Re: faild to build log4cxx = undefinde reference to `_imp__apr_xml_parse_file@20'

2013-07-10 Thread Pedro Lamarão
Em 10/07/2013 03:04, Ervin Bajramovic escreveu:

 cd apr-1.4.8

 cd apr-util-1.5.2


Hm... Can you mix apr 1.4 with apr-util 1.5?

Anyway, we build log4cxx with apr-util 1.4.

Have you tried that version?


-- 
Pedro Lamarão Rosa e Silva
Prodist Technologies
http://www.prodist.com.br/
Securing Transaction Systems
Tel.: (21) 4062-7188



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Compiling with Visual Studio

2013-06-04 Thread Pedro Lamarão
Em 04/06/2013 14:17, Dave Arndt escreveu:

 Thanks.  Well... are the projects known to compile under other tools
 (gnu, etc.)?   If I can get them to build cleanly with GNU, for example,
 then I may be able to create a VS 2010 project and post it.   I'm
 getting errors like:
 
 1C:\Users\darndt\Projects\log4cxx\apache-log4cxx-0.10.0\src\main\include\log4cxx/spi/loggingevent.h(155):
 error C2252: an explicit instantiation of a template can only occur at
 namespace scope

These are actual errors that need to be fixed in the code by moving the
instatiations out of the class definition to namespace scope. Minimal
code changes can be achieved by replacing those with typedef declarations.

We have MSBuild files for log4cxx that we can share if you would like to
try them. We use them to build log4cxx with Visual Studio 10.

-- 
Pedro Lamarão Rosa e Silva
Prodist Technologies
http://www.prodist.com.br/
Securing Transaction Systems
Tel.: (21) 4062-7188



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: log4cxx - reaching out for interested developers

2013-05-06 Thread Pedro Lamarão
Em 05/05/2013 03:42, Christian Grobmeier escreveu:
 Hello Chand,
 
 i asked the other logging members over at general@.
 One suggestion was to enable a git mirror for log4cxx and make it easier
 for others to contribute.
 Ralph (from log4j 2 mainly) mentioned he could look at the patches,
 because he has the skills which i lack.
 On the other hand, I might be able to release.
 
 Then the community could contribute / fork via GitHub too, which
 lightens the burden.
 
 So far not confirmed, but this is another option.


We were planning on a fork for our own purposes; this seems a good
opportunity for us to participate.

I will make a fork from trunk on GitHub today. Anyone wants in, we can
deal with the patches, tarball releases and things like that.

-- https://github.com/pedrolamarao/log4cxx

-- 
Pedro Lamarão Rosa e Silva
Prodist Technologies
http://www.prodist.com.br/
Securing Transaction Systems
Tel.: (21) 4062-7188



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: log4cxx - reaching out for interested developers

2013-05-06 Thread Pedro Lamarão
Em 06/05/2013 11:38, Rhys Ulerich escreveu:
 I will make a fork from trunk on GitHub today. Anyone wants in, we can
 deal with the patches, tarball releases and things like that.

 -- https://github.com/pedrolamarao/log4cxx
 
 With regards to a Github-based fork, one important thing from the
 discussion at 
 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/logging-general/201305.mbox/browser
 was that ICLAs should be in place before pull requests can be
 accepted.  Otherwise, incorporating any changes into an Apache-blessed
 tree at a later date becomes difficult.


If someone could instruct me on this process, I could submit a
contribution agreement ASAP, and then keep this in mind while managing
the fork. I suspect a small community would not give me much trouble in
this regard.


-- 
Pedro Lamarão Rosa e Silva
Prodist Technologies
http://www.prodist.com.br/
Securing Transaction Systems
Tel.: (21) 4062-7188



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: log4cxx - reaching out for interested developers

2013-05-06 Thread Pedro Lamarão
Em 06/05/2013 14:00, chand priyankara escreveu:

 Pretty good discussions, thanks to every body.
 Git seems a good track, and I'm in.
 
 Since *Christian* is here, I hope we can continue with:
 https://github.com/apache/log4cxx

I have somehow missed this.

We will see about rebasing our internal fork onto that.

Is there a process for patch reviewing and/or pull requests already in
place?

-- 
Pedro Lamarão Rosa e Silva
Prodist Technologies
http://www.prodist.com.br/
Securing Transaction Systems
Tel.: (21) 4062-7188



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature