Re: Editable File Log File Permissions

2016-11-14 Thread Mikael Ståldal 
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1503

On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Gary Gregory 
wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 11:34 PM, Demetrios Dimatos 
> wrote:
>
> > I am trying to make my way to commiter , I'm the technical lead for HDFS,
> > MapRed, Yarn; 6 of us on the team. I took this requirement from our cloud
> > team but I have doubts about our April time frame . We would have to
> change
> > quite a bit of Hadoop code, looks like it's no small task
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12956
> > I have a back up plan which is to contribute my ambari log search
> > prototype that allows for grouping service logs for download over their
> > current single component-node painful navigation .
> >
> > I will keep it in mind , I appreciate the offer. Btw I see you work for
> > rocket , I used to work with a bunch of rocketeers when I was doing full
> > stack for IBM:)
> >
>
> I'll have to read up on that ticket. We've recently made progress on
> supporting more of Log4j 1.x configuration files in our new Log4j 2.7
> release.
>
> Small world :-) I sent you a LinkedIn invite.
>
> Gary
>
> >
> > On Friday, November 11, 2016, Gary Gregory 
> wrote:
> >
> > > I just migrated HttpComponents to Log4j2, it's pretty simple. Let me
> know
> > > if need help. Are you a Hadoop committer?
> > >
> > > Gary
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 11:06 PM, Demetrios Dimatos  > > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Ok great , now I have to get buy in to have all the Hadoop components
> > to
> > > > move to log4j2. I will keep you posted, thanks for the speedy
> replies .
> > > >
> > > > On Friday, November 11, 2016, Gary Gregory  > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:47 PM, Demetrios Dimatos <
> > dima...@gmail.com
> > > 
> > > > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Our needs don't really go beyond file permissions, setting each
> > > Owner,
> > > > > > Group, Other , but I would say if we go this far that we also be
> > able
> > > > to
> > > > > > set the owner and the group for a file.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If this is something you have run across before and think it
> could
> > > > > benefit
> > > > > > with something more than what our needs are, I don't think its a
> > > > problem,
> > > > > > we are pretty flexible.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I've never needed that. It seems pretty simple to implement. Give
> it
> > a
> > > go
> > > > > :-)
> > > > >
> > > > > Gary
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 9:43 PM, Gary Gregory <
> > > garydgreg...@gmail.com 
> > > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > What do you plan beyond supporting
> > > > > > > https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/nio/
> > file/attribute/
> > > > > > > PosixFilePermission.html
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Gary
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 9:24 PM, Demetrios Dimatos <
> > > > dima...@gmail.com 
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Will do, needs some more work but looking to see if the
> > community
> > > > > would
> > > > > > > > accept seeing as they rejected a similar proposal long back.
> > > > Opening
> > > > > a
> > > > > > > JIRA
> > > > > > > > - Question now. Thanks.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Gary Gregory <
> > > > > garydgreg...@gmail.com  >
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Oh, and make sure you base your patch on the git master
> > branch.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Gary
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Nov 11, 2016 9:12 PM, "Gary Gregory" <
> > > garydgreg...@gmail.com 
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Ok, cool.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Gary
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Nov 11, 2016 9:10 PM, "Demetrios Dimatos" <
> > > > dima...@gmail.com 
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >> Hi Gary,
> > > > > > > > > >> We are using Log4j2, I thought to take it to the mail
> list
> > > > > before
> > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > >> opening
> > > > > > > > > >> a JIRA. I will open a JIRA for this.
> > > > > > > > > >> Thank you ,
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> On Friday, November 11, 2016, Gary Gregory <
> > > > > > garydgreg...@gmail.com  >
> > > > > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> > Which version of Log4j are you using?
> > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > >> > Bugzilla is no longer used and we no longer support
> > adding
> > > > to
> > > > > > > Log4j
> > > > > > > > 1.
> > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > >> > For Log4j 2

Re: Editable File Log File Permissions

2016-11-12 Thread Gary Gregory 
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 11:34 PM, Demetrios Dimatos 
wrote:

> I am trying to make my way to commiter , I'm the technical lead for HDFS,
> MapRed, Yarn; 6 of us on the team. I took this requirement from our cloud
> team but I have doubts about our April time frame . We would have to change
> quite a bit of Hadoop code, looks like it's no small task
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12956
> I have a back up plan which is to contribute my ambari log search
> prototype that allows for grouping service logs for download over their
> current single component-node painful navigation .
>
> I will keep it in mind , I appreciate the offer. Btw I see you work for
> rocket , I used to work with a bunch of rocketeers when I was doing full
> stack for IBM:)
>

I'll have to read up on that ticket. We've recently made progress on
supporting more of Log4j 1.x configuration files in our new Log4j 2.7
release.

