Re: lyxtexts & insettext

2003-03-23 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 03:37:56PM +, José  Matos wrote:
> > Row *, Row *, Row * your boat
> > gently down the ...
> 
>   I think that this would be the only place where Lars allows a raw pointer, 
> as long as it has a boat...

That's the point. You'd need at least an assert or use a boost::weak_ptr<>
to make sure there is a boat to Row...

Andre'

-- 
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)


Re: lyxtexts & insettext

2003-03-23 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 02:00:53PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | > >   Probably you meant "raw" pointers, no?
> | >
> | > No I meant (raw) "row" pointer
> | 
> |   Oh, I see, and Lars knows it? If he knows he is loosing qualities.
> 
> I have no idea what you are talking about!
> (My qualities are intact!)

  You are the person, I know, who likes raw pointers the least.
  So if they are there and you know... ;-) (uff at last I can have a
proper smilley).

  This subject is becoming very silly, and if I continue I will get in
your killfiles. :-)

> -- 
>   Lgb

-- 
José Abílio Matos
LyX and docbook a perfect match. :-)


Re: lyxtexts & insettext

2003-03-22 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
José  Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

| > No. Then let's do it with a little more lyrix:
| >
| > Row *, Row *, Row * your boat
| > gently down the ...

Hmm...

row(), row(), row(), this->boat->row()


not a pointer, but a function.

and it is  not .

-- 
Lgb


Re: lyxtexts & insettext

2003-03-22 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
José  Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

| On Friday 21 March 2003 10:42, Juergen Vigna wrote:
| > José Matos wrote:
| > >   Probably you meant "raw" pointers, no?
| >
| > No I meant (raw) "row" pointer
| 
|   Oh, I see, and Lars knows it? If he knows he is loosing qualities.

I have no idea what you are talking about!
(My qualities are intact!)

-- 
Lgb


Re: lyxtexts & insettext

2003-03-21 Thread José Matos
On Friday 21 March 2003 15:18, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> José  Matos wrote:
> > My problem is with you singing not with the lyrics (yes, this should be
> > lyrix and then evolve to lyx). Just because today we are entering in
> > spring that doesn't mean you should start imitating the little birds.
> > (Now
>
> Well, we are certainly not entering spring in my country, but autumn. Does
> this explanation satisfies you?

  Ok, but that still leaves several possible choices for countries in South 
America, and depending on our near you are from equador then we would need to 
consider if the four seasons (typical of medium latitudes) hold for your 
contry. But I take your word for it.

  If I'm guessing correctly then you can replace little bird by condor.

> No. Then let's do it with a little more lyrix:
>
> Row *, Row *, Row * your boat
> gently down the ...

  I think that this would be the only place where Lars allows a raw pointer, 
as long as it has a boat...
  I suspect that you are only doing this in order to Lars increase your karma.

> Alfredo

-- 
José Abílio


Re: lyxtexts & insettext

2003-03-21 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
José  Matos wrote:

> My problem is with you singing not with the lyrics (yes, this should be
> lyrix and then evolve to lyx). Just because today we are entering in
> spring that doesn't mean you should start imitating the little birds. (Now

Well, we are certainly not entering spring in my country, but autumn. Does
this explanation satisfies you?

No. Then let's do it with a little more lyrix:

Row *, Row *, Row * your boat 
gently down the ...

Alfredo




Re: lyxtexts & insettext

2003-03-21 Thread José Matos
On Friday 21 March 2003 13:24, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> >
> >   http://www.lyx.org/news/2726.php3#item3
>
> Bah, you are just plain annoying, and too ignorant to apreciate fine
> poetry. (Is that friday enough?)

  My problem is with you singing not with the lyrics (yes, this should be 
lyrix and then evolve to lyx). Just because today we are entering in spring 
that doesn't mean you should start imitating the little birds. (Now this is 
friday enough, I'm sure)

> Alfredo

-- 
José Abílio


Re: lyxtexts & insettext

2003-03-21 Thread John Levon
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 11:25:31AM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:

> Because it might be we are working on "Row" pointers which would
> disapear or be invalidated by the reinit, don't you think so?

Yep, gotcha. I  finally got minipage working simply by forcing a rebreak
on the lyxtext. Not polite or nice, but it works, and has lelss hack
factor than CHANGED_IN_DRAW

regards
john


Re: lyxtexts & insettext

2003-03-21 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
José  Matos wrote:

> eye so now I have decided to pick another victim. And my post was able to
> put Alfredo singing, even on a friday, someone should tell him what
> happens when people sing on this list on fridays.
> 
>   http://www.lyx.org/news/2726.php3#item3

Bah, you are just plain annoying, and too ignorant to apreciate fine poetry.
(Is that friday enough?)

Alfredo




Re: lyxtexts & insettext

2003-03-21 Thread José Matos
On Friday 21 March 2003 10:42, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> José Matos wrote:
> >   Probably you meant "raw" pointers, no?
>
> No I meant (raw) "row" pointer

  Oh, I see, and Lars knows it? If he knows he is loosing qualities.

> >   In this subject "row" pointers will probably mean something else. Also
> > I would not have pointed if it wasn't friday...
>
> Did you joke?

  No way. Last time it was Jean-Marc and Jonh who where the target of my picky 
eye so now I have decided to pick another victim. And my post was able to put 
Alfredo singing, even on a friday, someone should tell him what happens when 
people sing on this list on fridays. 

  http://www.lyx.org/news/2726.php3#item3


> Jug

-- 
José Abílio


Re: lyxtexts & insettext

2003-03-21 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
José  Matos wrote:

> Probably you meant "raw" pointers, no?
> In this subject "row" pointers will probably mean something else. Also I
> would not have pointed if it wasn't friday...

Row, row, row your boat
gently down the stream,
merrily merrily merrily,
life is but a dream!

I think he indeed meant raw row pointers  ;)

Alfredo




Re: lyxtexts & insettext

2003-03-21 Thread Juergen Vigna
José Matos wrote:
  Probably you meant "raw" pointers, no?
No I meant (raw) "row" pointer

  In this subject "row" pointers will probably mean something else. Also I 
would not have pointed if it wasn't friday...
Did you joke?

   Jug

--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen VignaE-Mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mitterstrich 151/A
I-39050 SteineggWeb: http://www.lyx.org/~jug
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._


Re: lyxtexts & insettext

2003-03-21 Thread José Matos
On Friday 21 March 2003 10:25, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> Because it might be we are working on "Row" pointers which would
> disapear or be invalidated by the reinit, don't you think so?

  Probably you meant "raw" pointers, no?
  In this subject "row" pointers will probably mean something else. Also I 
would not have pointed if it wasn't friday...

>Jug

-- 
José Abílio


Re: lyxtexts & insettext

2003-03-21 Thread Juergen Vigna
John Levon wrote:
Can somebody give me a brief summary of how/why this works ?

Especially, why can't we "reinitLyXText" when lt is non-null ?
Because it might be we are working on "Row" pointers which would
disapear or be invalidated by the reinit, don't you think so?
  Jug

--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen VignaE-Mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mitterstrich 151/A
I-39050 SteineggWeb: http://www.lyx.org/~jug
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._


lyxtexts & insettext

2003-03-20 Thread John Levon

Can somebody give me a brief summary of how/why this works ?

Especially, why can't we "reinitLyXText" when lt is non-null ?

thanks
john