Re: [maemo-developers] Scratchbox 1.x with scirocco/mistral
Ilpo Stenberg wrote: I have used scratchbox-1.0.6 (apophis) to compile couple of extra kernel modules (for 2.6.16-2.6.16.rel kernel IST 2006?). I had lot of problems with installation - binary tar balls didn't work, but .deb -packages did, and so on. Can you please specify any problems you had? http://syslog.movial.fi/archives/38-Scratchbox-Apophis-R4-released.html (though sb-conf didn't work, but sb-menu does) Noticed one error in that page, updated (and use 2.1 rootstraps while at it). ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: [maemo-developers] FlashPlayer and Opera updates?
On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 10:00:59AM +, ext Simon Moore wrote: Thanks for that I will give it a go, although I don't hold out much hope of it being good enough for what I am doing. Having real issues with Opera crashing (just closes itself) particularly with Flash movies - which makes it a nightmare to develop serious web apps for it (doesn't support everything we need for good AJAX either!). I have similiar (opera) problems with the latest 2006 update. I've got the impression that the browser stability has been somehow altered. There is no rule in the crashes but it seems to happen after going through a few pages. -- MDK Kind Regards Simon At 14:08 20/11/2006, Martin Guy wrote: On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 18:26 +, ext Simon Moore wrote: I don't suppose there is an updated flashplayer anywhere? 7 or better (or source code to compile one). All I can find is pre-compiled .SO for x86 Linux (7 and 9beta). A new alpha release of Gnash, the free flash player, was released two days ago, with mozilla/firefox and konqueror and opera plugins and a stand-alone player too. It's not complete yet and has bugs, but can play a lot of flash content. No videos yet... It just needs someone to compile it for Maemo. M ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.14.11/543 - Release Date: 20/11/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.14.11/543 - Release Date: 20/11/2006 ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: [maemo-developers] Java on 770 (was: Unresolved issues (Week 46))
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 18:02 +0200, Tommi Komulainen wrote: On Mon, 2006-11-20 at 15:13 +0200, ext Tommi Komulainen wrote: * http://maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-developers/2006-November/006188.html Java on the 770 Now that Java will be put under the GPL is there any plan (from Nokia) to integrate it into the firmware? We don't have any plans at the moment. On personal note, if someone makes nice packages it would be easier to gather some community effort around Java. It would also make our lives easier when the question about integrating Java comes up again. So, something for a new garage.maemo.org project. Then we can just apt-get install it from extras. -- Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: [maemo-developers] Java on 770
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Murray Cumming schreef: On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 18:02 +0200, Tommi Komulainen wrote: On Mon, 2006-11-20 at 15:13 +0200, ext Tommi Komulainen wrote: * http://maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-developers/2006-November/006188.html Java on the 770 Now that Java will be put under the GPL is there any plan (from Nokia) to integrate it into the firmware? We don't have any plans at the moment. On personal note, if someone makes nice packages it would be easier to gather some community effort around Java. It would also make our lives easier when the question about integrating Java comes up again. So, something for a new garage.maemo.org project. Then we can just apt-get install it from extras. Do we really need a garage project for something that is basically a Makefile? I can already see it happening that someone is going to but the java sources in garage svn because it's easier and we end up with a unmaintainable fork. I'm all for java packages for maemo, but lets do it in a sustainable way. regards, Koen -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFFZs5oMkyGM64RGpERAj+kAJ0YqwWOG83uHj5rtjeC3uZP8+K14ACcCfMu LxJu5aUnbWnnLfihG6nd7io= =Vfvy -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: [maemo-developers] Java on 770 (was: Unresolved issues (Week 46))
