Re: Index cross referencing with "see"

2011-03-07 Thread Peter Baumgartner
Jürgen,

I've got an error message on missing hyperref. I have switched it off in
order to get a super minimal file. But after turning hyperref on again, it
works now!

I'm really confused. I worked on this minimal file to find the error for
several hours. Now it works, even with all my modules, splitindex etc. - But
I do not know what happened and what was the problem...

Sorry for stealing your time.
Peter




Re: Index cross referencing with "see"

2011-03-07 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Peter Baumgartner wrote:
> > I just noticed that the cross reference mechanism does not work with LyX
> > Beta4.
> > 
> >> You should probably post a complete (minimal) example file.
> 
> See attachment. It is possible that the problem exists in earlier beta
> versions as well. I haven't yet time to test it.

Works for me, both with makeindex and xindy.

Do you have any suspicious messages in the index log (see Document > LaTeX 
Log, Log Type "Index")?

Jürgen


Re: Index cross referencing with "see"

2011-03-07 Thread Peter Baumgartner
> I just noticed that the cross reference mechanism does not work with LyX
> Beta4.
>> You should probably post a complete (minimal) example file.

See attachment. It is possible that the problem exists in earlier beta
versions as well. I haven't yet time to test it.

Peter



test-index.lyx
Description: video/flv


Re: Index cross referencing with "see"

2011-03-07 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Peter Baumgartner wrote:
> Any ideas what is wrong here?

You should probably post a complete (minimal) example file.

Jürgen


Index cross referencing with "see"

2011-03-07 Thread Peter Baumgartner
Hello,

I just noticed that the cross reference mechanism does not work with LyX
Beta4. Or I'm doing something wrong? See the following code:

Frontalunterricht\index{Modell!Frontalunterricht}
\index{Frontalunterricht|see{Modell}}
\printindex{}

The index entry does appear but there is not cross reference with "see",
respectively the German equivalent with "siehe". (I have tried different
languages, but that didn't help.)

Any ideas what is wrong here?

Peter