get your money from the RIAA
http://www.musiccdsettlement.com/english/default.htm seems as part of a settlement, most of us are entitled to a check from the RIAA for price-fixing audio CDs in the USA. If you bought an audio CD from a retail outlet between January 1, 1995 and December 22, 2000, they owe you money! -- Doug Hunley ODJFS DNS/Linux/Unix Admin These 3 guys walk into a bar. You'd think one of them would have ducked ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
RE: knowledge base software
Net Llama! mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] typed thusly on Wednesday, January 08, 2003 7:07 PM: Can anyone recommend knowledge base software? I'm looking for something web based that stores articles of commonly found problems in categories that are all indexed so that you can easily search through it. Actually, if you can define the categories, this sounds incredibly easy to write (in Perl, anyway, using DBI and DBD::Pg to a PostgreSQL backend). If you don't find anything, and I get some time after this weekend, I could probably whip something up in a few hours. The important thing is that you properly define the categories you need (and the size of those fields -- and IIRC, BLOBS can't be indexed). I dunno about BLOBS, but CLOBs can (at least under Oracle, not that this is a requirement or anything). Anyhoo, that's might generous of you to offer, but unfortunately, this project is no where near organized enough for me to have well defined categories (or anything else) yet. Also, this is for work, so i don't think you'd want to be volunteering your time for something that is going into a company. Lonnie, You might check out http://www.wiki.org. It is a collaborative site construction tool that allows users to add/modify articles. In Harmony's Way, and In A Chord, Tom :-}) Thomas A. Condon Barbershop Bass Singer Registered Linux User #154358 A Jester Unemployed ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Updated Step
Douglas Hunley has just updated http://www.linux-sxs.org/databases.html to incorporate the following: Updated to include a link to instructions on upgrading Berkeley DB ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: [suggestion] db.html
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Net Llama! spewed electrons into the ether that resembled: On 01/07/03 11:28, Douglas J Hunley wrote: the gcc_notes are my content from hunley.homeip.net . they are not part of the site (yet) How hard could/would it be to make them so? Seriously, why weren't they a part of the SxS from day 1? dude.. there's tons of stuff in my http://hunley.homeip.net/linux_sources/ directory that is not in the site. why? cause it's usually just a './configure' command . seemed like it wasn't worth it - -- Douglas J Hunley (doug at linux-sxs.org) - Linux User #174778 Admin: Linux StepByStep - http://www.linux-sxs.org and http://jobs.linux-sxs.org There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home. - --Ken Olson, president, chairman and founder of Digital Equipment Corp., 1977 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+Hado2MO5UukaubkRAmN1AJ9HlRU5Ad2jubyduN2fXFj9BoobzwCfeDb7 11D1dB3eLteZeFGl064UhSw= =6Xmy -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: mtrr setup?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David A. Bandel spewed electrons into the ether that resembled: reg00: base=0x ( 0MB), size=2048MB; write-back, count=1 you have 2Gb of memory? yep :) reg00: base=0x ( 0MB), size= 256MB: write-back, count=1 reg01: base=0xe400 (3648MB), size= 64MB: write-combining, count=1 reg02: base=0xdc00 (3520MB), size= 4MB: write-combining, count=1 IIRC, you can only have one write-back entry, the rest will be write-combining. Do you have other entries? Those others are the ones what I pasted is the only entry - -- Douglas J Hunley (doug at linux-sxs.org) - Linux User #174778 Admin: Linux StepByStep - http://www.linux-sxs.org and http://jobs.linux-sxs.org There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home. - --Ken Olson, president, chairman and founder of Digital Equipment Corp., 1977 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+HanD2MO5UukaubkRAqR1AJ4nKZmpGNGJc2zqF0O2wUZ0D0F7dwCeJiDB Il4yGPNVeqO2YbrpF7O7C7g= =IFhi -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Mozilla mail question
Hi all, Before I state my problem, I want to apologize for this not being a linux only question. But I thought that some of you might have experienced this problem. Ok, here goes: At my job most folks use MS Outlook for email and generally format their email in HTML. I use Mozilla connecting to the exchange server which is POP. I like mozilla much better, with its color coding of the inbox, etc. When I receive outlook html formatted email, it looks like plain text in mozilla. This is a real problem because in lengthy conversations, it becomes much more difficult to follow since color coding and font changes may be used. I have tried saving an Outlook mail that I've sent as html and then reading it with mozilla, and it looks fine. This leads me to believe that the html produced by outlook is readable by mozilla. When I read email that I've sent (formatted as html), it looks fine in both outlook and mozilla. I've searched the mozilla preferces over and over to see if there is some kind of setting, but don't see anything. Does anyone have any idea what mozilla could be doing? BTW, I tried Kmail and it has the same problem! So it could be something in outlook? Ideas of where I could start to look would be welcome. TIA = _ Susan Macchia mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ - Running Linux - because life is too short for reboots... ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
RE: Mozilla mail question
Susan Macchia mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] typed thusly on Thursday, January 09, 2003 9:14 AM: At my job most folks use MS Outlook for email and generally format their email in HTML. A serious symptom of their single digit IQs. I use Mozilla connecting to the exchange server which is POP. I like mozilla much better, with its color coding of the inbox, etc. When I receive outlook html formatted email, it looks like plain text in mozilla. This is a real problem because in lengthy conversations, it becomes much more difficult to follow since color coding and font changes may be used. I have tried saving an Outlook mail that I've sent as html and then reading it with mozilla, and it looks fine. This leads me to believe that the html produced by outlook is readable by mozilla. When I read email that I've sent (formatted as html), it looks fine in both outlook and mozilla. I've searched the mozilla preferces over and over to see if there is some kind of setting, but don't see anything. Does anyone have any idea what mozilla could be doing? BTW, I tried Kmail and it has the same problem! So it could be something in outlook? Ideas of where I could start to look would be welcome. If I could spell in French as well as I speak it I'd say the equivalent of What a concept! (pronounced as: kell eeday). Of course it is something in Outlook. M$ *NEVER* follows the standards, even of something as simple as HTML. The simplest solution is to tell them that you only read text messages and trash can anything in HTML. However, that is not the easiest, since you'd have to change their bad habits. The easiest solution is to save the html message (displayed as text) to a file as a text message and then change the extension to .html and open it with any browser. The solution they would prefer is to have you use Outhouse (like the rest of the drones) and set your email to full html all the time. Which, of course, only works if you get the frontal lobotomy with it. The funniest solution is to change the font to Greek and return the message to them with a comment that it is all Greek to you. Since they have all the bells and whistles turned on in Outhouse they will see it as Greek characters and it may take some of them days to realize what is wrong. Hmm. Perhaps I've been reading too much BOFH lately. In Harmony's Way, and In A Chord, Tom :-}) Thomas A. Condon Barbershop Bass Singer Registered Linux User #154358 A Jester Unemployed ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Mozilla mail question
