Re: iptables 1.2.4
yes. translation error. sorry. > No, I said `make patch-o-matic` gives you more stuff, including alpha > code. This may not be the best depending on your comfort level. > > > I've always just done 'make pending-patches' followed by 'make' and > > > hten'make install' -- The pivotal point is the "second chance", judged by another set of criteria. In Linux We Trust -- http://linux.nf and news://news.hkpcug.org ___ Linux-users mailing list Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: iptables 1.2.4
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 19:35:45 +0800 Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed into the bitstream: > Mr. Bandel said the patch-o-matic is the best. > I am gonig to try it tonight.. and see if there > would be more options in make menuconfig... No, I said `make patch-o-matic` gives you more stuff, including alpha code. This may not be the best depending on your comfort level. > > > I've always just done 'make pending-patches' followed by 'make' and > > hten'make install' > > -- > The pivotal point is the "second chance", judged by another set of > criteria. > In Linux We Trust -- http://linux.nf and news://news.hkpcug.org > ___ > Linux-users mailing list > Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Ciao, David A. Bandel -- Focus on the dream, not the competition. -- Nemesis Racing Team motto Internet (H323) phone: 206.28.187.30 ___ Linux-users mailing list Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: iptables 1.2.4
On Thu, 10 Jan 2002 19:30:45 +0800 "Chang [linuxism]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed into the bitstream: > do I need to make pending-patches before make patch-o-magic? > The INSTALL/README seemed to suggest that... > No. The pending-patches is a very small subset of patch-o-matic (not patch-o-magic). The most-of-pom target is a slightly larger subset. pending-patches: patches scheduled (and approved) for inclusion in the kernel most-of-pom: pending-patches plus experimental patches known to work and that don't collide with each other patch-o-matic: pending-patches plus most-of-pom plus all others. Be _very_ careful what you select here. In some cases, you'll be told which patches toast other patches, in some cases not. Also, some patches are _very_ alpha and may cause all kinds of unforseen problems. Ciao, David A. Bandel -- Focus on the dream, not the competition. -- Nemesis Racing Team motto Internet (H323) phone: 206.28.187.30 ___ Linux-users mailing list Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: iptables 1.2.4
do I need to make pending-patches before make patch-o-magic? The INSTALL/README seemed to suggest that... > the string.patch is only available if you run `make patch-o-matic` in the > iptables directory. You will not get it with make pending-patches or make > most-of-pom. -- The pivotal point is the "second chance", judged by another set of criteria. In Linux We Trust -- http://linux.nf and news://news.hkpcug.org ___ Linux-users mailing list Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: iptables 1.2.4
On Wed, 09 Jan 2002 21:43:23 +0800 Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed into the bitstream: > Now I am getting adventurous... what should I do to get the patch > applied? Also, I didn't see the string target match option in make > menuconfig... kernel is 2.4.17 the string.patch is only available if you run `make patch-o-matic` in the iptables directory. You will not get it with make pending-patches or make most-of-pom. Ciao, David A. Bandel > > -=== > > Welcome to Rusty's Patch-o-matic! > > Each patch is a new feature: many have minimal impact, some do not. > Almost every one has bugs, so I don't recommend applying them all! > --- > Already applied: ipt_MIRROR-ttl ipt_REJECT-checkentry ipt_LOG 2.4.1 > > Testing... tos-fix.patch NOT APPLIED (1 rejects out of 1 hunks) > The tos-fix patch: >Author: Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Status: Included in kernel 2.4.2 > >This fixes a bug in the checksum calculation of the TOS bit mangling >target. > > Do you want to apply this patch [N/y/t/f/q/?] y > Testing patch tos-fix.patch... > Failed to patch copy of /usr/src/linux > TEST FAILED: patch NOT applied. > - > Do you want to apply this patch [N/y/t/f/q/?] > -- Focus on the dream, not the competition. -- Nemesis Racing Team motto Internet (H323) phone: 206.28.187.30 ___ Linux-users mailing list Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
