RE: network/ limited number of ips

2002-01-18 Thread Schmeits, Roger

Way, way too much overkill. You certainly don't need 6 access points,
especially at over a grand each for Cisco. 
Youre right 3 is more than enough.  I was just throwing numbers out there
...
it is early in the project you know.

them all a unique ESSID if you want precise control, patch each one into
your physical network and use a single linux box to masquerade them to

the building is one block away from our main campus and it has no network
wiring in it. 
I have to start from zero on the network side.  That why I say wireless
fairly easily to setup..

the internet using a single public ip address and an access list of
internal ip's that you assign. If it's an ip address not allowed to be
masqueraded, then nobody can steal services from you. A good reason to
stay away from DHCP and use fixed addressing. 

With the cisco 350 I can register the network cards by MAC address.
Preventing anyone from stealing a ip address.


40 ip addresses should be a no brainer to administer. 
I am terrible lazy...


some of the students will be using laptops in this building and on the main
campus.
Roaming laptops.. I was hoping I could register the MAC (with the
Aironet) on student housding building  and the main campus.  We are a small
school so chances are I can get by with this..

Thanks for the input!
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



RE: network/ limited number of ips

2002-01-18 Thread Schmeits, Roger



-Original Message-
From: David A. Bandel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 8:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: network/ limited number of ips


On Fri, 18 Jan 2002 07:37:10 -0600
Schmeits, Roger [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed into the
bitstream:

[snip]
 
 the internet using a single public ip address and an access list of
 internal ip's that you assign. If it's an ip address not allowed to be
 masqueraded, then nobody can steal services from you. A good reason
 to stay away from DHCP and use fixed addressing. 
 
 With the cisco 350 I can register the network cards by MAC address.
 Preventing anyone from stealing a ip address.

I prevent this by using iptables and only accepting known MAC addresses. 
However, this will _not_ prevent someone from reconfiguring their MAC
address (i.e., doing a MAC address takeover) and breaking into your net,
but it does make it a little more difficult.  Combine that with WEP and
you should be OK against 99% of folks who want to try to break in.

 
 
 40 ip addresses should be a no brainer to administer. 
 I am terrible lazy...

no cure for this, but I'd suggest using bootp rather than dhcp or static
IPs.

Ciao,

David A. Bandel
-- 
Focus on the dream, not the competition.
-- Nemesis Racing Team motto
Internet (H323) phone: 206.28.187.30
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: network/ limited number of ips

2002-01-18 Thread David A. Bandel

On Fri, 18 Jan 2002 10:32:02 -0600
Schmeits, Roger [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed into the
bitstream:

[snip]

 
 Why bootp?

you assign a specific IP to a specific MAC.  Tradeoff between a static IP
and a completely dynamic one. You'll use dhcpd to do this, it just takes a
little more setup.

Ciao,

David A. Bandel
-- 
Focus on the dream, not the competition.
-- Nemesis Racing Team motto
Internet (H323) phone: 206.28.187.30
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



RE: network/ limited number of ips

2002-01-17 Thread GREWELL, AARON

The method I use to NAT from a private subnet to a public IP is to use an
LRP (Linux Router Project) derived boot disk.  The best place I know of to
get these is at http://leaf.sourceforge.net .  I don't know if they have
wireless support or not, though.  The one I use for my network is called
Oxygen, and it works very well.

-Original Message-
From: Schmeits, Roger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 11:45 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: network/ limited number of ips


Got a question...
We have a student housing building that has about 40 students.  We have been
wanting to wire the building but the cost has always stopped us ($4).  I
have been playing with the idea of using 5 or 6 Cisco aironet 350 access
points and have the students purchase a PCI wireless card for their machine.
For our Internet connection we are in the process of contacting Qwest for a
business line.  At this time I do not know at the details for a Internet
connection.  Mainly how many IP's we would get, cost, bandwidth, etc.

Knowing all of that - How can a person setup a machine linux running to act
as a NAT (???)/DHCP server when you have only been assigned anywhere from
one to six IP's addresses?  How does one tackles such a situation?

Or better yet which HOW-TO's to I read?

Roger

   
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: network/ limited number of ips

2002-01-17 Thread Andrew Mathews

Schmeits, Roger wrote:
 
 Got a question...
 We have a student housing building that has about 40 students.  We have been
 wanting to wire the building but the cost has always stopped us ($4).  I
 have been playing with the idea of using 5 or 6 Cisco aironet 350 access
 points and have the students purchase a PCI wireless card for their machine.
 For our Internet connection we are in the process of contacting Qwest for a
 business line.  At this time I do not know at the details for a Internet
 connection.  Mainly how many IP's we would get, cost, bandwidth, etc.
 
 Knowing all of that - How can a person setup a machine linux running to act
 as a NAT (???)/DHCP server when you have only been assigned anywhere from
 one to six IP's addresses?  How does one tackles such a situation?
 
 Or better yet which HOW-TO's to I read?
 
 Roger
 

Way, way too much overkill. You certainly don't need 6 access points,
especially at over a grand each for Cisco. Besides, an access point
opens your network up to anyone scanning for them. Alternative: Buy 6
Maxtech Mini-AP's which are simply external clients for p.c.'s, give
them all a unique ESSID if you want precise control, patch each one into
your physical network and use a single linux box to masquerade them to
the internet using a single public ip address and an access list of
internal ip's that you assign. If it's an ip address not allowed to be
masqueraded, then nobody can steal services from you. A good reason to
stay away from DHCP and use fixed addressing. 40 ip addresses should be
a no brainer to administer. 
-- 
Andrew Mathews

  1:37pm  up 5 days, 20:17,  4 users,  load average: 1.01, 1.02, 1.06

BOFH excuse #103:

operators on strike due to broken coffee machine
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: network/ limited number of ips

2002-01-17 Thread Dave Anselmi

Schmeits, Roger wrote:

 Got a question...
 We have a student housing building that has about 40 students.  We have been
 wanting to wire the building but the cost has always stopped us ($4).  I
 have been playing with the idea of using 5 or 6 Cisco aironet 350 access
 points and have the students purchase a PCI wireless card for their machine.
 For our Internet connection we are in the process of contacting Qwest for a
 business line.  At this time I do not know at the details for a Internet
 connection.  Mainly how many IP's we would get, cost, bandwidth, etc.

I don't know how much about wireless.  Certainly it's easier, but probably more
expensive and maybe less secure (at least you'd have to think about those
things).

It shouldn't be terribly hard to wire the building yourself, depending on how
it's built.  I'd be happy to offer advice about that.  I would think it would
only take a week or less, and less than $4000 in equipment.

As for Internet access, if you get DSL from Qwest that's probably the most cost
effective connection.  I don't know what type of bandwidth you'd need but even
going above 256/640k isn't too much.

If you do get DSL, the Cisco 678 you'll get will do NAT, DHCP, and packet
filtering (a little) for you.  You may still have use for a Linux
router/firewall box, but you probably don't need static IP addresses.  The one
dynamic one that comes with basic service will probably do.  If you want to run
servers, that's a different story, but just to get students on the net you don't
need your own block of IPs.

I don't see any reason to run your own servers.  There are plenty of free email
services where students can get accounts (maybe even from the school).  If you
let the DSL modem do DHCP, you won't have to worry about DNS and such too much.

Admittedly I've never done this on this scale, so there may be problems I don't
forsee.  But I have done some shoestring installs like this before.

Dave


___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users