Re: RH9 and xedit

2003-10-10 Thread James McDonald
Net Llama! wrote:

On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, James McDonald wrote:
 

To compile mplayer mean't a search of the web for many supporting
libraries that came standard with Mandrake.
   

That wasn't my experience.  mplayer build on both of my RH9 systems
without a single problem.
 

I was attempting build just about every codec as mentioned in the 
documentation and Mandrake has a lot more of the dependent libraries as 
opposed to Redhat.

 

So my opinion is that Redhat, in the quest for a simple easy to use
interface has decided that you get one 'notepad' one 'calc' and blue
   

That's not really true.  You still get tons of text editors (11 in my
count), and at least 4 calculators.
 

Duh, yes I know

--
James McDonald
Singleton Australia
61+ (0)2 65712401
61+ 0428 320 219
He only knew his iron spine held up the sky -- he didn't realize his brain
had fallen to the ground.
-- The Book of Serenity
Linux 2.4.22 #1 Mon Sep 1 20:03:11 EST 2003 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
23:15:00 up 6 days, 21:16, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: RH9 and xedit

2003-10-10 Thread Michael Hipp
James McDonald wrote:
Net Llama! wrote:

On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, James McDonald wrote:
 

To compile mplayer mean't a search of the web for many supporting
libraries that came standard with Mandrake.
  


That wasn't my experience.  mplayer build on both of my RH9 systems
without a single problem.
 

I was attempting build just about every codec as mentioned in the 
documentation and Mandrake has a lot more of the dependent libraries as 
opposed to Redhat.
Did you do a kitchen sink install of Red Hat? That's the only way to 
install any distro, IMHO.

I've *rarely* had dependency problems with Red Hat 9. Far better than 
older distros.

Just my experiences ...

Michael

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


RH9 and xedit

2003-10-09 Thread Net Llama!
Now that I've started to deploy RH9 on several boxes, the lack of xedit
has started to annoy me a lot.  I like xedit, because its a bare bones X
text editor.  Anyone know why RH9 doesn't include xedit (which i thought
was part of XFree86)?  Anyone know how i could get xedit without building
XFree86 from source?

-- 
~~
Lonni J Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Step-by-step  TyGeMo  http://netllama.ipfox.com
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: RH9 and xedit

2003-10-09 Thread Net Llama!
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Michael Hipp wrote:
 Net Llama! wrote:

  Now that I've started to deploy RH9 on several boxes, the lack of xedit
  has started to annoy me a lot.  I like xedit, because its a bare bones X
  text editor.  Anyone know why RH9 doesn't include xedit (which i thought
  was part of XFree86)?  Anyone know how i could get xedit without building
  XFree86 from source?

 Did older versions of RH include it? Could you just copy it from an
 older one?

RH-7.3 does.  I know i could try copying the binary, but i'm just puzzled
as to why its missing.

-- 
~~
Lonni J Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Step-by-step  TyGeMo  http://netllama.ipfox.com
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: RH9 and xedit

2003-10-09 Thread Tim Wunder
On 10/9/2003 1:13 PM, I believe that Net Llama! wrote:

On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Michael Hipp wrote:

Net Llama! wrote:


Now that I've started to deploy RH9 on several boxes, the lack of xedit
has started to annoy me a lot.  I like xedit, because its a bare bones X
text editor.  Anyone know why RH9 doesn't include xedit (which i thought
was part of XFree86)?  Anyone know how i could get xedit without building
XFree86 from source?
Did older versions of RH include it? Could you just copy it from an
older one?


RH-7.3 does.  I know i could try copying the binary, but i'm just puzzled
as to why its missing.
Hmmm...
FWIW, it's there in RHL 8.0.
/usr/X11R6/bin/xedit
$ rpm -qf /usr/X11R6/bin/xedit
XFree86-tools-4.2.1-21
Maybe you don't have XFree86-tools installed...

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: RH9 and xedit

2003-10-09 Thread Net Llama!
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Tim Wunder wrote:
 On 10/9/2003 1:13 PM, I believe that Net Llama! wrote:

  On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Michael Hipp wrote:
 
 Net Llama! wrote:
 
 
 Now that I've started to deploy RH9 on several boxes, the lack of xedit
 has started to annoy me a lot.  I like xedit, because its a bare bones X
 text editor.  Anyone know why RH9 doesn't include xedit (which i thought
 was part of XFree86)?  Anyone know how i could get xedit without building
 XFree86 from source?
 