Small world :-) I sent you a LinkedIn invite.

Gary

>
> On Friday, November 11, 2016, Gary Gregory  wrote:
>
> > I just migrated HttpComponents to Log4j2, it's pretty simple. Let me know
> > if need help. Are you a Hadoop committer?
> >
> > Gary
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 11:06 PM, Demetrios Dimatos  > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Ok great , now I have to get buy in to have all the Hadoop components
> to
> > > move to log4j2. I will keep you posted, thanks for the speedy replies .
> > >
> > > On Friday, November 11, 2016, Gary Gregory  > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:47 PM, Demetrios Dimatos <
> dima...@gmail.com
> > 
> > > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Our needs don't really go beyond file permissions, setting each
> > Owner,
> > > > > Group, Other , but I would say if we go this far that we also be
> able
> > > to
> > > > > set the owner and the group for a file.
> > > > >
> > > > > If this is something you have run across before and think it could
> > > > benefit
> > > > > with something more than what our needs are, I don't think its a
> > > problem,
> > > > > we are pretty flexible.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I've never needed that. It seems pretty simple to implement. Give it
> a
> > go
> > > > :-)
> > > >
> > > > Gary
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 9:43 PM, Gary Gregory <
> > garydgreg...@gmail.com 
> > > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > What do you plan beyond supporting
> > > > > > https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/nio/
> file/attribute/
> > > > > > PosixFilePermission.html
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Gary
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 9:24 PM, Demetrios Dimatos <
> > > dima...@gmail.com 
> > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Will do, needs some more work but looking to see if the
> community
> > > > would
> > > > > > > accept seeing as they rejected a similar proposal long back.
> > > Opening
> > > > a
> > > > > > JIRA
> > > > > > > - Question now. Thanks.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Gary Gregory <
> > > > garydgreg...@gmail.com  >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Oh, and make sure you base your patch on the git master
> branch.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Gary
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Nov 11, 2016 9:12 PM, "Gary Gregory" <
> > garydgreg...@gmail.com 
> > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Ok, cool.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Gary
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Nov 11, 2016 9:10 PM, "Demetrios Dimatos" <
> > > dima...@gmail.com 
> > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> Hi Gary,
> > > > > > > > >> We are using Log4j2, I thought to take it to the mail list
> > > > before
> > > > > a
> > > > > > > > >> opening
> > > > > > > > >> a JIRA. I will open a JIRA for this.
> > > > > > > > >> Thank you ,
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> On Friday, November 11, 2016, Gary Gregory <
> > > > > garydgreg...@gmail.com  >
> > > > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> > Which version of Log4j are you using?
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > >> > Bugzilla is no longer used and we no longer support
> adding
> > > to
> > > > > > Log4j
> > > > > > > 1.
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > >> > For Log4j 2 patches and requests, please use Jira.
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > >> > Thank you,
> > > > > > > > >> > Gary
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > >> > On Nov 11, 2016 8:18 PM, "Demetrios Dimatos" <
> > > > dima...@gmail.com  
> > > > > > > > >> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > >> > > Hello All,
> > > > > > > > >> > > We would like to hear the communities thoughts

Re: Editable File Log File Permissions

2016-11-11 Thread Demetrios Dimatos 
I am trying to make my way to commiter , I'm the technical lead for HDFS,
MapRed, Yarn; 6 of us on the team. I took this requirement from our cloud
team but I have doubts about our April time frame . We would have to change
quite a bit of Hadoop code, looks like it's no small task
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12956
I have a back up plan which is to contribute my ambari log search
prototype that allows for grouping service logs for download over their
current single component-node painful navigation .

I will keep it in mind , I appreciate the offer. Btw I see you work for
rocket , I used to work with a bunch of rocketeers when I was doing full
stack for IBM:)

On Friday, November 11, 2016, Gary Gregory  wrote:

> I just migrated HttpComponents to Log4j2, it's pretty simple. Let me know
> if need help. Are you a Hadoop committer?
>
> Gary
>
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 11:06 PM, Demetrios Dimatos  >
> wrote:
>
> > Ok great , now I have to get buy in to have all the Hadoop components to
> > move to log4j2. I will keep you posted, thanks for the speedy replies .
> >
> > On Friday, November 11, 2016, Gary Gregory  > wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:47 PM, Demetrios Dimatos  
> > > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Our needs don't really go beyond file permissions, setting each
> Owner,
> > > > Group, Other , but I would say if we go this far that we also be able
> > to
> > > > set the owner and the group for a file.
> > > >
> > > > If this is something you have run across before and think it could
> > > benefit
> > > > with something more than what our needs are, I don't think its a
> > problem,
> > > > we are pretty flexible.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I've never needed that. It seems pretty simple to implement. Give it a
> go
> > > :-)
> > >
> > > Gary
> > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 9:43 PM, Gary Gregory <
> garydgreg...@gmail.com 
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > What do you plan beyond supporting
> > > > > https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/nio/file/attribute/
> > > > > PosixFilePermission.html
> > > > >
> > > > > ?
> > > > >
> > > > > Gary
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 9:24 PM, Demetrios Dimatos <
> > dima...@gmail.com 
> > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Will do, needs some more work but looking to see if the community
> > > would
> > > > > > accept seeing as they rejected a similar proposal long back.
> > Opening
> > > a
> > > > > JIRA
> > > > > > - Question now. Thanks.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Gary Gregory <
> > > garydgreg...@gmail.com  >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Oh, and make sure you base your patch on the git master branch.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Gary
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Nov 11, 2016 9:12 PM, "Gary Gregory" <
> garydgreg...@gmail.com 
> > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Ok, cool.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Gary
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Nov 11, 2016 9:10 PM, "Demetrios Dimatos" <
> > dima...@gmail.com 
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> Hi Gary,
> > > > > > > >> We are using Log4j2, I thought to take it to the mail list
> > > before
> > > > a
> > > > > > > >> opening
> > > > > > > >> a JIRA. I will open a JIRA for this.
> > > > > > > >> Thank you ,
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> On Friday, November 11, 2016, Gary Gregory <
> > > > garydgreg...@gmail.com  >
> > > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> > Which version of Log4j are you using?
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > Bugzilla is no longer used and we no longer support adding
> > to
> > > > > Log4j
> > > > > > 1.
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > For Log4j 2 patches and requests, please use Jira.
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > Thank you,
> > > > > > > >> > Gary
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > On Nov 11, 2016 8:18 PM, "Demetrios Dimatos" <
> > > dima...@gmail.com  
> > > > > > > >> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > > Hello All,
> > > > > > > >> > > We would like to hear the communities thoughts on being
> > able
> > > > to
> > > > > > > >> configure
> > > > > > > >> > > the permissions log files are created with. We don't
> want
> > to
> > > > > rely
> > > > > > on
> > > > > > > >> > UMASK
> > > > > > > >> > > because we have managed services who's process should
> > > generate
> > > > > > logs
> > > > > > > >> with
> > > > > > > >> > a
> > > > > > > >> > > 644 yet deployed applications by users should default
> to a
> > > 640
> > > > > > > because
> > > > > > > >> > the
> > > > > > > >> > > logs may contain sensitive information.
> > > > > > > >> >

Re: Editable File Log File Permissions

2016-11-11 Thread Gary Gregory 
I just migrated HttpComponents to Log4j2, it's pretty simple. Let me know
if need help. Are you a Hadoop committer?

Gary

On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 11:06 PM, Demetrios Dimatos 
wrote:

> Ok great , now I have to get buy in to have all the Hadoop components to
> move to log4j2. I will keep you posted, thanks for the speedy replies .
>
> On Friday, November 11, 2016, Gary Gregory  wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:47 PM, Demetrios Dimatos  > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Our needs don't really go beyond file permissions, setting each Owner,
> > > Group, Other , but I would say if we go this far that we also be able
> to
> > > set the owner and the group for a file.
> > >
> > > If this is something you have run across before and think it could
> > benefit
> > > with something more than what our needs are, I don't think its a
> problem,
> > > we are pretty flexible.
> > >
> >
> > I've never needed that. It seems pretty simple to implement. Give it a go
> > :-)
> >
> > Gary
> >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 9:43 PM, Gary Gregory  > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > What do you plan beyond supporting
> > > > https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/nio/file/attribute/
> > > > PosixFilePermission.html
> > > >
> > > > ?
> > > >
> > > > Gary
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 9:24 PM, Demetrios Dimatos <
> dima...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Will do, needs some more work but looking to see if the community
> > would
> > > > > accept seeing as they rejected a similar proposal long back.
> Opening
> > a
> > > > JIRA
> > > > > - Question now. Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Gary Gregory <
> > garydgreg...@gmail.com >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Oh, and make sure you base your patch on the git master branch.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Gary
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Nov 11, 2016 9:12 PM, "Gary Gregory"  > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Ok, cool.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Gary
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Nov 11, 2016 9:10 PM, "Demetrios Dimatos" <
> dima...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> Hi Gary,
> > > > > > >> We are using Log4j2, I thought to take it to the mail list
> > before
> > > a
> > > > > > >> opening
> > > > > > >> a JIRA. I will open a JIRA for this.
> > > > > > >> Thank you ,
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On Friday, November 11, 2016, Gary Gregory <
> > > garydgreg...@gmail.com >
> > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> > Which version of Log4j are you using?
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Bugzilla is no longer used and we no longer support adding
> to
> > > > Log4j
> > > > > 1.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > For Log4j 2 patches and requests, please use Jira.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Thank you,
> > > > > > >> > Gary
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > On Nov 11, 2016 8:18 PM, "Demetrios Dimatos" <
> > dima...@gmail.com 
> > > > > > >> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > > Hello All,
> > > > > > >> > > We would like to hear the communities thoughts on being
> able
> > > to
> > > > > > >> configure
> > > > > > >> > > the permissions log files are created with. We don't want
> to
> > > > rely
> > > > > on
> > > > > > >> > UMASK
> > > > > > >> > > because we have managed services who's process should
> > generate
> > > > > logs
> > > > > > >> with
> > > > > > >> > a
> > > > > > >> > > 644 yet deployed applications by users should default to a
> > 640
> > > > > > because
> > > > > > >> > the
> > > > > > >> > > logs may contain sensitive information.
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > We are able to make the modification and set this in the
> > > > > properties
> > > > > > >> file.
> > > > > > >> > > Now we are looking to see what the community position
> would
> > be
> > > > on
> > > > > > >> > accepting
> > > > > > >> > > such a patch, we don't want to be patching our own
> > > distribution.
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > I searched all the JIRAs and was not able to find any
> > matching
> > > > > > >> > requirements
> > > > > > >> > > recently. All I could find was something dated in 2006:
> > > > > > >> > > https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40407
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > Thank you.
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com  | ggreg...@apache.org
> > 
> > > > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
> > > >  > > > tl?ie=UTF8=1789=9325=1617290459&
> > > > linkCode=as2=garygregory-20=
> cadb800f39946ec62ea2b1af9fe6a2
> > b8>
> > > >
> > > >

Re: Editable File Log File Permissions

2016-11-11 Thread Demetrios Dimatos 
Ok great , now I have to get buy in to have all the Hadoop components to
move to log4j2. I will keep you posted, thanks for the speedy replies .

On Friday, November 11, 2016, Gary Gregory  wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:47 PM, Demetrios Dimatos  >
> wrote:
>
> > Our needs don't really go beyond file permissions, setting each Owner,
> > Group, Other , but I would say if we go this far that we also be able to
> > set the owner and the group for a file.
> >
> > If this is something you have run across before and think it could
> benefit
> > with something more than what our needs are, I don't think its a problem,
> > we are pretty flexible.
> >
>
> I've never needed that. It seems pretty simple to implement. Give it a go
> :-)
>
> Gary
>
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 9:43 PM, Gary Gregory  >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > What do you plan beyond supporting
> > > https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/nio/file/attribute/
> > > PosixFilePermission.html
> > >
> > > ?
> > >
> > > Gary
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 9:24 PM, Demetrios Dimatos  >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Will do, needs some more work but looking to see if the community
> would
> > > > accept seeing as they rejected a similar proposal long back. Opening
> a
> > > JIRA
> > > > - Question now. Thanks.
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Gary Gregory <
> garydgreg...@gmail.com >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Oh, and make sure you base your patch on the git master branch.
> > > > >
> > > > > Gary
> > > > >
> > > > > On Nov 11, 2016 9:12 PM, "Gary Gregory"  >
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Ok, cool.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Gary
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Nov 11, 2016 9:10 PM, "Demetrios Dimatos"  >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Hi Gary,
> > > > > >> We are using Log4j2, I thought to take it to the mail list
> before
> > a
> > > > > >> opening
> > > > > >> a JIRA. I will open a JIRA for this.
> > > > > >> Thank you ,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Friday, November 11, 2016, Gary Gregory <
> > garydgreg...@gmail.com >
> > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> > Which version of Log4j are you using?
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Bugzilla is no longer used and we no longer support adding to
> > > Log4j
> > > > 1.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > For Log4j 2 patches and requests, please use Jira.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Thank you,
> > > > > >> > Gary
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > On Nov 11, 2016 8:18 PM, "Demetrios Dimatos" <
> dima...@gmail.com 
> > > > > >> > > wrote:
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > Hello All,
> > > > > >> > > We would like to hear the communities thoughts on being able
> > to
> > > > > >> configure
> > > > > >> > > the permissions log files are created with. We don't want to
> > > rely
> > > > on
> > > > > >> > UMASK
> > > > > >> > > because we have managed services who's process should
> generate
> > > > logs
> > > > > >> with
> > > > > >> > a
> > > > > >> > > 644 yet deployed applications by users should default to a
> 640
> > > > > because
> > > > > >> > the
> > > > > >> > > logs may contain sensitive information.
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > We are able to make the modification and set this in the
> > > > properties
> > > > > >> file.
> > > > > >> > > Now we are looking to see what the community position would
> be
> > > on
> > > > > >> > accepting
> > > > > >> > > such a patch, we don't want to be patching our own
> > distribution.
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > I searched all the JIRAs and was not able to find any
> matching
> > > > > >> > requirements
> > > > > >> > > recently. All I could find was something dated in 2006:
> > > > > >> > > https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40407
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > Thank you.
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com  | ggreg...@apache.org
> 
> > > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
> > >  > > tl?ie=UTF8=1789=9325=1617290459&
> > > linkCode=as2=garygregory-20=cadb800f39946ec62ea2b1af9fe6a2
> b8>
> > >
> > >  > > 1617290459>
> > > JUnit in Action, Second Edition
> > >  > > tl?ie=UTF8=1789=9325=1935182021&
> > > linkCode=as2=garygregory-20=31ecd1f6b6d1eaf8886ac902a24de4
> > 18%22
> > > >
> > >
> > >  > > 1935182021>
> > > Spring Batch in Action
> > >  > > tl?ie=UTF8=1789=9325=1935182951&
> > >

Re: Editable File Log File Permissions

2016-11-11 Thread Gary Gregory 
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:47 PM, Demetrios Dimatos 
wrote:

> Our needs don't really go beyond file permissions, setting each Owner,
> Group, Other , but I would say if we go this far that we also be able to
> set the owner and the group for a file.
>
> If this is something you have run across before and think it could benefit
> with something more than what our needs are, I don't think its a problem,
> we are pretty flexible.
>

I've never needed that. It seems pretty simple to implement. Give it a go
:-)

Gary

>
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 9:43 PM, Gary Gregory 
> wrote:
>
> > What do you plan beyond supporting
> > https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/nio/file/attribute/
> > PosixFilePermission.html
> >
> > ?
> >
> > Gary
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 9:24 PM, Demetrios Dimatos 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Will do, needs some more work but looking to see if the community would
> > > accept seeing as they rejected a similar proposal long back. Opening a
> > JIRA
> > > - Question now. Thanks.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Gary Gregory 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Oh, and make sure you base your patch on the git master branch.
> > > >
> > > > Gary
> > > >
> > > > On Nov 11, 2016 9:12 PM, "Gary Gregory" 
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Ok, cool.
> > > > >
> > > > > Gary
> > > > >
> > > > > On Nov 11, 2016 9:10 PM, "Demetrios Dimatos" 
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Hi Gary,
> > > > >> We are using Log4j2, I thought to take it to the mail list before
> a
> > > > >> opening
> > > > >> a JIRA. I will open a JIRA for this.
> > > > >> Thank you ,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Friday, November 11, 2016, Gary Gregory <
> garydgreg...@gmail.com>
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > Which version of Log4j are you using?
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Bugzilla is no longer used and we no longer support adding to
> > Log4j
> > > 1.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > For Log4j 2 patches and requests, please use Jira.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Thank you,
> > > > >> > Gary
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > On Nov 11, 2016 8:18 PM, "Demetrios Dimatos"  > > > >> > > wrote:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > Hello All,
> > > > >> > > We would like to hear the communities thoughts on being able
> to
> > > > >> configure
> > > > >> > > the permissions log files are created with. We don't want to
> > rely
> > > on
> > > > >> > UMASK
> > > > >> > > because we have managed services who's process should generate
> > > logs
> > > > >> with
> > > > >> > a
> > > > >> > > 644 yet deployed applications by users should default to a 640
> > > > because
> > > > >> > the
> > > > >> > > logs may contain sensitive information.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > We are able to make the modification and set this in the
> > > properties
> > > > >> file.
> > > > >> > > Now we are looking to see what the community position would be
> > on
> > > > >> > accepting
> > > > >> > > such a patch, we don't want to be patching our own
> distribution.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > I searched all the JIRAs and was not able to find any matching
> > > > >> > requirements
> > > > >> > > recently. All I could find was something dated in 2006:
> > > > >> > > https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40407
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Thank you.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
> > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
> >  > tl?ie=UTF8=1789=9325=1617290459&
> > linkCode=as2=garygregory-20=cadb800f39946ec62ea2b1af9fe6a2b8>
> >
> >  > 1617290459>
> > JUnit in Action, Second Edition
> >  > tl?ie=UTF8=1789=9325=1935182021&
> > linkCode=as2=garygregory-20=31ecd1f6b6d1eaf8886ac902a24de4
> 18%22
> > >
> >
> >  > 1935182021>
> > Spring Batch in Action
> >  > tl?ie=UTF8=1789=9325=1935182951&
> > linkCode=%7B%7BlinkCode%7D%7D=garygregory-20=%7B%
> > 7Blink_id%7D%7D%22%3ESpring+Batch+in+Action>
> >  > 1935182951>
> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> > Home: http://garygregory.com/
> > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
> >
>



