Re: CI USB

2010-04-17 Thread Another Sillyname
On 24 January 2010 09:56, Konstantin Dimitrov kosio.dimit...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Konstantin Dimitrov
 kosio.dimit...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Manu Abraham abraham.m...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Konstantin Dimitrov
 kosio.dimit...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 1:43 AM, Manu Abraham abraham.m...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Konstantin Dimitrov
 kosio.dimit...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 1:31 AM, Manu Abraham abraham.m...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Ian Wilkinson n...@sgtwilko.f9.co.uk 
 wrote:
 HoP wrote:

 I don't know the details into the USB device, but each of those CAM's
 have bandwidth limits on them and they vary from one CAM to the other.
 Also, there is a limit on the number of simultaneous PID's that which
 you can decrypt.

 Some allow only 1 PID, some allow 3. Those are the basic CAM's for
 home usage.The most expensive CAM's allow a maximum of 24 PID's. But


 You, of course, ment number of descramblers not PIDS because it is 
 evident
 that getting TV service descrambled, you need as minimum 2 PIDS for 
 A/V.

 Anyway, it is very good note. Users, in general, don't know about it.


 If it is using a CI+ plus chip (I heard from someone that it is a CI+
 chip inside) :
 http://www.smardtv.com/index.php?page=ciplus

 After reading the CI+ specifications, I doubt that it can be supported
 under Linux with open source support, without a paired decoder
 hardware or software decoder. A paired open source software decoder
 seems highly unlikely, as the output of the CI+ module is eventually
 an encrypted stream which can be descrambled with the relevant keys.
 The TS is not supposed to be stored on disk, or that's what the whole
 concept is for CI+

 http://www.ci-plus.com/data/ci-plus_overview_v2009-07-06.pdf

 See pages 7, 8 , 12, 15

 It could be possible to pair a software decoder with a key and hence
 under Windows, but under Linux I would really doubt it, if it happens
 to be a CI+ chip

 at least in Windows Hauppage WinTV-CI USB (which is OEM version of
 SmartDTV USB CI) allows you to capture the decrypted stream to your
 hard drive (i've just tested it).


 Maybe it is not CI+ itself in the first place


 so, i can't see a reason why even if it has CI+ chip inside same
 functionally as in Windows can't be provided in Linux if someone
 developed a driver.


 It would be interesting to know what chips the hardware has  ...

 i can confirm the information here:

 * http://www.linuxtv.org/wiki/index.php/Hauppauge_WinTV-CI

 and it contains:

 * an FX2 from Cypress (CY7C68013A) and a FPGA (Actel Proasic-plus, 
 APA075-F)



 No CI+ in there ... Generic USB bridge with microcontroller and
 possibly a FPGA programmed by Hauppauge themselves, most probably. The

 no, the whole Hauppauge device is actually made by SmartDTV even on
 the board there is a title SmartDTV Rev...

 also, Terratec device is the same as Hauppauge device, they even look the 
 same:

 http://www.terratec.net/en/products/Cinergy_CI_USB_2296.html

 and Terratec driver for Windows says Copyright SmarDTV., which means
 it's made by SmarDTV.

 actually, Terratec driver for Windows is essentially the same as
 Hauppauge one, because firmware extracted from both drivers is the
 same (they update the firmware with driver updates, so matching
 versions of Terratec and Hauppauge driver is needed to check that the
 firmwares are the same).

 bridge would be similar to other DVB USB devices, Application on the
 FPGA would be more or less similar to the one found on general DVB CI
 devices.

 If it's not a Masked FPGA, it would need to load it's instructions
 some place, maybe an EEPROM or maybe from the firmware that you need
 load itself. Some part of the firmware that you load could be partly
 for the microcontroller on the USB bridge as well.

 i believe that 40 A3 firmware requests are for the USB controller

 typo, 40 A0 firmware requests are for the USB controller

 and then the subsequent 40 A3 firmware requests are to load the FPGA
 instructions through the USB controller.



 Manu


 --
 To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in
 the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
 More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


According to this page

http://www.bsc-bvba.be/linux/dvb/

the firmware load problem was solved about a month ago

What is needed in the way of resources to solve this problem?

Regards
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: CI USB

2010-01-24 Thread Manu Abraham
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Konstantin Dimitrov
kosio.dimit...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 1:43 AM, Manu Abraham abraham.m...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Konstantin Dimitrov
 kosio.dimit...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 1:31 AM, Manu Abraham abraham.m...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Ian Wilkinson n...@sgtwilko.f9.co.uk 
 wrote:
 HoP wrote:

 I don't know the details into the USB device, but each of those CAM's
 have bandwidth limits on them and they vary from one CAM to the other.
 Also, there is a limit on the number of simultaneous PID's that which
 you can decrypt.

 Some allow only 1 PID, some allow 3. Those are the basic CAM's for
 home usage.The most expensive CAM's allow a maximum of 24 PID's. But


 You, of course, ment number of descramblers not PIDS because it is evident
 that getting TV service descrambled, you need as minimum 2 PIDS for A/V.

