Re: [PATCH] net/macb: Add hardware revision information during probe

2014-09-12 Thread David Miller
From: Alexandre Belloni 
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 16:51:36 +0200

> From: Bo Shen 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bo Shen 
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre 
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb.c 
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb.c
> index ca5d7798b265..a3b35c146d9c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb.c
> @@ -2241,6 +2241,7 @@ static int __init macb_probe(struct platform_device 
> *pdev)
>  
>   netif_carrier_off(dev);
>  
> + netdev_info(dev, "Cadence rev 0x%08x\n", macb_readl(bp, MID));
>   netdev_info(dev, "Cadence %s at 0x%08lx irq %d (%pM)\n",
>   macb_is_gem(bp) ? "GEM" : "MACB", dev->base_addr,
>   dev->irq, dev->dev_addr);

This is really sloppy.  The "Cadence %s at ..." is what announces the device,
therefore it's out of context to print out the device revision beforehand.

Why don't you just add it to the existing printout instead?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH] net/macb: Add hardware revision information during probe

2014-09-12 Thread David Miller
From: Alexandre Belloni alexandre.bell...@free-electrons.com
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 16:51:36 +0200

 From: Bo Shen voice.s...@atmel.com
 
 Signed-off-by: Bo Shen voice.s...@atmel.com
 Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre nicolas.fe...@atmel.com
 ---
  drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb.c | 1 +
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
 
 diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb.c 
 b/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb.c
 index ca5d7798b265..a3b35c146d9c 100644
 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb.c
 +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb.c
 @@ -2241,6 +2241,7 @@ static int __init macb_probe(struct platform_device 
 *pdev)
  
   netif_carrier_off(dev);
  
 + netdev_info(dev, Cadence rev 0x%08x\n, macb_readl(bp, MID));
   netdev_info(dev, Cadence %s at 0x%08lx irq %d (%pM)\n,
   macb_is_gem(bp) ? GEM : MACB, dev-base_addr,
   dev-irq, dev-dev_addr);

This is really sloppy.  The Cadence %s at ... is what announces the device,
therefore it's out of context to print out the device revision beforehand.

Why don't you just add it to the existing printout instead?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/