Re: Editors for LaTeX-files with syntax highlighting

2006-02-10 Thread Kevin Pfeiffer
Lars Gullik Bjønnes writes:
> That sounds like a thoroughly bad idea. It is true that sometimes you
> can edit .lyx files with an editor, but that is only because of
> limitations in LyX. IMHO the best view of .lyx files is that they
> should be treated as "hackable" binary files.

(I assume that you mean "editing a LyX file by hand" is a bad idea 
rather than "having a syntax file for LyX files".)

Why? I do this all the time (with care, of course). When I need to 
change 75 instances of "my_images.eps" to "my_images.tif", etc. Or 
whenever I need to do any search-and-replace that involves ERTs -- 
let's say, for example, that I want to replace all references to 
"Tiros-Translations" with "Tiros-\hspace{-0.1em}Translations" -- or is 
this now possible from within LyX in newer versions?

-Kevin


-- 
Kevin Pfeiffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Tiros-Translations


Re: Editors for LaTeX-files with syntax highlighting

2006-02-10 Thread Bruce Muirhead
Hi folks,
I come from a purely humanities background, and the interesting thing
about what has been said here is that, the more I use lyx, the more I
realise that I need to know tex/latex.
For that reason I am now patiently going through beginners latex
books,
using gedit- I am not yet ready to face emacs+auctex. (I use emacs only
for the most basic of editing when X won't behave and I need to use a
console to fix it).
This list and the issues discussed on it have brought  me to the
realisation that I actually need to learn latex in order to make the
best use of lyx. Per haps I may eventually cease using lyx, but I doubt
it: lyx has replaced all "normal" word processors in my life: the
quality of it's output on the printed page, and in other formats, is
infinitely superior to any other writing tool I have used. Knowing latex
more deeply can only improve my use of it. :-)
Generally, a big thank you to everyone on this list, because
just reading through your comments is an invaluable learning experience
for me. And, of course, to the lyx developers, latex authors, Donald
Knuth,and is there anyone I have forgotten? (Of course there is!)
Cheers

Bruce



On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 09:27 +, Eric S Fraga wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 09:51:26AM -0500, Dimitrios Diamantaras wrote:
> > [...] In fact I am liking the 
> > Emacs-AUCTeX-preview-latex combination so much that I have been working
> > on it exclusively lately, even though about a year ago I thought I would 
> > never need anything but Lyx (I am a LaTeX user for many years, though, 
> > and know quite a few of the commands I need---Lyx is perfect for those 
> > who don't).
> 
> Thanks for saying this. I had been feeling, in a funny kind of way, guilty
> because I've also been using Emacs et al. almost exclusively for a while now
> despite being a long time LyX user (but a longer time LaTeX user, I must
> admit).  What's done it for me, at the moment, is reftex which provides an
> easier interface to references for somebody like me that does not like using
> the mouse.
> 
> But I still think LyX is absolutely fantastic and it's my first port-of-call
> when I can't remember how to do something in LaTeX!!
> 
> cheers,
> eric




Re: Editors for LaTeX-files with syntax highlighting

2006-02-10 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Kevin Pfeiffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

| Uwe Stöhr writes:
| > the next version of the windows installer will have support for
| > editors with which LaTeX-files can be viewed with highlighted syntax.
| 
| A side question -- does anyone know of further developments of a (vim) 
| syntax file for the LyX file format? Someone had posted the beginnings 
| of one a while ago.

That sounds like a thoroughly bad idea. It is true that sometimes you
can edit .lyx files with an editor, but that is only because of
limitations in LyX. IMHO the best view of .lyx files is that they
should be treated as "hackable" binary files.

-- 
Lgb



Re: Editors for LaTeX-files with syntax highlighting

2006-02-08 Thread Eric S Fraga
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 09:51:26AM -0500, Dimitrios Diamantaras wrote:
> [...] In fact I am liking the 
> Emacs-AUCTeX-preview-latex combination so much that I have been working
> on it exclusively lately, even though about a year ago I thought I would 
> never need anything but Lyx (I am a LaTeX user for many years, though, 
> and know quite a few of the commands I need---Lyx is perfect for those 
> who don't).

Thanks for saying this. I had been feeling, in a funny kind of way, guilty
because I've also been using Emacs et al. almost exclusively for a while now
despite being a long time LyX user (but a longer time LaTeX user, I must
admit).  What's done it for me, at the moment, is reftex which provides an
easier interface to references for somebody like me that does not like using
the mouse.

But I still think LyX is absolutely fantastic and it's my first port-of-call
when I can't remember how to do something in LaTeX!!

cheers,
eric

-- 
 Eric S. Fraga, Department of Chemical Engineering, UCL, London
***.*..**.*.*...***.***.*...*...***.*...


Re: Editors for LaTeX-files with syntax highlighting

2006-02-04 Thread Uwe Stöhr

Jack M. Lyon wrote:

Do you know other editors that offer syntax-highlighting for LaTeX and 
run on Windows?


Thanks for the lists of programs. I've now built in support for the 
following editors:


jEdit, PSPad, WinShell, ConTEXT, Crimson Editor, Vim, TeXnicCenter, 
LaTeXEditor, WinEdt, LEd, WinTeX, (notepad)


If no editor is found notepad will be used as viewer for LaTeX.

regards Uwe



Re: Editors for LaTeX-files with syntax highlighting

2006-02-03 Thread Stephen Harris


- Original Message - 
From: "Uwe Stöhr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: 
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 12:19 AM
Subject: Re: Editors for LaTeX-files with syntax highlighting



Jack M. Lyon wrote:

Does Kile and Emacs easily run under windows, I mean do they have an own 
win-installer?


many thanks
regards Uwe



Emacs and Xemacs have their own Windows installers and
can be used to program in several languages and send email.
Kile doesn't run natively on Windows, but perhaps with Cygwin. 





Re: Editors for LaTeX-files with syntax highlighting

2006-02-03 Thread Dimitrios Diamantaras

Dimitrios Diamantaras wrote:

Uwe Stöhr wrote:

Jack M. Lyon wrote:

Does Kile and Emacs easily run under windows, I mean do they have an 
own win-installer?


many thanks
regards Uwe


IIRC, texmaker is a Windows Kile-like editor.

There are versions of Emacs out there that are precompiled with AUCTeX 
and preview-latex (actually, one and the same thing in the latest 
version). I have it running under Windows XP SP2 and it works quite well 
as long as I don't try to preview in PDFLaTeX mode. Installation was 
easy, I just had to run an executable. In fact I am liking the 
Emacs-AUCTeX-preview-latex combination so much that I have been working 
on it exclusively lately, even though about a year ago I thought I would 
never need anything but Lyx (I am a LaTeX user for many years, though, 
and know quite a few of the commands I need---Lyx is perfect for those 
who don't).


To get the precompiled Emacs (I have 22.0.50) with AUCTeX (I have 11.81, 
but 11.82 is ready, I believe) you can Google emacs+auctex-w32. I just 
did it, and found this mirror:

http://mirrors.ircam.fr/pub/gnu/alpha/gnu/auctex/

Hope this helps.


To correct myself, installation is even easier. I just had to unzip a 
directory, and then emacs runs by executing "runemacs" from the bin 
subdirectory of that directory.




Re: Editors for LaTeX-files with syntax highlighting

2006-02-03 Thread Dimitrios Diamantaras

Uwe Stöhr wrote:

Jack M. Lyon wrote:

Does Kile and Emacs easily run under windows, I mean do they have an own 
win-installer?


many thanks
regards Uwe


IIRC, texmaker is a Windows Kile-like editor.

There are versions of Emacs out there that are precompiled with AUCTeX 
and preview-latex (actually, one and the same thing in the latest 
version). I have it running under Windows XP SP2 and it works quite well 
as long as I don't try to preview in PDFLaTeX mode. Installation was 
easy, I just had to run an executable. In fact I am liking the 
Emacs-AUCTeX-preview-latex combination so much that I have been working 
on it exclusively lately, even though about a year ago I thought I would 
never need anything but Lyx (I am a LaTeX user for many years, though, 
and know quite a few of the commands I need---Lyx is perfect for those 
who don't).


