[PATCH] edac: mpc85xx: Add support for MPC8572
From: Andrew Kilkenny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This adds support for the dual-core MPC8572 processor. We have
to support making SPR changes on each core. Also, since we can
have multiple memory controllers sharing an interrupt, flag the
interrupts with IRQF_SHARED.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Kilkenny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Nate Case [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c | 34 +++---
1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c b/drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c
index 2265d9c..0668492 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
#include linux/io.h
#include linux/mod_devicetable.h
#include linux/edac.h
+#include linux/smp.h
#include linux/of_platform.h
#include linux/of_device.h
@@ -40,7 +41,7 @@ static u32 orig_pci_err_en;
#endif
static u32 orig_l2_err_disable;
-static u32 orig_hid1;
+static u32 orig_hid1[2];
/ MC SYSFS parts ***/
@@ -272,7 +273,8 @@ static int __devinit mpc85xx_pci_err_probe(struct of_device
*op,
if (edac_op_state == EDAC_OPSTATE_INT) {
pdata-irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(op-node, 0);
res = devm_request_irq(op-dev, pdata-irq,
- mpc85xx_pci_isr, IRQF_DISABLED,
+ mpc85xx_pci_isr,
+ IRQF_DISABLED | IRQF_SHARED,
[EDAC] PCI err, pci);
if (res 0) {
printk(KERN_ERR
@@ -576,7 +578,8 @@ static int __devinit mpc85xx_l2_err_probe(struct of_device
*op,
if (edac_op_state == EDAC_OPSTATE_INT) {
pdata-irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(op-node, 0);
res = devm_request_irq(op-dev, pdata-irq,
- mpc85xx_l2_isr, IRQF_DISABLED,
+ mpc85xx_l2_isr,
+ IRQF_DISABLED | IRQF_SHARED,
[EDAC] L2 err, edac_dev);
if (res 0) {
printk(KERN_ERR
@@ -647,6 +650,9 @@ static struct of_device_id mpc85xx_l2_err_of_match[] = {
{
.compatible = fsl,8568-l2-cache-controller,
},
+ {
+.compatible = fsl,8572-l2-cache-controller,
+},
{},
};
@@ -912,7 +918,8 @@ static int __devinit mpc85xx_mc_err_probe(struct of_device
*op,
/* register interrupts */
pdata-irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(op-node, 0);
res = devm_request_irq(op-dev, pdata-irq,
- mpc85xx_mc_isr, IRQF_DISABLED,
+ mpc85xx_mc_isr,
+ IRQF_DISABLED | IRQF_SHARED,
[EDAC] MC err, mci);
if (res 0) {
printk(KERN_ERR %s: Unable to request irq %d for
@@ -980,6 +987,9 @@ static struct of_device_id mpc85xx_mc_err_of_match[] = {
{
.compatible = fsl,8568-memory-controller,
},
+ {
+.compatible = fsl,8572-memory-controller,
+},
{},
};
@@ -995,6 +1005,12 @@ static struct of_platform_driver mpc85xx_mc_err_driver = {
},
};
+static void __init mpc85xx_mc_clear_rfxe(void *data)
+{
+ orig_hid1[smp_processor_id()] = mfspr(SPRN_HID1);
+ mtspr(SPRN_HID1, (orig_hid1[smp_processor_id()] ~0x2));
+}
+
static int __init mpc85xx_mc_init(void)
{
int res = 0;
@@ -1031,8 +1047,7 @@ static int __init mpc85xx_mc_init(void)
* so we can catch it
*/
if (edac_op_state == EDAC_OPSTATE_INT) {
- orig_hid1 = mfspr(SPRN_HID1);
- mtspr(SPRN_HID1, (orig_hid1 ~0x2));
+ on_each_cpu(mpc85xx_mc_clear_rfxe, NULL, 0);
}
return 0;
@@ -1040,9 +1055,14 @@ static int __init mpc85xx_mc_init(void)
module_init(mpc85xx_mc_init);
+static void __exit mpc85xx_mc_restore_hid1(void *data)
+{
+ mtspr(SPRN_HID1, orig_hid1[smp_processor_id()]);
+}
+
static void __exit mpc85xx_mc_exit(void)
{
- mtspr(SPRN_HID1, orig_hid1);
+ on_each_cpu(mpc85xx_mc_restore_hid1, NULL, 0);
#ifdef CONFIG_PCI
of_unregister_platform_driver(mpc85xx_pci_err_driver);
#endif
--
1.6.0.2
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: [PATCH] edac: mpc85xx: Add support for MPC8572
