[LUTE] Re: Hi guys, nylon frets...

2009-03-17 Thread Martyn Hodgson


   Why don't you try a much thinner 9th fret (say 0.50mm) which not only
   fits with Dowland's fretting advice (the principal historic source of
   fret sizes) but would also enable you to have smaller lower frets, say
   down to 0.90mm and thereby set the lute 'fine'?

   MH
   --- On Tue, 17/3/09, damian dlugolecki dam...@teleport.com wrote:

 From: damian dlugolecki dam...@teleport.com
 Subject: [LUTE] Re: Hi guys, nylon frets...
 To: Daniel Winheld dwinh...@comcast.net, lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
 Date: Tuesday, 17 March, 2009, 3:52 AM

   Using the thinnest frets that you can get away with is a basic
   premise for fretting, but there are many lutes where the neck has set
   (but hopefully not twisted)
   where heavy frets are called for.  My baroque lute represents just such
   an instance where everything is fine except that much thicker frets are
   called for and more
   care in selecting sizes to taper up to the 10th fret.  Here is the fret
   scheme for my lute:
   frets
   1,2,3   1.25 mm
   4,5   1.20 
   6  1.10 
   7  1.05 
   8  1.00 
   9   .95  
   10 .85  
   So if you find you need heavier frets, do not be alarmed.  My lute
   plays beautifully, there is no undue wear on the strings on the finger
   board,
   and everything is in tune.  You may have to invest in some fret gut,
   but like tuning, it's part of the job.
   Damian
   Please visit my web site at www.damianstrings.com
   - Original Message - From: Daniel Winheld
   [1]dwinh...@comcast.net
   To: [2]l...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 11:57 AM
   Subject: [LUTE] Re: Hi guys, nylon frets...
Dana- this seems like excellent advice  cautions in regard to nylon
frets. In line with that, I would also advise noting what the neck
and fingerboard are made of- ebony fingerboard with ebony veneered
neck would seem to be best; in any case the hardest, toughest woods
possible would be in order.
Anything else, especially if the lute is of some value, could be
counter productive so why not go with the easier, safer, and in any
case better sounding traditional alternative?
   
That said, I would also advise the thinnest frets that you could get
away with. Dowland's advice seems appropriate here; he starts with
4th course for the first two frets (.85 - .90 mm), next two of 3rd
course size, (.70-ish) 5th  6th fret, 2nd course; and the rest
trebles.
   
Also single frets would be best; while the traditional doubles are
rarely used by modern lutenists anyway, only gut doubles will bed
down properly for cleanest sound. Attempting to get enough tension
for tightness, and for the fret to lie flat near the fingerboard
edges at the first fret position with 1.15 nylon would take two
gorillas with vice grip pliers. And a titanium neck with carbon
fingerboard.
   
Dan
   
   
Nylon can be made to work, but it even more of a pain in the
   proverbial
than gut.  It is stronger than most neck woods and will leave an
indentation; some like that, it marks where the fret goes. Others
   dislike
it for the same reason, get it wrong and you are stuck.  The knots
   are
prickly, and burning them makes noxious smoke which you really
   shouldnt
inhale.
   
Nylon is probably longer lasting than gut, but not forever, I have
   had
nylon frets break.
   
I switched to gut a long time ago and far prefer it.
   
The first fret is particularly challenging as you have so little
   room
above it to use in stretching the knot tighter; I always found
   pliers
necesary on the first fret; leave the ends long enough that you can
   grip
away from the knot, then wrap a length around the jaws, you dont
   want to
be squashing the nylon to get a grip anywhere near the knot.
--
Dana Emery
   
--
   
   
To get on or off this list see list information at
[3]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   

   --

References

   1. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=dwinh...@comcast.net
   2. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=l...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   3. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



[LUTE] Re: two tanslation questions

2009-03-17 Thread David van Ooijen
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:43 PM, David Tayler vidan...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
 Auden gives Nico, but I never tracked down the reference so perhaps it is Niso


Fellowes gives Nicho, a copy of what looks like an Oxford edition gives Nico.
http://kulturserver-bayern.de/home/harald-lillmeyer/Texte/Downloads/Liedtexte/Cavendish/LiedtexteCavendish.html
gives Nico for the solo versin and Nicho for the tutti.
I'll check the facsimile this afternoon to see what the other voices have.

Anyway, Nicho, a man's name?), fits better with the text. No nymph then, alas.

Another question:

Euery bush now springing,
Euery bird now singing,
Merily fate poore Nicho
Chanting tro li lo
Lo li lo li lo,
Til her he had espide,
On whom his hope relide,
Down a down a down,
Down with a frown,
Oh she puld him down.


