[LUTE] Guitare baroque

2011-07-15 Thread Valery Sauvage
   Again a nice vid :


   [1]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LijMh4LBJSg


   Val ;-)



   --

References

   1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LijMh4LBJSg


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: Guitare baroque

2011-07-15 Thread Edward Mast
Wonderful. Hearing this lovely instrument, one wonders (well, I wonder) why 
makers and players felt that it needed the improvements of the modern guitar 
and its technique.  Well, ok, it wasn't suitable for recitals in Carnegie Hall. 
 But, as always, something gained, something lost.
On Jul 15, 2011, at 2:35 AM, Valery Sauvage wrote:

   Again a nice vid :
 
 
   [1]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LijMh4LBJSg
 
 
   Val ;-)
 
 
 
   --
 
 References
 
   1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LijMh4LBJSg
 
 
 To get on or off this list see list information at
 http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html





[LUTE] Re: Balli Rutenici XIII XIV

2011-07-15 Thread Eugene Kurenko
   Thanks for music Roman!

   Here is my video of XIV:

   [1]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dzrEbHAa8zk

   2011/7/14 Roman Turovsky [2]r.turov...@verizon.net

 Ballo Ruteno XIII, in d -

 [3]http://torban.org/balli/images/341.mp3
 [4]http://torban.org/balli/images/341.pdf

 Ballo Ruteno XIV, in c -

 [5]http://torban.org/balli/images/342.mp3
 [6]http://torban.org/balli/images/342.pdf

 Enjoy.
 Amities,
 RT
 To get on or off this list see list information at
 [7]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dzrEbHAa8zk
   2. mailto:r.turov...@verizon.net
   3. http://torban.org/balli/images/341.mp3
   4. http://torban.org/balli/images/341.pdf
   5. http://torban.org/balli/images/342.mp3
   6. http://torban.org/balli/images/342.pdf
   7. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



[LUTE] Re: Balli Rutenici XIII XIV

2011-07-15 Thread Roman Turovsky

Well done, Eugene!
RT

From: Eugene Kurenko eugene.kure...@gmail.com
Thanks for the music Roman!
Here is my video of XIV:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dzrEbHAa8zk

2011/7/14 Roman Turovsky r.turov...@verizon.net


Ballo Ruteno XIII, in d -


http://torban.org/balli/**images/341.mp3http://torban.org/balli/images/341.mp3
http://torban.org/balli/**images/341.pdfhttp://torban.org/balli/images/341.pdf



Ballo Ruteno XIV, in c -


http://torban.org/balli/**images/342.mp3http://torban.org/balli/images/342.mp3
http://torban.org/balli/**images/342.pdfhttp://torban.org/balli/images/342.pdf



Enjoy.
AmitiƩs,
RT



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~**wbc/lute-admin/index.htmlhttp://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html






[LUTE] Re: Guitare baroque

2011-07-15 Thread Edward Mast
David, I think you misunderstood my post.  The fact that this was very 
obviously a HIP performance, rather than modern, and was so lovely,  gave rise 
to my question.  Of course, as Christopher recognized, it was somewhat 
rhetorical.   That instruments - and techniques - evolve is no doubt to be 
expected, and the reasons are many.  But one reason is the constant striving 
for more volume.  At best, success along these lines appears to me to be mixed 
blessing.  
On Jul 15, 2011, at 10:08 AM, David Smith wrote:

   Nice performance. The player looked awfully nervous for someone who
   plays that well, lol.
   Edward, what about this struck you as modern (aside from the clothing
   worn by the player). It looked significantly divergent from modern
   guitar technique to me. (I don't know enough about baroque technique to
   evaluate that.)
 
   On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Edward Mast [1]nedma...@aol.com
   wrote:
 
 Wonderful. Hearing this lovely instrument, one wonders (well, I
 wonder) why makers and players felt that it needed the
 improvements of the modern guitar and its technique.  Well, ok, it
 wasn't suitable for recitals in Carnegie Hall.  But, as always,
 something gained, something lost.
 