On 1/9/2003 12:13 PM, someone claiming to be Susan Macchia wrote: Hi all, Before I state my problem, I want to apologize for this not being a linux only question. But I thought that some of you might have experienced this problem. Ok, here goes: At my job most folks use MS Outlook for email and generally format their email in HTML. I use Mozilla connecting to the exchange server which is POP. I like mozilla much better, with its color coding of the inbox, etc. When I receive outlook html formatted email, it looks like plain text in mozilla. This is a real problem because in lengthy conversations, it becomes much more difficult to follow since color coding and font changes may be used. I have tried saving an Outlook mail that I've sent as html and then reading it with mozilla, and it looks fine. This leads me to believe that the html produced by outlook is readable by mozilla. When I read email that I've sent (formatted as html), it looks fine in both outlook and mozilla. I've searched the mozilla preferces over and over to see if there is some kind of setting, but don't see anything. Does anyone have any idea what mozilla could be doing? BTW, I tried Kmail and it has the same problem! So it could be something in outlook? Ideas of where I could start to look would be welcome. TIA Depending on the Mozilla version... View-Message Body As-choose to suit from the Mail window. I've got mine to view as plain text, but when viewed as HTML it works fine... I'm using a current Mozilla nightly, which would place it at version 1.3a+ HTH, Tim ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: [suggestion] db.html
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Douglas J Hunley wrote: Net Llama! spewed electrons into the ether that resembled: On 01/07/03 11:28, Douglas J Hunley wrote: the gcc_notes are my content from hunley.homeip.net . they are not part of the site (yet) How hard could/would it be to make them so? Seriously, why weren't they a part of the SxS from day 1? dude.. there's tons of stuff in my http://hunley.homeip.net/linux_sources/ directory that is not in the site. why? cause it's usually just a './configure' command . seemed like it wasn't worth it But i guess its not obvious to some folks, if they're making inquiries. -- ~~ Lonni J Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step TyGeMo http://netllama.ipfox.com ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Mozilla mail question
On 1/9/2003 12:13 PM, someone claiming to be Susan Macchia wrote: Hi all, Before I state my problem, I want to apologize for this not being a linux only question. But I thought that some of you might have experienced this problem. Ok, here goes: At my job most folks use MS Outlook for email and generally format their email in HTML. I use Mozilla connecting to the exchange server which is POP. I like mozilla much better, with its color coding of the inbox, etc. When I receive outlook html formatted email, it looks like plain text in mozilla. This is a real problem because in lengthy conversations, it becomes much more difficult to follow since color coding and font changes may be used. I have tried saving an Outlook mail that I've sent as html and then reading it with mozilla, and it looks fine. This leads me to believe that the html produced by outlook is readable by mozilla. When I read email that I've sent (formatted as html), it looks fine in both outlook and mozilla. I've searched the mozilla preferces over and over to see if there is some kind of setting, but don't see anything. Does anyone have any idea what mozilla could be doing? BTW, I tried Kmail and it has the same problem! So it could be something in outlook? Ideas of where I could start to look would be welcome. TIA Depending on the Mozilla version... View-Message Body As-choose to suit from the Mail window. I've got mine to view as plain text, but when viewed as HTML it works fine... I'm using a current Mozilla nightly, which would place it at version 1.3a+ HTH, Tim I've tried that and I still don't see the email as originally formatted. As I said before, If I save the email in outlook as html, mozilla views it just fine (even as an attachment). I am running 1.3a, but have had this problem since 1.1... Thanks. Any other ideas? = _ Susan Macchia mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ - Running Linux - because life is too short for reboots... ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Mozilla mail question
On 1/9/2003 1:41 PM, someone claiming to be Susan Macchia wrote: On 1/9/2003 12:13 PM, someone claiming to be Susan Macchia wrote: Hi all, Before I state my problem, I want to apologize for this not being a linux only question. But I thought that some of you might have experienced this problem. Ok, here goes: At my job most folks use MS Outlook for email and generally format their email in HTML. I use Mozilla connecting to the exchange server which is POP. I like mozilla much better, with its color coding of the inbox, etc. When I receive outlook html formatted email, it looks like plain text in mozilla. This is a real problem because in lengthy conversations, it becomes much more difficult