Re: NFS in 2.4.x
On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Kurt Garloff wrote: >> In other words, erase the word "Red Hat" from my question, and >> restate it "what version of nfs-utils is needed by 2.4.0test9"? >> >> Then I can compare with what I have regardless of dist. > >Look into linux/Documentation/Changes. >Oh, it fails to tell about the NFS stuff. Precisely. ;o) >Basically, for using the NFS client, you need nothing. Just mount the >volumes. 2.4.0test9 NFS client to 2.2.0 stock NFS server (knfsd). >For a NFS server, you need either userspace NFS server (aka unfsd), or the >user space for the kernelspace one (aka knfsd). For both, you also need the >RPC broker portmap running. My NFS server runs fine - well as fine as stock 2.2.16 NFS gets.. I can connect from 2.2.x client, but 2.4.0test9 will not connect. I will play some more with it tomorrow, and if I still can't get it working, I'll write back with more details (logs). >http://nfs.sourceforge.net/ Yep, I'll check that out too. Thanks for the tips. Take care, TTYL -- Mike A. Harris - Linux advocate - Open source advocate Computer Consultant - Capslock Consulting Copyright 2000 all rights reserved -- If you're looking for Linux books, guides, and other documentation, visit the Linux Documentation Project homepage: http://linuxdoc.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: NFS in 2.4.x
> " " == Kurt Garloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Look into linux/Documentation/Changes. Oh, it fails to tell > about the NFS stuff. o util-linux 2.10o # kbdrate -v The only thing missing is the nfs-utils version: the rule there is 'all versions work but nfs-utils-0.2.1 is supposed to work best'. Personally, however, I'm still using the stock nfs-utils-0.1.9.1 that you get with most distributions. Cheers, Trond - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: NFS in 2.4.x
On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 06:22:48AM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote: > On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Kurt Garloff wrote: > >Ask RedHat. > > I'm _not_ using a Red Hat kernel. That is why I posted here, > because Red Hat will tell me that I'm not using their > kernel. People here know wether or not it needs to be updated. > > In other words, erase the word "Red Hat" from my question, and > restate it "what version of nfs-utils is needed by 2.4.0test9"? > > Then I can compare with what I have regardless of dist. Look into linux/Documentation/Changes. Oh, it fails to tell about the NFS stuff. Basically, for using the NFS client, you need nothing. Just mount the volumes. For a NFS server, you need either userspace NFS server (aka unfsd), or the user space for the kernelspace one (aka knfsd). For both, you also need the RPC broker portmap running. See http://nfs.sourceforge.net/ Regards, -- Kurt Garloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Eindhoven, NL GPG key: See mail header, key servers Linux kernel development SuSE GmbH, Nuernberg, FRG SCSI, Security PGP signature
Re: NFS in 2.4.x
On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 06:22:48AM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote: On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Kurt Garloff wrote: Ask RedHat. I'm _not_ using a Red Hat kernel. That is why I posted here, because Red Hat will tell me that I'm not using their kernel. People here know wether or not it needs to be updated. In other words, erase the word "Red Hat" from my question, and restate it "what version of nfs-utils is needed by 2.4.0test9"? Then I can compare with what I have regardless of dist. Look into linux/Documentation/Changes. Oh, it fails to tell about the NFS stuff. Basically, for using the NFS client, you need nothing. Just mount the volumes. For a NFS server, you need either userspace NFS server (aka unfsd), or the user space for the kernelspace one (aka knfsd). For both, you also need the RPC broker portmap running. See http://nfs.sourceforge.net/ Regards, -- Kurt Garloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] Eindhoven, NL GPG key: See mail header, key servers Linux kernel development SuSE GmbH, Nuernberg, FRG SCSI, Security PGP signature
Re: NFS in 2.4.x
" " == Kurt Garloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Look into linux/Documentation/Changes. Oh, it fails to tell about the NFS stuff. o util-linux 2.10o # kbdrate -v The only thing missing is the nfs-utils version: the rule there is 'all versions work but nfs-utils-0.2.1 is supposed to work best'. Personally, however, I'm still using the stock nfs-utils-0.1.9.1 that you get with most distributions. Cheers, Trond - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: NFS in 2.4.x
On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Kurt Garloff wrote: In other words, erase the word "Red Hat" from my question, and restate it "what version of nfs-utils is needed by 2.4.0test9"? Then I can compare with what I have regardless of dist. Look into linux/Documentation/Changes. Oh, it fails to tell about the NFS stuff. Precisely. ;o) Basically, for using the NFS client, you need nothing. Just mount the volumes. 2.4.0test9 NFS client to 2.2.0 stock NFS server (knfsd). For a NFS server, you need either userspace NFS server (aka unfsd), or the user space for the kernelspace one (aka knfsd). For both, you also need the RPC broker portmap running. My NFS server runs fine - well as fine as stock 2.2.16 NFS gets.. I can connect from 2.2.x client, but 2.4.0test9 will not connect. I will play some more with it tomorrow, and if I still can't get it working, I'll write back with more details (logs). http://nfs.sourceforge.net/ Yep, I'll check that out too. Thanks for the tips. Take care, TTYL -- Mike A. Harris - Linux advocate - Open source advocate Computer Consultant - Capslock Consulting Copyright 2000 all rights reserved -- If you're looking for Linux books, guides, and other documentation, visit the Linux Documentation Project homepage: http://linuxdoc.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