 Anyway, it is very good note. Users, in general, don't know about it.


 If it is using a CI+ plus chip (I heard from someone that it is a CI+
 chip inside) :
 http://www.smardtv.com/index.php?page=ciplus

 After reading the CI+ specifications, I doubt that it can be supported
 under Linux with open source support, without a paired decoder
 hardware or software decoder. A paired open source software decoder
 seems highly unlikely, as the output of the CI+ module is eventually
 an encrypted stream which can be descrambled with the relevant keys.
 The TS is not supposed to be stored on disk, or that's what the whole
 concept is for CI+

 http://www.ci-plus.com/data/ci-plus_overview_v2009-07-06.pdf

 See pages 7, 8 , 12, 15

 It could be possible to pair a software decoder with a key and hence
 under Windows, but under Linux I would really doubt it, if it happens
 to be a CI+ chip

 at least in Windows Hauppage WinTV-CI USB (which is OEM version of
 SmartDTV USB CI) allows you to capture the decrypted stream to your
 hard drive (i've just tested it).


 Maybe it is not CI+ itself in the first place


 so, i can't see a reason why even if it has CI+ chip inside same
 functionally as in Windows can't be provided in Linux if someone
 developed a driver.


 It would be interesting to know what chips the hardware has  ...

 i can confirm the information here:

 * http://www.linuxtv.org/wiki/index.php/Hauppauge_WinTV-CI

 and it contains:

 * an FX2 from Cypress (CY7C68013A) and a FPGA (Actel Proasic-plus, APA075-F)



No CI+ in there ... Generic USB bridge with microcontroller and
possibly a FPGA programmed by Hauppauge themselves, most probably. The
bridge would be similar to other DVB USB devices, Application on the
FPGA would be more or less similar to the one found on general DVB CI
devices.

If it's not a Masked FPGA, it would need to load it's instructions
some place, maybe an EEPROM or maybe from the firmware that you need
load itself. Some part of the firmware that you load could be partly
for the microcontroller on the USB bridge as well.


Manu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: CI USB

2010-01-24 Thread Konstantin Dimitrov
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Manu Abraham abraham.m...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Konstantin Dimitrov
 kosio.dimit...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 1:43 AM, Manu Abraham abraham.m...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Konstantin Dimitrov
 kosio.dimit...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 1:31 AM, Manu Abraham abraham.m...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Ian Wilkinson n...@sgtwilko.f9.co.uk 
 wrote:
 HoP wrote:

 I don't know the details into the USB device, but each of those CAM's
 have bandwidth limits on them and they vary from one CAM to the other.
 Also, there is a limit on the number of simultaneous PID's that which
 you can decrypt.

 Some allow only 1 PID, some allow 3. Those are the basic CAM's for
 home usage.The most expensive CAM's allow a maximum of 24 PID's. But


 You, of course, ment number of descramblers not PIDS because it is 
 evident
 that getting TV service descrambled, you need as minimum 2 PIDS for A/V.

 Anyway, it is very good note. Users, in general, don't know about it.


 If it is using a CI+ plus chip (I heard from someone that it is a CI+
 chip inside) :
 http://www.smardtv.com/index.php?page=ciplus

 After reading the CI+ specifications, I doubt that it can be supported
 under Linux with open source support, without a paired decoder
 hardware or software decoder. A paired open source software decoder
 seems highly unlikely, as the output of the CI+ module is eventually
 an encrypted stream which can be descrambled with the relevant keys.
 The TS is not supposed to be stored on disk, or that's what the whole
 concept is for CI+

 http://www.ci-plus.com/data/ci-plus_overview_v2009-07-06.pdf

 See pages 7, 8 , 12, 15

 It could be possible to pair a software decoder with a key and hence
 under Windows, but under Linux I would really doubt it, if it happens
 to be a CI+ chip

 at least in Windows Hauppage WinTV-CI USB (which is OEM version of
 SmartDTV USB CI) allows you to capture the decrypted stream to your
 hard drive (i've just tested it).


 Maybe it is not CI+ itself in the first place


 so, i can't see a reason why even if it has CI+ chip inside same
 functionally as in Windows can't be provided in Linux if someone
 developed a driver.


 It would be interesting to know what chips the hardware has  ...

 i can confirm the information here:

 * http://www.linuxtv.org/wiki/index.php/Hauppauge_WinTV-CI

 and it contains:

 * an FX2 from Cypress (CY7C68013A) and a FPGA (Actel Proasic-plus, 
 APA075-F)



 No CI+ in there ... Generic USB bridge with microcontroller and
 possibly a FPGA programmed by Hauppauge themselves, most probably. The

no, the whole Hauppauge device is actually made by SmartDTV even on
the board there is a title SmartDTV Rev...

also, Terratec device is the same as Hauppauge device, they even look the same:

http://www.terratec.net/en/products/Cinergy_CI_USB_2296.html

and Terratec driver for Windows says Copyright SmarDTV., which means
it's made by SmarDTV.

actually, Terratec driver for Windows is essentially the same as
Hauppauge one, because firmware extracted from both drivers is the
same (they update the firmware with driver updates, so matching
versions of Terratec and Hauppauge driver is needed to check that the
firmwares are the same).

 bridge would be similar to other DVB USB devices, Application on the
 FPGA would be more or less similar to the one found on general DVB CI
 devices.

