Re: trying to compile 2.6 kernel

2003-07-30 Thread Keith Antoine
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 11:11 am, Net Llama! wrote:
 On 07/29/03 17:49, Keith Antoine wrote:
  Well at least my computer is stubborn and consistent:
 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] linux-2.6.0-test1]# make gconfig
  *
  * Unable to find the GTK+ installation. Please make sure that
  * the GTK+ 2.0 development package is correctly installed...
  * You need gtk+-2.0, glib-2.0 and libglade-2.0.

 what do you get from the following commands:
 rpm -q gtk+
 rpm -q libglade
 rpm -q glib

The only one that returns a negative is gtk+, however it is installed. I am 
guessing that its missing its devel file but I cannot find a compatible 
gtk+2.0-2.2.2.rpm
that is installed on this computer.

-- 
Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'SKIPPY'
18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061, Australia:: PH:61733002161
Practising Geriatric, Retired Electronics Engineer, Knowall, Brain in storage


___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: trying to compile 2.6 kernel

2003-07-29 Thread James McDonald

do a locate *.pc and add each directory that contains pc files to your
PKG_CONFIG_PATH

I had the same trouble until I added the /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig to
 it...

PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/usr/lib/pkgconfig:/usr/local/lib/pkgconfig


 Keith,
 What is the output from the following:
 locate .pc
 rpm -q pango
 rpm -q atk
 rpm -q glib
I tried to use gconfig last night and it failed miserably too Keith I
tried to do the same install stuff and got the dependency night mare
aswell.

BUT... make xconfig (which launches the QT interface worked fine). So if
your not biased against KDE/AT then just use that.


___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: trying to compile 2.6 kernel

2003-07-29 Thread Keith Antoine
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 12:13 pm, Net Llama! wrote:

Out puts as follows, guess that I have to install atk and glib.
Had problems with rpms and mandrake if its not .mdk rpm its 
refused so will try as tarballs

 Keith,
 What is the output from the following:
 locate .pc

Huge output 99% from /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/ etc
then from /usr/src kernels

 rpm -q pango

pango-1.2.1-1mdk

 rpm -q atk

Not installed

 rpm -q glib

Not installed

 thanks!

Since I did the lookups I have managed to install both missing progs.
But it still tells me;
*
* Unable to find the GTK+ installation. Please make sure that
* the GTK+ 2.0 development package is correctly installed...
* You need gtk+-2.0, glib-2.0 and libglade-2.0.
*
make[1]: *** [scripts/kconfig/.tmp_gtkcheck] Error 1
make: *** [scripts/kconfig/gconf] Error 2

also:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] linux-2.6.0-test1]# rpm -q gtk+2.0
gtk+2.0-2.2.2-4mdk
and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] linux-2.6.0-test1]# rpm -q glib
glib-1.3.15-1

libglade is now install also but same result.



-- 
Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'SKIPPY'
18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061, Australia:: PH:61733002161
Practising Geriatric, Retired Electronics Engineer, Knowall, Brain in storage


___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: trying to compile 2.6 kernel

2003-07-29 Thread James McDonald

Since I did the lookups I have managed to install both missing progs.
But it still tells me;
*
* Unable to find the GTK+ installation. Please make sure that
* the GTK+ 2.0 development package is correctly installed...
* You need gtk+-2.0, glib-2.0 and libglade-2.0.
*
make[1]: *** [scripts/kconfig/.tmp_gtkcheck] Error 1
make: *** [scripts/kconfig/gconf] Error 2
also:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] linux-2.6.0-test1]# rpm -q gtk+2.0
gtk+2.0-2.2.2-4mdk
and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] linux-2.6.0-test1]# rpm -q glib
glib-1.3.15-1
libglade is now install also but same result.

 

KEITH install libglade2-devel 

Mine had that exact error aswell and after Installed the devel package I finally got the gtk interface YE HAR!

It's on CD3 of the Mandrake distributions CDs

Also I found the code that does the check for the right environment

pkg-config gtk+-2.0 exists
echo $?
pkg-config gmodule-2.0 --exists
echo $?
pkg-config libglade-2.0 --exists
echo $?
The echo should be zero if you have the package.