to follow since color coding and font changes may be used. I have tried saving an Outlook mail that I've sent as html and then reading it with mozilla, and it looks fine. This leads me to believe that the html produced by outlook is readable by mozilla. When I read email that I've sent (formatted as html), it looks fine in both outlook and mozilla. I've searched the mozilla preferces over and over to see if there is some kind of setting, but don't see anything. Does anyone have any idea what mozilla could be doing? BTW, I tried Kmail and it has the same problem! So it could be something in outlook? Ideas of where I could start to look would be welcome. TIA Depending on the Mozilla version... View-Message Body As-choose to suit from the Mail window. I've got mine to view as plain text, but when viewed as HTML it works fine... I'm using a current Mozilla nightly, which would place it at version 1.3a+ HTH, Tim I've tried that and I still don't see the email as originally formatted. As I said before, If I save the email in outlook as html, mozilla views it just fine (even as an attachment). I am running 1.3a, but have had this problem since 1.1... Thanks. Any other ideas? snip Do you have any special settings in your user profile/user.js or user profile/chrome/userChrome.css file(s) that may be mucking things up? Perhaps you could temporarily move those files out of the way (exit Mozilla before renaming them) to see if that's the problem. This seems to work fine for me, which would indicate that some profile-specific settings could be the culprit. Of course, it's entirely possible that I haven't gotten mail that would exhibit the problem you're having. Care to send me an example off list? HTH, Tim ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: get your money from the RIAA
DOUGLAS HUNLEY wrote: seems as part of a settlement, most of us are entitled to a check from the RIAA for price-fixing audio CDs in the USA. If you bought an audio CD from a retail outlet between January 1, 1995 and December 22, 2000, they owe you money! That could be nothing if too many apply. Better stop spreading the word ;-) -- Ken Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: KPF
On Wed, 08 Jan 2003 22:06:43 -0800 Ted Ozolins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since installing KDE-3.1rc6 when login as root I get a message that I can not run KPF as root. I thought that this was fixed as of 3.0.4.. Anyone else see this? Hmmm... I am running rc6 here and... what is KPF? -- ** Registered Linux User Number 185956 http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=ensafe=offgroup=linux Join me in chat at #linux-users on irc.freenode.net 5:43pm up 1 day, 23:17, 3 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: get your money from the RIAA
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 08:17:11AM -0800, Ken Moffat wrote: DOUGLAS HUNLEY wrote: seems as part of a settlement, most of us are entitled to a check from the RIAA for price-fixing audio CDs in the USA. If you bought an audio CD from a retail outlet between January 1, 1995 and December 22, 2000, they owe you money! That could be nothing if too many apply. Better stop spreading the word ;-) Looks like the normal class action boilerplate. Usually the lawyer-slime make all the money on these things. Bill -- INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC UUCP: camco!bill PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way FAX:(206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676 URL: http://www.celestial.com/ ``One of the common failings among honorable people is a failure to appreciate how thoroughly dishonorable some other people can be, and how dangerous it is to trust them.'' - Thomas Sowell ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Please Fix List's Reply-To: Header
Say, Doug, would you mind fixing the Reply-To: that Mailman puts on messages to the list? Currently, it is Reply-To: General Linux discussion and help [EMAIL PROTECTED] which is the same as the List-Id: header: List-Id: General Linux discussion and help linux-users.linux-sxs.org Thanks, Kurt -- 'I believe in getting into hot water; it keeps you clean. -- G. K. Chesterton ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Please Fix List's Reply-To: Header