 Did older versions of RH include it? Could you just copy it from an
 older one?
 
 
  RH-7.3 does.  I know i could try copying the binary, but i'm just puzzled
  as to why its missing.
 

 Hmmm...
 FWIW, it's there in RHL 8.0.
 /usr/X11R6/bin/xedit
 $ rpm -qf /usr/X11R6/bin/xedit
 XFree86-tools-4.2.1-21

 Maybe you don't have XFree86-tools installed...

$ rpm -q XFree86-tools
XFree86-tools-4.3.0-2

-- 
~~
Lonni J Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Step-by-step  TyGeMo  http://netllama.ipfox.com
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: RH9 and xedit

2003-10-09 Thread Collins Richey
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003 13:30:09 -0400 (EDT) Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Tim Wunder wrote:
  On 10/9/2003 1:13 PM, I believe that Net Llama! wrote:
 
   On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Michael Hipp wrote:
  
  Net Llama! wrote:
  
  
  Now that I've started to deploy RH9 on several boxes, the lack of xedit
  has started to annoy me a lot.  I like xedit, because its a bare bones X
  text editor.  Anyone know why RH9 doesn't include xedit (which i thought
  was part of XFree86)?  Anyone know how i could get xedit without building
  XFree86 from source?
  
  Did older versions of RH include it? Could you just copy it from an
  older one?
  
  
   RH-7.3 does.  I know i could try copying the binary, but i'm just puzzled
   as to why its missing.
  
 
  Hmmm...
  FWIW, it's there in RHL 8.0.
  /usr/X11R6/bin/xedit
  $ rpm -qf /usr/X11R6/bin/xedit
  XFree86-tools-4.2.1-21
 
  Maybe you don't have XFree86-tools installed...
 
 $ rpm -q XFree86-tools
 XFree86-tools-4.3.0-2
 


Can't help you with RedHat, but gentoo installs it as a standard part of
xfree-4.3.0-r2.

-- 
Collins Richey - Denver Area
if you fill your heart with regrets of yesterday and the 
worries of tomorrow, you have no today to be thankful for.


___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: RH9 and xedit

2003-10-09 Thread James McDonald
Net Llama! wrote:

Now that I've started to deploy RH9 on several boxes, the lack of xedit
has started to annoy me a lot.  I like xedit, because its a bare bones X
text editor.  Anyone know why RH9 doesn't include xedit (which i thought
was part of XFree86)?  Anyone know how i could get xedit without building
XFree86 from source?
 

I started running redhat several months ago and have found that in their 
attempt to make the unified theme work. They have failed to include many 
packages that were in the Mandrake 9.1 install I had previously.

To compile mplayer mean't a search of the web for many supporting 
libraries that came standard with Mandrake.

So my opinion is that Redhat, in the quest for a simple easy to use 
interface has decided that you get one 'notepad' one 'calc' and blue 
curve. For the average user I suppose clicking on `Terminal' and getting 
a redhat chosen terminal is fine but for myself I like the option of 
trying everything and choosing a favourite. This has meant going to the 
web and basically having to install all the `missing' stuff, which 
strangely enough I enjoy because I learn more with each passing compile.

Querying the entire redhat XFree86 install shows nothing as far as xedit 
goes.

for i in `ls -1 RedHat/RPMS/XFree86-*`; do rpm -qp --list $i 2/dev/null 
| grep xedit ; done

--
James McDonald
Singleton Australia
61+ (0)2 65712401
61+ 0428 320 219
I'm sick of being trodden on!  The Elder Gods say they can make me a man!
All it costs is my soul!  I'll do it, cuz NOW I'M MAD!!!
- Necronomicomics #1, Jack Herman  Jeff Dee
Linux 2.4.22 #1 Mon Sep 1 20:03:11 EST 2003 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
10:05:00 up 6 days, 8:06, 1 user, load average: 0.01, 0.10, 0.06
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: RH9 and xedit

2003-10-09 Thread Net Llama!
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, James McDonald wrote:
 To compile mplayer mean't a search of the web for many supporting
 libraries that came standard with Mandrake.

That wasn't my experience.  mplayer build on both of my RH9 systems
without a single problem.

 So my opinion is that Redhat, in the quest for a simple easy to use
 interface has decided that you get one 'notepad' one 'calc' and blue

That's not really true.  You still get tons of text editors (11 in my
count), and at least 4 calculators.


-- 
~~
Lonni J Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Step-by-step  TyGeMo  http://netllama.ipfox.com
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users