Re: Which has greater usability/accessibility, Sound Flower or Jac oS X?

2011-11-07 Thread James AUSTIN 
Hi Nicolai,

Thanks very much. I'll go and install Jack OS X
TC :)
james 
You can contact me in the following ways:
E-Mail:james.aus...@mac-access.net
MSN: james.londons...@gmail.com
Skype: saulky1984 - if you'd like to share details, please let me know who you 
are when you send a request. Thank you

On 7 Nov 2011, at 07:39, Nicolai Svendsen wrote:

> Hello James,
> 
> Jac OS X is more meant for studio setups or in those cases where you need 
> multiple inputs and outputs through aggregate devices or other methods. While 
> I think Soundflower has similar capabilities, Soundflower needs to be 
> accessed via the status bar which VoiceOver is unable to do with third-party 
> icons.
> 
> So, if you need to do more than what you're doing now, I'd switch to Jac OS X.
> 
> Regards,
> Nicolai
> On Nov 6, 2011, at 10:02 PM, James AUSTIN wrote:
> 
>> Hi folks, 
>> 
>> I am wanting to hijack system audio with Audio Hijack Pro and Amadeus Pro. I 
>> am wondering though which of the following offers greater 
>> accessibility/usability. Sound Flower or Jack oS X?
>> 
>> Any thoughts greatly appreciated.
>> Thanks 
>> TC :)
>> james 
>> If you wish, you  can contact me in the following ways:
>> E-Mail:james.aus...@mac-access.net
>> MSN: james.londons...@gmail.com
>> Skype: saulky1984 - if you'd like to share details, please let me know who 
>> you are when you send a request. Thank you
>> 
>> <--- Mac Access At Mac Access Dot Net --->
>> 
>> To reply to this post, please address your message to 
>> mac-access@mac-access.net
>> 
>> You can find an archive of all messages postedto the Mac-Access forum at 
>> either the list's own dedicated web archive:
>> 
>> or at the public Mail Archive:
>> .
>> Subscribe to the list's RSS feed from:
>> 
>> 
>> The Mac-Access mailing list is guaranteed malware, spyware, Trojan, virus 
>> and worm-free!
>> 
>> Please remember to update your membership options periodically by visiting 
>> the list website at:
>> 
> 
> <--- Mac Access At Mac Access Dot Net --->
> 
> To reply to this post, please address your message to 
> mac-access@mac-access.net
> 
> You can find an archive of all messages postedto the Mac-Access forum at 
> either the list's own dedicated web archive:
> 
> or at the public Mail Archive:
> .
> Subscribe to the list's RSS feed from:
> 
> 
> The Mac-Access mailing list is guaranteed malware, spyware, Trojan, virus and 
> worm-free!
> 
> Please remember to update your membership options periodically by visiting 
> the list website at:
> 

<--- Mac Access At Mac Access Dot Net --->

To reply to this post, please address your message to mac-access@mac-access.net

You can find an archive of all messages postedto the Mac-Access forum at 
either the list's own dedicated web archive:

or at the public Mail Archive:
.
Subscribe to the list's RSS feed from:


The Mac-Access mailing list is guaranteed malware, spyware, Trojan, virus and 
worm-free!

Please remember to update your membership options periodically by visiting the 
list website at:

Re: Which has greater usability/accessibility, Sound Flower or Jac oS X?

2011-11-06 Thread Nicolai Svendsen 
Hello James,

Jac OS X is more meant for studio setups or in those cases where you need 
multiple inputs and outputs through aggregate devices or other methods. While I 
think Soundflower has similar capabilities, Soundflower needs to be accessed 
via the status bar which VoiceOver is unable to do with third-party icons.

So, if you need to do more than what you're doing now, I'd switch to Jac OS X.

Regards,
Nicolai
On Nov 6, 2011, at 10:02 PM, James AUSTIN wrote:

> Hi folks, 
> 
> I am wanting to hijack system audio with Audio Hijack Pro and Amadeus Pro. I 
> am wondering though which of the following offers greater 
> accessibility/usability. Sound Flower or Jack oS X?
> 
> Any thoughts greatly appreciated.
> Thanks 
> TC :)
> james 
> If you wish, you  can contact me in the following ways:
> E-Mail:james.aus...@mac-access.net
> MSN: james.londons...@gmail.com
> Skype: saulky1984 - if you'd like to share details, please let me know who 
> you are when you send a request. Thank you
> 
> <--- Mac Access At Mac Access Dot Net --->
> 
> To reply to this post, please address your message to 
> mac-access@mac-access.net
> 
> You can find an archive of all messages postedto the Mac-Access forum at 
> either the list's own dedicated web archive:
> 
> or at the public Mail Archive:
> .
> Subscribe to the list's RSS feed from:
> 
> 
> The Mac-Access mailing list is guaranteed malware, spyware, Trojan, virus and 
> worm-free!
> 
> Please remember to update your membership options periodically by visiting 
> the list website at:
> 

<--- Mac Access At Mac Access Dot Net --->

To reply to this post, please address your message to mac-access@mac-access.net

You can find an archive of all messages postedto the Mac-Access forum at 
either the list's own dedicated web archive:

or at the public Mail Archive:
.
Subscribe to the list's RSS feed from:


The Mac-Access mailing list is guaranteed malware, spyware, Trojan, virus and 
worm-free!

Please remember to update your membership options periodically by visiting the 
list website at: