Re: [PATCH] Tokyo Electron SDIO controller (Ellen) support
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 14:39:26 + Ben Dooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 08:22:07AM -0600, Matt Porter wrote: > > > > What's the status of Ben's separation patches? I haven't seen a posting of > > those > > versus a recent kernel. I've got some SDHCI driver glue for the non-pci > > Arasan core > > running in an older kernel tree with those patches. It's just waiting for > > the separation > > patches to hit the mmc or mainline tree. > > I need to go back and try and sort out the last of Pierre's last > comments, and update to the latest kernel version. I was waiting > for 2.6.24-rc4 to re-start the effort to try and ensure there are > fewer changes due to fixes. > Any progress on this little project? Rgds Pierre signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [PATCH] Tokyo Electron SDIO controller (Ellen) support
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 14:39:26 + Ben Dooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 08:22:07AM -0600, Matt Porter wrote: What's the status of Ben's separation patches? I haven't seen a posting of those versus a recent kernel. I've got some SDHCI driver glue for the non-pci Arasan core running in an older kernel tree with those patches. It's just waiting for the separation patches to hit the mmc or mainline tree. I need to go back and try and sort out the last of Pierre's last comments, and update to the latest kernel version. I was waiting for 2.6.24-rc4 to re-start the effort to try and ensure there are fewer changes due to fixes. Any progress on this little project? Rgds Pierre signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [PATCH] Tokyo Electron SDIO controller (Ellen) support
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 08:22:07AM -0600, Matt Porter wrote: > On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 09:50:10PM +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote: > > As for the patch, it's a big NAK at this point. Vendors who can't be > > bothered to follow > > the standard will have to wait for Ben's separation patches before they can > > be supported. > > Then they can have some voodoo front-end to handle their mistakes instead > > of turning > > sdhci.c into a collection of hacks and workarounds. > > What's the status of Ben's separation patches? I haven't seen a posting of > those > versus a recent kernel. I've got some SDHCI driver glue for the non-pci > Arasan core > running in an older kernel tree with those patches. It's just waiting for the > separation > patches to hit the mmc or mainline tree. I need to go back and try and sort out the last of Pierre's last comments, and update to the latest kernel version. I was waiting for 2.6.24-rc4 to re-start the effort to try and ensure there are fewer changes due to fixes. -- Ben ([EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.fluff.org/) 'a smiley only costs 4 bytes' -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH] Tokyo Electron SDIO controller (Ellen) support
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 09:50:10PM +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote: > As for the patch, it's a big NAK at this point. Vendors who can't be bothered > to follow > the standard will have to wait for Ben's separation patches before they can > be supported. > Then they can have some voodoo front-end to handle their mistakes instead of > turning > sdhci.c into a collection of hacks and workarounds. What's the status of Ben's separation patches? I haven't seen a posting of those versus a recent kernel. I've got some SDHCI driver glue for the non-pci Arasan core running in an older kernel tree with those patches. It's just waiting for the separation patches to hit the mmc or mainline tree. -Matt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH] Tokyo Electron SDIO controller (Ellen) support
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 09:50:10PM +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote: As for the patch, it's a big NAK at this point. Vendors who can't be bothered to follow the standard will have to wait for Ben's separation patches before they can be supported. Then they can have some voodoo front-end to handle their mistakes instead of turning sdhci.c into a collection of hacks and workarounds. What's the status of Ben's separation patches? I haven't seen a posting of those versus a recent kernel. I've got some SDHCI driver glue for the non-pci Arasan core running in an older kernel tree with those patches. It's just waiting for the separation patches to hit the mmc or mainline tree. -Matt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH] Tokyo Electron SDIO controller (Ellen) support
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 08:22:07AM -0600, Matt Porter wrote: On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 09:50:10PM +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote: As for the patch, it's a big NAK at this point. Vendors who can't be bothered to follow the standard will have to wait for Ben's separation patches before they can be supported. Then they can have some voodoo front-end to handle their mistakes instead of turning sdhci.c into a collection of hacks and workarounds. What's the status of Ben's separation patches? I haven't seen a posting of those versus a recent kernel. I've got some SDHCI driver glue for the non-pci Arasan core running in an older kernel tree with those patches. It's just waiting for the separation patches to hit the mmc or mainline tree. I need to go back and try and sort out the last of Pierre's last comments, and update to the latest kernel version. I was waiting for 2.6.24-rc4 to re-start the effort to try and ensure there are fewer changes due to fixes. -- Ben ([EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.fluff.org/) 'a smiley only costs 4 bytes' -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH] Tokyo Electron SDIO controller (Ellen) support
On Sat, 01 Dec 2007 00:27:06 -0800 Vitaly Luban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Kernel "pci_ids.h" file has data for that card missing. > > Also, Ellen needs some control bits flipped before it functions properly > as SDIO controller by the spec. > Should apply clenly to Linus and Drzeus trees. Please apply. > > Signed-off-by: Vitaly Luban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > The illiteracy rates for hardware engineers must be through the roof. Nobody seems capable of reading specifications anymore... As for the patch, it's a big NAK at this point. Vendors who can't be bothered to follow the standard will have to wait for Ben's separation patches before they can be supported. Then they can have some voodoo front-end to handle their mistakes instead of turning sdhci.c into a collection of hacks and workarounds. Rgds Pierre signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [PATCH] Tokyo Electron SDIO controller (Ellen) support
On Sat, 01 Dec 2007 00:27:06 -0800 Vitaly Luban [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kernel pci_ids.h file has data for that card missing. Also, Ellen needs some control bits flipped before it functions properly as SDIO controller by the spec. Should apply clenly to Linus and Drzeus trees. Please apply. Signed-off-by: Vitaly Luban [EMAIL PROTECTED] The illiteracy rates for hardware engineers must be through the roof. Nobody seems capable of reading specifications anymore... As for the patch, it's a big NAK at this point. Vendors who can't be bothered to follow the standard will have to wait for Ben's separation patches before they can be supported. Then they can have some voodoo front-end to handle their mistakes instead of turning sdhci.c into a collection of hacks and workarounds. Rgds Pierre signature.asc Description: PGP signature
