[ANNOUNCEMENT] Welcome Ralph Goers as the new Apache Logging Chair
Hello all, I was the chair of the Apache Logging Services project for 3 1/2 years. Thank you, it was a great time. But it is time to move on. I think it is critical for ASF projects to let the Chair role rotate. At Logging Services, we agreed to discuss the role each year at the time of the ASF members meeting. We did that. We will continue to do that (at least that's my hope! :)). The PMC discussed who could fill the role of the Logging Chair, and while we have many great people among us, we unanimously voted for Ralph Goers. Ralph wrote the first versions of what became Log4j 2.0. He wrote large parts of it until a fantastic community grew around the project. Without him and his hard work, we would still be stuck on Log4j 1.x times when things didn't look so bright. Ralph is not only an experienced developer but also a great teammate and knows the Apache way in and out. Now I am very happy to say he accepted our vote, and the ASF Board confirmed him in his role, effective immediately. Welcome, Ralph! All the best for your new role, and may the force be with you! Cheers, Christian PS: if you are confused by the terms PMC, Chair or whatever, I'd like to invite you to read the blog I posted when I became chair: http://www.grobmeier.de/hey-i-became-a-vice-president-07072012.html Or the official docs: http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html
Re: KEYS in dist (was Re: [VOTE] Release Log4Net 1.2.13 based on RC3)
On 21 Nov 2013, at 9:56, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2013-11-21, Christian Grobmeier wrote: On 21 Nov 2013, at 8:15, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2013-11-21, Christian Grobmeier wrote: One no blocker which I just saw: the KEYS file is included in the dist. Shouldn't it be left out? I think we've always done it that way in log4net and I know Ant has been doing so since 2000 - what's wrong with it? when somebody downloads it and opens the zip, it is tempting to validate the package against the included KEYS file. But if somebody could manipulate the content of the package, he also could manipulate the KEYS file. For that reason the KEYS file should be on a different location. This is the case, that's why I meant it's not critical. It is on the other hand tempting to take the included one… nitpickery! Thanks for pushing out the release! If this somebody downloaded the signature from the ASF and not from a mirror then the signature will not work if the zip has been modified, no matter which KEYS file it contains. Unless you think the attacker has modifie the signature, but then the KEYS file in the dist area would be as vulnerable as that. Good point. Not sure if this is actually a problem or not. When I have time I will ask one of the infra gurus. cheers Christian Stefan --- http://www.grobmeier.de @grobmeier GPG: 0xA5CC90DB
Re: [VOTE] Release Log4Net 1.2.13 based on RC3
+1 checked formalities, but didn't interpret the content b/c lack of windows :-) One no blocker which I just saw: the KEYS file is included in the dist. Shouldn't it be left out? Cheers On 18 Nov 2013, at 6:21, Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi all, three times is a charm. :-) Changes over RC2 is a packaging change (the 3.5 assemblies now contain the ILogExtensions) and two bug fixes. log4net 1.2.13 RC3 is available for review here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net (revision 3550) Details of changes since 1.2.12 are in the release notes: http://logging.apache.org/log4net/log4net-1.2.13/release/release-notes.html I have tested this with Mono and several .NET frameworks using NAnt. The tag is here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4net/tags/1.2.13RC3 (revision 1542676) Site: http://logging.apache.org/log4net/log4net-1.2.13/ (this is revision 887035 of https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/websites/production/logging/content/log4net/log4net-1.2.13) RAT Report: http://logging.apache.org/log4net/log4net-1.2.13/rat-report.html Votes, please. This vote will close in 72 hours, 0530 GMT 21-Nov 2013 [ ] +1 Release these artifacts [ ] +0 OK, but... [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... [ ] -1 I oppose this release because... Thanks! Stefan --- http://www.grobmeier.de @grobmeier GPG: 0xA5CC90DB
Re: [VOTE] Release Log4Net 1.2.13 based on RC3
On 21 Nov 2013, at 8:15, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2013-11-21, Christian Grobmeier wrote: +1 checked formalities, but didn't interpret the content b/c lack of windows :-) thanks. One no blocker which I just saw: the KEYS file is included in the dist. Shouldn't it be left out? I think we've always done it that way in log4net and I know Ant has been doing so since 2000 - what's wrong with it? when somebody downloads it and opens the zip, it is tempting to validate the package against the included KEYS file. But if somebody could manipulate the content of the package, he also could manipulate the KEYS file. For that reason the KEYS file should be on a different location. This is the case, that's why I meant it's not critical. It is on the other hand tempting to take the included one… nitpickery! Thanks for pushing out the release! Stefan --- http://www.grobmeier.de @grobmeier GPG: 0xA5CC90DB
Re: [VOTE] Release Log4Net 1.2.13 based on RC2