 If it's not a Masked FPGA, it would need to load it's instructions
 some place, maybe an EEPROM or maybe from the firmware that you need
 load itself. Some part of the firmware that you load could be partly
 for the microcontroller on the USB bridge as well.

i believe that 40 A3 firmware requests are for the USB controller
and then the subsequent 40 A3 firmware requests are to load the FPGA
instructions through the USB controller.



 Manu

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: CI USB

2010-01-24 Thread Konstantin Dimitrov
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Konstantin Dimitrov
kosio.dimit...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Manu Abraham abraham.m...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Konstantin Dimitrov
 kosio.dimit...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 1:43 AM, Manu Abraham abraham.m...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Konstantin Dimitrov
 kosio.dimit...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 1:31 AM, Manu Abraham abraham.m...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Ian Wilkinson n...@sgtwilko.f9.co.uk 
 wrote:
 HoP wrote:

 I don't know the details into the USB device, but each of those CAM's
 have bandwidth limits on them and they vary from one CAM to the other.
 Also, there is a limit on the number of simultaneous PID's that which
 you can decrypt.

 Some allow only 1 PID, some allow 3. Those are the basic CAM's for
 home usage.The most expensive CAM's allow a maximum of 24 PID's. But


 You, of course, ment number of descramblers not PIDS because it is 
 evident
 that getting TV service descrambled, you need as minimum 2 PIDS for A/V.

 Anyway, it is very good note. Users, in general, don't know about it.


 If it is using a CI+ plus chip (I heard from someone that it is a CI+
 chip inside) :
 http://www.smardtv.com/index.php?page=ciplus

 After reading the CI+ specifications, I doubt that it can be supported
 under Linux with open source support, without a paired decoder
 hardware or software decoder. A paired open source software decoder
 seems highly unlikely, as the output of the CI+ module is eventually
 an encrypted stream which can be descrambled with the relevant keys.
 The TS is not supposed to be stored on disk, or that's what the whole
 concept is for CI+

 http://www.ci-plus.com/data/ci-plus_overview_v2009-07-06.pdf

 See pages 7, 8 , 12, 15

 It could be possible to pair a software decoder with a key and hence
 under Windows, but under Linux I would really doubt it, if it happens
 to be a CI+ chip

 at least in Windows Hauppage WinTV-CI USB (which is OEM version of
 SmartDTV USB CI) allows you to capture the decrypted stream to your
 hard drive (i've just tested it).


 Maybe it is not CI+ itself in the first place


 so, i can't see a reason why even if it has CI+ chip inside same
 functionally as in Windows can't be provided in Linux if someone
 developed a driver.


 It would be interesting to know what chips the hardware has  ...

 i can confirm the information here:

 * http://www.linuxtv.org/wiki/index.php/Hauppauge_WinTV-CI

 and it contains:

 * an FX2 from Cypress (CY7C68013A) and a FPGA (Actel Proasic-plus, 
 APA075-F)



 No CI+ in there ... Generic USB bridge with microcontroller and
 possibly a FPGA programmed by Hauppauge themselves, most probably. The

 no, the whole Hauppauge device is actually made by SmartDTV even on
 the board there is a title SmartDTV Rev...

 also, Terratec device is the same as Hauppauge device, they even look the 
 same:

 http://www.terratec.net/en/products/Cinergy_CI_USB_2296.html

 and Terratec driver for Windows says Copyright SmarDTV., which means
 it's made by SmarDTV.

 actually, Terratec driver for Windows is essentially the same as
 Hauppauge one, because firmware extracted from both drivers is the
 same (they update the firmware with driver updates, so matching
 versions of Terratec and Hauppauge driver is needed to check that the
 firmwares are the same).

 bridge would be similar to other DVB USB devices, Application on the
 FPGA would be more or less similar to the one found on general DVB CI
 devices.

 If it's not a Masked FPGA, it would need to load it's instructions
 some place, maybe an EEPROM or maybe from the firmware that you need
 load itself. Some part of the firmware that you load could be partly
 for the microcontroller on the USB bridge as well.

 i believe that 40 A3 firmware requests are for the USB controller

typo, 40 A0 firmware requests are for the USB controller

 and then the subsequent 40 A3 firmware requests are to load the FPGA
 instructions through the USB controller.



 Manu


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: CI USB

2010-01-23 Thread Konstantin Dimitrov
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 1:31 AM, Manu Abraham abraham.m...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Ian Wilkinson n...@sgtwilko.f9.co.uk wrote:
 HoP wrote:

 I don't know the details into the USB device, but each of those CAM's
 have bandwidth limits on them and they vary from one CAM to the other.
 Also, there is a limit on the number of simultaneous PID's that which
 you can decrypt.

 Some allow only 1 PID, some allow 3. Those are the basic CAM's for
 home usage.The most expensive CAM's allow a maximum of 24 PID's. But


 You, of course, ment number of descramblers not PIDS because it is evident
 that getting TV service descrambled, you need as minimum 2 PIDS for A/V.

 Anyway, it is very good note. Users, in general, don't know about it.


 If it is using a CI+ plus chip (I heard from someone that it is a CI+
 chip inside) :
 http://www.smardtv.com/index.php?page=ciplus

 After reading the CI+ specifications, I doubt that it can be supported
 under Linux with open source support, without a paired decoder
 hardware or software decoder. A paired open source software decoder
 seems highly unlikely, as the output of the CI+ module is eventually
 an encrypted stream which can be descrambled with the relevant keys.
 The TS is not supposed to be stored on disk, or that's what the whole
 concept is for CI+

 http://www.ci-plus.com/data/ci-plus_overview_v2009-07-06.pdf

 See pages 7, 8 , 12, 15

 It could be possible to pair a software decoder with a key and hence
 under Windows, but under Linux I would really doubt it, if it happens
 to be a CI+ chip

at least in Windows Hauppage WinTV-CI USB (which is OEM version of
SmartDTV USB CI) allows you to capture the decrypted stream to your
hard drive (i've just tested it).

so, i can't see a reason why even if it has CI+ chip inside same
functionally as in Windows can't be provided in Linux if someone
developed a driver.


 Regards,
 Manu
 --
 To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in
 the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
 More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: CI USB

2010-01-23 Thread Manu Abraham
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Konstantin Dimitrov
kosio.dimit...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 1:31 AM, Manu Abraham abraham.m...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Ian Wilkinson n...@sgtwilko.f9.co.uk 
 wrote:
 HoP wrote:

 I don't know the details into the USB device, but each of those CAM's
 have bandwidth limits on them and they vary from one CAM to the other.
 Also, there is a limit on the number of simultaneous PID's that which
 you can decrypt.

 Some allow only 1 PID, some allow 3. Those are the basic CAM's for
 home usage.The most expensive CAM's allow a maximum of 24 PID's. But


 You, of course, ment number of descramblers not PIDS because it is evident
 that getting TV service descrambled, you need as minimum 2 PIDS for A/V.

 Anyway, it is very good note. Users, in general, don't know about it.


 If it is using a CI+ plus chip (I heard from someone that it is a CI+
 chip inside) :
 http://www.smardtv.com/index.php?page=ciplus

 After reading the CI+ specifications, I doubt that it can be supported
 under Linux with open source support, without a paired decoder
 hardware or software decoder. A paired open source software decoder
 seems highly unlikely, as the output of the CI+ module is eventually
 an encrypted stream which can be descrambled with the relevant keys.
 The TS is not supposed to be stored on disk, or that's what the whole
 concept is for CI+

 http://www.ci-plus.com/data/ci-plus_overview_v2009-07-06.pdf

 See pages 7, 8 , 12, 15

 It could be possible to pair a software decoder with a key and hence
 under Windows, but under Linux I would really doubt it, if it happens
 to be a CI+ chip

 at least in Windows Hauppage WinTV-CI USB (which is OEM version of
 SmartDTV USB CI) allows you to capture the decrypted stream to your
 hard drive (i've just tested it).


Maybe it is not CI+ itself in the first place


 so, i can't see a reason why even if it has CI+ chip inside same
 functionally as in Windows can't be provided in Linux if someone
 developed a driver.


It would be interesting to know what chips the hardware has  ...

Regards,
Manu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: CI USB

2010-01-23 Thread Konstantin Dimitrov
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 1:43 AM, Manu Abraham abraham.m...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Konstantin Dimitrov
 kosio.dimit...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 1:31 AM, Manu Abraham abraham.m...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Ian Wilkinson n...@sgtwilko.f9.co.uk 
 wrote:
 HoP wrote:

 I don't know the details into the USB device, but each of those CAM's
 have bandwidth limits on them and they vary from one CAM to the other.
 Also, there is a limit on the number of simultaneous PID's that which
 you can decrypt.

 Some allow only 1 PID, some allow 3. Those are the basic CAM's for
 home usage.The most expensive CAM's allow a maximum of 24 PID's. But


 You, of course, ment number of descramblers not PIDS because it is evident
 that getting TV service descrambled, you need as minimum 2 PIDS for A/V.

 Anyway, it is very good note. Users, in general, don't know about it.


