Re: [WSG] Please Vote for your Favorite
On 06/04/12 01:55 (GMT-0400) Christian Montoya apparently typed: Liquid Designs reached 100 entries yesterday and I figured the best way to celebrate would be to let everyone decide the best design out of those 100. I had a team of 4 guest reviewers pick their favorites and they came up with 7 finalists. Please take a moment to vote for your favorite one. Voting will continue until midnight Saturday (EST). http://cssliquid.com/2006/news/100-gallery-entries-now-vote-for-the-best/ It's missing a none of the above selection. -- Have nothing to do with the fruitless deeds of darkness, but rather expose them.Ephesians 5:11 NIV Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 Felix Miata *** http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/auth/auth ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Please Vote for your Favorite
On 4/12/06, Felix Miata [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 06/04/12 01:55 (GMT-0400) Christian Montoya apparently typed: Liquid Designs reached 100 entries yesterday and I figured the best way to celebrate would be to let everyone decide the best design out of those 100. I had a team of 4 guest reviewers pick their favorites and they came up with 7 finalists. Please take a moment to vote for your favorite one. Voting will continue until midnight Saturday (EST). http://cssliquid.com/2006/news/100-gallery-entries-now-vote-for-the-best/ It's missing a none of the above selection. No it's not. If you look at the top left of your screen, it should say Back. -- -- Christian Montoya christianmontoya.com ... rdpdesign.com ... cssliquid.com ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Please Vote for your Favorite
Christian Montoya wrote: Hello listers, Liquid Designs reached 100 entries yesterday and I figured the best way to celebrate would be to let everyone decide the best design out of those 100. I had a team of 4 guest reviewers pick their favorites and they came up with 7 finalists. Please take a moment to vote for your favorite one. Voting will continue until midnight Saturday (EST). http://cssliquid.com/2006/news/100-gallery-entries-now-vote-for-the-best/ Hi Christian: is the voting really working right. When I clicked on the bottom-right one to view it, the radio button was also selected, even though i didn't necessarily mean to vote for it. and, in looking at the results the first site has far the most votes which made me wonder further if they got the vote by people starting down the list with the intent to look at all of them but voted instead. Neat idea! cheers Donna -- -- Christian Montoya christianmontoya.com ... rdpdesign.com ... cssliquid.com ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** -- Donna Jones Portland, Maine 207 772 0266 http://www.westendwebs.com/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Please Vote for your Favorite
Christian Montoya wrote: On 4/12/06, Felix Miata [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 06/04/12 01:55 (GMT-0400) Christian Montoya apparently typed: Liquid Designs reached 100 entries yesterday and I figured the best way to celebrate would be to let everyone decide the best design out of those 100. I had a team of 4 guest reviewers pick their favorites and they came up with 7 finalists. Please take a moment to vote for your favorite one. Voting will continue until midnight Saturday (EST). http://cssliquid.com/2006/news/100-gallery-entries-now-vote-for-the-best/ It's missing a none of the above selection. No it's not. If you look at the top left of your screen, it should say Back. ;-) Regards, Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Please Vote for your Favorite
On 06/04/12 11:45 (GMT-0400) Christian Montoya apparently typed: On 4/12/06, Felix Miata [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 06/04/12 01:55 (GMT-0400) Christian Montoya apparently typed: Please take a moment to vote http://cssliquid.com/2006/news/100-gallery-entries-now-vote-for-the-best/ It's missing a none of the above selection. No it's not. If you look at the top left of your screen, it should say Back. But you wrote please, and I did take the time to look at them all, 3 times each. -- Have nothing to do with the fruitless deeds of darkness, but rather expose them.Ephesians 5:11 NIV Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 Felix Miata *** http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/auth/auth ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Please Vote for your Favorite
Forgive me if I'm mistaken, but isn't this off topic? ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Please Vote for your Favorite
On 4/12/06, Chris Littell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Forgive me if I'm mistaken, but isn't this off topic? I'm going to say this falls under Site reviews and critiques, which is one of the approved topics. -- -- Christian Montoya christianmontoya.com ... rdpdesign.com ... cssliquid.com ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Please Vote for your Favorite
On 4/13/06, Jack Pivac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: on 13/04/06 08:41 Christian Montoya said the following: On 4/12/06, Chris Littell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Forgive me if I'm mistaken, but isn't this off topic? I'm going to say this falls under Site reviews and critiques, which is one of the approved topics. Where does one find this list of approved topics thus to avoid myself from prosecution? In the footer of every single message sent via wsg@webstandardsgroup.org: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm -- -- Christian Montoya christianmontoya.com ... rdpdesign.com ... cssliquid.com ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Please Vote for your Favorite
On 06/04/12 01:55 (GMT-0400) Christian Montoya apparently typed: Liquid Designs reached 100 entries yesterday and I figured the best way to celebrate would be to let everyone decide the best design out of those 100. I had a team of 4 guest reviewers pick their favorites and they came up with 7 finalists. Please take a moment to vote for your favorite one. Voting will continue until midnight Saturday (EST). http://cssliquid.com/2006/news/100-gallery-entries-now-vote-for-the-best/ For any who might care, I've captured all those sites with 1280 wide resolution screenshots, with and without minimum font size set equal to my 20px default. Each of them links to each of the other 6 contextual setup pages and to all 14 screenshots. http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/auth/Sites/sc-cssliquid-cheea.html will get you started. All except Watchmaker nicely tolerate the 20px minimum. What all except Jason show is the dominant text size on each is considerably smaller than Firefox's menu text. Firefox's menu text size here is 10pt, the same size KDE defaults to for all QT app and desktop menus, so the only thing special about it is that it's larger than the 8pt M$ default most web designers live most intimately with. Since _everything_ I've found with a claimed scientific basis either recommends an absolute minimum of 10pt, or finds that more ordinary web users prefer the most common OEM browser default of 12pt over other sizes, this means that among the finalists style trumps user preferences, and accessibility for sighted users is something less than optimal. My question is why is this so? Why is it that style cannot permit users by default text they are comfortable reading? Why is this a so nearly universal modern web standard? I'll provide bad answer #1: because space above the fold is precious. Please don't sidetrack on the issue of impropriety of pt for CSS text sizing. CSS text sizes need not be specified in pt for users to get the 12pt or any other size they prefer. -- Have nothing to do with the fruitless deeds of darkness, but rather expose them.Ephesians 5:11 NIV Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 Felix Miata *** http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/auth/auth ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
