[LUTE] Re: Recorder and Lute

2012-04-03 Thread howard posner

On Apr 3, 2012, at 5:41 PM, Tobiah wrote:

> How are the timelines of these instruments
> related, and what pieces include both instruments?

Are you asking what music was originally specified by the composer for an 
instrumentation that included lute and recorder?

Or what music can be done with a combination that includes lute and recorder?
--

To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: Recorder and Lute

2012-04-03 Thread Sean Smith



I should think Ortiz' variations on chansons and madrigals would be  
fair game. Dalla Cassa is a lot of fun if only because they're so  
difficult for the melody instrument. Giovanni Bassano, too, but since  
he comes from a family of traverso makers there are probably those who  
would take issue with me but they are lovely. And by extension most  
chansons from mid/late-16th century (giving the top voice to the  
soprano recorder and the lower 3 --or even alto and bass-- to the  
lute) are easily doable. It usually means arranging it yourself but  
that's part of playing the lute. My current favorite is Crecquillon  
but Sermisy, Certon, Jannequin, non Papa, Lasso, deRore and Pathie  
have all been flavors of the month at some time or another.


Any decent music/university library (and now the web!) will have  
scores. If you're in a purchasing mood, London Pro Musica scores are  
wonderful and often have a lute tab page for us grand-staff cripples.  
The Attagnant 1529 Tres breve et Familiere Introduction are songs of  
this ilk and are all ready to go. Even in the facsimile you luck out  
by having it set usually for a G lute and a G clef for the singer/ 
melody instrument. The Phalese 1553 is another good source for mid- 
century lutesongs but often various clefs and/or lute sizes are  
specified (but not written in stone so somebody gets to transpose).


My 1.9 cents. Please round down in Canada.
Sean


On Apr 3, 2012, at 5:41 PM, Tobiah wrote:

How are the timelines of these instruments
related, and what pieces include both instruments?

Thanks,

Tobiah



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html




[LUTE] Recorder and Lute

2012-04-03 Thread Tobiah

How are the timelines of these instruments
related, and what pieces include both instruments?

Thanks,

Tobiah



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: miking a lute/theorbo

2012-04-03 Thread jslute
   Dear All,
In my limited experience, too-close miking leads to boomey, guttural
   distortion. Some pros recommend 10 feet (or 3 meters) away, and 10 feet
   up.
This, of course is based on having a good acoustic environment to
   start with.
   Cheers,
   Jim Stimson



   On 04/03/12, Brad Walton wrote:

   Hello folks,
   On the weekend I recorded two pieces in a professional recording
   studio. I was accompanying a singer on the theorbo. The recording
   engineer aimed two mikes quite close to the body of the theorbo.
   On the recording, the sound of the theorbo is very tinny and distorted,
   and bears almost no similarity to the natural/ acoustic sound of the
   instrument.
   Has anybody had experience with miking a lute or theorbo for recording?
   What mike placement gave you the best results so far as concerned
   fidelity to the natural sound of the instrument?
   Thanks,
   Brad
   To get on or off this list see list information at
   [1]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

References

   1. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/



[LUTE] Re: miking a lute/theorbo

2012-04-03 Thread David van Ooijen
On 3 April 2012 18:05, Brad Walton  wrote:
> On the weekend I recorded two pieces in a professional recording studio.  I
..
> On the recording, the sound of the theorbo is very tinny and distorted, and
> bears almost no similarity to the natural/ acoustic sound of the instrument.

So much for the 'professional recording studio' ...

What is more important than the studio or the equipment, is the ear of
the engineer. What does he want to record? If he has a preconceived
idea of what a theorbo should shound, that is what he will put on
tape. So, talk to the man, play for him, let him listen to what you
think your theorbo should sound like. Listen to the test recordings,
discuss things you would like differently, and keep coming back till
you're both happy. Setting up the mics just rigth can take a lot of
time, but it is time well spent. I have made many recordings, over 30
cds with many different profffessional engineers with _very_ fancy
mics, and many more recordings with less professional people with very
ordinary mics, but the people I could talk to, and discuss with what I
like about my sound, made the best recordings, whatever their
equipment. There is no one way to record a lute.

 David



-- 
***
David van Ooijen
davidvanooi...@gmail.com
www.davidvanooijen.nl
***



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: miking a lute/theorbo

2012-04-03 Thread hera caius
I recently recorded a CD with Christmas music in a studio in Hungary and I can 
tell you they get the sound of the theorbo as beautiful as possible. I really 
don't know what kind of microphone they used but it was a huge one about 40 cm 
from the soundboard and a smaller one about 20 cm from the fretboard. In that 
way the sound was very natural and the CD listened on a HI-FI stuff it's like a 
real live one...
I think it's also a matter of preamps (they were using some tube preamps and 
amps...). 
Shure, AKG and Sennheiser are among the best what you can find on "normal" 
prices. 
Shure is my favorite.
--- On Tue, 4/3/12, Brad Walton  wrote:

> From: Brad Walton 
> Subject: [LUTE] miking a lute/theorbo
> To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
> Date: Tuesday, April 3, 2012, 7:05 PM
> Hello folks,
> 
> 
> On the weekend I recorded two pieces in a professional
> recording studio.  I was accompanying a singer on the
> theorbo.  The recording engineer aimed two mikes quite
> close to the body of the theorbo.
> 
> 
> On the recording, the sound of the theorbo is very tinny and
> distorted, and bears almost no similarity to the natural/
> acoustic sound of the instrument.
> 
> 
> Has anybody had experience with miking a lute or theorbo for
> recording?  What mike placement gave you the best
> results so far as concerned fidelity to the natural sound of
> the instrument?
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 
> Brad
> 
> 
> 
> To get on or off this list see list information at
> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
> 




[LUTE] Re: miking a lute/theorbo

2012-04-03 Thread andy butler

Hi Brad,
if you could post an excerpt somewhere I'd probably be
able to tell you what was going on with your recording.