   On Jul 15, 2011, at 2:35 AM, Valery Sauvage wrote:
  Again a nice vid :
 
 
  [1][2]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LijMh4LBJSg
 
 
  Val ;-)
 
 
 
  --
 
 References
 
  1. [3]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LijMh4LBJSg
 
 
 To get on or off this list see list information at
 [4]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
 
   --
 
 References
 
   1. mailto:nedma...@aol.com
   2. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LijMh4LBJSg
   3. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LijMh4LBJSg
   4. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
 





[LUTE] Re: What's the point to 'historical sound'

2011-07-15 Thread Edward Mast
Yes - good points, Thomas.  
On Jul 15, 2011, at 2:29 PM, Thomas Schall wrote:

   I'm with David
 
   Just want to add that most of the interpretations are getting better
   (the
 
   music sounds better) if we know more about the instrument, the
   composer, the
 
   way it could have been intended to play, but also cultural surrounding
   like
 
   poetry (imagine early renaissance music without Petrach's poetry!), the
   rooms
 
   the music was performed and the audiences.
 
   It's not necessary that today's audiences know such details but I am
   convinced
 
   it helps to find a interpretation. And that audiences appreciate the
   quality.
 
   We don't need to know all the effort Donna and Ron are putting into
   their interpretations to feel they are on the highest level.
 
   The If they have had ...  is reducing because then we would never
   have had
 
   the subtleness and sweetness of the old instruments and the music for
   them.
 
   Thomas
 
   Am Dienstag, 12. Juli 2011, 16.13:21 schrieb David van Ooijen:
 
 On 12 July 2011 04:15, t...@heartistrymusic.com wrote:
 
 I think that, if the old masters had possessed effects, they would
   have
 
 used them.
 
 
 
 .. and would have written different music which would have utilised
 
 these effects. Which is the whole point about HIP: using the means
   the
 
 old had at their disposal to create a sound that could have been in
 
 their ears when they wre writing their music.
 
 
 
 David
 
   --
 
   Thomas Schall
 
   Doerflistrasse 2
 
   CH-6078 Lungern
 
   +41 41 678 00 79
 
   thomas.sch...@bluewin.ch
 
   -
 
   -- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --
 
   Betreff: Re: [LUTE] Re: What's the point to 'historical sound'
 
   Datum: Freitag, 15. Juli 2011, 20.20:13
 
   Von: Thomas Schall lauten...@lautenist.de
 
   An: Martyn Hodgson hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
 
   Kopie: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu, David van Ooijen
   davidvanooi...@gmail.com
 
   which reminds me on my feelings towards Beethoven's piano sonatas. I
   couldn't
 
   stand them any more ... but then I've heard a concert when they were
   played on
 
   a Hammerklavier - so delicate! I loved it ...
 
   The same to Chopin on an old piano instead of the modern Steinways it's
 
   usually played.
 
   It's like a new world - and I like it.
 
   I'm not sure BTW that the old composers would have enjoyed modern
   instruments.
 
   They have had different listening habits and the modern instruments
   would have
 
   felt like visiting a Heavy Metal concert when used to lute music.
 
   Thomas
 
   Am Dienstag, 12. Juli 2011, 17.09:12 schrieb Martyn Hodgson:
 
 Indeed David, and precisely the point I made which launched this
   round
 
 of mails. Once we move away from considerations of historical
   evidence
 
 we quickly get into the realms of mere personal assertion to fit an
 
 individual's own preferences which may, or may not, be related to
   what
 
 the Old Ones expected.
 
 
 
 The idea that, to take one composer at random, JS Bach would have
 
 preferred a modern Bechstein grand is, of course, not new and this
   sort
 
 of case was used from the earliest days of the revival of interest in
 
 his music in the mid 19th century. Whether or not he would have done
   is
 
 something we'll never know - what we do know reasonably well are the
 
 sorts of keyboard instruments he would actually have come across.
 