To get the precompiled Emacs (I have 22.0.50) with AUCTeX (I have 11.81, 
but 11.82 is ready, I believe) you can Google emacs+auctex-w32. I just 
did it, and found this mirror:

http://mirrors.ircam.fr/pub/gnu/alpha/gnu/auctex/

Hope this helps.



Re: Editors for LaTeX-files with syntax highlighting

2006-02-03 Thread Mael Hilléreau

There are probably others out there as well.



Context:
http://www.context.cx/

PSPad:
http://www.pspad.com/

NEdit (via CygWin):
http://www.nedit.org/

--
Mael Hilléreau



Re: Editors for LaTeX-files with syntax highlighting

2006-02-03 Thread Gerasimos Grammatikopoulos
On Friday 03 February 2006 09:19, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>
> Does Kile and Emacs easily run under windows, I mean do they have an own
> win-installer?
>
> many thanks
> regards Uwe

I believe Emacs works ok under windows but requires some major hocus pocus to 
install it. As for Kile... oh dear. You would need at least kde-libs, 
kde-base and kde-graphics upon a cygwin environment. Now that probably 
doesn't come easy at all...


Re: Editors for LaTeX-files with syntax highlighting

2006-02-03 Thread Herbert Voss

Uwe Stöhr wrote:

Does Kile and Emacs easily run under windows, I mean do they have an own 
win-installer?


Kile is *nix and MAC GUI

Herbert




Re: Editors for LaTeX-files with syntax highlighting

2006-02-03 Thread Uwe Stöhr

Jack M. Lyon wrote:

Does Kile and Emacs easily run under windows, I mean do they have an own 
win-installer?


many thanks
regards Uwe


RE: Editors for LaTeX-files with syntax highlighting

2006-02-02 Thread Jack M. Lyon
Uwe Stoehr wrote:

> Do you know other editors that offer syntax-highlighting for LaTeX and 
> run on Windows?

Crimson Editor:
http://www.crimsoneditor.com/

Scintilla Text Editor:
http://www.scintilla.org

LaTeX Editor:
http://www.latexeditor.org/

Kile:
http://kile.sourceforge.net/

LaTeXEditor:
http://www.ntu.edu.sg/home5/pg03053527/latexeditor/

Texmaker:
http://www.xm1math.net/texmaker/

Emacs:
http://www.math.aau.dk/~dethlef/Tips/introduction.html

Nirvana Editor:
http://nedit.gmxhome.de/latexmode.html

Texmaker:
http://www.xm1math.net/texmaker/download.html

WinTeX:
http://www.tex-tools.de/cms/

LaTexMng:
http://www.latexsoft.com/latexmng.htm

TeXShell:
http://www.projectory.de/texshell/

WinShell:
http://www.winshell.de/

There are probably others out there as well.

Best wishes,
Jack M. Lyon
___

The EDITORIUM
Microsoft Word Add-Ins for Publishing Professionals
http://www.editorium.com
___
 

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 4:56 PM
> To: LyX-Users
> Subject: Editors for LaTeX-files with syntax highlighting
> 
> 
> Hello LyXers,
> 
> the next version of the windows installer will have support 
> for editors 
> with which LaTeX-files can be viewed with highlighted syntax. 
> Currently 
> I have built in support for jEdit, WinShell, TeXnicCenter, 
> WinEdt, and 
> WinTeX.
> The first editor that is found on the system will be set as 
> viewer for 
> LaTeX-files within LyX.
> 
> Do you kow other editors that offer syntax-highlighting for LaTeX and 
> run on Windows?
> 
> thanks and regards
> Uwe
> 



Re: Editors for LaTeX-files with syntax highlighting

2006-02-02 Thread Kevin Pfeiffer
Uwe Stöhr writes:
> the next version of the windows installer will have support for
> editors with which LaTeX-files can be viewed with highlighted syntax.

A side question -- does anyone know of further developments of a (vim) 
syntax file for the LyX file format? Someone had posted the beginnings 
of one a while ago.

-Kevin



-- 
Kevin Pfeiffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Tiros-Translations