Re: Lost Keybindings in 1.4.1

2006-06-28 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes 
 Rich == Rich Shepard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Rich   That was it: names changed from prior versions. In a few
Rich cases, the words were reversed in the latest cua.bind, in others
Rich 'dialog-show' was prepended to the word. Sigh.

Do you know that, if you start from, say, cua.bind, the best way to
produce your bindings is like this?

-mybindings.bind---
\bind_file cua.bind

#your bindings below
\bind F1 foo
---

JMarc

Re: Lost Keybindings in 1.4.1

2006-06-28 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller 
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:

 Do you know that, if you start from, say, cua.bind, the best way to
 produce your bindings is like this?

Incidentally, is it possible to include bind files? Something like

-mybindings.bind---
#my bindings
\bind F1 foo

Input cua.bind
---

would be very nifty especially wrt upgrading.

Jürgen

Re: Lost Keybindings in 1.4.1

2006-06-28 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller 
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:

 Incidentally, is it possible to include bind files?

After switching my brain on, I noticed that it's just what
\bind_file
does.

Sorry for the noise.

Jürgen

Re: Lost Keybindings in 1.4.1

2006-06-28 Thread Rich Shepard 

On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:


-mybindings.bind---
\bind_file cua.bind

#your bindings below
\bind F1 foo
---


JMarc,

  No, I didn't.

  What I did years ago was 'cp cua.bind my.bind' and change the latter. But,
despite selecting that in the preferences dialog, each time LyX is invoked
the bind file is returned to cua.bind.

  Even if I append my key bindings to the latest cua.bind, don't I still need
to figure out syntactical changes? For example, prior function name was
'spellchecker' while the new function name is 'display-show spellchecker.'
So, if I use the old function name it still won't work as expected. No?

Thanks,

Rich

--
Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D.   |The Environmental Permitting
Applied Ecosystem Services, Inc.(TM)|Accelerator
http://www.appl-ecosys.com Voice: 503-667-4517  Fax: 503-667-8863

Re: Lost Keybindings in 1.4.1

2006-06-28 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes 
 Rich == Rich Shepard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Rich   Even if I append my key bindings to the latest cua.bind, don't
Rich I still need to figure out syntactical changes? For example,
Rich prior function name was 'spellchecker' while the new function
Rich name is 'display-show spellchecker.' So, if I use the old
Rich function name it still won't work as expected. No?

You are right. What I mean is that, by using \bind_file cua in your
.bind file, you are sure that it will use the current version of
cua.bind, not an old copy. This means that you only have to fix your
own bindings when upgrading.

JMarc

Re: Lost Keybindings in 1.4.1

2006-06-28 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes 
 Rich == Rich Shepard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Rich   That was it: names changed from prior versions. In a few
Rich cases, the words were reversed in the latest cua.bind, in others
Rich 'dialog-show' was prepended to the word. Sigh.

Do you know that, if you start from, say, cua.bind, the best way to
produce your bindings is like this?

-mybindings.bind---
\bind_file cua.bind

#your bindings below
\bind F1 foo
---

JMarc

Re: Lost Keybindings in 1.4.1

2006-06-28 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller 
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:

 Do you know that, if you start from, say, cua.bind, the best way to
 produce your bindings is like this?

Incidentally, is it possible to include bind files? Something like

-mybindings.bind---
#my bindings
\bind F1 foo

Input cua.bind
---

would be very nifty especially wrt upgrading.

Jürgen

Re: Lost Keybindings in 1.4.1

2006-06-28 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller 
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:

 Incidentally, is it possible to include bind files?

After switching my brain on, I noticed that it's just what
\bind_file
does.

Sorry for the noise.

Jürgen

Re: Lost Keybindings in 1.4.1

2006-06-28 Thread Rich Shepard 

On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:


-mybindings.bind---
\bind_file cua.bind

#your bindings below
\bind F1 foo
---


JMarc,

  No, I didn't.

  What I did years ago was 'cp cua.bind my.bind' and change the latter. But,
despite selecting that in the preferences dialog, each time LyX is invoked
the bind file is returned to cua.bind.

  Even if I append my key bindings to the latest cua.bind, don't I still need
to figure out syntactical changes? For example, prior function name was
'spellchecker' while the new function name is 'display-show spellchecker.'
So, if I use the old function name it still won't work as expected. No?

