RE: photographs: what format to use for b/w printing via lyx?

2010-01-25 Thread Rob Oakes
Hi Richard,

What kinds of photos are they?  For example, are they screenshots that
you've converted to black and white?  Or are they text on a white
background?  Or are they grayscale images or are they true black and white
(two-tone images)?

Are there any pertinent details that you wish to highlight?  What kind of
contrast values are you hoping to get?   What is the initial resolution?  Do
you have high-res copies for printing on a press or will you be printing
from a desktop computer?

The answer to your original question really depends on what you want to do
with them.  My experience with LyX has been that it does a pretty good job
with whatever images you feed to it, but it isn't a photo manipulation
program.  All of the manipulation should happen to the input images before
you compile into a DVI or PDF.  After that, you will need to make the
changes to the PDF in a program like Inkscape, Acrobat Professional, or
Illustrator.

In general,  however, I would recommend that you use TIFF images for black +
white and grayscale (either uncompressed or lossless compression).
Greyscale images are much smaller than color images with only a single
channel of information.  In contrast, color images often have three or four
channels of information.  Since they contain much less data, using lossy
compression (such as JPEG) doesn't result in a much smaller image size.

Additionally,  JPEG and other compressed image formats will often introduce
distortions.  While this won't be visible if printing on a desktop printer
or viewing on screen, it is a terribly bad idea to use low resolution or
compressed images in a file bound for a printing press.

For graphs and other data graphics, I would highly recommend creating either
an EPS or PDF image.  When doing so, make sure that the graphic is a vector
based image rather than a rasterized version.  This will result in a much
crisper looking print reproduction.  The process for doing so varies from
program to program, however.

Best of luck with your project.

Cheers,

Rob Oakes



RE: photographs: what format to use for b/w printing via lyx?

2010-01-25 Thread Richard Brown
Thanks for that encouraging reply, Rob. Can I ask a quick supplementary?
I have colour jpgs, not particularly high res but neither are they poor.
And I'm making a pdf for submission to a printer, to be printed in b/w.
The jpgs are atthe moment much bigger than I need: I'll have to scale
them to about 40%.  Should I process the jpgs into monochrome tiffs? Or
would the conversion cost me definition?

On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 11:20 -0700, Rob Oakes wrote:
 Hi Richard,
 
 What kinds of photos are they?  For example, are they screenshots that
 you've converted to black and white?  Or are they text on a white
 background?  Or are they grayscale images or are they true black and white
 (two-tone images)?
 
 Are there any pertinent details that you wish to highlight?  What kind of
 contrast values are you hoping to get?   What is the initial resolution?  Do
 you have high-res copies for printing on a press or will you be printing
 from a desktop computer?
 
 The answer to your original question really depends on what you want to do
 with them.  My experience with LyX has been that it does a pretty good job
 with whatever images you feed to it, but it isn't a photo manipulation
 program.  All of the manipulation should happen to the input images before
 you compile into a DVI or PDF.  After that, you will need to make the
 changes to the PDF in a program like Inkscape, Acrobat Professional, or
 Illustrator.
 
 In general,  however, I would recommend that you use TIFF images for black +
 white and grayscale (either uncompressed or lossless compression).
 Greyscale images are much smaller than color images with only a single
 channel of information.  In contrast, color images often have three or four
 channels of information.  Since they contain much less data, using lossy
 compression (such as JPEG) doesn't result in a much smaller image size.
 
 Additionally,  JPEG and other compressed image formats will often introduce
 distortions.  While this won't be visible if printing on a desktop printer
 or viewing on screen, it is a terribly bad idea to use low resolution or
 compressed images in a file bound for a printing press.
 
 For graphs and other data graphics, I would highly recommend creating either
 an EPS or PDF image.  When doing so, make sure that the graphic is a vector
 based image rather than a rasterized version.  This will result in a much
 crisper looking print reproduction.  The process for doing so varies from
 program to program, however.
 
 Best of luck with your project.
 
 Cheers,
 
 Rob Oakes
 



RE: photographs: what format to use for b/w printing via lyx?

2010-01-25 Thread Rob Oakes
Hi Richard,

 Can I ask a quick supplementary? 

Of course.

 The jpgs are at the moment much bigger than I need: I'll have to scale
them to about 40%.  Should I process the jpgs into monochrome tiffs? Or
would the conversion cost me definition? 

By all means, process the files.  If possible, do this yourself or have
someone with a good photographic eye do it.  This ensures that you get the
image that you want.  If you don't convert them, then someone (or worse,
some machine) at the printers will.  This can sometimes result in a final
product different than you had envisioned.

Black and white is a completely different medium than color and it usually
takes a little bit of tweaking to make sure that you get the images to your
satisfaction.  For example, most black and white photos should have a bit
more contrast and a slightly higher adjusted exposure than the equivalent
color photograph.  This helps to bring out relevant details that might
otherwise not be visible. (Keep in mind that I tend to be extremely fussy
about images and figures.)
 
The conversion shouldn't really cost you any definition, since you're only
converting from color  to black and white. Loss of definition seems to
happen when changing the physical dimensions of the image.  The conversion
can be done in the photo program of your choice, but using Photoshop or Gimp
will give you a tremendous amount of fine control over the image appearance.

Re: JPEG to Tiff conversion.  If your source images are already JPEG, then
you shouldn't you don't really gain anything by saving it to TIFF (though I
would anyway).  If you save back to JPEG, make sure that the quality bar
is set to 100%, or it will further compress the image and you will lose
additional data.

Also, when you scale the images, make sure that they aren't down sampled
(some image editing programs don't distinguish between the pixel dimensions
and the physical dimensions).  You want the pixel dimensions to remain the
same, regardless of the physical dimensions.  Most printing presses require
images that are at least 300 dpi, though bigger is *always* better.  It's a
completely different mindset than when creating something for online
distribution.

Thus, I would avoid Photoshop's Save for Web and Devices feature or
anything any-way similar.  The entire purpose of Save for Web and Devices
and co. is to down sample, not scale. 

One final thought: as long as the source images are of sufficient size, I
would stick to scaling inside of LyX itself.  There is a dialog box that
will let you specify the physical dimensions without messing with the source
image.

Hope this is of some help.  If you have any other questions, please don't
hesitate to let me know.

Cheers,

Rob



RE: photographs: what format to use for b/w printing via lyx?

2010-01-25 Thread Richard Brown
Thanks, Rob. That was very clear and helpful!

Richard

On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 13:12 -0700, Rob Oakes wrote:
 Hi Richard,
 
  Can I ask a quick supplementary? 
 
 Of course.
 
  The jpgs are at the moment much bigger than I need: I'll have to scale
 them to about 40%.  Should I process the jpgs into monochrome tiffs? Or
 would the conversion cost me definition? 
 
 By all means, process the files.  If possible, do this yourself or have
 someone with a good photographic eye do it.  This ensures that you get the
 image that you want.  If you don't convert them, then someone (or worse,
 some machine) at the printers will.  This can sometimes result in a final
 product different than you had envisioned.
 
 Black and white is a completely different medium than color and it usually
 takes a little bit of tweaking to make sure that you get the images to your
 satisfaction.  For example, most black and white photos should have a bit
 more contrast and a slightly higher adjusted exposure than the equivalent
 color photograph.  This helps to bring out relevant details that might
 otherwise not be visible. (Keep in mind that I tend to be extremely fussy
 about images and figures.)
  
 The conversion shouldn't really cost you any definition, since you're only
 converting from color  to black and white. Loss of definition seems to
 happen when changing the physical dimensions of the image.  The conversion
 can be done in the photo program of your choice, but using Photoshop or Gimp
 will give you a tremendous amount of fine control over the image appearance.
 
 Re: JPEG to Tiff conversion.  If your source images are already JPEG, then
 you shouldn't you don't really gain anything by saving it to TIFF (though I
 would anyway).  If you save back to JPEG, make sure that the quality bar
 is set to 100%, or it will further compress the image and you will lose
 additional data.
 
 Also, when you scale the images, make sure that they aren't down sampled
 (some image editing programs don't distinguish between the pixel dimensions
 and the physical dimensions).  You want the pixel dimensions to remain the
 same, regardless of the physical dimensions.  Most printing presses require
 images that are at least 300 dpi, though bigger is *always* better.  It's a
 completely different mindset than when creating something for online
 distribution.
 
 Thus, I would avoid Photoshop's Save for Web and Devices feature or
 anything any-way similar.  The entire purpose of Save for Web and Devices
 and co. is to down sample, not scale. 
 
 One final thought: as long as the source images are of sufficient size, I
 would stick to scaling inside of LyX itself.  There is a dialog box that
 will let you specify the physical dimensions without messing with the source
 image.
 
 Hope this is of some help.  If you have any other questions, please don't
 hesitate to let me know.
 
 Cheers,
 
 Rob
 



RE: photographs: what format to use for b/w printing via lyx?