 If it is using a CI+ plus chip (I heard from someone that it is a CI+
 chip inside) :
 http://www.smardtv.com/index.php?page=ciplus

 After reading the CI+ specifications, I doubt that it can be supported
 under Linux with open source support, without a paired decoder
 hardware or software decoder. A paired open source software decoder
 seems highly unlikely, as the output of the CI+ module is eventually
 an encrypted stream which can be descrambled with the relevant keys.
 The TS is not supposed to be stored on disk, or that's what the whole
 concept is for CI+

 http://www.ci-plus.com/data/ci-plus_overview_v2009-07-06.pdf

 See pages 7, 8 , 12, 15

 It could be possible to pair a software decoder with a key and hence
 under Windows, but under Linux I would really doubt it, if it happens
 to be a CI+ chip

 at least in Windows Hauppage WinTV-CI USB (which is OEM version of
 SmartDTV USB CI) allows you to capture the decrypted stream to your
 hard drive (i've just tested it).


 Maybe it is not CI+ itself in the first place


 so, i can't see a reason why even if it has CI+ chip inside same
 functionally as in Windows can't be provided in Linux if someone
 developed a driver.


 It would be interesting to know what chips the hardware has  ...

i can confirm the information here:

* http://www.linuxtv.org/wiki/index.php/Hauppauge_WinTV-CI

and it contains:

* an FX2 from Cypress (CY7C68013A) and a FPGA (Actel Proasic-plus, APA075-F)

also, i can confirm that firmware extractor here:

http://www.bsc-bvba.be/linux/dvb/

is correct at least for A2 hardware (but A1 hardware is no longer in
production anyway), because a long time ago i verified with spying the
USB traffic what firmware is uploaded in Windows for A2 hardware and
informed Luc Brosens and he fixed his firmware extractor tool.

however, it seems that the main problem as it's mentioned by Luc
Brosens is why firmware upload fails in Linux, because according to
Steven Toth words:

* http://www.linuxtv.org/pipermail/linux-dvb/2008-April/025284.html

* I also looked at the USB traffic on the current Hauppauge driver, with a
* cam inserted and decryption happening. The protocol appears pretty simple.

after the firmware is uploaded is easy to figure out how to send
commands to the device.


 Regards,
 Manu

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: CI USB

2010-01-22 Thread Manu Abraham
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Ian Wilkinson n...@sgtwilko.f9.co.uk wrote:
 HoP wrote:

 I don't know the details into the USB device, but each of those CAM's
 have bandwidth limits on them and they vary from one CAM to the other.
 Also, there is a limit on the number of simultaneous PID's that which
 you can decrypt.

 Some allow only 1 PID, some allow 3. Those are the basic CAM's for
 home usage.The most expensive CAM's allow a maximum of 24 PID's. But


 You, of course, ment number of descramblers not PIDS because it is evident
 that getting TV service descrambled, you need as minimum 2 PIDS for A/V.

 Anyway, it is very good note. Users, in general, don't know about it.


If it is using a CI+ plus chip (I heard from someone that it is a CI+
chip inside) :
http://www.smardtv.com/index.php?page=ciplus

After reading the CI+ specifications, I doubt that it can be supported
under Linux with open source support, without a paired decoder
hardware or software decoder. A paired open source software decoder
seems highly unlikely, as the output of the CI+ module is eventually
an encrypted stream which can be descrambled with the relevant keys.
The TS is not supposed to be stored on disk, or that's what the whole
concept is for CI+

http://www.ci-plus.com/data/ci-plus_overview_v2009-07-06.pdf

See pages 7, 8 , 12, 15

It could be possible to pair a software decoder with a key and hence
under Windows, but under Linux I would really doubt it, if it happens
to be a CI+ chip

Regards,
Manu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: CI USB

2010-01-18 Thread Emmanuel

HoP a écrit :

I don't know the details into the USB device, but each of those CAM's
have bandwidth limits on them and they vary from one CAM to the other.
Also, there is a limit on the number of simultaneous PID's that which
you can decrypt.

Some allow only 1 PID, some allow 3. Those are the basic CAM's for
home usage.The most expensive CAM's allow a maximum of 24 PID's. But



You, of course, ment number of descramblers not PIDS because it is evident
that getting TV service descrambled, you need as minimum 2 PIDS for A/V.

Anyway, it is very good note. Users, in general, don't know about it.

/Honza
  
Just a quick note here: you might want to post to the mythtv ML and the 
VDR one also (probably others but I dont know them off hand) and see how 
people feel about this. My guess is that quite a few potential users are 
on these ML, and the CI threads are recurrent there because of good 
dvb-s cards but without CI support.
A usb-CI or equivalent HW + good drivers would allow people to pick the 
dvb-s(2) cards without worrying about CI support.

HTH
Bye
Manu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: CI USB

2010-01-10 Thread Emmanuel

Markus Rechberger a écrit :

On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 11:55 PM, HoP jpetr...@gmail.com wrote:
  

Hi Jonas



Does anyone know if there's any progress on USB CI adapter support?
Last posts I can find are from 2008 (Terratec Cinergy CI USB 
Hauppauge WinTV-CI).