___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: trying to compile 2.6 kernel

2003-07-29 Thread David A. Bandel
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 10:00:05 -0600
Collins Richey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

[snip]

 I'm always sad to hear about people experiencing dependancy hell. 
 Fortunately for me, my distro isolates me from this problem.  gconfig
 works just fine for me; any screwing about with pkgconfig must have
 been done under the covers.  I gave up on the built in alsa, switched
 back to the(now deprecated) OSS support for my sound card, and for the
 moment at least I'm now running on 2.6.0-test1
 
you'll want to patch up to 2.6.0-test2, test1 has a nasty habit of
locking up.  Haven't had the problem with test2.

Ciao,

David A. Bandel
-- 
Focus on the dream, not the competition.
Nemesis Racing Team motto
GPG key autoresponder:  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: trying to compile 2.6 kernel

2003-07-29 Thread Keith Antoine
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 04:34 pm, James McDonald wrote:

 I tried to use gconfig last night and it failed miserably too Keith I
 tried to do the same install stuff and got the dependency night mare
 aswell.

 BUT... make xconfig (which launches the QT interface worked fine). So if
 your not biased against KDE/AT then just use that.

Its the challange that I love, even if I do not succeed. Thats was whole point 
in drawing me into Linux, now they are making it too difficult for the non 
tech software guy. I wnat to get gconfig to work to see if it is simpler than
the other commands to handle, especially as compiling a kernel is now much
more difficult if the documentation is lacking/poor.

I was able to handle the very early 0.xx series kernels on command line, but 
they were time consuming, mainly due to low speed buses. Somewhere about the 
begining of the 2 series or slightly earlier, they got X/gui and xconfig, 
which made it all simpler. Also with the advent of faster proceeeors/buses it 
was a dream. Now they are giving us a massive information overload: I wonder 
sometimes if progress is worth the it, course I am locked into memories etc 
now and my learning curve is too steep.

-- 
Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'SKIPPY'
18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061, Australia:: PH:61733002161
Practising Geriatric, Retired Electronics Engineer, Knowall, Brain in storage


___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: trying to compile 2.6 kernel

2003-07-29 Thread Kurt Wall
Quoth Collins Richey:

[2.6-testX]

 Interestingly enough, the emerge now does warn you about the input
 devices gotcha.

Alan Cox posted some patches to return some sanity to the default
config (giving you a console, making sure you have a keyboard), so
I hope Linus picks these up for -test3.

Kurt
-- 
The chief danger in life is that you may take too may precautions.
-- Alfred Adler
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: trying to compile 2.6 kernel

2003-07-29 Thread Keith Antoine
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 07:40 pm, James McDonald wrote:

James:

Well !

 KEITH install libglade2-devel

 Mine had that exact error aswell and after Installed the devel package I
 finally got the gtk interface YE HAR!

 It's on CD3 of the Mandrake distributions CDs

 Also I found the code that does the check for the right environment

 pkg-config gtk+-2.0 exists
 echo $?
 pkg-config gmodule-2.0 --exists
 echo $?
 pkg-config libglade-2.0 --exists
 echo $?

 The echo should be zero if you have the package.

Did the above, should I get no return at all at the prompt ?
That is what I am getting just a return prompt.

Well at least my computer is stubborn and consistent:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] linux-2.6.0-test1]# make gconfig
*
* Unable to find the GTK+ installation. Please make sure that
* the GTK+ 2.0 development package is correctly installed...
* You need gtk+-2.0, glib-2.0 and libglade-2.0.
*
make[1]: *** [scripts/kconfig/.tmp_gtkcheck] Error 1
make: *** [scripts/kconfig/gconf] Error 2

This was after the install of libglade-2.0 ???

-- 
Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'SKIPPY'
18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061, Australia:: PH:61733002161
Practising Geriatric, Retired Electronics Engineer, Knowall, Brain in storage


___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: trying to compile 2.6 kernel

2003-07-29 Thread Net Llama!
On 07/29/03 17:49, Keith Antoine wrote:
Well at least my computer is stubborn and consistent:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] linux-2.6.0-test1]# make gconfig
*
* Unable to find the GTK+ installation. Please make sure that
* the GTK+ 2.0 development package is correctly installed...
* You need gtk+-2.0, glib-2.0 and libglade-2.0.
what do you get from the following commands:
rpm -q gtk+
rpm -q libglade
rpm -q glib
--
~
L. Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Step-by-step  TyGeMo:http://netllama.ipfox.com
  6:10pm  up 14 days, 20:53,  2 users,  load average: 0.01, 0.01, 0.00

