Re: Viola sine arculo = Vihuela ?

2004-09-26 Thread Daniel F Heiman
Alain:

Yes, I do think the viola da mano is essentially the same instrument as
the vihuela.
---
To address your question about the earliest extant lute, one approach is
to search the Lautenweltadressbuch:

http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~lsa/associated/index.html#Lautenweltadressbu
ch

If you enter   152into the date field, you will retrieve all lutes
listed with a date in the 1520s.
There are earlier entries as well, but most of those dates look highly
suspicious.

Regards,

Daniel

---
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 09:23:17 -0700 Alain Veylit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
> Hi all,
> To second Daniel's message (I think): I have been puzzled by the 
> debate on 
> the vihuela on those same grounds:is there any reasonable evidence 
> that the 
> vihuela was NOT the same instrument as the viola da mano in use in 
> Italy, 
> and on which Da Vinci is said to have improvised?
> In that case, it seems that perhaps the vihuela/viola da mano simply 
> 
> survived a little longer in Spain than elsewhere, a phenomenon that 
> is not 
> uncommon: the gamba in France or the Baroque lute in Germany, for 
> instance, 
> perhaps on the strength of a particular school of musicians.
> The connection between vihuela and viola may be strengthened by  the 
> fact 
> that large violas were apparently held horizontal by the players 
> until the 
> 17th century and possibly later.
> There is plenty of iconographic and literary evidence that the viola 
> da 
> mano was widely in use until the first couple of decades of the 16th 
> 
> century - yet, not unlike the vihuela, I don't think there are any 
> examples 
> of a surviving instrument of that type. Not too surprising given the 
> 
> frailty of thin wood.
> --BTW, how old is the oldest surviving lute?
> Alain
> 
> 
> At 07:54 AM 9/25/2004, Daniel F Heiman wrote:
> 
> >Since the May 2004 issue of Early Music has been brought up, I 
> suggest
> >all who have access to it take a look at the article on page 177, 
> "The
> >Spanish plucked viola in Renaissance Italy, 1480 ­ 1530," by 
> Hiroyuki
> >Minamino.  He has compiled a remarkable amount of iconographic 
> evidence
> >from all over the Italian peninsula for what may well be the 
> "vihuela" of
> >the turn of the sixteenth century.  The paintings show a relatively 
> large
> >instrumnent (string length perhaps in the low 60 cm range based on
> >proportion to the players' bodies) played with the strings near
> >horizontal.  The bridge appears glued to the soundboard; the sides 
> are
> >vertical, and the back is flat or nearly so, based on the way the
> >instrument sits against the body of the player.  The outline 
> consistently
> >has bouts, sometimes smooth, like a "classical" guitar, sometimes 
> with
> >sharp ends like the modern violin family, and once mixed. (Gambas 
> of the
> >Renaissance and Baroque also show this kind of inconsistency in 
> outline).
> >The neck is fairly long, and, when the level of detail provided 
> allows
> >for counting, seems to have about 10 tied frets. There are 
> apparently six
> >or sometimes five courses. The only significant deviation from the
> >instruments pictured in Milan is that on these instruments pegbox 
> has the
> >pegs oriented parallel to the soundboard and is curved like that of 
> a
> >gamba or violin (However, one low-detail.engraving shows a 
> lute-style
> >pegbox, folded back.)
> >
> >So did the Iberians call these things "vihuelas" in 1480?  They 
> certainly
> >look as if they could play the vihuela music of the mid-sixteenth
> >century.
> >
> >For those without ready access to Early Music magazine, take a 
> look
> >online at:
> >
>
>http://www.metmuseum.org/Works_of_Art/viewOne.asp?dep=11&viewMode=1&item
=
> >20%2E92
> >(front and near center, angel musician)
> >
> >This is the only one of the examples I was able to find on the 
> Internet
> >in a quick search.
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >Daniel Heiman
> >
> >
> >Get your name as your email address.
> >Includes spam protection, 1GB storage, no ads and more
> >Only $1.99/ month - visit http://www.mysite.com/name today!
> >
> >
> >
> >To get on or off this list see list information at
> >http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
> >
> >
> >---
> >Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> >Version: 6.0.769 / Virus Database: 516 - Release Date: 9/24/2004
> 
> 


Get your name as your email address.
Includes spam protection, 1GB storage, no ads and more
Only $1.99/ month - visit http://www.mysite.com/name today!



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


Re: ARCHLUTE CONTEST

2004-09-26 Thread Jon Murphy

To which we should add Abramovich of the vihuela. But the idea of vihuela as
a vehicle of contemporary music is just preposterous.
RT


Therein lies an anomaly. What is contemporary music? By defining it as
Britten or others it becomes past music. There is no problem with the idea
of contemporary music for the lute, all one needs is a modern composer to
write to the lute. One of my college classmates is a "career contemporist
(to coin a word)". In college in the fifties Johnny Eaton was published on
LP as College Jazz Modern, using 12 tone scale and a bit of Hindemuth in a
jazz combo. Now, after a career of writing modern opera (successful, but not
famous) he is into "micro tuning". Two pianos, tuned a quarter tone apart,
and he plays one with the left hand and one with the right (and has invited
me to set up my double strung harp to work with him).

Nope, I may be modern but I ain't that modern. Innovation isn't always good,
it should always be tried but it should be dropped if it doesn't work. RT
mentioned discordance in this thread, and that the lute isn't proper for it.
Perhaps that is why the thrust of that message a year ago on "the chord from
hell" in "Gypsies Lilt" was that the chord was improper and a
mistranscription, but it works well for me. Discordance is sometimes
discord, and sometimes a leading tone. But much of the 16th c. lute music
I'm learning ends on a leading tone. Nothing is preposterous except the
assumption that anything is preposterous. Contemporary means now, but it
doesn't mean that which is "now". There is no reason to assume that there
can be no contemporary lute music, it is there to be composed.

Best, Jon






To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


Re: vihuela vs guitar

2004-09-26 Thread Jon Murphy
Tony,

>
> One of the reasons I have read (can't remember where) for the triumph of
the
> violin family over the gambas is that the tuning in fifths is more
suitable
> for melody whereas the fourths basis is more suitable for chords.  I am
not
> sure I understood why, but I am sure it was written by someone who did ;-)

I have no idea either why the fifths would be more suitable for melody in
general, but one can point out that the step to the next string comes at a
natural point in the key. If I'm playing a triad in the tonic a fifth tuning
lets me play an open string, then on stop, then the next open. Not having
played violin since 1948 (when I was last chair, last stand, in the Summit
High School Orchestra) I can't do more than guess. As to the choice, there
are no chords on the violin other than the occassional diad. The move might
have had to do with the unfretted nature of the instrument, and the easier
range of fingering due to the shorter vibrating length (which wouldn't
explain the viola, violoncello, or bass - but they could have been
followers).

>
> The provenance (ancestor?) of the lute may well have been a melody
> instrument played with a plectrum, but that in itself doesn't explain the
> tuning.  The oud is still basically tuned in fourths and is still
basically
> a melody instrument.

Yup, it don't. But it is a good matter for speculation. Is the arabic oud,
ancestor of the lute we believe, tuned to a tetrachord, or was it tuned for
ease of fingering. Any answer would be speculation, I look forward to
visiting Roger's site that RT offered.

Best, Jon



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html