quick fix!

Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor 


[PATCH v2] clk: bcm2835: Do not use prediv with bcm2711's PLLs

2020-07-30 Thread Nicolas Saenz Julienne
Contrary to previous SoCs, bcm2711 doesn't have a prescaler in the PLL
feedback loop. Bypass it by zeroing fb_prediv_mask when running on
bcm2711.

Note that, since the prediv configuration bits were re-purposed, this
was triggering miscalculations on all clocks hanging from the VPU clock,
notably the aux UART, making its output unintelligible.

Fixes: 42de9ad400af ("clk: bcm2835: Add BCM2711_CLOCK_EMMC2 support")
Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor 
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne 
---

Changes since v1:
 - Previous approach broken. Check if running on bcm2711 upon using
   fb_prediv_mask.

FYI relevant discussion with RPi engineers:
https://github.com/raspberrypi/firmware/issues/1435#issuecomment-666242077

 drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c | 25 +
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c
index 027eba31f793..3439bc65bb4e 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c
@@ -314,6 +314,7 @@ struct bcm2835_cprman {
struct device *dev;
void __iomem *regs;
spinlock_t regs_lock; /* spinlock for all clocks */
+   unsigned int soc;
 
/*
 * Real names of cprman clock parents looked up through
@@ -526,6 +527,20 @@ static int bcm2835_pll_is_on(struct clk_hw *hw)
A2W_PLL_CTRL_PRST_DISABLE;
 }
 
+static u32 bcm2835_pll_get_prediv_mask(struct bcm2835_cprman *cprman,
+  const struct bcm2835_pll_data *data)
+{
+   /*
+* On BCM2711 there isn't a pre-divisor available in the PLL feedback
+* loop. Bits 13:14 of ANA1 (PLLA,PLLB,PLLC,PLLD) have been re-purposed
+* for to for VCO RANGE bits.
+*/
+   if (cprman->soc & SOC_BCM2711)
+   return 0;
+
+   return data->ana->fb_prediv_mask;
+}
+
 static void bcm2835_pll_choose_ndiv_and_fdiv(unsigned long rate,
 unsigned long parent_rate,
 u32 *ndiv, u32 *fdiv)
@@ -583,7 +598,7 @@ static unsigned long bcm2835_pll_get_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
ndiv = (a2wctrl & A2W_PLL_CTRL_NDIV_MASK) >> A2W_PLL_CTRL_NDIV_SHIFT;
pdiv = (a2wctrl & A2W_PLL_CTRL_PDIV_MASK) >> A2W_PLL_CTRL_PDIV_SHIFT;
using_prediv = cprman_read(cprman, data->ana_reg_base + 4) &
-   data->ana->fb_prediv_mask;
+  bcm2835_pll_get_prediv_mask(cprman, data);
 
if (using_prediv) {
ndiv *= 2;
@@ -666,6 +681,7 @@ static int bcm2835_pll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
struct bcm2835_pll *pll = container_of(hw, struct bcm2835_pll, hw);
struct bcm2835_cprman *cprman = pll->cprman;
const struct bcm2835_pll_data *data = pll->data;
+   u32 prediv_mask = bcm2835_pll_get_prediv_mask(cprman, data);
bool was_using_prediv, use_fb_prediv, do_ana_setup_first;
u32 ndiv, fdiv, a2w_ctl;
u32 ana[4];
@@ -683,7 +699,7 @@ static int bcm2835_pll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
for (i = 3; i >= 0; i--)
ana[i] = cprman_read(cprman, data->ana_reg_base + i * 4);
 
-   was_using_prediv = ana[1] & data->ana->fb_prediv_mask;
+   was_using_prediv = ana[1] & prediv_mask;
 
ana[0] &= ~data->ana->mask0;
ana[0] |= data->ana->set0;
@@ -693,10 +709,10 @@ static int bcm2835_pll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
ana[3] |= data->ana->set3;
 
if (was_using_prediv && !use_fb_prediv) {
-   ana[1] &= ~data->ana->fb_prediv_mask;
+   ana[1] &= ~prediv_mask;
do_ana_setup_first = true;
} else if (!was_using_prediv && use_fb_prediv) {
-   ana[1] |= data->ana->fb_prediv_mask;
+   ana[1] |= prediv_mask;
do_ana_setup_first = false;
} else {
do_ana_setup_first = true;
@@ -2262,6 +2278,7 @@ static int bcm2835_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, cprman);
 
cprman->onecell.num = asize;
+   cprman->soc = pdata->soc;
hws = cprman->onecell.hws;
 
for (i = 0; i < asize; i++) {
-- 
2.27.0