-- 
E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition



JUnit in Action, Second Edition

Re: Editable File Log File Permissions

2016-11-11 Thread Demetrios Dimatos 
Our needs don't really go beyond file permissions, setting each Owner,
Group, Other , but I would say if we go this far that we also be able to
set the owner and the group for a file.

If this is something you have run across before and think it could benefit
with something more than what our needs are, I don't think its a problem,
we are pretty flexible.

On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 9:43 PM, Gary Gregory 
wrote:

> What do you plan beyond supporting
> https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/nio/file/attribute/
> PosixFilePermission.html
>
> ?
>
> Gary
>
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 9:24 PM, Demetrios Dimatos 
> wrote:
>
> > Will do, needs some more work but looking to see if the community would
> > accept seeing as they rejected a similar proposal long back. Opening a
> JIRA
> > - Question now. Thanks.
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Gary Gregory 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Oh, and make sure you base your patch on the git master branch.
> > >
> > > Gary
> > >
> > > On Nov 11, 2016 9:12 PM, "Gary Gregory" 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Ok, cool.
> > > >
> > > > Gary
> > > >
> > > > On Nov 11, 2016 9:10 PM, "Demetrios Dimatos" 
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi Gary,
> > > >> We are using Log4j2, I thought to take it to the mail list before a
> > > >> opening
> > > >> a JIRA. I will open a JIRA for this.
> > > >> Thank you ,
> > > >>
> > > >> On Friday, November 11, 2016, Gary Gregory 
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Which version of Log4j are you using?
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Bugzilla is no longer used and we no longer support adding to
> Log4j
> > 1.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > For Log4j 2 patches and requests, please use Jira.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Thank you,
> > > >> > Gary
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Nov 11, 2016 8:18 PM, "Demetrios Dimatos"  > > >> > > wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > Hello All,
> > > >> > > We would like to hear the communities thoughts on being able to
> > > >> configure
> > > >> > > the permissions log files are created with. We don't want to
> rely
> > on
> > > >> > UMASK
> > > >> > > because we have managed services who's process should generate
> > logs
> > > >> with
> > > >> > a
> > > >> > > 644 yet deployed applications by users should default to a 640
> > > because
> > > >> > the
> > > >> > > logs may contain sensitive information.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > We are able to make the modification and set this in the
> > properties
> > > >> file.
> > > >> > > Now we are looking to see what the community position would be
> on
> > > >> > accepting
> > > >> > > such a patch, we don't want to be patching our own distribution.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > I searched all the JIRAs and was not able to find any matching
> > > >> > requirements
> > > >> > > recently. All I could find was something dated in 2006:
> > > >> > > https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40407
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Thank you.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
>  tl?ie=UTF8=1789=9325=1617290459&
> linkCode=as2=garygregory-20=cadb800f39946ec62ea2b1af9fe6a2b8>
>
>  1617290459>
> JUnit in Action, Second Edition
>  tl?ie=UTF8=1789=9325=1935182021&
> linkCode=as2=garygregory-20=31ecd1f6b6d1eaf8886ac902a24de418%22
> >
>
>  1935182021>
> Spring Batch in Action
>  tl?ie=UTF8=1789=9325=1935182951&
> linkCode=%7B%7BlinkCode%7D%7D=garygregory-20=%7B%
> 7Blink_id%7D%7D%22%3ESpring+Batch+in+Action>
>  1935182951>
> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>

Re: Editable File Log File Permissions

2016-11-11 Thread Gary Gregory 
What do you plan beyond supporting
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/nio/file/attribute/PosixFilePermission.html

?