Thanks,

Rich

--
Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D.   |The Environmental Permitting
Applied Ecosystem Services, Inc.(TM)|Accelerator
http://www.appl-ecosys.com Voice: 503-667-4517  Fax: 503-667-8863

Re: Lost Keybindings in 1.4.1

2006-06-28 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes 
 Rich == Rich Shepard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Rich   Even if I append my key bindings to the latest cua.bind, don't
Rich I still need to figure out syntactical changes? For example,
Rich prior function name was 'spellchecker' while the new function
Rich name is 'display-show spellchecker.' So, if I use the old
Rich function name it still won't work as expected. No?

You are right. What I mean is that, by using \bind_file cua in your
.bind file, you are sure that it will use the current version of
cua.bind, not an old copy. This means that you only have to fix your
own bindings when upgrading.

JMarc

Re: Lost Keybindings in 1.4.1

2006-06-28 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes 
> "Rich" == Rich Shepard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Rich>   That was it: names changed from prior versions. In a few
Rich> cases, the words were reversed in the latest cua.bind, in others
Rich> 'dialog-show' was prepended to the word. Sigh.

Do you know that, if you start from, say, cua.bind, the best way to
produce your bindings is like this?

-mybindings.bind---
\bind_file cua.bind

#your bindings below
\bind "F1" "foo"
---

JMarc

Re: Lost Keybindings in 1.4.1

2006-06-28 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller 
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:

> Do you know that, if you start from, say, cua.bind, the best way to
> produce your bindings is like this?

Incidentally, is it possible to include bind files? Something like

-mybindings.bind---
#my bindings
\bind "F1" "foo"

Input cua.bind
---

would be very nifty especially wrt upgrading.

Jürgen

Re: Lost Keybindings in 1.4.1

2006-06-28 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller 
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:

> Incidentally, is it possible to include bind files?

After switching my brain on, I noticed that it's just what
\bind_file
does.

Sorry for the noise.

Jürgen

Re: Lost Keybindings in 1.4.1

2006-06-28 Thread Rich Shepard 

On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:


-mybindings.bind---
\bind_file cua.bind

#your bindings below
\bind "F1" "foo"
---


JMarc,

  No, I didn't.

  What I did years ago was 'cp cua.bind my.bind' and change the latter. But,
despite selecting that in the preferences dialog, each time LyX is invoked
the bind file is returned to cua.bind.

  Even if I append my key bindings to the latest cua.bind, don't I still need
to figure out syntactical changes? For example, prior function name was
'spellchecker' while the new function name is 'display-show spellchecker.'
So, if I use the old function name it still won't work as expected. No?

Thanks,

Rich

--
Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D.   |The Environmental Permitting
Applied Ecosystem Services, Inc.(TM)|Accelerator
 Voice: 503-667-4517  Fax: 503-667-8863

Re: Lost Keybindings in 1.4.1

2006-06-28 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes 
> "Rich" == Rich Shepard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Rich>   Even if I append my key bindings to the latest cua.bind, don't
Rich> I still need to figure out syntactical changes? For example,
Rich> prior function name was 'spellchecker' while the new function
Rich> name is 'display-show spellchecker.' So, if I use the old
Rich> function name it still won't work as expected. No?

You are right. What I mean is that, by using "\bind_file cua" in your
.bind file, you are sure that it will use the current version of
cua.bind, not an old copy. This means that you only have to fix your
own bindings when upgrading.

JMarc

Re: Lost Keybindings in 1.4.1

2006-06-27 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes 
 Rich == Rich Shepard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Rich   This is frustrating: in 1.4.1 (linux), some of my shortcut
Rich keys no longer work. Same bind file as before. Some that do work
Rich include: C-d View dvi output C-i Italics (emphasize) C-b Bold
Rich C-h Compile with pdflatex

Rich   Some that no longer work include: C-f Find F7 Spellcheck C-s
Rich Save

Rich   Can someone help me understand why, and what I need to do to
Rich get back the full functionality of my keyboard?

What does your preference file look like?

Did you make your own bindings file? Some of the LyX functions changed
names.

JMarc

Re: Lost Keybindings in 1.4.1

2006-06-27 Thread Rich Shepard 

On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:


Did you make your own bindings file? Some of the LyX functions changed
names.


JMarc,

  That was it: names changed from prior versions. In a few cases, the words
were reversed in the latest cua.bind, in others 'dialog-show' was prepended
to the word. Sigh.

  It's all better now. Many thanks.

Rich

--
Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D.   |The Environmental Permitting
Applied Ecosystem Services, Inc.(TM)|Accelerator
http://www.appl-ecosys.com Voice: 503-667-4517  Fax: 503-667-8863

Re: Lost Keybindings in 1.4.1

2006-06-27 Thread Paul A. Rubin 

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:

Rich == Rich Shepard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


Rich   This is frustrating: in 1.4.1 (linux), some of my shortcut
Rich keys no longer work. Same bind file as before. Some that do work
Rich include: C-d View dvi output C-i Italics (emphasize) C-b Bold
Rich C-h Compile with pdflatex

Rich   Some that no longer work include: C-f Find F7 Spellcheck C-s
Rich Save

Rich   Can someone help me understand why, and what I need to do to
Rich get back the full functionality of my keyboard?

