Re: [WSG] We do not support the Safari browser yet
On 11/10/06, Barney Carroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Matthew Pennell wrote: I believe Safari has some issues with certain _javascript_/Ajax implementations, maybe? Or maybe they only had earlier versions to test on and couldn't get the site to work in 1.2...Safari's _javascript_ support is very patchy, to the extent where you canno longer rely on functionality degrading gracefully if you have heavyfunctional implementation of js.I also get the impression that there is a bit of an unspoken culture of I built this up nice and clean to work in Firefox, and then I worked myfingers to the bone getting it to work in IE because it's themajorities' browser... Safari can fuck off.Regards,Barney I've noticed that much of the AJAX stuff in gmail doesn't show in Safari either, so there's probably something going on there.~eys ***List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfmUnsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfmHelp: [EMAIL PROTECTED]***
[WSG] Standards sites with clever use of Flash?
To the list,I'm looking for webstandards/css complaint sites with flash in them. Clever flash, flash that looks Ajaxy, heavy good actionscripting, innovative menus, generic random animation... Those sort of things. The only one I can remember, but not find again, was for an ISP (I think), had a web2.0-look with dark background and some cartoon-animated buttons. Allthough I'm looking for more than that. ~Eys ***List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfmUnsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfmHelp: [EMAIL PROTECTED]***
Re: [WSG] Standards sites with clever use of Flash?
I'm looking for webstandards/css complaint sites with flash in them. OK, Stylegala is the best place to look. A bunch of examples:http://www.hellgatelondon.com/https://www.widsets.com/ http://web.burza.hr/en/thanks. http://web.burza.hr/en/ was the one I was thinking of. http://www.stylegala.com/ is good too! Don't let this stop you from giving me more pointers though :)~eys ***List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfmUnsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfmHelp: [EMAIL PROTECTED]***
Re: [WSG] Safari and bg-images for list bullets
On 10/10/06, John Faulds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a couple of problems with Safari which can be seen on this page:http://www.tyssendesign.com.au/examples/test.htmlSo, is there a solution? Does it require using a Safari-only filter? I ran into the same problem not long ago, and solved by simply altering the image itself - to have more whitespace between the two states (hover and not-hover). Using a gif it won't make the image file any (noticeably) larger. It's not an ideal solution, but it's a means to an end. ~eys ***List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfmUnsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfmHelp: [EMAIL PROTECTED]***
Re: [WSG] Safari and bg-images for list bullets
On 10/10/06, John Faulds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a couple of problems with Safari which can be seen on this page: http://www.tyssendesign.com.au/examples/test.html So, is there a solution? Does it require using a Safari-only filter? I ran into the same problem not long ago, and solved by simply altering the image itself - to have more whitespace between the two states (hover and not-hover). Using a gif it won't make the image file any (noticeably) larger. It's not an ideal solution, but it's a means to an end. I've already done that though. The space between the two states is about 5times the height of the actual bullet. In Safari you can actually seem theon state appearing above the off state even though it's about 40px below it in the image file and bg-repeat is set to no-repeat.I should've remembered, I added whitespace at the top and bottom of the image, and adjusted the background-postition accordingly. In other words, it's still showing the bottom/top in the wrong place, but since you've changed it to the same backgroundcolor (or transparent) it won't show. If anyone knows why the bottom of the bg shows above the top on no-repeat please feel free to enlighten us! ~eys ***List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfmUnsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfmHelp: [EMAIL PROTECTED]***