Gary

On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 9:24 PM, Demetrios Dimatos 
wrote:

> Will do, needs some more work but looking to see if the community would
> accept seeing as they rejected a similar proposal long back. Opening a JIRA
> - Question now. Thanks.
>
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Gary Gregory 
> wrote:
>
> > Oh, and make sure you base your patch on the git master branch.
> >
> > Gary
> >
> > On Nov 11, 2016 9:12 PM, "Gary Gregory"  wrote:
> >
> > > Ok, cool.
> > >
> > > Gary
> > >
> > > On Nov 11, 2016 9:10 PM, "Demetrios Dimatos" 
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Gary,
> > >> We are using Log4j2, I thought to take it to the mail list before a
> > >> opening
> > >> a JIRA. I will open a JIRA for this.
> > >> Thank you ,
> > >>
> > >> On Friday, November 11, 2016, Gary Gregory 
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Which version of Log4j are you using?
> > >> >
> > >> > Bugzilla is no longer used and we no longer support adding to Log4j
> 1.
> > >> >
> > >> > For Log4j 2 patches and requests, please use Jira.
> > >> >
> > >> > Thank you,
> > >> > Gary
> > >> >
> > >> > On Nov 11, 2016 8:18 PM, "Demetrios Dimatos"  > >> > > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Hello All,
> > >> > > We would like to hear the communities thoughts on being able to
> > >> configure
> > >> > > the permissions log files are created with. We don't want to rely
> on
> > >> > UMASK
> > >> > > because we have managed services who's process should generate
> logs
> > >> with
> > >> > a
> > >> > > 644 yet deployed applications by users should default to a 640
> > because
> > >> > the
> > >> > > logs may contain sensitive information.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > We are able to make the modification and set this in the
> properties
> > >> file.
> > >> > > Now we are looking to see what the community position would be on
> > >> > accepting
> > >> > > such a patch, we don't want to be patching our own distribution.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I searched all the JIRAs and was not able to find any matching
> > >> > requirements
> > >> > > recently. All I could find was something dated in 2006:
> > >> > > https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40407
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Thank you.
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> >
>



-- 
E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition



JUnit in Action, Second Edition



Spring Batch in Action


Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory

Re: Editable File Log File Permissions

2016-11-11 Thread Demetrios Dimatos 
Will do, needs some more work but looking to see if the community would
accept seeing as they rejected a similar proposal long back. Opening a JIRA
- Question now. Thanks.

On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Gary Gregory 
wrote:

> Oh, and make sure you base your patch on the git master branch.
>
> Gary
>
> On Nov 11, 2016 9:12 PM, "Gary Gregory"  wrote:
>
> > Ok, cool.
> >
> > Gary
> >
> > On Nov 11, 2016 9:10 PM, "Demetrios Dimatos"  wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Gary,
> >> We are using Log4j2, I thought to take it to the mail list before a
> >> opening
> >> a JIRA. I will open a JIRA for this.
> >> Thank you ,
> >>
> >> On Friday, November 11, 2016, Gary Gregory 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Which version of Log4j are you using?
> >> >
> >> > Bugzilla is no longer used and we no longer support adding to Log4j 1.
> >> >
> >> > For Log4j 2 patches and requests, please use Jira.
> >> >
> >> > Thank you,
> >> > Gary
> >> >
> >> > On Nov 11, 2016 8:18 PM, "Demetrios Dimatos"  >> > > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Hello All,
> >> > > We would like to hear the communities thoughts on being able to
> >> configure
> >> > > the permissions log files are created with. We don't want to rely on
> >> > UMASK
> >> > > because we have managed services who's process should generate logs
> >> with
> >> > a
> >> > > 644 yet deployed applications by users should default to a 640
> because
> >> > the
> >> > > logs may contain sensitive information.
> >> > >
> >> > > We are able to make the modification and set this in the properties
> >> file.
> >> > > Now we are looking to see what the community position would be on
> >> > accepting
> >> > > such a patch, we don't want to be patching our own distribution.
> >> > >
> >> > > I searched all the JIRAs and was not able to find any matching
> >> > requirements
> >> > > recently. All I could find was something dated in 2006:
> >> > > https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40407
> >> > >
> >> > > Thank you.
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
>

Re: Editable File Log File Permissions

2016-11-11 Thread Gary Gregory 
Oh, and make sure you base your patch on the git master branch.

