ExclusiveLock on Mono/Linux
Hi, I'm down to one failing test on my Ubuntu Linux box (Ubuntu 10.4 with Mono 2.4, I'm conservative 8-): RollingFileAppender.TestExclusiveLockLocks. What happens on Linux is that an attempt to open a locked file throws an exception (as expected by the test) but the file is truncated anyway. After that when the next statement gets written the file is filled with zero bytes up to the length it had before and then the new text is appended. This likely is a bug in the specific version of Mono but may be worth highlighting in the docs - something like "ExclusiveLock is known to have issues with some versions of Mono on Linux". Stefan
Re: Does anybody have any idea on where to find the really old framework (and CF) SDKs?
On 2011-09-15, Roy Chastain wrote: > I have successfully installed VS 2008 and even VS 2005 after installing > VS 2010. I was hoping to set up my build machine without installing anything non-free 8-( > Just in case, do not confuse the Compact Framework with the 3.5/4.0 > Client Framework or the Windows Phone 7 code. Don't worry. > You have to go back to VS.NET (circa 2000) for .NET 1.0. I really hope > no one is still using 1.0. Maybe it is time to drop support for it with 1.2.11 already. Stefan
RE: Does anybody have any idea on where to find the really old framework (and CF) SDKs?
I have successfully installed VS 2008 and even VS 2005 after installing VS 2010. As I recall, installing VS 2005 and including the either "mobile" or "phone tools" installs the .NET Compact Framework. Just in case, do not confuse the Compact Framework with the 3.5/4.0 Client Framework or the Windows Phone 7 code. You have to go back to VS.NET (circa 2000) for .NET 1.0. I really hope no one is still using 1.0. -- Roy Chastain -Original Message- From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bode...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 10:33 To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org Subject: Does anybody have any idea on where to find the really old framework (and CF) SDKs? Hi all, I now have an environment that builds .NET 1.1 up to 4.0 (including client profile) and both Mono targets. For .NET 1.0 and ECMA I can't find any traces, for SSCLI 1.0 I do find hints at a source code only download for the 2.0 version but don't have any idea whether this would work with NAnt (and needed to figure out how to build it in the first place). Any ideas? For compact framework I have installed the 3.5 runtime but the thing closest to a SDK I have found is the Windows Phone 6 SDK which requires VS 2008 (the real one, not Express) and before I try my luck and try to install it on a system with VS 2010 I thought I'd better ask whether I'm overlooking something here as well. Stefan
Does anybody have any idea on where to find the really old framework (and CF) SDKs?
Hi all, I now have an environment that builds .NET 1.1 up to 4.0 (including client profile) and both Mono targets. For .NET 1.0 and ECMA I can't find any traces, for SSCLI 1.0 I do find hints at a source code only download for the 2.0 version but don't have any idea whether this would work with NAnt (and needed to figure out how to build it in the first place). Any ideas? For compact framework I have installed the 3.5 runtime but the thing closest to a SDK I have found is the Windows Phone 6 SDK which requires VS 2008 (the real one, not Express) and before I try my luck and try to install it on a system with VS 2010 I thought I'd better ask whether I'm overlooking something here as well. Stefan
Re: Internals question
On 2011-09-15, Roy Chastain wrote: > Hopefully someone knows the answer so I do not have to search through > the code. I did a quick grepp through the code as I wasn't sure myself. > If a configuration for an appender is activated, then changed and > activated again, is there a new instance of the appender class or is the > old instance reused? AFAICT the only place new instances of appenders are ever created is in XmlHierarchyConfigurator.ParseAppender which means unless you reconfigure the Hierarchy the old instances are re-used. Stefan
Internals question
Hopefully someone knows the answer so I do not have to search through the code. If a configuration for an appender is activated, then changed and activated again, is there a new instance of the appender class or is the old instance reused? -- Roy Chastain
