Re: Lost Keybindings in 1.4.1

2006-06-28 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Rich" == Rich Shepard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Rich>   Even if I append my key bindings to the latest cua.bind, don't
Rich> I still need to figure out syntactical changes? For example,
Rich> prior function name was 'spellchecker' while the new function
Rich> name is 'display-show spellchecker.' So, if I use the old
Rich> function name it still won't work as expected. No?

You are right. What I mean is that, by using "\bind_file cua" in your
.bind file, you are sure that it will use the current version of
cua.bind, not an old copy. This means that you only have to fix your
own bindings when upgrading.

JMarc


Re: Lost Keybindings in 1.4.1

2006-06-28 Thread Rich Shepard

On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:


-mybindings.bind---
\bind_file cua.bind

#your bindings below
\bind "F1" "foo"
---


JMarc,

  No, I didn't.

  What I did years ago was 'cp cua.bind my.bind' and change the latter. But,
despite selecting that in the preferences dialog, each time LyX is invoked
the bind file is returned to cua.bind.

  Even if I append my key bindings to the latest cua.bind, don't I still need
to figure out syntactical changes? For example, prior function name was
'spellchecker' while the new function name is 'display-show spellchecker.'
So, if I use the old function name it still won't work as expected. No?

Thanks,

Rich

--
Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D.   |The Environmental Permitting
Applied Ecosystem Services, Inc.(TM)|Accelerator
 Voice: 503-667-4517  Fax: 503-667-8863


Re: Lost Keybindings in 1.4.1

2006-06-28 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:

> Incidentally, is it possible to include bind files?

After switching my brain on, I noticed that it's just what
\bind_file
does.

Sorry for the noise.

Jürgen



Re: Lost Keybindings in 1.4.1

2006-06-28 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:

> Do you know that, if you start from, say, cua.bind, the best way to
> produce your bindings is like this?

Incidentally, is it possible to include bind files? Something like

-mybindings.bind---
#my bindings
\bind "F1" "foo"

Input cua.bind
---

would be very nifty especially wrt upgrading.

Jürgen



Re: Lost Keybindings in 1.4.1

2006-06-28 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Rich" == Rich Shepard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Rich>   That was it: names changed from prior versions. In a few
Rich> cases, the words were reversed in the latest cua.bind, in others
Rich> 'dialog-show' was prepended to the word. Sigh.

Do you know that, if you start from, say, cua.bind, the best way to
produce your bindings is like this?

-mybindings.bind---
\bind_file cua.bind

#your bindings below
\bind "F1" "foo"
---

JMarc


Re: Lost Keybindings in 1.4.1

2006-06-27 Thread Paul A. Rubin

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:

"Rich" == Rich Shepard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


Rich>   This is frustrating: in 1.4.1 (linux), some of my shortcut
Rich> keys no longer work. Same bind file as before. Some that do work
Rich> include: C-d View dvi output C-i Italics (emphasize) C-b Bold
Rich> C-h Compile with pdflatex

Rich>   Some that no longer work include: C-f Find F7 Spellcheck C-s
Rich> Save

Rich>   Can someone help me understand why, and what I need to do to
Rich> get back the full functionality of my keyboard?

What does your preference file look like?

Did you make your own bindings file? Some of the LyX functions changed
names.

JMarc



Is there (or will there soon be) an updated list of function names on 
the Wiki?


/Paul




Re: Lost Keybindings in 1.4.1

2006-06-27 Thread Rich Shepard

On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:


Did you make your own bindings file? Some of the LyX functions changed
names.


JMarc,

  That was it: names changed from prior versions. In a few cases, the words
were reversed in the latest cua.bind, in others 'dialog-show' was prepended
to the word. Sigh.

  It's all better now. Many thanks.

Rich

--
Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D.   |The Environmental Permitting
Applied Ecosystem Services, Inc.(TM)|Accelerator
 Voice: 503-667-4517  Fax: 503-667-8863


Re: Lost Keybindings in 1.4.1

2006-06-27 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Rich" == Rich Shepard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Rich>   This is frustrating: in 1.4.1 (linux), some of my shortcut
Rich> keys no longer work. Same bind file as before. Some that do work
Rich> include: C-d View dvi output C-i Italics (emphasize) C-b Bold
Rich> C-h Compile with pdflatex

Rich>   Some that no longer work include: C-f Find F7 Spellcheck C-s
Rich> Save

Rich>   Can someone help me understand why, and what I need to do to
Rich> get back the full functionality of my keyboard?

What does your preference file look like?

Did you make your own bindings file? Some of the LyX functions changed
names.

JMarc


Lost Keybindings in 1.4.1

2006-06-26 Thread Rich Shepard

  This is frustrating: in 1.4.1 (linux), some of my shortcut keys no longer
work. Same bind file as before. Some that do work include:
  C-d   View dvi output
  C-i   Italics (emphasize)
  C-b   Bold
  C-h   Compile with pdflatex

  Some that no longer work include:
  C-f   Find
  F7Spellcheck
  C-s   Save

  Can someone help me understand why, and what I need to do to get back the
full functionality of my keyboard?

Thanks,

Rich

--
Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D.   |The Environmental Permitting
Applied Ecosystem Services, Inc.(TM)|Accelerator
 Voice: 503-667-4517  Fax: 503-667-8863