Acked-by: Dave Jiang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nate Case wrote:
From: Andrew Kilkenny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This adds support for the dual-core MPC8572 processor. We have
to support making SPR changes on each core. Also, since we can
have multiple memory controllers sharing an interrupt, flag the
interrupts with IRQF_SHARED.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Kilkenny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Nate Case [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c | 34 +++---
1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c b/drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c
index 2265d9c..0668492 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
#include linux/io.h
#include linux/mod_devicetable.h
#include linux/edac.h
+#include linux/smp.h
#include linux/of_platform.h
#include linux/of_device.h
@@ -40,7 +41,7 @@ static u32 orig_pci_err_en;
#endif
static u32 orig_l2_err_disable;
-static u32 orig_hid1;
+static u32 orig_hid1[2];
/ MC SYSFS parts ***/
@@ -272,7 +273,8 @@ static int __devinit mpc85xx_pci_err_probe(struct of_device *op,
if (edac_op_state == EDAC_OPSTATE_INT) {
pdata-irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(op-node, 0);
res = devm_request_irq(op-dev, pdata-irq,
- mpc85xx_pci_isr, IRQF_DISABLED,
+ mpc85xx_pci_isr,
+ IRQF_DISABLED | IRQF_SHARED,
[EDAC] PCI err, pci);
if (res 0) {
printk(KERN_ERR
@@ -576,7 +578,8 @@ static int __devinit mpc85xx_l2_err_probe(struct of_device
*op,
if (edac_op_state == EDAC_OPSTATE_INT) {
pdata-irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(op-node, 0);
res = devm_request_irq(op-dev, pdata-irq,
- mpc85xx_l2_isr, IRQF_DISABLED,
+ mpc85xx_l2_isr,
+ IRQF_DISABLED | IRQF_SHARED,
[EDAC] L2 err, edac_dev);
if (res 0) {
printk(KERN_ERR
@@ -647,6 +650,9 @@ static struct of_device_id mpc85xx_l2_err_of_match[] = {
{
.compatible = fsl,8568-l2-cache-controller,
},
+ {
+.compatible = fsl,8572-l2-cache-controller,
+},
{},
};
@@ -912,7 +918,8 @@ static int __devinit mpc85xx_mc_err_probe(struct of_device *op,
/* register interrupts */
pdata-irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(op-node, 0);
res = devm_request_irq(op-dev, pdata-irq,
- mpc85xx_mc_isr, IRQF_DISABLED,
+ mpc85xx_mc_isr,
+ IRQF_DISABLED | IRQF_SHARED,
[EDAC] MC err, mci);
if (res 0) {
printk(KERN_ERR %s: Unable to request irq %d for
@@ -980,6 +987,9 @@ static struct of_device_id mpc85xx_mc_err_of_match[] = {
{
.compatible = fsl,8568-memory-controller,
},
+ {
+.compatible = fsl,8572-memory-controller,
+},
{},
};
@@ -995,6 +1005,12 @@ static struct of_platform_driver mpc85xx_mc_err_driver = {
},
};
+static void __init mpc85xx_mc_clear_rfxe(void *data)
+{
+ orig_hid1[smp_processor_id()] = mfspr(SPRN_HID1);
+ mtspr(SPRN_HID1, (orig_hid1[smp_processor_id()] ~0x2));
+}
+
static int __init mpc85xx_mc_init(void)
{
int res = 0;
@@ -1031,8 +1047,7 @@ static int __init mpc85xx_mc_init(void)
* so we can catch it
*/
if (edac_op_state == EDAC_OPSTATE_INT) {
- orig_hid1 = mfspr(SPRN_HID1);
- mtspr(SPRN_HID1, (orig_hid1 ~0x2));
+ on_each_cpu(mpc85xx_mc_clear_rfxe, NULL, 0);
}
return 0;
@@ -1040,9 +1055,14 @@ static int __init mpc85xx_mc_init(void)
module_init(mpc85xx_mc_init);
+static void __exit mpc85xx_mc_restore_hid1(void *data)
+{
+ mtspr(SPRN_HID1, orig_hid1[smp_processor_id()]);
+}
+
static void __exit mpc85xx_mc_exit(void)
{
- mtspr(SPRN_HID1, orig_hid1);
+ on_each_cpu(mpc85xx_mc_restore_hid1, NULL, 0);
#ifdef CONFIG_PCI
of_unregister_platform_driver(mpc85xx_pci_err_driver);
#endif
--
--
Dave Jiang
Software Engineer
MontaVista Software, Inc.
