\rm in formula

2009-07-24 Thread Patrick Dupre 

Hello,

With version 1.6.3 it is easy to see what does lyx, so I would like to
mention this problem.
In math mode (CTRL M), I can type \rm and then CH, but I want a subscript,
I need to leave the rm mode while latex like: $\rm CH_3$ or $\rm CH_{3}$
Using lyx, I did not find any way to enter the same. lyx forces:
${\rm CH}_{3}$.
Is their any way to by pass this problem ?

Thank.

--
---
==
 Patrick DUPRÉ  |   |
 Department of Chemistry|   |Phone: (44)-(0)-1904-434384
 The University of York |   |Fax:   (44)-(0)-1904-432516
 Heslington |   |
 York YO10 5DD  United Kingdom  |   |email: pd...@york.ac.uk
==

Re: \rm in formula

2009-07-24 Thread Matthias Bechmann 
Patrick Dupre pd...@... writes:



 lyx forces:
 ${\rm CH}_{3}$.
 Is their any way to by pass this problem ?

you can try using \mathrm instead of \rm


matthias

\rm in formula

2009-07-24 Thread Patrick Dupre 

Hello,

With version 1.6.3 it is easy to see what does lyx, so I would like to
mention this problem.
In math mode (CTRL M), I can type \rm and then CH, but I want a subscript,
I need to leave the rm mode while latex like: $\rm CH_3$ or $\rm CH_{3}$
Using lyx, I did not find any way to enter the same. lyx forces:
${\rm CH}_{3}$.
Is their any way to by pass this problem ?

Thank.

--
---
==
 Patrick DUPRÉ  |   |
 Department of Chemistry|   |Phone: (44)-(0)-1904-434384
 The University of York |   |Fax:   (44)-(0)-1904-432516
 Heslington |   |
 York YO10 5DD  United Kingdom  |   |email: pd...@york.ac.uk
==

Re: \rm in formula

2009-07-24 Thread Matthias Bechmann 
Patrick Dupre pd...@... writes:



 lyx forces:
 ${\rm CH}_{3}$.
 Is their any way to by pass this problem ?

you can try using \mathrm instead of \rm


matthias

\rm in formula

2009-07-24 Thread Patrick Dupre 

Hello,

With version 1.6.3 it is easy to see what does lyx, so I would like to
mention this problem.
In math mode (CTRL M), I can type \rm and then CH, but I want a subscript,
I need to leave the rm mode while latex like: $\rm CH_3$ or $\rm CH_{3}$
Using lyx, I did not find any way to enter the same. lyx forces:
${\rm CH}_{3}$.
Is their any way to by pass this problem ?

Thank.

--
---
==
 Patrick DUPRÉ  |   |
 Department of Chemistry|   |Phone: (44)-(0)-1904-434384
 The University of York |   |Fax:   (44)-(0)-1904-432516
 Heslington |   |
 York YO10 5DD  United Kingdom  |   |email: pd...@york.ac.uk
==

Re: \rm in formula

2009-07-24 Thread Matthias Bechmann 
Patrick Dupre  writes:



> lyx forces:
> ${\rm CH}_{3}$.
> Is their any way to by pass this problem ?

you can try using \mathrm instead of \rm


matthias