Re: compile error about do_softirq in 2.4.5-ac21
On Sun, 1 Jul 2001, Byeong-ryeol Kim wrote:
>On Sat, 30 Jun 2001, Keith Owens wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 30 Jun 2001 10:07:20 +0900 (KST),
>>Byeong-ryeol Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>background.c:57: `do_softirq_Rf0a529b7' undeclared (first use in \
>this function)
>>
>>Missing include in fs/jffs2/background.c. spin_unlock_bh() needs the
>>definition of do_softirq(). Against 2.4.5-ac21, will fit -ac22 as well.
>>
>>Index: 5.52/fs/jffs2/background.c
>>--- 5.52/fs/jffs2/background.c Sun, 22 Apr 2001 07:25:55 +1000 kaos
>(linux-2.4/Z/d/7_background 1.1 644)
>>+++ 5.52(w)/fs/jffs2/background.c Sat, 30 Jun 2001 14:13:12 +1000 kaos
>(linux-2.4/Z/d/7_background 1.1 644)
>>@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
>> #include
>> #include
>>+#include
>> #include
>> #include "nodelist.h"
>...
>
>Thank you.
>But, it is proved to be that jffs2/background.c includes 'linux/smp_lock.h',
>'linux/smp_lock.h' includes 'asm/smplock.h' and 'asm/smplock.h' includes
>'linux/interrupt.h'.
>Is it correct to put 'linux/interrupt.h' into jffs2/background.c in this
>situation?
...
Please, ignore my previous mail about 'linux/interrupt.h'.
I bypassed the '#ifndef CONFIG_SMP ... #endif' wrapper in linux/smp_lock.h.
...
#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
#define lock_kernel() do { } while(0)
#define unlock_kernel() do { } while(0)
#define release_kernel_lock(task, cpu) do { } while(0)
#define reacquire_kernel_lock(task) do { } while(0)
#define kernel_locked() 1
#else
#include
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
...
Thanks,
--
Where there is a will, there is a way. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For the future of you and me! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fingerprint = 1429 8AAF 8A2C 6043 DA2E BD4C 964C 2698 687D 4B7D
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: compile error about do_softirq in 2.4.5-ac21
On Sat, 30 Jun 2001, Keith Owens wrote: >On Sat, 30 Jun 2001 10:07:20 +0900 (KST), >Byeong-ryeol Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: background.c:57: `do_softirq_Rf0a529b7' undeclared (first use in \ this function) > >Missing include in fs/jffs2/background.c. spin_unlock_bh() needs the >definition of do_softirq(). Against 2.4.5-ac21, will fit -ac22 as well. > >Index: 5.52/fs/jffs2/background.c >--- 5.52/fs/jffs2/background.c Sun, 22 Apr 2001 07:25:55 +1000 kaos >(linux-2.4/Z/d/7_background 1.1 644) >+++ 5.52(w)/fs/jffs2/background.c Sat, 30 Jun 2001 14:13:12 +1000 kaos >(linux-2.4/Z/d/7_background 1.1 644) >@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ > #include > #include >+#include > #include > #include "nodelist.h" ... Thank you. But, it is proved to be that jffs2/background.c includes 'linux/smp_lock.h', 'linux/smp_lock.h' includes 'asm/smplock.h' and 'asm/smplock.h' includes 'linux/interrupt.h'. Is it correct to put 'linux/interrupt.h' into jffs2/background.c in this situation? -- Where there is a will, there is a way. [EMAIL PROTECTED] For the future of you and me! [EMAIL PROTECTED] fingerprint = 1429 8AAF 8A2C 6043 DA2E BD4C 964C 2698 687D 4B7D - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: compile error about do_softirq in 2.4.5-ac21
On Sat, 30 Jun 2001, Keith Owens wrote: On Sat, 30 Jun 2001 10:07:20 +0900 (KST), Byeong-ryeol Kim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: background.c:57: `do_softirq_Rf0a529b7' undeclared (first use in \ this function) Missing include in fs/jffs2/background.c. spin_unlock_bh() needs the definition of do_softirq(). Against 2.4.5-ac21, will fit -ac22 as well. Index: 5.52/fs/jffs2/background.c --- 5.52/fs/jffs2/background.c Sun, 22 Apr 2001 07:25:55 +1000 kaos (linux-2.4/Z/d/7_background 1.1 644) +++ 5.52(w)/fs/jffs2/background.c Sat, 30 Jun 2001 14:13:12 +1000 kaos (linux-2.4/Z/d/7_background 1.1 644) @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ #include linux/jffs2.h #include linux/mtd/mtd.h +#include linux/interrupt.h #include linux/smp_lock.h #include nodelist.h ... Thank you. But, it is proved to be that jffs2/background.c includes 'linux/smp_lock.h', 'linux/smp_lock.h' includes 'asm/smplock.h' and 'asm/smplock.h' includes 'linux/interrupt.h'. Is it correct to put 'linux/interrupt.h' into jffs2/background.c in this situation? -- Where there is a will, there is a way. [EMAIL PROTECTED] For the future of you and me! [EMAIL PROTECTED] fingerprint = 1429 8AAF 8A2C 6043 DA2E BD4C 964C 2698 687D 4B7D - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: compile error about do_softirq in 2.4.5-ac21
On Sun, 1 Jul 2001, Byeong-ryeol Kim wrote:
On Sat, 30 Jun 2001, Keith Owens wrote:
On Sat, 30 Jun 2001 10:07:20 +0900 (KST),
Byeong-ryeol Kim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
background.c:57: `do_softirq_Rf0a529b7' undeclared (first use in \
this function)
Missing include in fs/jffs2/background.c. spin_unlock_bh() needs the
definition of do_softirq(). Against 2.4.5-ac21, will fit -ac22 as well.