http://www.mvista.com
--
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: [PATCH] edac: mpc85xx: Add support for MPC8572
On Sep 19, 2008, at 4:12 PM, Nate Case wrote:
From: Andrew Kilkenny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This adds support for the dual-core MPC8572 processor. We have
to support making SPR changes on each core. Also, since we can
have multiple memory controllers sharing an interrupt, flag the
interrupts with IRQF_SHARED.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Kilkenny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Nate Case [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c | 34 +++---
1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c b/drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c
index 2265d9c..0668492 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
#include linux/io.h
#include linux/mod_devicetable.h
#include linux/edac.h
+#include linux/smp.h
#include linux/of_platform.h
#include linux/of_device.h
@@ -40,7 +41,7 @@ static u32 orig_pci_err_en;
#endif
static u32 orig_l2_err_disable;
-static u32 orig_hid1;
+static u32 orig_hid1[2];
/ MC SYSFS parts
***/
@@ -272,7 +273,8 @@ static int __devinit
mpc85xx_pci_err_probe(struct of_device *op,
if (edac_op_state == EDAC_OPSTATE_INT) {
pdata-irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(op-node, 0);
res = devm_request_irq(op-dev, pdata-irq,
- mpc85xx_pci_isr, IRQF_DISABLED,
+ mpc85xx_pci_isr,
+ IRQF_DISABLED | IRQF_SHARED,
I don't have any issue with this, but why are you marking the PCI
error interrupt as shared?
[EDAC] PCI err, pci);
if (res 0) {
printk(KERN_ERR
@@ -576,7 +578,8 @@ static int __devinit mpc85xx_l2_err_probe(struct
of_device *op,
if (edac_op_state == EDAC_OPSTATE_INT) {
pdata-irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(op-node, 0);
res = devm_request_irq(op-dev, pdata-irq,
- mpc85xx_l2_isr, IRQF_DISABLED,
+ mpc85xx_l2_isr,
+ IRQF_DISABLED | IRQF_SHARED,
[EDAC] L2 err, edac_dev);
this I'm a bit more skeptical about.
if (res 0) {
printk(KERN_ERR
@@ -647,6 +650,9 @@ static struct of_device_id
mpc85xx_l2_err_of_match[] = {
{
.compatible = fsl,8568-l2-cache-controller,
},
+ {
+.compatible = fsl,8572-l2-cache-controller,
+},
its fsl,mpc8572.. (we need to fix the others to match that convention
as its pretty standard for other device tree nodes)
{},
};
@@ -912,7 +918,8 @@ static int __devinit mpc85xx_mc_err_probe(struct
of_device *op,
/* register interrupts */
pdata-irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(op-node, 0);
res = devm_request_irq(op-dev, pdata-irq,
- mpc85xx_mc_isr, IRQF_DISABLED,
+ mpc85xx_mc_isr,
+ IRQF_DISABLED | IRQF_SHARED,
[EDAC] MC err, mci);
if (res 0) {
printk(KERN_ERR %s: Unable to request irq %d for
@@ -980,6 +987,9 @@ static struct of_device_id
mpc85xx_mc_err_of_match[] = {
{
.compatible = fsl,8568-memory-controller,
},
+ {
+.compatible = fsl,8572-memory-controller,
+},
ditto on 'fsl,mpc8572'
{},
};
@@ -995,6 +1005,12 @@ static struct of_platform_driver
mpc85xx_mc_err_driver = {
},
};
+static void __init mpc85xx_mc_clear_rfxe(void *data)
+{
+ orig_hid1[smp_processor_id()] = mfspr(SPRN_HID1);
+ mtspr(SPRN_HID1, (orig_hid1[smp_processor_id()] ~0x2));
+}
+
static int __init mpc85xx_mc_init(void)
{
int res = 0;
@@ -1031,8 +1047,7 @@ static int __init mpc85xx_mc_init(void)
* so we can catch it
*/
if (edac_op_state == EDAC_OPSTATE_INT) {
- orig_hid1 = mfspr(SPRN_HID1);
- mtspr(SPRN_HID1, (orig_hid1 ~0x2));
+ on_each_cpu(mpc85xx_mc_clear_rfxe, NULL, 0);
}
return 0;
@@ -1040,9 +1055,14 @@ static int __init mpc85xx_mc_init(void)
module_init(mpc85xx_mc_init);
+static void __exit mpc85xx_mc_restore_hid1(void *data)
+{
+ mtspr(SPRN_HID1, orig_hid1[smp_processor_id()]);
+}
+
static void __exit mpc85xx_mc_exit(void)
{
- mtspr(SPRN_HID1, orig_hid1);
+ on_each_cpu(mpc85xx_mc_restore_hid1, NULL, 0);
#ifdef CONFIG_PCI
of_unregister_platform_driver(mpc85xx_pci_err_driver);
#endif
--
1.6.0.2
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: [PATCH] edac: mpc85xx: Add support for MPC8572
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 16:43 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: I don't have any issue with this, but why are you marking the PCI error interrupt as shared? [snip] this I'm a bit more skeptical about. The only one we really need to make shared is the memory controller interrupt. I'll drop it for the PCI and L2 interrupts in the next rev of the patch. its fsl,mpc8572.. (we need to fix the others to match that convention as its pretty standard for other device tree nodes) I actually started out with fsl,mpc8572-* but then somehow convinced myself I was wrong when I saw fsl,85xx in so many other places :) Thanks for the feedback. I'll correct these and re-submit. -- Nate Case [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