The story is clear enough. But is Nicho/Niso 'just' sitting here,
'merely'. Or is he a happy guy, singing for himself, so should I read
'merrily'? Doesn't fit with the 'poore', does it. But poore or not, he
is chanting the lolilo bit, so he's not that sad after all.

I know it's not important, but I think every detail counts, so any
thoughts welcome.

David - grateful as ever




-- 
***
David van Ooijen
davidvanooi...@gmail.com
www.davidvanooijen.nl
***



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: two tanslation questions

2009-03-17 Thread Lex van Sante
Possibly the bushes and the birds are laughing at Nicho and his fate  
or destiny.
Being creatures of nature they might not see his problem in the way he  
does.
Anyway I think the end is not very sad for him, is it. Nature having  
its way.


Cheers!

Lex van Sante

Op 17 mrt 2009, om 09:54 heeft David van Ooijen het volgende geschreven:

On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:43 PM, David Tayler  
vidan...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
Auden gives Nico, but I never tracked down the reference so perhaps  
it is Niso



Fellowes gives Nicho, a copy of what looks like an Oxford edition  
gives Nico.

http://kulturserver-bayern.de/home/harald-lillmeyer/Texte/Downloads/Liedtexte/Cavendish/LiedtexteCavendish.html
gives Nico for the solo versin and Nicho for the tutti.
I'll check the facsimile this afternoon to see what the other voices  
have.


Anyway, Nicho, a man's name?), fits better with the text. No nymph  
then, alas.


Another question:

Euery bush now springing,
Euery bird now singing,
Merily fate poore Nicho
Chanting tro li lo
Lo li lo li lo,
Til her he had espide,
On whom his hope relide,
Down a down a down,
Down with a frown,
Oh she puld him down.


The story is clear enough. But is Nicho/Niso 'just' sitting here,
'merely'. Or is he a happy guy, singing for himself, so should I read
'merrily'? Doesn't fit with the 'poore', does it. But poore or not, he
is chanting the lolilo bit, so he's not that sad after all.

I know it's not important, but I think every detail counts, so any
thoughts welcome.

David - grateful as ever




--
***
David van Ooijen
davidvanooi...@gmail.com
www.davidvanooijen.nl
***



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html





[LUTE] Re: two tanslation questions

2009-03-17 Thread David Tayler
I have puzled over this text for years, but there is no easy answer.
There is a change of voice in the poem from Narrator to he to she, or 
she to he to she.
It SEEMS that the voice changes over to Nico as a he.
But as I read it now, I could believe that the he character is anonymous.

So it could read
Scene
She (Nico) lures
He spies her
She pulls

or
Scene
Nico (he) waits
He spies
She pulls

The role reversal in the second interpretation seems a bit 
dissonant--though perhaps deliberate--in context.
Whereas in the first scenario, she is springing the trap. Also, the 
chanting could have the suggestion of incanting, enchanting. Which 
would be in character with the role in the idylls.
Perplexing.
dt


At 01:54 AM 3/17/2009, you wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:43 PM, David Tayler vidan...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
  Auden gives Nico, but I never tracked down the reference so 
 perhaps it is Niso


Fellowes gives Nicho, a copy of what looks like an Oxford edition gives Nico.
http://kulturserver-bayern.de/home/harald-lillmeyer/Texte/Downloads/Liedtexte/Cavendish/LiedtexteCavendish.html
gives Nico for the solo versin and Nicho for the tutti.
I'll check the facsimile this afternoon to see what the other voices have.

Anyway, Nicho, a man's name?), fits better with the text. No nymph then, alas.

Another question:

Euery bush now springing,
Euery bird now singing,
Merily fate poore Nicho
Chanting tro li lo
Lo li lo li lo,
Til her he had espide,
On whom his hope relide,
Down a down a down,
Down with a frown,
Oh she puld him down.


The story is clear enough. But is Nicho/Niso 'just' sitting here,
'merely'. Or is he a happy guy, singing for himself, so should I read
'merrily'? Doesn't fit with the 'poore', does it. But poore or not, he
is chanting the lolilo bit, so he's not that sad after all.

I know it's not important, but I think every detail counts, so any
thoughts welcome.

David - grateful as ever




--
***
David van Ooijen
davidvanooi...@gmail.com
www.davidvanooijen.nl
***



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html




[LUTE] Re: two tanslation questions

2009-03-17 Thread David van Ooijen
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 10:56 AM, David Tayler vidan...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
 So it could read
 Scene
 She (Nico) lures
 He spies her
 She pulls


 she is springing the trap. Also, the
 chanting could have the suggestion of incanting, enchanting. Which
 would be in character with the role in the idylls.