2010-01-25 Thread Rob Oakes
Hi Richard,

What kinds of photos are they?  For example, are they screenshots that
you've converted to black and white?  Or are they text on a white
background?  Or are they grayscale images or are they true black and white
(two-tone images)?

Are there any pertinent details that you wish to highlight?  What kind of
contrast values are you hoping to get?   What is the initial resolution?  Do
you have high-res copies for printing on a press or will you be printing
from a desktop computer?

The answer to your original question really depends on what you want to do
with them.  My experience with LyX has been that it does a pretty good job
with whatever images you feed to it, but it isn't a photo manipulation
program.  All of the manipulation should happen to the input images before
you compile into a DVI or PDF.  After that, you will need to make the
changes to the PDF in a program like Inkscape, Acrobat Professional, or
Illustrator.

In general,  however, I would recommend that you use TIFF images for black +
white and grayscale (either uncompressed or lossless compression).
Greyscale images are much smaller than color images with only a single
channel of information.  In contrast, color images often have three or four
channels of information.  Since they contain much less data, using lossy
compression (such as JPEG) doesn't result in a much smaller image size.

Additionally,  JPEG and other compressed image formats will often introduce
distortions.  While this won't be visible if printing on a desktop printer
or viewing on screen, it is a terribly bad idea to use low resolution or
compressed images in a file bound for a printing press.

For graphs and other data graphics, I would highly recommend creating either
an EPS or PDF image.  When doing so, make sure that the graphic is a vector
based image rather than a rasterized version.  This will result in a much
crisper looking print reproduction.  The process for doing so varies from
program to program, however.

Best of luck with your project.

Cheers,

Rob Oakes



RE: photographs: what format to use for b/w printing via lyx?

2010-01-25 Thread Richard Brown
Thanks for that encouraging reply, Rob. Can I ask a quick supplementary?
I have colour jpgs, not particularly high res but neither are they poor.
And I'm making a pdf for submission to a printer, to be printed in b/w.
The jpgs are atthe moment much bigger than I need: I'll have to scale
them to about 40%.  Should I process the jpgs into monochrome tiffs? Or
would the conversion cost me definition?

On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 11:20 -0700, Rob Oakes wrote:
 Hi Richard,
 
 What kinds of photos are they?  For example, are they screenshots that
 you've converted to black and white?  Or are they text on a white
 background?  Or are they grayscale images or are they true black and white
 (two-tone images)?
 
 Are there any pertinent details that you wish to highlight?  What kind of
 contrast values are you hoping to get?   What is the initial resolution?  Do
 you have high-res copies for printing on a press or will you be printing
 from a desktop computer?
 
 The answer to your original question really depends on what you want to do
 with them.  My experience with LyX has been that it does a pretty good job
 with whatever images you feed to it, but it isn't a photo manipulation
 program.  All of the manipulation should happen to the input images before
 you compile into a DVI or PDF.  After that, you will need to make the
 changes to the PDF in a program like Inkscape, Acrobat Professional, or
 Illustrator.
 
 In general,  however, I would recommend that you use TIFF images for black +
 white and grayscale (either uncompressed or lossless compression).
 Greyscale images are much smaller than color images with only a single
 channel of information.  In contrast, color images often have three or four
 channels of information.  Since they contain much less data, using lossy
 compression (such as JPEG) doesn't result in a much smaller image size.
 
 Additionally,  JPEG and other compressed image formats will often introduce
 distortions.  While this won't be visible if printing on a desktop printer
 or viewing on screen, it is a terribly bad idea to use low resolution or
 compressed images in a file bound for a printing press.
 
 For graphs and other data graphics, I would highly recommend creating either
 an EPS or PDF image.  When doing so, make sure that the graphic is a vector
 based image rather than a rasterized version.  This will result in a much
 crisper looking print reproduction.  The process for doing so varies from
 program to program, however.
 
 Best of luck with your project.
 
 Cheers,
 
 Rob Oakes
 



RE: photographs: what format to use for b/w printing via lyx?

2010-01-25 Thread Rob Oakes
Hi Richard,

 Can I ask a quick supplementary? 

Of course.

 The jpgs are at the moment much bigger than I need: I'll have to scale
them to about 40%.  Should I process the jpgs into monochrome tiffs? Or
would the conversion cost me definition? 

By all means, process the files.  If possible, do this yourself or have
someone with a good photographic eye do it.  This ensures that you get the
image that you want.  If you don't convert them, then someone (or worse,
some machine) at the printers will.  This can sometimes result in a final
product different than you had envisioned.

Black and white is a completely different medium than color and it usually
takes a little bit of tweaking to make sure that you get the images to your
satisfaction.  For example, most black and white photos should have a bit
more contrast and a slightly higher adjusted exposure than the equivalent
color photograph.  This helps to bring out relevant details that might
otherwise not be visible. (Keep in mind that I tend to be extremely fussy
about images and figures.)
 
The conversion shouldn't really cost you any definition, since you're only
converting from color  to black and white. Loss of definition seems to
happen when changing the physical dimensions of the image.  The conversion
can be done in the photo program of your choice, but using Photoshop or Gimp
will give you a tremendous amount of fine control over the image appearance.

Re: JPEG to Tiff conversion.  If your source images are already JPEG, then
you shouldn't you don't really gain anything by saving it to TIFF (though I
would anyway).  If you save back to JPEG, make sure that the quality bar
is set to 100%, or it will further compress the image and you will lose
additional data.

Also, when you scale the images, make sure that they aren't down sampled
(some image editing programs don't distinguish between the pixel dimensions
and the physical dimensions).  You want the pixel dimensions to remain the
same, regardless of the physical dimensions.  Most printing presses require
images that are at least 300 dpi, though bigger is *always* better.  It's a
completely different mindset than when creating something for online
distribution.

Thus, I would avoid Photoshop's Save for Web and Devices feature or
anything any-way similar.  The entire purpose of Save for Web and Devices
and co. is to down sample, not scale. 

One final thought: as long as the source images are of sufficient size, I
would stick to scaling inside of LyX itself.  There is a dialog box that
will let you specify the physical dimensions without messing with the source
image.

Hope this is of some help.  If you have any other questions, please don't
hesitate to let me know.

Cheers,

Rob



RE: photographs: what format to use for b/w printing via lyx?

2010-01-25 Thread Richard Brown
Thanks, Rob. That was very clear and helpful!

Richard

On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 13:12 -0700, Rob Oakes wrote:
 Hi Richard,
 
  Can I ask a quick supplementary? 
 
 Of course.
 
  The jpgs are at the moment much bigger than I need: I'll have to scale
 them to about 40%.  Should I process the jpgs into monochrome tiffs? Or
 would the conversion cost me definition? 
 
 By all means, process the files.  If possible, do this yourself or have
 someone with a good photographic eye do it.  This ensures that you get the
 image that you want.  If you don't convert them, then someone (or worse,
 some machine) at the printers will.  This can sometimes result in a final
 product different than you had envisioned.
 
 Black and white is a completely different medium than color and it usually
 takes a little bit of tweaking to make sure that you get the images to your
 satisfaction.  For example, most black and white photos should have a bit
 more contrast and a slightly higher adjusted exposure than the equivalent
 color photograph.  This helps to bring out relevant details that might
 otherwise not be visible. (Keep in mind that I tend to be extremely fussy
 about images and figures.)
  
 The conversion shouldn't really cost you any definition, since you're only
 converting from color  to black and white. Loss of definition seems to
 happen when changing the physical dimensions of the image.  The conversion
 can be done in the photo program of your choice, but using Photoshop or Gimp
 will give you a tremendous amount of fine control over the image appearance.
 
 Re: JPEG to Tiff conversion.  If your source images are already JPEG, then
 you shouldn't you don't really gain anything by saving it to TIFF (though I
 would anyway).  If you save back to JPEG, make sure that the quality bar
 is set to 100%, or it will further compress the image and you will lose
 additional data.
 
 Also, when you scale the images, make sure that they aren't down sampled
 (some image editing programs don't distinguish between the pixel dimensions
 and the physical dimensions).  You want the pixel dimensions to remain the
 same, regardless of the physical dimensions.  Most printing presses require
 images that are at least 300 dpi, though bigger is *always* better.  It's a
 completely different mindset than when creating something for online
 distribution.
 
 Thus, I would avoid Photoshop's Save for Web and Devices feature or
 anything any-way similar.  The entire purpose of Save for Web and Devices
 and co. is to down sample, not scale. 
 
 One final thought: as long as the source images are of sufficient size, I
 would stick to scaling inside of LyX itself.  There is a dialog box that
 will let you specify the physical dimensions without messing with the source
 image.
 
 Hope this is of some help.  If you have any other questions, please don't
 hesitate to let me know.
 
 Cheers,
 
 Rob
 



RE: photographs: what format to use for b/w printing via lyx?