+1 Note: i have no Windows machine and was not able to verify building or other technical checks. I have tested formal requirements though On 10 Nov 2013, at 9:54, Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi all, per discussion of the last few days we intend to cut a final(?) release from the 1.2.x branch fixing some problems with the ILog extensions and compilation for the compact framework. log4net 1.2.13 RC2 is available for review here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net (revision 3469) Details of changes since 1.2.12 are in the release notes: http://logging.apache.org/log4net/log4net-1.2.13/release/release-notes.html (note, I've already committed the site ot the live system but it is not reachable by any links - the 1.2.12 site is the one shown by default) I have tested this with Mono and several .NET frameworks using NAnt. The tag is here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4net/tags/1.2.13RC2 (revision 1540448) Site: http://logging.apache.org/log4net/log4net-1.2.13/ RAT Report: http://logging.apache.org/log4net/log4net-1.2.13/rat-report.html Votes, please. This vote will close in 72 hours, 0900 GMT 13-Nov 2013 [ ] +1 Release these artifacts [ ] +0 OK, but... [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... [ ] -1 I oppose this release because... Thanks! Stefan --- http://www.grobmeier.de @grobmeier GPG: 0xA5CC90DB
Re: [VOTE] Release log4net 1.2.12 based on RC1
+1 I did the usual checks but due to a different OS I am not able to run the tests (without lot of efforts :-)). Please note, teh Apache Rat 0.10 looks a bit different than the one below. Unapproved licenses: log4net-1.2.12/log4net.snk.readme log4net-1.2.12/tests/lib/prerequisites.txt I do not consider this a blocker, but you may want to run the report manually again or update the plugin. Cheers! Christian Am 09.09.13 15:11, schrieb Stefan Bodewig: Hi all, after about two years it's more than about time to cut a new release. log4net 1.2.12 RC1 is available for review here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net (revision 2850) Details of changes since 1.2.11 are in the release notes: http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/release/release-notes.html I have tested this with Mono and several .NET frameworks using NAnt. The tag is here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4net/tags/1.2.12RC1 (revision 1520872) Site: http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/ RAT Report: http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/rat-report.html Votes, please. This vote will close in 72 hours, 1300 GMT 11-Sep 2013 [ ] +1 Release these artifacts [ ] +0 OK, but... [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... [ ] -1 I oppose this release because... Thanks! Stefan
Re: Nightly builds
Hi, is it a big problem to enable nightlies? I mean, if it is not, why do we hesitate? Maybe the build attract a few more people to contribute, because they can use their changes pretty much in an instant. Personally I like nightly builds. I am not a .net user, so I have no opinion in this specific case, but in general I like them. My 2 cents - Cheers Christian On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Dominik Psenner dpsen...@gmail.com wrote: Hi there, the poll ended some hour ago and I wanted to give it a little more time. But unfortunately that did not help and only a few people participated. Even though 2 ouf of 4 people who shared their opinion are interested in nightly builds, there does not seem to be enough interest in the community to pursue this idea. Cheers, D. -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de
Re: Nightly builds
Hi, is it a big problem to enable nightlies? I mean, if it is not, why do we hesitate? Maybe the build attract a few more people to contribute, because they can use their changes pretty much in an instant. Personally I like nightly builds. I am not a .net user, so I have no opinion in this specific case, but in general I like them. My 2 cents - Cheers Christian On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Dominik Psenner dpsen...@gmail.com wrote: Hi there, the poll ended some hour ago and I wanted to give it a little more time. But unfortunately that did not help and only a few people participated. Even though 2 ouf of 4 people who shared their opinion are interested in nightly builds, there does not seem to be enough interest in the community to pursue this idea. Cheers, D. -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de
Re: Newbie - can't get anything to show in the log
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 4:08 PM, skifreak skifreak...@gmail.com wrote: I am a developer :) :-) Dominik meant, this list is for developing log4net itself. The users list is for developing with log4net. So unless you want to contribute patches to log4net, we kindly ask you to put your message to the log4net-users list. As here: log4net-u...@logging.apache.org Cheers Christian -- View this message in context: http://apache-logging.6191.n7.nabble.com/Newbie-can-t-get-anything-to-show-in-the-log-tp35190p35192.html Sent from the Log4net - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de
Re: FW: Add new FAQ entry
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Dominik Psenner dpsen...@gmail.com wrote: That inconsistent line ending seems to be a problem with the eol-style:native on my tortoisesvn client versioned as: TortoiseSVN 1.7.10 Subversion 1.7.7 That svn client kept modifying half of all EOL in the files to windows format and the other half to unix format while preparing to send the file contents. I had to manually go through all files and convert all EOL to unix style until the commit went through. Pretty annoying, but doable. Ouch. After a long time using OSX only, I often wonder how developers can still work with Windows. That said, the recent OSX developments make me sad too. Anyway, so far I am glad that my *nix based system is not so weird when it comes to line endings. BTW, there are perl oneliners out there which would have helped you The website is now fresh new and up to date. Thanks for your help Christian! If we get the chance I would definitely drink a couple of beers together. :-) Definitely! Maybe next ApacheCon EU? Cheers Christian Cheers, Dominik -Original Message- From: Christian Grobmeier [mailto:grobme...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 11:02 PM To: Log4NET Dev Subject: Re: FW: Add new FAQ entry I got that one working too now. It was because I mixed mvn3 files with the ones I generated with mvn2. But now the commit fails with: Error: Commit failed (details follow): Error: Changing file Error: '\log4net-site-content\log4net\log4net-1.2.11\project- reports.html' Error: is forbidden by the server Error: Access to Error: '/repos/infra/!svn/txr/839889- i0ux/websites/production/loggingtest/content/l og4net/log4net-1.2.11/project-reports.html' Error: forbidden I have the impression that this is something someone else has to fix. :-) :-) For some reason i think the link in the wiki is wrong... I found this one: https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/websites/production/logging/content/ it does not containt loggingtest, just logging. Could you try it with that again? At least my browser shows me correct content Cheers Christian Cheers, D. -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de
Re: FW: Add new FAQ entry
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Dominik Psenner dpsen...@gmail.com wrote: Spare time is a rare resource. :-) I know what you mean :-) I noticed a strange thing with the index.html site: parts of the index are now missing. This affects these links below Project Documentation: ... I'm sure it has something to do with: menu ref=reports/ in 'log4net\src\site\site.xml'. But where does that content come from and how can I fix that? Can you check your maven version? There was a change between 2 and 3. Maybe its related to that. mvn --version And you can add your name to the developers section in the pom.xml if you like :-) Cheers Christian -Original Message- From: Christian Grobmeier [mailto:grobme...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 8:49 AM To: Log4NET Dev Subject: Re: FW: Add new FAQ entry Cool, and thanks for updating the site! Good to see you are still there :-) On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Dominik Psenner dpsen...@gmail.com wrote: Good morning Christian, thanks for the fast feedback. That wiki was the one I've been searching for. :-) I'll post back if I run into more trouble. Thanks! Cheers, D. -Original Message- From: Christian Grobmeier [mailto:grobme...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 8:26 AM To: Logging General Cc: Log4NET Dev Subject: Re: FW: Add new FAQ entry Hi, I noticed, but didn't find the time to respond sorry :-) Did you see this? http://wiki.apache.org/logging/ManagingTheWebSite Basically you must now generate the site via mvn site and then copy/paste the target/site into the website svn directory hth Cheers Christian On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Dominik Psenner dpsen...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Yesterday I posted this message on log4net-dev but maybe noone noticed. :-) Is there someone around that knows how the publishing of the log4net website works? Cheers, D. -Original Message- From: Dominik Psenner [mailto:dpsen...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 1:19 PM To: 'Log4NET Dev' Subject: Add new FAQ entry Hi, I gotta question about adding a new FAQ entry. I don't know how the build system works behind the scenes but I believe it should be enough to update: src\site\xdoc\release\faq.xml and commit. The website should then update itself, doesn't it? Cheers, D. -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de
Re: FW: Add new FAQ entry
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Dominik Psenner dpsen...@gmail.com wrote: *hm* .. using maven 2.2.1 it seems to work flawlessly. At least it does not produce warnings. ;-) I checked the site and mostly only the dates are changed now. *yay!* mvn 2 + 3 do need different things in the reporting section. Maybe we (you? ;-)) should look into migrating to m3 for log4net The last problem I have now are the line endings in the generated site. I am on windows and I suppose the svn expects \n instead of \r\n line endings? I wrote a blog on that because it bugged me often too: http://www.grobmeier.de/svn-properties-client-config-05072009.html Common usus is native style i think Will the site automatically be updated once I commit the updated site? If you commit it to the svn site branch, then yes. It should be there pretty quickly as it is picked up by svnpubsub Cheers Christian -Original Message- From: Dominik Psenner [mailto:dpsen...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 11:07 AM To: 'Log4NET Dev' Subject: RE: FW: Add new FAQ entry Can you check your maven version? There was a change between 2 and 3. Maybe its related to that. mvn --version Apache Maven 3.0.3 I found out that the menu ref=reports/-snippet triggers mvn to generate the projec documentation. But nonetheless mvn behaves really odd. When I build it first I get the RAT report. When I build it again I get the Changes and JIRA reports but the RAT report is missing. Building it once more brings back the RAT report but JIRA and Changes are missing again. *huh?!* I am really afraid I could break something not obvious and this is what ist he warning produced by maven: [INFO] Downloading from JIRA at: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?view=rsspid=1069 0 statusIds=5statusIds=6resolutionIds=1sorter/field=createdsorter/order= D ESCsorter/field=prioritysorter/order=DESCtempMax=100reset=truedecorato r =none [WARNING] org.apache.maven.plugin.MojoExecutionException: Failed to parse JIRA XML. at org.apache.maven.plugin.jira.JiraXML.parse(JiraXML.java:132) at org.apache.maven.plugin.jira.JiraXML.parseXML(JiraXML.java:108) ... Caused by: org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: The entity name must immediately follow the '' in the entity reference. -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de
Re: FW: Add new FAQ entry
I got that one working too now. It was because I mixed mvn3 files with the ones I generated with mvn2. But now the commit fails with: Error: Commit failed (details follow): Error: Changing file Error: '\log4net-site-content\log4net\log4net-1.2.11\project-reports.html' Error: is forbidden by the server Error: Access to Error: '/repos/infra/!svn/txr/839889-i0ux/websites/production/loggingtest/content/l og4net/log4net-1.2.11/project-reports.html' Error: forbidden I have the impression that this is something someone else has to fix. :-) :-) For some reason i think the link in the wiki is wrong... I found this one: https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/websites/production/logging/content/ it does not containt loggingtest, just logging. Could you try it with that again? At least my browser shows me correct content Cheers Christian Cheers, D. -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de
Re: FW: Add new FAQ entry
Hi, I noticed, but didn't find the time to respond sorry :-) Did you see this? http://wiki.apache.org/logging/ManagingTheWebSite Basically you must now generate the site via mvn site and then copy/paste the target/site into the website svn directory hth Cheers Christian On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Dominik Psenner dpsen...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Yesterday I posted this message on log4net-dev but maybe noone noticed. :-) Is there someone around that knows how the publishing of the log4net website works? Cheers, D. -Original Message- From: Dominik Psenner [mailto:dpsen...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 1:19 PM To: 'Log4NET Dev' Subject: Add new FAQ entry Hi, I gotta question about adding a new FAQ entry. I don't know how the build system works behind the scenes but I believe it should be enough to update: src\site\xdoc\release\faq.xml and commit. The website should then update itself, doesn't it? Cheers, D. -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de
Re: FW: Add new FAQ entry
Cool, and thanks for updating the site! Good to see you are still there :-) On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Dominik Psenner dpsen...@gmail.com wrote: Good morning Christian, thanks for the fast feedback. That wiki was the one I've been searching for. :-) I'll post back if I run into more trouble. Thanks! Cheers, D. -Original Message- From: Christian Grobmeier [mailto:grobme...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 8:26 AM To: Logging General Cc: Log4NET Dev Subject: Re: FW: Add new FAQ entry Hi, I noticed, but didn't find the time to respond sorry :-) Did you see this? http://wiki.apache.org/logging/ManagingTheWebSite Basically you must now generate the site via mvn site and then copy/paste the target/site into the website svn directory hth Cheers Christian On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Dominik Psenner dpsen...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Yesterday I posted this message on log4net-dev but maybe noone noticed. :-) Is there someone around that knows how the publishing of the log4net website works? Cheers, D. -Original Message- From: Dominik Psenner [mailto:dpsen...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 1:19 PM To: 'Log4NET Dev' Subject: Add new FAQ entry Hi, I gotta question about adding a new FAQ entry. I don't know how the build system works behind the scenes but I believe it should be enough to update: src\site\xdoc\release\faq.xml and commit. The website should then update itself, doesn't it? Cheers, D. -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de
Re: Welcome Dominik Psenner as new Committer
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: Welcome Dominik, its good to have you on board. I wish you all the best for your work here and hope you'll be around for a long time. Usually we write a blog post on http://blogs.apache.org/logging/ when somebody joins. Which I have done now. :-) Cheers Christian The last thing I have heard was there is a security issue with the bloggins system and blogging is disabled. I will ask if this has changed meanwhile and the write a post if it is possible. I mention this here because I don't want to give you a bad feeling in case you know our blog: you are as much welcome as every other committer. I also want to suggest you subscribe to gene...@logging.apache.org, we discuss project wide questions there. Cheers + Have fun, Christian On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Dominik Psenner dpsen...@gmail.com wrote: Dear log4net community, it is my pleasure to inform you, Dominik has been elected as a new committer to the project. He's been active around here for quite some time and will now be able to work on the code base directly. I'm sure the project is going to benefit a lot from him. Welcome Dominik Hi community, thanks Stefan for the warm welcome! I'm glad to have been chosen and am sure that our joint efforts will bear great benefits to the project. Cheers, Dominik -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de
Re: Async logging
Hi, On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Dominik Psenner dpsen...@gmail.com wrote: · the queue size should be configurable +1 · the ThreadPool should be used in favour over a designated worker Thread no idea becuase I have no clue on .NET, but it sounds like fun :-) · if the queue is full, it should fallback to synchronous logging, shouldn’t it? Not sure on this: this would probably impact the application in terms of performance right? Probably this should be configurable to: QUEUE_OVERFLOW_STRATEGY=DISMISS - throws away the log events QUEUE_OVERFLOW_STRATEGY=SYNC - goes back to synchronized logging In either case, a warning message should be generated. Another interesting feature would to set a threshhold for the queue. Lets assume it is 100, and 100 messages are in the queue while 150 are allowed, one could get a warning log that the threshhold of 100 is passed. · queued log events should be processed when the appender gets disposed +1 Cheers Christian Cheers, Dominik -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de
Re: Welcome Dominik Psenner as new Committer
Welcome Dominik, its good to have you on board. I wish you all the best for your work here and hope you'll be around for a long time. Usually we write a blog post on http://blogs.apache.org/logging/ when somebody joins. The last thing I have heard was there is a security issue with the bloggins system and blogging is disabled. I will ask if this has changed meanwhile and the write a post if it is possible. I mention this here because I don't want to give you a bad feeling in case you know our blog: you are as much welcome as every other committer. I also want to suggest you subscribe to gene...@logging.apache.org, we discuss project wide questions there. Cheers + Have fun, Christian On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Dominik Psenner dpsen...@gmail.com wrote: Dear log4net community, it is my pleasure to inform you, Dominik has been elected as a new committer to the project. He's been active around here for quite some time and will now be able to work on the code base directly. I'm sure the project is going to benefit a lot from him. Welcome Dominik Hi community, thanks Stefan for the warm welcome! I'm glad to have been chosen and am sure that our joint efforts will bear great benefits to the project. Cheers, Dominik -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de
Re: New download page
+1 looks good On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote: Hi all, based on the download pages of Ant and Commons I've created a new download page for log4net currently visible at http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net-site/download_log4net.cgi This page is more user friendly as it provides direct links to the mirrored files and thus saves one more pageload and click. Unless anybody objects I plan to put the newly generated site live during the next few days. Stefan -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de
Comment on twitter
Thought you would find this interesting cheers! From @ObjT @grobmeier Well, log4net and log4j pack much too much functionality. Might be nice for Microsoft and Oracle. Logging should be simple IMHO. -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.11 based on RC1
Votes, please. This vote will close in 72 hours, 1900 GMT 9-Oct 2011 [X] +1 Release these artifacts [ ] +0 OK, but... [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... [ ] -1 I oppose this release because... I checked everything I said, but did not manage to get the .NET beast running fully. I will try to set up a unit testing environment for the next release (no promises :-)). Anyway, I trust you on coding level, so please go ahead and release this package. Cheers! Christian Thanks! Stefan -- http://www.grobmeier.de
Re: WebSite for 1.2.11 - Please Review
Hello Stefan, The site is at http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/ in particular please review the release notes http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/release/release-notes.html the new download page http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/download.html (links certainly don't work) and the two new FAQ entries http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/release/faq.html#two-snks and http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/release/faq.html#log-early. I looked at all pages, nothing found. I have checked brandmark requirements, all well. Just a minor thing, not important: if you go to this link: http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/issue-tracking.html Issue tracking is 2 times in the navigation. Not a problem, but one time is better. On the content of the FAQ/Release notes I have no idea :-) Cheers, Christian