That attempt seems to have stranded with Luc Brosens (who gave it a
shot back then) asking for help.

The chip manufacturer introduced a usb stick as well;
http://www.smardtv.com/index.php?page=products_listingrubrique=pctvsection=usbcam
but besides the scary Vista logo on that page, it looks like they
target broadcast companies only and not end users.

  

You are right. Seems DVB CI stick is not targeted to end consumers.

Anyway, it looks interesting, even it requires additional DVB tuner
somewhere in the pc what means duplicated traffic (to the CI stick
for descrambling and back for mpeg a/v decoding).

It would be nice to see such stuff working in linux, but because of
market targeting i don' t expect that.

BTW, Hauppauge's WinTV-CI looked much more promissing.
At least when I started reading whole thread about it here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-...@linuxtv.org/msg28113.html

Unfortunatelly, last Steve's note about not getting anything
(even any answer) has disappointed me fully. And because
google is quiet about any progress on it I pressume
no any docu nor driver was released later on.




The question is more or less how many people are interested in USB CI
support for Linux.
We basically have everything to provide a USB CI solution for linux now.

Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
  


Well I dont know for others but it really looks interesting as you can 
have multiple cards with only one CI, meaning only one CAM and only one 
subscription card which is economically interesting.
Also some card (at least for DVB-S) are really good but targeted towards 
free channels, and in France for example, alot of good channels are not.

If the price is right (tm) I am sure a lot of people would be interested.
Bye
Manu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: CI USB

2010-01-10 Thread Manu Abraham
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Emmanuel eall...@gmail.com wrote:
 Markus Rechberger a écrit :

 On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 11:55 PM, HoP jpetr...@gmail.com wrote:


 Hi Jonas



 Does anyone know if there's any progress on USB CI adapter support?
 Last posts I can find are from 2008 (Terratec Cinergy CI USB 
 Hauppauge WinTV-CI).

 That attempt seems to have stranded with Luc Brosens (who gave it a
 shot back then) asking for help.

 The chip manufacturer introduced a usb stick as well;

 http://www.smardtv.com/index.php?page=products_listingrubrique=pctvsection=usbcam
 but besides the scary Vista logo on that page, it looks like they
 target broadcast companies only and not end users.



 You are right. Seems DVB CI stick is not targeted to end consumers.

 Anyway, it looks interesting, even it requires additional DVB tuner
 somewhere in the pc what means duplicated traffic (to the CI stick
 for descrambling and back for mpeg a/v decoding).

 It would be nice to see such stuff working in linux, but because of
 market targeting i don' t expect that.

 BTW, Hauppauge's WinTV-CI looked much more promissing.
 At least when I started reading whole thread about it here:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-...@linuxtv.org/msg28113.html

 Unfortunatelly, last Steve's note about not getting anything
 (even any answer) has disappointed me fully. And because
 google is quiet about any progress on it I pressume
 no any docu nor driver was released later on.



 The question is more or less how many people are interested in USB CI
 support for Linux.
 We basically have everything to provide a USB CI solution for linux now.

 Markus
 --
 To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in
 the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
 More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


 Well I dont know for others but it really looks interesting as you can have
 multiple cards with only one CI, meaning only one CAM and only one
 subscription card which is economically interesting.


I don't know the details into the USB device, but each of those CAM's
have bandwidth limits on them and they vary from one CAM to the other.
Also, there is a limit on the number of simultaneous PID's that which
you can decrypt.

Some allow only 1 PID, some allow 3. Those are the basic CAM's for
home usage.The most expensive CAM's allow a maximum of 24 PID's. But
then you would be better of buying multiple CAM's for a home use
purpose.



 Also some card (at least for DVB-S) are really good but targeted towards
 free channels, and in France for example, alot of good channels are not.
 If the price is right (tm) I am sure a lot of people would be interested.
 Bye
 Manu


Regards,
Mmanu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: CI USB

2010-01-10 Thread HoP
 I don't know the details into the USB device, but each of those CAM's
 have bandwidth limits on them and they vary from one CAM to the other.
 Also, there is a limit on the number of simultaneous PID's that which
 you can decrypt.

 Some allow only 1 PID, some allow 3. Those are the basic CAM's for
 home usage.The most expensive CAM's allow a maximum of 24 PID's. But

You, of course, ment number of descramblers not PIDS because it is evident
that getting TV service descrambled, you need as minimum 2 PIDS for A/V.

Anyway, it is very good note. Users, in general, don't know about it.

/Honza
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: CI USB

2010-01-10 Thread Ian Wilkinson
HoP wrote:
 I don't know the details into the USB device, but each of those CAM's
 have bandwidth limits on them and they vary from one CAM to the other.
 Also, there is a limit on the number of simultaneous PID's that which
 you can decrypt.

 Some allow only 1 PID, some allow 3. Those are the basic CAM's for
 home usage.The most expensive CAM's allow a maximum of 24 PID's. But
 

 You, of course, ment number of descramblers not PIDS because it is evident
 that getting TV service descrambled, you need as minimum 2 PIDS for A/V.

 Anyway, it is very good note. Users, in general, don't know about it.
   
Hiya,

I've been reading this mailing list with regards to using a USB CI, but
hadn't found anything to help until I found the posts from Luc and Steve
sometime ago about getting the WinTV-CI to work under Linux.

Coincidently, at the end of last year I had e-mailed Luc about the
WinTV-CI, to see if I can help.
I'm in the process of purchasing some hardware to start testing.

He had managed to grab the firmware from the Windows driver but had so
far been unable to get it to load correctly in his new driver.


Regards,

Ian Wilkinson
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: CI USB]

2010-01-10 Thread Johan

Manu Abraham wrote:

On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Emmanuel eall...@gmail.com wrote:
 

Markus Rechberger a écrit :
   

On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 11:55 PM, HoP jpetr...@gmail.com wrote:

 

Hi Jonas


   

Does anyone know if there's any progress on USB CI adapter support?
Last posts I can find are from 2008 (Terratec Cinergy CI USB 
Hauppauge WinTV-CI).

That attempt seems to have stranded with Luc Brosens (who gave it a
shot back then) asking for help.

The chip manufacturer introduced a usb stick as well;

http://www.smardtv.com/index.php?page=products_listingrubrique=pctvsection=usbcam 


but besides the scary Vista logo on that page, it looks like they
target broadcast companies only and not end users.


  

You are right. Seems DVB CI stick is not targeted to end consumers.

Anyway, it looks interesting, even it requires additional DVB tuner
somewhere in the pc what means duplicated traffic (to the CI stick
for descrambling and back for mpeg a/v decoding).

It would be nice to see such stuff working in linux, but because of
market targeting i don' t expect that.

BTW, Hauppauge's WinTV-CI looked much more promissing.
At least when I started reading whole thread about it here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-...@linuxtv.org/msg28113.html

Unfortunatelly, last Steve's note about not getting anything
(even any answer) has disappointed me fully. And because
google is quiet about any progress on it I pressume
no any docu nor driver was released later on.




The question is more or less how many people are interested in USB CI
support for Linux.
We basically have everything to provide a USB CI solution for linux 
now.


Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe 
linux-media in

the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  
Well I dont know for others but it really looks interesting as you 
can have

multiple cards with only one CI, meaning only one CAM and only one
subscription card which is economically interesting.




I don't know the details into the USB device, but each of those CAM's
have bandwidth limits on them and they vary from one CAM to the other.
Also, there is a limit on the number of simultaneous PID's that which
you can decrypt.

Some allow only 1 PID, some allow 3. Those are the basic CAM's for
home usage.The most expensive CAM's allow a maximum of 24 PID's. But
then you would be better of buying multiple CAM's for a home use
purpose.



 

Also some card (at least for DVB-S) are really good but targeted towards
free channels, and in France for example, alot of good channels are not.
If the price is right (tm) I am sure a lot of people would be 
interested.

Bye
Manu




Regards,
Mmanu
  
Here in Belgium and the Netherlands all channels are encrypted and 
besides the economics, I have very little possibility to view those 
channels.
(not since my nexus-S with dual CI is not keeping up with the latest 
developments anymore).


I now own a HVR4000, but Hauppauge are only supporting the USB CI for 
all new cards and apparently dropped the flatcable direct connection to 
a CI interface.
There is software available to use a USB cardreader, which I am using 
now. This software however permits illegal distribution of keys as well.


Interesting though is that this software doesn't use the official CI, 
nor a CAM, but a generic USB smartcard reader.
If a solution could be developed, which is manufacturer independent, 
does not use a CAM and does not permit illegal use that would be great...


regards,

Johan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: CI USB

2010-01-10 Thread Emmanuel

Manu Abraham a écrit :

On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Emmanuel eall...@gmail.com wrote:
  

Markus Rechberger a écrit :


On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 11:55 PM, HoP jpetr...@gmail.com wrote:

  

Hi Jonas




Does anyone know if there's any progress on USB CI adapter support?
Last posts I can find are from 2008 (Terratec Cinergy CI USB 
Hauppauge WinTV-CI).

That attempt seems to have stranded with Luc Brosens (who gave it a
shot back then) asking for help.

The chip manufacturer introduced a usb stick as well;

http://www.smardtv.com/index.php?page=products_listingrubrique=pctvsection=usbcam
but besides the scary Vista logo on that page, it looks like they
target broadcast companies only and not end users.


  

You are right. Seems DVB CI stick is not targeted to end consumers.

Anyway, it looks interesting, even it requires additional DVB tuner
somewhere in the pc what means duplicated traffic (to the CI stick
for descrambling and back for mpeg a/v decoding).

It would be nice to see such stuff working in linux, but because of
market targeting i don' t expect that.