Index: 5.52/fs/jffs2/background.c
--- 5.52/fs/jffs2/background.c Sun, 22 Apr 2001 07:25:55 +1000 kaos
(linux-2.4/Z/d/7_background 1.1 644)
+++ 5.52(w)/fs/jffs2/background.c Sat, 30 Jun 2001 14:13:12 +1000 kaos
(linux-2.4/Z/d/7_background 1.1 644)
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
#include linux/jffs2.h
#include linux/mtd/mtd.h
+#include linux/interrupt.h
#include linux/smp_lock.h
#include nodelist.h
...
Thank you.
But, it is proved to be that jffs2/background.c includes 'linux/smp_lock.h',
'linux/smp_lock.h' includes 'asm/smplock.h' and 'asm/smplock.h' includes
'linux/interrupt.h'.
Is it correct to put 'linux/interrupt.h' into jffs2/background.c in this
situation?
...
Please, ignore my previous mail about 'linux/interrupt.h'.
I bypassed the '#ifndef CONFIG_SMP ... #endif' wrapper in linux/smp_lock.h.
...
#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
#define lock_kernel() do { } while(0)
#define unlock_kernel() do { } while(0)
#define release_kernel_lock(task, cpu) do { } while(0)
#define reacquire_kernel_lock(task) do { } while(0)
#define kernel_locked() 1
#else
#include asm/smplock.h
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
...
Thanks,
--
Where there is a will, there is a way. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For the future of you and me! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fingerprint = 1429 8AAF 8A2C 6043 DA2E BD4C 964C 2698 687D 4B7D
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
compile error about do_softirq in 2.4.5-ac21
I met following error while compiling 2.4.5-ac21: I know, of course, this error was reported several times as the compile problem of 2.4.6-preX, and there posted a patch about it by Mr. Keith Owens. I confirmed It had been applied to include/asm-i386/softirq.h of 2.4.5-ac21). But I see this in 2.4.5-ac21 again, and confused so much. I use Red Hat 7.1 (with up to latest errata updates + kernel-2.4.5-ac19, glibc-2.2.3, gcc-2.96-88, binutils-2.11.90.0.15, etc.) BTW, this error ocurred on both K6-II+ desktop(no-name) and Pentium III 500 MHZ noteboot(IBM ThkinPad 600X), and compiler was the same on both machines. Before trying to compile, I applied a patch about drivers/net/Config.in posted to this list by Mr. Keith Owens. Long lines were wrapped by me. ... make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.5-ac21/fs/jffs' make -C jffs2 modules ... gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.5-ac21/include -Wall \ -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer \ -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 \ -march=k6 -DMODULE -DMODVERSIONS \ -include /usr/src/linux-2.4.5-ac21/include/linux/modversions.h \ -c -o background.o background.c background.c: In function `jffs2_garbage_collect_trigger': background.c:57: `do_softirq_Rf0a529b7' undeclared (first use in \ this function) background.c:57: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once background.c:57: for each function it appears in.) background.c: In function `jffs2_stop_garbage_collect_thread': background.c:87: `do_softirq_Rf0a529b7' undeclared (first use in this \ function) background.c: In function `jffs2_garbage_collect_thread': background.c:141: `do_softirq_Rf0a529b7' undeclared (first use in this \ function) make[2]: *** [background.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.5-ac21/fs/jffs2' make[1]: *** [_modsubdir_jffs2] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.5-ac21/fs' make: *** [_mod_fs] Error 2 -- Where there is a will, there is a way. [EMAIL PROTECTED] For the future of you and me! [EMAIL PROTECTED] fingerprint = 1429 8AAF 8A2C 6043 DA2E BD4C 964C 2698 687D 4B7D - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
compile error about do_softirq in 2.4.5-ac21
I met following error while compiling 2.4.5-ac21: I know, of course, this error was reported several times as the compile problem of 2.4.6-preX, and there posted a patch about it by Mr. Keith Owens. I confirmed It had been applied to include/asm-i386/softirq.h of 2.4.5-ac21). But I see this in 2.4.5-ac21 again, and confused so much. I use Red Hat 7.1 (with up to latest errata updates + kernel-2.4.5-ac19, glibc-2.2.3, gcc-2.96-88, binutils-2.11.90.0.15, etc.) BTW, this error ocurred on both K6-II+ desktop(no-name) and Pentium III 500 MHZ noteboot(IBM ThkinPad 600X), and compiler was the same on both machines. Before trying to compile, I applied a patch about drivers/net/Config.in posted to this list by Mr. Keith Owens. Long lines were wrapped by me. ... make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.5-ac21/fs/jffs' make -C jffs2 modules ... gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.5-ac21/include -Wall \ -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer \ -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 \ -march=k6 -DMODULE -DMODVERSIONS \ -include /usr/src/linux-2.4.5-ac21/include/linux/modversions.h \ -c -o background.o background.c background.c: In function `jffs2_garbage_collect_trigger': background.c:57: `do_softirq_Rf0a529b7' undeclared (first use in \ this function) background.c:57: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once background.c:57: for each function it appears in.) background.c: In function `jffs2_stop_garbage_collect_thread': background.c:87: `do_softirq_Rf0a529b7' undeclared (first use in this \ function) background.c: In function `jffs2_garbage_collect_thread': background.c:141: `do_softirq_Rf0a529b7' undeclared (first use in this \ function) make[2]: *** [background.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.5-ac21/fs/jffs2' make[1]: *** [_modsubdir_jffs2] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.5-ac21/fs' make: *** [_mod_fs] Error 2 -- Where there is a will, there is a way. [EMAIL PROTECTED] For the future of you and me! [EMAIL PROTECTED] fingerprint = 1429 8AAF 8A2C 6043 DA2E BD4C 964C 2698 687D 4B7D - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
