Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] powernv:stop: Uniformly rename power9 to arch300
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Gautham R Shenoy wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 03:17:33PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 02:37:01PM +0530, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote: >> > From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" >> > >> > Balbir pointed out that in idle_book3s.S and powernv/idle.c some >> > functions and variables had power9 in their names while some others >> > had arch300. >> > >> >> I would prefer power9 to arch300 >> > > > I don't have a strong preference for arch300 vs power9, will change it > to power9 if that looks better. Personally I think we should be as descriptive as possible and use power_9_arch_300_the_bikeshed_is_red_dammit. Oliver
Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] powernv:stop: Uniformly rename power9 to arch300
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 03:17:33PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 02:37:01PM +0530, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote: > > From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" > > > > Balbir pointed out that in idle_book3s.S and powernv/idle.c some > > functions and variables had power9 in their names while some others > > had arch300. > > > > I would prefer power9 to arch300 > I don't have a strong preference for arch300 vs power9, will change it to power9 if that looks better. -- Thanks and Regards gautham.
Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] powernv:stop: Uniformly rename power9 to arch300
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 02:37:01PM +0530, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote: > From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" > > Balbir pointed out that in idle_book3s.S and powernv/idle.c some > functions and variables had power9 in their names while some others > had arch300. > I would prefer power9 to arch300 Balbir Singh.