 
 
 Martyn
 
 --- On Tue, 12/7/11, David van Ooijen davidvanooi...@gmail.com
   wrote:
 
 
 
 From: David van Ooijen davidvanooi...@gmail.com
 
 Subject: [LUTE] Re: What's the point to 'historical sound'
 
 To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
 
 Date: Tuesday, 12 July, 2011, 15:13
 
 
 
 On 12 July 2011 04:15, [1]t...@heartistrymusic.com wrote:
 
 I think that, if the old masters had possessed effects, they would
 
 
 
 have used them.
 
 .. and would have written different music which would have utilised
 
 these effects. Which is the whole point about HIP: using the means
   the
 
 old had at their disposal to create a sound that could have been in
 
 their ears when they wre writing their music.
 
 David
 
 --
 
 ***
 
 David van Ooijen
 
 [2]davidvanooi...@gmail.com
 
 www.davidvanooijen.nl
 
 ***
 
 To get on or off this list see list information at
 
 [3]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
 
 
 
 --
 
 
 
 References
 
 
 
 1.
   http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=t...@heartistrymusic.com
 
 2.
   http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=davidvanooi...@gmail.com
 
 3. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
 
   --
 
   Thomas Schall
 
   Doerflistrasse 2
 
   CH-6078 Lungern
 
   +41 41 678 00 79
 
   lauten...@lautenist.de
 
   -
   --
 
   Thomas Schall
 
   Doerflistrasse 2
 
   CH-6078 Lungern
 
   +41 41 678 00 79
 
   

[LUTE] Re: Guitare baroque

2011-07-15 Thread David Smith
   OK. I realized I had misread when I saw Christopher's response.
   It's all the business model. If you replace one nobleman paying a
   living wage stipend with a bunch of plebs buying low cost tickets, you
   have to play louder so all the ticket holders can hear the show.

   On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Edward Mast [1]nedma...@aol.com
   wrote:

 David, I think you misunderstood my post.  The fact that this was
 very obviously a HIP performance, rather than modern, and was so
 lovely,  gave rise to my question.  Of course, as Christopher
 recognized, it was somewhat rhetorical.   That instruments - and
 techniques - evolve is no doubt to be expected, and the reasons are
 many.  But one reason is the constant striving for more volume.  At
 best, success along these lines appears to me to be mixed blessing.

   On Jul 15, 2011, at 10:08 AM, David Smith wrote:
  Nice performance. The player looked awfully nervous for someone who
  plays that well, lol.
  Edward, what about this struck you as modern (aside from the
   clothing
  worn by the player). It looked significantly divergent from modern
  guitar technique to me. (I don't know enough about baroque
   technique to
  evaluate that.)
   

  On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Edward Mast
   [1][2]nedma...@aol.com
  wrote:
   
Wonderful. Hearing this lovely instrument, one wonders (well, I
wonder) why makers and players felt that it needed the
improvements of the modern guitar and its technique.  Well, ok,
   it
wasn't suitable for recitals in Carnegie Hall.  But, as always,
something gained, something lost.
   
  On Jul 15, 2011, at 2:35 AM, Valery Sauvage wrote:
 Again a nice vid :
   
   
 [1][2][3]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LijMh4LBJSg
   
   
 Val ;-)
   
   
   
 --
   
References
   
 1. [3][4]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LijMh4LBJSg
   
   
To get on or off this list see list information at
[4][5]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   
  --
   
References
   
  1. mailto:[6]nedma...@aol.com
  2. [7]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LijMh4LBJSg
  3. [8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LijMh4LBJSg
  4. [9]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
   

   --

References

   1. mailto:nedma...@aol.com
   2. mailto:nedma...@aol.com
   3. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LijMh4LBJSg
   4. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LijMh4LBJSg
   5. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
   6. mailto:nedma...@aol.com
   7. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LijMh4LBJSg
   8. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LijMh4LBJSg
   9. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html