BTW, Hauppauge's WinTV-CI looked much more promissing.
At least when I started reading whole thread about it here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-...@linuxtv.org/msg28113.html

Unfortunatelly, last Steve's note about not getting anything
(even any answer) has disappointed me fully. And because
google is quiet about any progress on it I pressume
no any docu nor driver was released later on.




The question is more or less how many people are interested in USB CI
support for Linux.
We basically have everything to provide a USB CI solution for linux now.

Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  

Well I dont know for others but it really looks interesting as you can have
multiple cards with only one CI, meaning only one CAM and only one
subscription card which is economically interesting.




I don't know the details into the USB device, but each of those CAM's
have bandwidth limits on them and they vary from one CAM to the other.
Also, there is a limit on the number of simultaneous PID's that which
you can decrypt.

Some allow only 1 PID, some allow 3. Those are the basic CAM's for
home usage.The most expensive CAM's allow a maximum of 24 PID's. But
then you would be better of buying multiple CAM's for a home use
purpose.
  
Well  my Astoncrypt is able to descramble 2 channels simultanueously, 
but here the good thing would be that you could descramble after the 
recording, so that you would be able for example to capture 4 channels 
on the same transponder only to descramble one by one later on.

Bye
Manu

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: CI USB

2010-01-09 Thread Markus Rechberger
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 11:55 PM, HoP jpetr...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi Jonas

 Does anyone know if there's any progress on USB CI adapter support?
 Last posts I can find are from 2008 (Terratec Cinergy CI USB 
 Hauppauge WinTV-CI).

 That attempt seems to have stranded with Luc Brosens (who gave it a
 shot back then) asking for help.

 The chip manufacturer introduced a usb stick as well;
 http://www.smardtv.com/index.php?page=products_listingrubrique=pctvsection=usbcam
 but besides the scary Vista logo on that page, it looks like they
 target broadcast companies only and not end users.


 You are right. Seems DVB CI stick is not targeted to end consumers.

 Anyway, it looks interesting, even it requires additional DVB tuner
 somewhere in the pc what means duplicated traffic (to the CI stick
 for descrambling and back for mpeg a/v decoding).

 It would be nice to see such stuff working in linux, but because of
 market targeting i don' t expect that.

 BTW, Hauppauge's WinTV-CI looked much more promissing.
 At least when I started reading whole thread about it here:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-...@linuxtv.org/msg28113.html

 Unfortunatelly, last Steve's note about not getting anything
 (even any answer) has disappointed me fully. And because
 google is quiet about any progress on it I pressume
 no any docu nor driver was released later on.


The question is more or less how many people are interested in USB CI
support for Linux.
We basically have everything to provide a USB CI solution for linux now.

Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: CI USB

2010-01-04 Thread Steven Toth
 BTW, Hauppauge's WinTV-CI looked much more promissing.
 At least when I started reading whole thread about it here:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-...@linuxtv.org/msg28113.html

 Unfortunatelly, last Steve's note about not getting anything
 (even any answer) has disappointed me fully. And because
 google is quiet about any progress on it I pressume
 no any docu nor driver was released later on.

The whole project went badly wrong when the hardware vendor promised
documentation then failed to deliver. My mistake for trusting them in
the first place.

I had considered running a driver reverse engineering tutorial project
via kernellabs.com. Perhaps a 4 part series of writings, tools and
instructions that describe how to reverse engineer USB drivers and
culminates in a working skeleton driver for the WinTV CI that could be
used. I doubt I could make this happen without a project sponsor so if
you know any companies that would be willing to sponsor a project like
this then I'd certainly be interested in helping.

Regards,

-- 
Steven Toth - Kernel Labs
http://www.kernellabs.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: CI USB

2010-01-02 Thread HoP
Hi Jonas

 Does anyone know if there's any progress on USB CI adapter support?
 Last posts I can find are from 2008 (Terratec Cinergy CI USB 
 Hauppauge WinTV-CI).

 That attempt seems to have stranded with Luc Brosens (who gave it a
 shot back then) asking for help.

 The chip manufacturer introduced a usb stick as well;
 http://www.smardtv.com/index.php?page=products_listingrubrique=pctvsection=usbcam
 but besides the scary Vista logo on that page, it looks like they
 target broadcast companies only and not end users.


You are right. Seems DVB CI stick is not targeted to end consumers.

Anyway, it looks interesting, even it requires additional DVB tuner
somewhere in the pc what means duplicated traffic (to the CI stick
for descrambling and back for mpeg a/v decoding).

It would be nice to see such stuff working in linux, but because of
market targeting i don' t expect that.

BTW, Hauppauge's WinTV-CI looked much more promissing.
At least when I started reading whole thread about it here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-...@linuxtv.org/msg28113.html

Unfortunatelly, last Steve's note about not getting anything
(even any answer) has disappointed me fully. And because
google is quiet about any progress on it I pressume
no any docu nor driver was released later on.

/Honza
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html