Re: [109460] trunk/dports/security/certsync/Portfile
On 2013-8-16 08:15 , Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> On Aug 15, 2013, at 6:09 PM, Joshua Root wrote:
>>> Revision: 109460
>>> https://trac.macports.org/changeset/109460
>>> Author: landonf at macports.org
>>> Date: 2013-08-15 15:01:38 -0700 (Thu, 15 Aug 2013)
>>> Log Message:
>>> ---
>>> Enable 10.5 as a minimum target version
>>>
>>> Modified Paths:
>>> --
>>>trunk/dports/security/certsync/Portfile
>>>
>>> Modified: trunk/dports/security/certsync/Portfile
>>> ===
>>> --- trunk/dports/security/certsync/Portfile 2013-08-15 21:57:55 UTC (rev
>>> 109459)
>>> +++ trunk/dports/security/certsync/Portfile 2013-08-15 22:01:38 UTC (rev
>>> 109460)
>>> @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
>>> build {
>>> system -W ${worksrcpath} "${configure.objc} \
>>> ${configure.objcflags} \
>>> - -mmacosx-version-min=10.6 \
>>> + -mmacosx-version-min=10.5 \
>>
>> Shouldn't this be using $macosx_deployment_target?
>>
>> And presumably this means that the code doesn't work on 10.4, so other
>> ports shouldn't depend on certsync on 10.4?
>
>
> do we care about 10.4 (I don't think we should). The only reason why it's a
> little bit reasonable to care about 10.5 is that it's the last release that
> runs on ppc machines.
>
> In both cases, Apple isn't releasing updates for them anymore...
Sure, everything < 10.6 is nominally unsupported. Base still works back
to 10.4 and some maintainers choose to support those versions.
- Josh
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
Re: [109460] trunk/dports/security/certsync/Portfile
until the next generation MacBook Pros are announced, which I'm hoping is on September 10th. I think the chances of that are slim to none. Doesn't make sense for Apple to 'dilute' an iPhone event with Mac announcements. Craig (Not that I have any inside information.) ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
Re: [109460] trunk/dports/security/certsync/Portfile
On 08/15/2013 03:15 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote: do we care about 10.4 (I don't think we should). The only reason why it's a little bit reasonable to care about 10.5 is that it's the last release that runs on ppc machines. Yes, please, our 5 year iMac went belly up so all I'm left with is our PPC PowerBook until the next generation MacBook Pros are announced, which I'm hoping is on September 10th. Blair ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
Re: [109460] trunk/dports/security/certsync/Portfile
On Aug 15, 2013, at 6:09 PM, Joshua Root wrote:
>> Revision: 109460
>> https://trac.macports.org/changeset/109460
>> Author: landonf at macports.org
>> Date: 2013-08-15 15:01:38 -0700 (Thu, 15 Aug 2013)
>> Log Message:
>> ---
>> Enable 10.5 as a minimum target version
>>
>> Modified Paths:
>> --
>>trunk/dports/security/certsync/Portfile
>>
>> Modified: trunk/dports/security/certsync/Portfile
>> ===
>> --- trunk/dports/security/certsync/Portfile 2013-08-15 21:57:55 UTC (rev
>> 109459)
>> +++ trunk/dports/security/certsync/Portfile 2013-08-15 22:01:38 UTC (rev
>> 109460)
>> @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
>> build {
>> system -W ${worksrcpath} "${configure.objc} \
>> ${configure.objcflags} \
>> --mmacosx-version-min=10.6 \
>> +-mmacosx-version-min=10.5 \
>
> Shouldn't this be using $macosx_deployment_target?
>
> And presumably this means that the code doesn't work on 10.4, so other
> ports shouldn't depend on certsync on 10.4?
do we care about 10.4 (I don't think we should). The only reason why it's a
little bit reasonable to care about 10.5 is that it's the last release that
runs on ppc machines.
In both cases, Apple isn't releasing updates for them anymore...
--
Daniel J. Luke
++
| * dl...@geeklair.net * |
| *-- http://www.geeklair.net -* |
++
| Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily |
| reflect the opinions of my employer. |
++
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
[109460] trunk/dports/security/certsync/Portfile
> Revision: 109460
> https://trac.macports.org/changeset/109460
> Author: landonf at macports.org
> Date: 2013-08-15 15:01:38 -0700 (Thu, 15 Aug 2013)
> Log Message:
> ---
> Enable 10.5 as a minimum target version
>
> Modified Paths:
> --
> trunk/dports/security/certsync/Portfile
>
> Modified: trunk/dports/security/certsync/Portfile
> ===
> --- trunk/dports/security/certsync/Portfile 2013-08-15 21:57:55 UTC (rev
> 109459)
> +++ trunk/dports/security/certsync/Portfile 2013-08-15 22:01:38 UTC (rev
> 109460)
> @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
> build {
> system -W ${worksrcpath} "${configure.objc} \
> ${configure.objcflags} \
> - -mmacosx-version-min=10.6 \
> + -mmacosx-version-min=10.5 \
Shouldn't this be using $macosx_deployment_target?
And presumably this means that the code doesn't work on 10.4, so other
ports shouldn't depend on certsync on 10.4?
- Josh
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