2010-01-25 Thread Rob Oakes
Hi Richard,

What kinds of photos are they?  For example, are they screenshots that
you've converted to black and white?  Or are they text on a white
background?  Or are they grayscale images or are they true black and white
(two-tone images)?

Are there any pertinent details that you wish to highlight?  What kind of
contrast values are you hoping to get?   What is the initial resolution?  Do
you have high-res copies for printing on a press or will you be printing
from a desktop computer?

The answer to your original question really depends on what you want to do
with them.  My experience with LyX has been that it does a pretty good job
with whatever images you feed to it, but it isn't a photo manipulation
program.  All of the manipulation should happen to the input images before
you compile into a DVI or PDF.  After that, you will need to make the
changes to the PDF in a program like Inkscape, Acrobat Professional, or
Illustrator.

In general,  however, I would recommend that you use TIFF images for black +
white and grayscale (either uncompressed or lossless compression).
Greyscale images are much smaller than color images with only a single
channel of information.  In contrast, color images often have three or four
channels of information.  Since they contain much less data, using lossy
compression (such as JPEG) doesn't result in a much smaller image size.

Additionally,  JPEG and other compressed image formats will often introduce
distortions.  While this won't be visible if printing on a desktop printer
or viewing on screen, it is a terribly bad idea to use low resolution or
compressed images in a file bound for a printing press.

For graphs and other data graphics, I would highly recommend creating either
an EPS or PDF image.  When doing so, make sure that the graphic is a vector
based image rather than a rasterized version.  This will result in a much
crisper looking print reproduction.  The process for doing so varies from
program to program, however.

Best of luck with your project.

Cheers,

Rob Oakes



RE: photographs: what format to use for b/w printing via lyx?

2010-01-25 Thread Richard Brown
Thanks for that encouraging reply, Rob. Can I ask a quick supplementary?
I have colour jpgs, not particularly high res but neither are they poor.
And I'm making a pdf for submission to a printer, to be printed in b/w.
The jpgs are atthe moment much bigger than I need: I'll have to scale
them to about 40%.  Should I process the jpgs into monochrome tiffs? Or
would the conversion cost me definition?

On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 11:20 -0700, Rob Oakes wrote:
> Hi Richard,
> 
> What kinds of photos are they?  For example, are they screenshots that
> you've converted to black and white?  Or are they text on a white
> background?  Or are they grayscale images or are they true black and white
> (two-tone images)?
> 
> Are there any pertinent details that you wish to highlight?  What kind of
> contrast values are you hoping to get?   What is the initial resolution?  Do
> you have high-res copies for printing on a press or will you be printing
> from a desktop computer?
> 
> The answer to your original question really depends on what you want to do
> with them.  My experience with LyX has been that it does a pretty good job
> with whatever images you feed to it, but it isn't a photo manipulation
> program.  All of the manipulation should happen to the input images before
> you compile into a DVI or PDF.  After that, you will need to make the
> changes to the PDF in a program like Inkscape, Acrobat Professional, or
> Illustrator.
> 
> In general,  however, I would recommend that you use TIFF images for black +
> white and grayscale (either uncompressed or lossless compression).
> Greyscale images are much smaller than color images with only a single
> channel of information.  In contrast, color images often have three or four
> channels of information.  Since they contain much less data, using lossy
> compression (such as JPEG) doesn't result in a much smaller image size.
> 
> Additionally,  JPEG and other compressed image formats will often introduce
> distortions.  While this won't be visible if printing on a desktop printer
> or viewing on screen, it is a terribly bad idea to use low resolution or
> compressed images in a file bound for a printing press.
> 
> For graphs and other data graphics, I would highly recommend creating either
> an EPS or PDF image.  When doing so, make sure that the graphic is a vector
> based image rather than a rasterized version.  This will result in a much
> crisper looking print reproduction.  The process for doing so varies from
> program to program, however.
> 
> Best of luck with your project.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Rob Oakes
> 



RE: photographs: what format to use for b/w printing via lyx?

2010-01-25 Thread Rob Oakes
Hi Richard,

<< Can I ask a quick supplementary? >>

Of course.

<< The jpgs are at the moment much bigger than I need: I'll have to scale
them to about 40%.  Should I process the jpgs into monochrome tiffs? Or
would the conversion cost me definition? >>

By all means, process the files.  If possible, do this yourself or have
someone with a good photographic eye do it.  This ensures that you get the
image that you want.  If you don't convert them, then someone (or worse,
some machine) at the printers will.  This can sometimes result in a final
product different than you had envisioned.

Black and white is a completely different medium than color and it usually
takes a little bit of tweaking to make sure that you get the images to your
satisfaction.  For example, most black and white photos should have a bit
more contrast and a slightly higher adjusted exposure than the equivalent
color photograph.  This helps to bring out relevant details that might
otherwise not be visible. (Keep in mind that I tend to be extremely fussy
about images and figures.)
 
The conversion shouldn't really cost you any definition, since you're only
converting from color  to black and white. Loss of "definition" seems to
happen when changing the physical dimensions of the image.  The conversion
can be done in the photo program of your choice, but using Photoshop or Gimp
will give you a tremendous amount of fine control over the image appearance.

Re: JPEG to Tiff conversion.  If your source images are already JPEG, then
you shouldn't you don't really gain anything by saving it to TIFF (though I
would anyway).  If you save back to JPEG, make sure that the "quality" bar
is set to 100%, or it will further compress the image and you will lose
additional data.

Also, when you "scale the images", make sure that they aren't down sampled
(some image editing programs don't distinguish between the pixel dimensions
and the physical dimensions).  You want the pixel dimensions to remain the
same, regardless of the physical dimensions.  Most printing presses require
images that are at least 300 dpi, though bigger is *always* better.  It's a
completely different mindset than when creating something for online
distribution.

Thus, I would avoid Photoshop's "Save for Web and Devices" feature or
anything any-way similar.  The entire purpose of "Save for Web and Devices"
and co. is to down sample, not scale. 

One final thought: as long as the source images are of sufficient size, I
would stick to scaling inside of LyX itself.  There is a dialog box that
will let you specify the physical dimensions without messing with the source
image.

Hope this is of some help.  If you have any other questions, please don't
hesitate to let me know.

Cheers,

Rob



RE: photographs: what format to use for b/w printing via lyx?

2010-01-25 Thread Richard Brown
Thanks, Rob. That was very clear and helpful!

Richard

On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 13:12 -0700, Rob Oakes wrote:
> Hi Richard,
> 
> << Can I ask a quick supplementary? >>
> 
> Of course.
> 
> << The jpgs are at the moment much bigger than I need: I'll have to scale
> them to about 40%.  Should I process the jpgs into monochrome tiffs? Or
> would the conversion cost me definition? >>
> 
> By all means, process the files.  If possible, do this yourself or have
> someone with a good photographic eye do it.  This ensures that you get the
> image that you want.  If you don't convert them, then someone (or worse,
> some machine) at the printers will.  This can sometimes result in a final
> product different than you had envisioned.
> 
> Black and white is a completely different medium than color and it usually
> takes a little bit of tweaking to make sure that you get the images to your
> satisfaction.  For example, most black and white photos should have a bit
> more contrast and a slightly higher adjusted exposure than the equivalent
> color photograph.  This helps to bring out relevant details that might
> otherwise not be visible. (Keep in mind that I tend to be extremely fussy
> about images and figures.)
>  
> The conversion shouldn't really cost you any definition, since you're only
> converting from color  to black and white. Loss of "definition" seems to
> happen when changing the physical dimensions of the image.  The conversion
> can be done in the photo program of your choice, but using Photoshop or Gimp
> will give you a tremendous amount of fine control over the image appearance.
> 
> Re: JPEG to Tiff conversion.  If your source images are already JPEG, then
> you shouldn't you don't really gain anything by saving it to TIFF (though I
> would anyway).  If you save back to JPEG, make sure that the "quality" bar
> is set to 100%, or it will further compress the image and you will lose
> additional data.
> 
> Also, when you "scale the images", make sure that they aren't down sampled
> (some image editing programs don't distinguish between the pixel dimensions
> and the physical dimensions).  You want the pixel dimensions to remain the
> same, regardless of the physical dimensions.  Most printing presses require
> images that are at least 300 dpi, though bigger is *always* better.  It's a
> completely different mindset than when creating something for online
> distribution.
> 
> Thus, I would avoid Photoshop's "Save for Web and Devices" feature or
> anything any-way similar.  The entire purpose of "Save for Web and Devices"
> and co. is to down sample, not scale. 
> 
> One final thought: as long as the source images are of sufficient size, I
> would stick to scaling inside of LyX itself.  There is a dialog box that
> will let you specify the physical dimensions without messing with the source
> image.
> 
> Hope this is of some help.  If you have any other questions, please don't
> hesitate to let me know.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Rob
>