Gary

On Nov 11, 2016 9:12 PM, "Gary Gregory"  wrote:

> Ok, cool.
>
> Gary
>
> On Nov 11, 2016 9:10 PM, "Demetrios Dimatos"  wrote:
>
>> Hi Gary,
>> We are using Log4j2, I thought to take it to the mail list before a
>> opening
>> a JIRA. I will open a JIRA for this.
>> Thank you ,
>>
>> On Friday, November 11, 2016, Gary Gregory 
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Which version of Log4j are you using?
>> >
>> > Bugzilla is no longer used and we no longer support adding to Log4j 1.
>> >
>> > For Log4j 2 patches and requests, please use Jira.
>> >
>> > Thank you,
>> > Gary
>> >
>> > On Nov 11, 2016 8:18 PM, "Demetrios Dimatos" > > > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hello All,
>> > > We would like to hear the communities thoughts on being able to
>> configure
>> > > the permissions log files are created with. We don't want to rely on
>> > UMASK
>> > > because we have managed services who's process should generate logs
>> with
>> > a
>> > > 644 yet deployed applications by users should default to a 640 because
>> > the
>> > > logs may contain sensitive information.
>> > >
>> > > We are able to make the modification and set this in the properties
>> file.
>> > > Now we are looking to see what the community position would be on
>> > accepting
>> > > such a patch, we don't want to be patching our own distribution.
>> > >
>> > > I searched all the JIRAs and was not able to find any matching
>> > requirements
>> > > recently. All I could find was something dated in 2006:
>> > > https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40407
>> > >
>> > > Thank you.
>> > >
>> >
>>
>

Re: Editable File Log File Permissions

2016-11-11 Thread Gary Gregory 
Ok, cool.

Gary

On Nov 11, 2016 9:10 PM, "Demetrios Dimatos"  wrote:

> Hi Gary,
> We are using Log4j2, I thought to take it to the mail list before a opening
> a JIRA. I will open a JIRA for this.
> Thank you ,
>
> On Friday, November 11, 2016, Gary Gregory  wrote:
>
> > Which version of Log4j are you using?
> >
> > Bugzilla is no longer used and we no longer support adding to Log4j 1.
> >
> > For Log4j 2 patches and requests, please use Jira.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Gary
> >
> > On Nov 11, 2016 8:18 PM, "Demetrios Dimatos"  > > wrote:
> >
> > > Hello All,
> > > We would like to hear the communities thoughts on being able to
> configure
> > > the permissions log files are created with. We don't want to rely on
> > UMASK
> > > because we have managed services who's process should generate logs
> with
> > a
> > > 644 yet deployed applications by users should default to a 640 because
> > the
> > > logs may contain sensitive information.
> > >
> > > We are able to make the modification and set this in the properties
> file.
> > > Now we are looking to see what the community position would be on
> > accepting
> > > such a patch, we don't want to be patching our own distribution.
> > >
> > > I searched all the JIRAs and was not able to find any matching
> > requirements
> > > recently. All I could find was something dated in 2006:
> > > https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40407
> > >
> > > Thank you.
> > >
> >
>

Re: Editable File Log File Permissions

2016-11-11 Thread Demetrios Dimatos 
Hi Gary,
We are using Log4j2, I thought to take it to the mail list before a opening
a JIRA. I will open a JIRA for this.
Thank you ,

On Friday, November 11, 2016, Gary Gregory  wrote:

> Which version of Log4j are you using?
>
> Bugzilla is no longer used and we no longer support adding to Log4j 1.
>
> For Log4j 2 patches and requests, please use Jira.
>
> Thank you,
> Gary
>
> On Nov 11, 2016 8:18 PM, "Demetrios Dimatos"  > wrote:
>
> > Hello All,
> > We would like to hear the communities thoughts on being able to configure
> > the permissions log files are created with. We don't want to rely on
> UMASK
> > because we have managed services who's process should generate logs with
> a
> > 644 yet deployed applications by users should default to a 640 because
> the
> > logs may contain sensitive information.
> >
> > We are able to make the modification and set this in the properties file.
> > Now we are looking to see what the community position would be on
> accepting
> > such a patch, we don't want to be patching our own distribution.
> >
> > I searched all the JIRAs and was not able to find any matching
> requirements
> > recently. All I could find was something dated in 2006:
> > https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40407
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
>

Re: Editable File Log File Permissions

2016-11-11 Thread Gary Gregory 
Which version of Log4j are you using?

Bugzilla is no longer used and we no longer support adding to Log4j 1.

For Log4j 2 patches and requests, please use Jira.

Thank you,
Gary

On Nov 11, 2016 8:18 PM, "Demetrios Dimatos"  wrote:

> Hello All,
> We would like to hear the communities thoughts on being able to configure
> the permissions log files are created with. We don't want to rely on UMASK
> because we have managed services who's process should generate logs with a
> 644 yet deployed applications by users should default to a 640 because the
> logs may contain sensitive information.
>
> We are able to make the modification and set this in the properties file.
> Now we are looking to see what the community position would be on accepting
> such a patch, we don't want to be patching our own distribution.
>
> I searched all the JIRAs and was not able to find any matching requirements
> recently. All I could find was something dated in 2006:
> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40407
>
> Thank you.
>