What does your preference file look like?

Did you make your own bindings file? Some of the LyX functions changed
names.

JMarc



Is there (or will there soon be) an updated list of function names on 
the Wiki?


/Paul

Re: Lost Keybindings in 1.4.1

2006-06-27 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes 
 Rich == Rich Shepard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Rich   This is frustrating: in 1.4.1 (linux), some of my shortcut
Rich keys no longer work. Same bind file as before. Some that do work
Rich include: C-d View dvi output C-i Italics (emphasize) C-b Bold
Rich C-h Compile with pdflatex

Rich   Some that no longer work include: C-f Find F7 Spellcheck C-s
Rich Save

Rich   Can someone help me understand why, and what I need to do to
Rich get back the full functionality of my keyboard?

What does your preference file look like?

Did you make your own bindings file? Some of the LyX functions changed
names.

JMarc

Re: Lost Keybindings in 1.4.1

2006-06-27 Thread Rich Shepard 

On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:


Did you make your own bindings file? Some of the LyX functions changed
names.


JMarc,

  That was it: names changed from prior versions. In a few cases, the words
were reversed in the latest cua.bind, in others 'dialog-show' was prepended
to the word. Sigh.

  It's all better now. Many thanks.

Rich

--
Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D.   |The Environmental Permitting
Applied Ecosystem Services, Inc.(TM)|Accelerator
http://www.appl-ecosys.com Voice: 503-667-4517  Fax: 503-667-8863

Re: Lost Keybindings in 1.4.1

2006-06-27 Thread Paul A. Rubin 

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:

Rich == Rich Shepard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


Rich   This is frustrating: in 1.4.1 (linux), some of my shortcut
Rich keys no longer work. Same bind file as before. Some that do work
Rich include: C-d View dvi output C-i Italics (emphasize) C-b Bold
Rich C-h Compile with pdflatex

Rich   Some that no longer work include: C-f Find F7 Spellcheck C-s
Rich Save

Rich   Can someone help me understand why, and what I need to do to
Rich get back the full functionality of my keyboard?

What does your preference file look like?

Did you make your own bindings file? Some of the LyX functions changed
names.

JMarc



Is there (or will there soon be) an updated list of function names on 
the Wiki?


/Paul

Re: Lost Keybindings in 1.4.1

2006-06-27 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes 
> "Rich" == Rich Shepard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Rich>   This is frustrating: in 1.4.1 (linux), some of my shortcut
Rich> keys no longer work. Same bind file as before. Some that do work
Rich> include: C-d View dvi output C-i Italics (emphasize) C-b Bold
Rich> C-h Compile with pdflatex

Rich>   Some that no longer work include: C-f Find F7 Spellcheck C-s
Rich> Save

Rich>   Can someone help me understand why, and what I need to do to
Rich> get back the full functionality of my keyboard?

What does your preference file look like?

Did you make your own bindings file? Some of the LyX functions changed
names.

JMarc

Re: Lost Keybindings in 1.4.1

2006-06-27 Thread Rich Shepard 

On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:


Did you make your own bindings file? Some of the LyX functions changed
names.


JMarc,

  That was it: names changed from prior versions. In a few cases, the words
were reversed in the latest cua.bind, in others 'dialog-show' was prepended
to the word. Sigh.

  It's all better now. Many thanks.

Rich

--
Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D.   |The Environmental Permitting
Applied Ecosystem Services, Inc.(TM)|Accelerator
 Voice: 503-667-4517  Fax: 503-667-8863

Re: Lost Keybindings in 1.4.1

2006-06-27 Thread Paul A. Rubin 

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:

"Rich" == Rich Shepard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


Rich>   This is frustrating: in 1.4.1 (linux), some of my shortcut
Rich> keys no longer work. Same bind file as before. Some that do work
Rich> include: C-d View dvi output C-i Italics (emphasize) C-b Bold
Rich> C-h Compile with pdflatex

Rich>   Some that no longer work include: C-f Find F7 Spellcheck C-s
Rich> Save

Rich>   Can someone help me understand why, and what I need to do to
Rich> get back the full functionality of my keyboard?

What does your preference file look like?

Did you make your own bindings file? Some of the LyX functions changed
names.

JMarc



Is there (or will there soon be) an updated list of function names on 
the Wiki?


/Paul