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: trying to compile 2.6 kernel

2003-07-29 Thread David A. Bandel
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 10:49:54 +1000
Keith Antoine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

[snip]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] linux-2.6.0-test1]# make gconfig
 *
 * Unable to find the GTK+ installation. Please make sure that
 * the GTK+ 2.0 development package is correctly installed...
 * You need gtk+-2.0, glib-2.0 and libglade-2.0.
 *
 make[1]: *** [scripts/kconfig/.tmp_gtkcheck] Error 1
 make: *** [scripts/kconfig/gconf] Error 2
 
 This was after the install of libglade-2.0 ???

you must have the -devel packages installed.  You don't, you only have
the libraries.  The header files are in the -devel packages.

Ciao,

David A. Bandel
-- 
Focus on the dream, not the competition.
Nemesis Racing Team motto
GPG key autoresponder:  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


trying to compile 2.6 kernel

2003-07-28 Thread Keith Antoine
I am stopped at the first base. When I type in gconfig it says that :
* Unable to find the GTK+ installation. Please make sure that
* the GTK+ 2.0 development package is correctly installed...
* You need gtk+-2.0, glib-2.0 and libglade-2.0.

I have installed from a tarball glib-2.2.2, when I try to install gtk+-2.2.2
I get:
-
checking for glib-2.0 = 2.1.4 atk = 1.0.1 pango = 1.0.1... Package glib-2.0 
was not found in the pkg-config search path.
Perhaps you should add the directory containing `glib-2.0.pc'
to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
No package 'glib-2.0' found

configure: error: Library requirements (glib-2.0 = 2.1.4 atk = 1.0.1 pango 
= 1.0.1) not met; consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment 
variable if your libraries are in a nonstandard prefix so pkg-config can find 
them.
-
There does not appear to be an rpm that I can install to mandrake from, which 
is what I need these days as I have no idea how to fix the install as is. 
They have made things real difficult to even start into now. By the same 
token Mandrake is remiss too.


-- 
Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'SKIPPY'
18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061, Australia:: PH:61733002161
Practising Geriatric, Retired Electronics Engineer, Knowall, Brain in storage


___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: trying to compile 2.6 kernel

2003-07-28 Thread James McDonald
Keith Antoine wrote:

checking for glib-2.0 = 2.1.4 atk = 1.0.1 pango = 1.0.1... Package glib-2.0 
was not found in the pkg-config search path.
Perhaps you should add the directory containing `glib-2.0.pc'
to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
No package 'glib-2.0' found

do a locate *.pc and add each directory that contains pc files to your PKG_CONFIG_PATH

I had the same trouble until I added the /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig to it...

PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/usr/lib/pkgconfig:/usr/local/lib/pkgconfig



___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: trying to compile 2.6 kernel

2003-07-28 Thread Net Llama!
On 07/28/03 18:22, Keith Antoine wrote:

On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 07:16 pm, James McDonald wrote:

Keith Antoine wrote:

checking for glib-2.0 = 2.1.4 atk = 1.0.1 pango = 1.0.1... Package
glib-2.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path.
Perhaps you should add the directory containing `glib-2.0.pc'
to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
No package 'glib-2.0' found
do a locate *.pc and add each directory that contains pc files to your
PKG_CONFIG_PATH
I had the same trouble until I added the /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig to it...

PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/usr/lib/pkgconfig:/usr/local/lib/pkgconfig


Well as I did not have much *.pc that did not work for me. So I tried 
installing gtk+2.0 rpms only to encounter the dreaded dependencies
roundabout. So I thought that I would --nodeps and --force, tried this in 
command line only it did not work any longer: PROGRESS ?? this is rpm 4.0.4!
What is going on, or is it Mandrake ?
Keith,
What is the output from the following:
locate .pc
rpm -q pango
rpm -q atk
rpm -q glib
thanks!

--
~
L. Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Step-by-step  TyGeMo:http://netllama.ipfox.com
  7:10pm  up 13 days, 21:53,  1 user,  load average: 0.35, 0.19, 0.08

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users