Yes! I found the reference to Niko the 'erotic enchantress, luring men
away from women's quarters'. Long live Google books. It fits with the
scene described in the poem. The 'poore' Nicho/Niko/Niso is just
faking it: damsells in distress are very attractive, after all. But
still, the text looks a bit garbled to me, perhaps it's from a larger
poem, or the printer got things mixed up. I'm awaiting the facsimile,
but Fellowes usually has the basics right, even if he often freely
edits to his own sense of logic as well as decency.

David

-- 
***
David van Ooijen
davidvanooi...@gmail.com
www.davidvanooijen.nl
***



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Lutenists' Life Data

2009-03-17 Thread Mathias Rösel
Hi everyone,

I've made up three simplified comparative diagrammes with life data of
39 European lutenists (JDowland to JBHagen). Pls let me know off-list if
you're interested.
-- 
Mathias



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: Hi guys, nylon frets...

2009-03-17 Thread damian dlugolecki


   The projection of the string is determined by the height of the nut and
   the holes in the bridge.  If the neck has a set or slight warp, thicker
   frets will be called for and that thickness will be determined by the
   projection of the strings.

   I used to use much thinner frets but as Dan Winheld has noted, there is
   no drawback whatever to using thicker frets.



   Cordially,



   Damian




   Why don't you try a much thinner 9th fret (say 0.50mm) which not only
   fits with Dowland's fretting advice (the principal historic source of
   fret sizes) but would also enable you to have smaller lower frets, say
   down to 0.90mm and thereby set the lute 'fine'?

   MH
   --- On Tue, 17/3/09, damian dlugolecki [1]dam...@teleport.com wrote:

 From: damian dlugolecki [2]dam...@teleport.com
 Subject: [LUTE] Re: Hi guys, nylon frets...
 To: Daniel Winheld dwinh...@comcast.net, lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
 Date: Tuesday, 17 March, 2009, 3:52 AM

   Using the thinnest frets that you can get away with is a basic
   premise for fretting, but there are many lutes where the neck has set
   (but hopefully not twisted)
   where heavy frets are called for.  My baroque lute represents just such
   an instance where everything is fine except that much thicker frets are
   called for and more
   care in selecting sizes to taper up to the 10th fret.  Here is the fret
   scheme for my lute:
   frets
   1,2,3   1.25 mm
   4,5   1.20 
   6  1.10 
   7  1.05 
   8  1.00 
   9   .95  
   10 .85  
   So if you find you need heavier frets, do not be alarmed.  My lute
   plays beautifully, there is no undue wear on the strings on the finger
   board,
   and everything is in tune.  You may have to invest in some fret gut,
   but like tuning, it's part of the job.
   Damian
   Please visit my web site at www.damianstrings.com
   - Original Message - From: Daniel Winheld
   [3]dwinh...@comcast.net
   To: [4]l...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 11:57 AM
   Subject: [LUTE] Re: Hi guys, nylon frets...
Dana- this seems like excellent advice  cautions in regard to nylon
frets. In line with that, I would also advise noting what the neck
and fingerboard are made of- ebony fingerboard with ebony veneered
neck would seem to be best; in any case the hardest, toughest woods
possible would be in order.
Anything else, especially if the lute is of some value, could be
counter productive so why not go with the easier, safer, and in any
case better sounding traditional alternative?
   
That said, I would also advise the thinnest frets that you could get
away with. Dowland's advice seems appropriate here; he starts with
4th course for the first two frets (.85 - .90 mm), next two of 3rd
course size, (.70-ish) 5th  6th fret, 2nd course; and the rest
trebles.
   
Also single frets would be best; while the traditional doubles are
rarely used by modern lutenists anyway, only gut doubles will bed
down properly for cleanest sound. Attempting to get enough tension
for tightness, and for the fret to lie flat near the fingerboard
edges at the first fret position with 1.15 nylon would take two
gorillas with vice grip pliers. And a titanium neck with carbon
fingerboard.
   
Dan
   
   
Nylon can be made to work, but it even more of a pain in the
   proverbial
than gut.  It is stronger than most neck woods and will leave an
indentation; some like that, it marks where the fret goes. Others
   dislike
it for the same reason, get it wrong and you are stuck.  The knots
   are
prickly, and burning them makes noxious smoke which you really
   shouldnt
inhale.
   
Nylon is probably longer lasting than gut, but not forever, I have
   had
nylon frets break.
   
I switched to gut a long time ago and far prefer it.
   
The first fret is particularly challenging as you have so little
   room
above it to use in stretching the knot tighter; I always found
   pliers
necesary on the first fret; leave the ends long enough that you can
   grip
away from the knot, then wrap a length around the jaws, you dont
   want to
be squashing the nylon to get a grip anywhere near the knot.
--
Dana Emery
   
--
   
   
To get on or off this list see list information at
[5]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   

   --

References

   1. mailto:dam...@teleport.com
   2. mailto:dam...@teleport.com
   3. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=dwinh...@comcast.net
   4. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=l...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   5. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html