"Tinny and Distorted" doesn't immediately give the impression
of "mic too close".

A wild guess might be that the mics were out of phase with 
each other, that is one would have been "wired the wrong 
way round" so that the 2 mics cancelled each other, rather
than working together. 


I'd probably start with the mic about 18inches from the instrument,
on the midline of the soundboard and just to the neck
side of the rose, I never recorded theorbo before so
like Eugene says I'd try a number of tests to get the right placement.



andy butler
(sound engineer for many years, lute player for too few)

Brad Walton wrote:

Hello folks,


On the weekend I recorded two pieces in a professional recording 
studio.  I was accompanying a singer on the theorbo.  The recording 
engineer aimed two mikes quite close to the body of the theorbo.



On the recording, the sound of the theorbo is very tinny and distorted, 
and bears almost no similarity to the natural/ acoustic sound of the 
instrument.



Has anybody had experience with miking a lute or theorbo for recording?  
What mike placement gave you the best results so far as concerned 
fidelity to the natural sound of the instrument?



Thanks,


Brad



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html






[LUTE] Re: miking a lute/theorbo

2012-04-03 Thread Edward Mast
David Tayler is someone who could offer good advice; his recordings are very 
natural sounding.  David . . .?
On Apr 3, 2012, at 12:05 PM, Brad Walton wrote:

> Hello folks,
> 
> 
> On the weekend I recorded two pieces in a professional recording studio.  I 
> was accompanying a singer on the theorbo.  The recording engineer aimed two 
> mikes quite close to the body of the theorbo.
> 
> 
> On the recording, the sound of the theorbo is very tinny and distorted, and 
> bears almost no similarity to the natural/ acoustic sound of the instrument.
> 
> 
> Has anybody had experience with miking a lute or theorbo for recording?  What 
> mike placement gave you the best results so far as concerned fidelity to the 
> natural sound of the instrument?
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 
> Brad
> 
> 
> 
> To get on or off this list see list information at
> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html





[LUTE] Re: miking a lute/theorbo

2012-04-03 Thread Eugene Kurenko
   It may depend on many things (mic type, room acoustic, sound projection
   of your lute etc). So it's better to spend some time for several short
   sound-tests with different mic placing.

   But no close distances from mic to lute. Try somthing around 1,5-3
   meters.
   2012/4/3 Brad Walton <[1]gtung.wal...@utoronto.ca>

 Hello folks,
 On the weekend I recorded two pieces in a professional recording
 studio.  I was accompanying a singer on the theorbo.  The recording
 engineer aimed two mikes quite close to the body of the theorbo.
 On the recording, the sound of the theorbo is very tinny and
 distorted, and bears almost no similarity to the natural/ acoustic
 sound of the instrument.
 Has anybody had experience with miking a lute or theorbo for
 recording?  What mike placement gave you the best results so far as
 concerned fidelity to the natural sound of the instrument?
 Thanks,
 Brad
 To get on or off this list see list information at
 [2]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   1. mailto:gtung.wal...@utoronto.ca
   2. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



[LUTE] miking a lute/theorbo

2012-04-03 Thread Brad Walton

Hello folks,


On the weekend I recorded two pieces in a professional recording 
studio.  I was accompanying a singer on the theorbo.  The recording 
engineer aimed two mikes quite close to the body of the theorbo.



On the recording, the sound of the theorbo is very tinny and distorted, 
and bears almost no similarity to the natural/ acoustic sound of the 
instrument.



Has anybody had experience with miking a lute or theorbo for recording?  
What mike placement gave you the best results so far as concerned 
fidelity to the natural sound of the instrument?



Thanks,


Brad



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: Holborne

2012-04-03 Thread Edward Mast
Hello Bruno,

I have The Complete Works of Anthony Holborne, Vol. 1, Music for Lute & 
Bandora, Harvard University Press Edited by Masakata Kanazawa.  Included is 
Lute Pavan No. 2.  If you like I can scan and send you a copy.  Since the lute 
tablature alternates with staff notation, it would be 5 pages.

Best,

Ned
On Apr 3, 2012, at 12:23 AM, Bruno Correia wrote:

>   Does anybody has Holborne's Pavan 2. I have a pdf version from
>   Gerbode's site but I'd love to check the original tablature.
> 
> 
> 
>   Best wishes.
>   --
> 
>   Bruno Correia
> 
> 
> 
>   Pesquisador autonomo da pratica e interpretac,ao
> 
>   historicamente informada no alaude e teorba.
> 
>   Doutor em Praticas Interpretativas pela
> 
>   Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro.
> 
>   --
> 
> 
> To get on or off this list see list information at
> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html