On 01/09/03 16:38, Bill Campbell wrote: On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 07:35:01PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Say, Doug, would you mind fixing the Reply-To: that Mailman puts on messages to the list? Currently, it is Reply-To: General Linux discussion and help [EMAIL PROTECTED] which is the same as the List-Id: header: List-Id: General Linux discussion and help linux-users.linux-sxs.org I would much prefer to see the Reply-To: left out entirely: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html I wouldn't. The argument that you referenced is one written by list admins for list admins, and intentionally ignores the needs of list members. -- ~ L. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step TyGeMo: http://netllama.ipfox.com 4:50pm up 25 days, 23:58, 2 users, load average: 0.45, 0.88, 0.60 ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Please Fix List's Reply-To: Header
[ snips ] On Thu, 9 Jan 2003 20:00:43 -0500 Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FWIW, I *much* prefer having the Reply To set. I *hate* having to Reply All to get my replies to the list (gnucash's mailing lists are like that, as is the local BaltoLUG's list). FYI, Sylpheed can decode the email headers and properly reply to the list (optional) automatically even if the reply to address has not been munged. -- Collins Richey - Denver Area gentoo 1.4 system ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Please Fix List's Reply-To: Header
Yes, Sylpheed does a good job but I had to put the list's address in properties/default to make it work. However, many of us check lists via webmail and if some idiot, er excuse me administrator, sets the list up so we can't reply to it we have to A) remember it or b) find someplace in the message we're replying to and copy/paste the address. Most of the lists (except for two) that I belong to allow me to hit reply and answer the person ON THE LIST. The other two have set the list up so reply goes to the sender instead of the list - some excuse about a mailbox filling up and sending stuff back to the list but I've never seen that in all the time I've subscribed to lists. Those two lists give me 99% of the grief - I am replying to an individual and have to reply to the list again. Going to Sylpheed from Kmail (and I'm not looking back G) helped but not everyone runs Sylpheed. As Lonnie said - it's a convience for list admins, not the users. On Thu, 9 Jan 2003 19:08:05 -0700 Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ snips ] On Thu, 9 Jan 2003 20:00:43 -0500 Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FWIW, I *much* prefer having the Reply To set. I *hate* having to Reply All to get my replies to the list (gnucash's mailing lists are like that, as is the local BaltoLUG's list). FYI, Sylpheed can decode the email headers and properly reply to the list (optional) automatically even if the reply to address has not been munged. -- Collins Richey - Denver Area gentoo 1.4 system ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Pentium I - Mandrake COL 3.1.1
My computer is an older(?) Gateway P5 166 Mhz Intel processor it's a P I. The CDROM is a Ricoh RW. It works with Windoze and eD2., i A couple of months ago I bought Mandrake 8.2. Upon 1st installation it bombed, couldn't pick packages. I went to their site and found there was a problem with M 8.2 and some P I's. There was a patch. I installed it with the patch and everything seemed OK after I fixed the plugplay modem. I also burned 2 CD's of COL 3.1.1 at my kids home in Rene 'cause they have DSL and it took only 10 hours, not 2 weeks at home. When I installed this on another partition it, too, seemed to work OK. Now my problems. The Mandrake and the 3.1.1 freeze up when I try to use the CDROM RW. The CDROM works fine on eD2.4, evens burns CD's. And on the Mandrake partition the desktop icon won't start the floppy. Here is the /etc/fstab of the Mandrake /dev/hda5 / ext2 defaults 1 1 none /dev/pts devpts mode=0620 0 0 none /dev/shm tmpfs defaults 0 0 /dev/scd0/mnt/cdromiso9660 iocharset=iso8859-1,ro,nosuid,noauto,exec,user,nodev0 0 /dev/fd0/mnt/floppyvfat iocharset=iso8859-1,umask=0,sync,nosuid,user,noauto,nodev,codepage=850,unhide 0 0 /dev/hda1 /mnt/windows vfat iocharset=iso8859-1,umask=0,codepage=850 0 0 none /proc proc defaults 0 0 /dev/hdb2 swap swap defaults 0 0 - The one for COL 3.1.1 devpts /dev/pts devpts gid=5, mode=620 0 0 /proc /proc proc defaults 0 0 /dev/cdrom /mnt/cdrom oso9660 ro, user, noauto, exec 0 0 /dev/fd0 /mnt/floppy auto defaults, user, noauto 0 0 /dev/hdb2 swap swap defaults 1 3 /dev/hda1 /mnt/hda1 vfat ro, 0 0 /dev/hdb1 /mnt/hdb1 ext2 defaults 0 0 - The one foe eD2.4 /dev/hdb3 / ext2 rw 0 0 devpts /dev/pts devpts rw, gid=5,mode=620 0 0 /proc /proc proc rw 0 0 /dev/hda1 /mnt/hda1 vfat ro 0 0 /dev/hdb1 /mnt/hdb1 ext2 rw 0 0 hemus: (pid570) /auto nfs intr,rw,port=1023,timeo=8,retrans=110,indirect,map=/etc/am.d/localdev,dev-0003 0 0 Is the problem a software problem? Something wrong with the installed default fstab's. They are all different though similar? What if I opied the eD2.4 fstab, corrected for the working partition to the Mandrake and 3.1.1 partitions? Any/all help will be greatly appreciated. Bob :-\ The smiley face works. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Pentium I - Mandrake COL 3.1.1
My guess is perhaps DMA being turned on/off, or someother hdparm related setting that isn't getting along with your ancient IDE controller. Run: hdparm /dev/scd0 and see what the settings are. On 01/09/03 04:13, Bob Hemus wrote: My computer is an older(?) Gateway P5 166 Mhz Intel processor it's a P I. The CDROM is a Ricoh RW. It works with Windoze and eD2., i A couple of months ago I bought Mandrake 8.2. Upon 1st installation it bombed, couldn't pick packages. I went to their site and found there was a problem with M 8.2 and some P I's. There was a patch. I installed it with the patch and everything seemed OK after I fixed the plugplay modem. I also burned 2 CD's of COL 3.1.1 at my kids home in Rene 'cause they have DSL and it took only 10 hours, not 2 weeks at home. When I installed this on another partition it, too, seemed to work OK. Now my problems. The Mandrake and the 3.1.1 freeze up when I try to use the CDROM RW. The CDROM works fine on eD2.4, evens burns CD's. And on the Mandrake partition the desktop icon won't start the floppy. Here is the /etc/fstab of the Mandrake /dev/hda5 / ext2 defaults 1 1 none /dev/pts devpts mode=0620 0 0 none /dev/shm tmpfs defaults 0 0 /dev/scd0/mnt/cdromiso9660 iocharset=iso8859-1,ro,nosuid,noauto,exec,user,nodev0 0 /dev/fd0/mnt/floppyvfat iocharset=iso8859-1,umask=0,sync,nosuid,user,noauto,nodev,codepage=850,unhide 0 0 /dev/hda1 /mnt/windows vfat iocharset=iso8859-1,umask=0,codepage=850 0 0 none /proc proc defaults 0 0 /dev/hdb2 swap swap defaults 0 0 - The one for COL 3.1.1 devpts /dev/pts devpts gid=5, mode=620 0 0 /proc /proc proc defaults 0 0 /dev/cdrom /mnt/cdrom oso9660 ro, user, noauto, exec 0 0 /dev/fd0 /mnt/floppy auto defaults, user, noauto 0 0 /dev/hdb2 swap swap defaults 1 3 /dev/hda1 /mnt/hda1 vfat ro, 0 0 /dev/hdb1 /mnt/hdb1 ext2 defaults 0 0 - The one foe eD2.4 /dev/hdb3 / ext2 rw 0 0 devpts /dev/pts devpts rw, gid=5,mode=620 0 0 /proc /proc proc rw 0 0 /dev/hda1 /mnt/hda1 vfat ro 0 0 /dev/hdb1 /mnt/hdb1 ext2 rw 0 0 hemus: (pid570) /auto nfs intr,rw,port=1023,timeo=8,retrans=110,indirect,map=/etc/am.d/localdev,dev-0003 0 0 Is the problem a software problem? Something wrong with the installed default fstab's. They are all different though similar? What if I opied the eD2.4 fstab, corrected for the working partition to the Mandrake and 3.1.1 partitions? Any/all help will be greatly appreciated. Bob :-\ The smiley face works. -- ~ L. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step TyGeMo: http://netllama.ipfox.com 7:15pm up 26 days, 2:23, 2 users, load average: 0.14, 0.17, 0.10 ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Please Fix List's Reply-To: Header
On Thursday 09 January 2003 9:43 pm, someone claiming to be Brett I. Holcomb wrote: snip Going to Sylpheed from Kmail (and I'm not looking back G) helped but not everyone runs Sylpheed. As Lonnie said - it's a convience for list admins, not the users. snip Well, upon further review, kmail (1.4.3 1.5) *does* have a Reply to List button, just not loaded on the Toolbar by default. It *is* accessible by pressing the letter L, however. And I've added it to the toolbar. So, I guess I don't care what's in the reply to field, now :-) BTW, a new feature (at least I *think* it's new) in kmail version 1.5 is a delete button that actually deletes the message instead of moving it to trash. You can still move messages to trash, if you like, but you can also *really* delete a message. I also like the ability to set expiration rules in individual mail folders in kmail. But I digress... Regards, Tim -- RedHat Psyche 8.0, stock kernel, KDE 3.1-CVS, Xfree86 4.2.1 9:00pm up 15 days, 7:05, 4 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 It's what you learn AFTER you know it all that counts ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