BTW, we're doing some work/experimenting with the mono stack on 770. So, most likely C#/mono will be availible on 770 before Java is. This is thanks to the work done by lupus/Novell to get the vm working on arm. Also, getting java vm itself working is just the first step. It's not very usefull unless all the g_ bindings are there. I don't know much about java, but I think the state of java g_ bindings is not that good as *-sharp bindings. MDK On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 06:02:45PM +0200, ext Tommi Komulainen wrote: On Mon, 2006-11-20 at 15:13 +0200, ext Tommi Komulainen wrote: * http://maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-developers/2006-November/006188.html Java on the 770 Now that Java will be put under the GPL is there any plan (from Nokia) to integrate it into the firmware? We don't have any plans at the moment. On personal note, if someone makes nice packages it would be easier to gather some community effort around Java. It would also make our lives easier when the question about integrating Java comes up again. -- Tommi Komulainen[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: [maemo-developers] Java on 770
On Fri, 2006-11-24 at 11:50 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Murray Cumming schreef: On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 18:02 +0200, Tommi Komulainen wrote: On Mon, 2006-11-20 at 15:13 +0200, ext Tommi Komulainen wrote: * http://maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-developers/2006-November/006188.html Java on the 770 Now that Java will be put under the GPL is there any plan (from Nokia) to integrate it into the firmware? We don't have any plans at the moment. On personal note, if someone makes nice packages it would be easier to gather some community effort around Java. It would also make our lives easier when the question about integrating Java comes up again. So, something for a new garage.maemo.org project. Then we can just apt-get install it from extras. Do we really need a garage project for something that is basically a Makefile? I can already see it happening that someone is going to but the java sources in garage svn because it's easier and we end up with a unmaintainable fork. I'm all for java packages for maemo, but lets do it in a sustainable way. Currently the only way to upload packages to extras (previously contrib) is to create a garage project. But that doesn't force you to use the svn repository in garage or otherwise fork anyone's source code. If there's a better way to get packages into extras, I'd like to know about it. -- Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: [maemo-developers] FlashPlayer and Opera updates?
That is what I will be working on regarding minimo development for these days. http://tonikitoo.blogspot.com/2006/11/what-is-about-to-come.html thoughts ? On 11/24/06, Simon Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 09:46 24/11/2006, Michael Dominic Kostrzewa wrote: I have similiar (opera) problems with the latest 2006 update. I've got the impression that the browser stability has been somehow altered. There is no rule in the crashes but it seems to happen after going through a few pages. Did you have the problem before the latest 2006 update? I have noticed the problem both pre and post latest update. I would be interested in hearing other people's views on Opera's stability. (I think it is very poor) The latest minimo seems much better than it was when I last tested it. I have not had time to rigorously test it though (no support for plugins like flash at the moment). Perhaps Nokia could put some development time into making Minimo port better and compile a flash player for it (version 6 would be fine)? I have no time at the moment to try to hack something together - but it may well be the flash .SO for Opera could be made to work for Minimo, perhaps someone who knows more about it could indicate if it is worth trying to do this, or whether the flash player needed to be compiled with Minimo headers (in which case Nokia will need to do it)? Regards Simon -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.14.14/548 - Release Date: 23/11/2006 ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers -- --Antonio Gomes ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: [maemo-developers] Java on 770
ext Murray Cumming wrote: Currently the only way to upload packages to extras (previously contrib) is to create a garage project. But that doesn't force you to use the svn repository in garage or otherwise fork anyone's source code. If there's a better way to get packages into extras, I'd like to know about it. yes, this is all true. you need an account on garage first. then you need an invitation from us. you can always send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you'd like to have the upload rights. with this procedure we would like to ensure some level of quality, so we do some reference checking before granting the access. after receiving the invite and completing a simple web form you are ready to go. what can be then more simple than using dput for uploading packages? :) Regards, Ferenc ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: [maemo-developers] Java on 770
Michael Dominic Kostrzewa wrote: I find it more reasonable to port a Java widget toolkit to hildon, than to create a wholly new toolkit. SWT can already use Gtk, so I guess it'd mostly be porting the backend to use hildon widgets where applicable. Hmm, I'm not sure what you mean. There is, indeed, no sense in creating a new toolkit (for what?). What we prolly need is hildon-* bindings for Java and gtk bindings (I assume they exists somewhere). Afaik there are no Gtk bindings per se. But there is IBM's swt toolkit, that can use Gtk as a backend. If we just make Gtk bindings, we lose quite a lot of the reasons to use Java in the first place. If we have our own, product specific, library for widgets, then there is a need for porting software. Instead there should be a backend for swt (or awt/swing) that uses hildon widgets where appropriate. This way the program will run and look native in multitude of environments. All this without need for modifying source or even recompiling. Also, it's not only about GUI toolkit but also about other API's. Ie. you most likely want to use gnome-vfs, dbus, gstreamer, etc. Using plain SWT (even with Gtk drawing) will result in a lot of inconsistencies. Ie. the input methods will not work as expected. Why will the input methods not work? I may be wrong on this, but I really think they would work. But anyway, having gnome-vfs available would be nice, but once again, if it is only used on maemo there is no real gain from using java. For gnome-vfs, I'd say the best way is to replace FileInputStreams with gnome-vfs implementations. Sure, then you'd be forced to use gnome-vfs, but at least you would not need code changes. GStreamer is a harder one, this would probably be a nice-to-have one. And without DBus I guess there's no way to get total integration with rest of the system. With mono, the bindings exist for most of the components we use, although they might need some tweaking. For some custom components (ie. hildon-libs) we want to generate the bindings with the gapi-parser. This way the mono apps on 770 will have a 100% native look, feel and behaviour. Call me idealist, but in my opinion for Java (and mono) to be really useful, the same code -- even the same binaries, should run everywhere and look native -- without a mess of checks on what the system we're on supports. Oops, forgot (once again) reply-to-all and thus we were out of the list for a couple of messages. -- Santtu Lakkala ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
[maemo-developers] Re: Java on 770
On Fri, 2006-11-24 at 15:08 +0200, Santtu Lakkala wrote: Afaik there are no Gtk bindings per se. But there is IBM's swt toolkit, that can use Gtk as a backend. Top hit for java gtk on Google: http://java-gnome.sourceforge.net Ross -- Ross Burton mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.burtonini.com./ PGP Fingerprint: 1A21 F5B0 D8D0 CFE3 81D4 E25A 2D09 E447 D0B4 33DF ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: [maemo-developers] FlashPlayer and Opera updates?
I am guessing for Minimo you just need to look for a certain keyboard key press and map it to the function to make it go full screen? And didn't I see some little file that gives the keyboard equivalent of the Hardware keys on a per application basis? Let me know if there is anything I can do to help. Regards Simon At 11:42 24/11/2006, Antonio Gomes wrote: That is what I will be working on regarding minimo development for these days. http://tonikitoo.blogspot.com/2006/11/what-is-about-to-come.htmlhttp://tonikitoo.blogspot.com/2006/11/what-is-about-to-come.html thoughts ? On 11/24/06, Simon Moore mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 09:46 24/11/2006, Michael Dominic Kostrzewa wrote: I have similiar (opera) problems with the latest 2006 update. I've got the impression that the browser stability has been somehow altered. There is no rule in the crashes but it seems to happen after going through a few pages. Did you have the problem before the latest 2006 update? I have noticed the problem both pre and post latest update. I would be interested in hearing other people's views on Opera's stability. (I think it is very poor) The latest minimo seems much better than it was when I last tested it. I have not had time to rigorously test it though (no support for plugins like flash at the moment). Perhaps Nokia could put some development time into making Minimo port better and compile a flash player for it (version 6 would be fine)? I have no time at the moment to try to hack something together - but it may well be the flash .SO for Opera could be made to work for Minimo, perhaps someone who knows more about it could indicate if it is worth trying to do this, or whether the flash player needed to be compiled with Minimo headers (in which case Nokia will need to do it)? Regards Simon -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.14.14/548 - Release Date: 23/11/2006 ___ maemo-developers mailing list mailto:maemo-developers@maemo.orgmaemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers -- --Antonio Gomes No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.14.14/548 - Release Date: 23/11/2006 No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.14.14/548 - Release Date: 23/11/2006 ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: [maemo-developers] Java on 770
Am 24 Nov 2006 um 15:08 hat Santtu Lakkala geschrieben: Afaik there are no Gtk bindings per se. But there is IBM's swt toolkit, that can use Gtk as a backend. If we just make Gtk bindings, we lose quite a lot of the reasons to use Java in the first place. If we have our own, product specific, library for widgets, then there is a need for porting software. Instead there should be a backend for swt (or awt/swing) that uses hildon widgets where appropriate. This way the AFAIK the GNU classpath project tries to be compatible to SUN/Java's AWT toolkit and it is based upon the gtk toolkit. So this would be the way to go. Is the Sun/Java *ix version still Motif based? If yes, we will have not much benefit of the GPL'd Sun/Java sources. Or is there anybody who *really* wants to run Motif apps on our small little 770? program will run and look native in multitude of environments. All this without need for modifying source or even recompiling. Yes - this is the goal of Java. I really think there isn't much use of a gtk or hildon only widget set. -Klaus -- Klaus Rotter * klaus at rotters dot de * www.rotters.de ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: [maemo-developers] Re: Java on the 770
On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 15:57 +0100, Clemens Eisserer wrote: Furthermore I guess we would not really need Jazelle to archieve good performance. As far as I know Sun will release its ARM JIT also under GPL which should be enough to build a high-performance CDC JVM for the 770. I'm an enthusiast of the Java language and was excited to read that Sun started the phoneME community project [1] which centers around providing the JavaME (Java Micro Edition) platform as source code compilable for different target platforms (e.g. Linux/ARM). The 'phoneME advanced' [2] subproject seems to be te candidate to be suited for the Nokia 770 as it will provide the CDC [3] architecture. phoneME advanced has only one realease yet (MR1) and starts developing on the next relase (MR2) in the next month [5]. Documentation about how to build the Java runtime environment and other needed parts (APIs from the different profiles) of MR1 can be found under [6]. Maybe the Maemo SDK's ARM target in scratchbox could be used to build 'phoneME Advanced MR1 Software'. Unfortunately it seems to depend on an available Java SE 1.4.2 on the build system to run some of the Java Build Tools (see section 2.4.3 in [7]). It would be nice if anybody could suggest how to proceed. After I downloaded [8] into my scratchbox I was stuck. Greets, Jonek. [1] https://phoneme.dev.java.net/ [2] https://phoneme.dev.java.net/content/phoneme_platforms.html#phonemeadvanced [3] http://java.sun.com/products/cdc/overview.html [4] http://java.sun.com/javame/reference/apis.jsp#cdc [5] https://phoneme.dev.java.net/content/phoneme_advanced_r2.html [6] https://phoneme.dev.java.net/content/phoneme_advanced_guide.html [7] http://java.sun.com/javame/reference/docs/cdc_build_system.pdf [8] http://download.java.net/mobileembedded/phoneme/advanced/phoneme_advanced-mr1-rel-src-b06-10_nov_2006.zip ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: [maemo-developers] FlashPlayer and Opera updates?
Go for it! :-) I think minimo is our best hope for a truly stable and flexible browser, given enough work. With Opera we'll always be wondering if and when the next release or bugfix will come out. No license restrictions either, so if there's ever a need to bundle minimo we have no worries. Larry On 11/24/06, Antonio Gomes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That is what I will be working on regarding minimo development for these days. http://tonikitoo.blogspot.com/2006/11/what-is-about-to-come.html thoughts ? ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
[maemo-developers] J2ME on 770
I am developing a p2p caching(via bluetooth) application using j2me. Does maemo provide support for j2me? I am a novice user and don't have much knowledge about maemo. Regards, Vipul Shingde IIT Bombay. ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
[maemo-developers] Re: Troubleshooting .desktop and .service file
Hi, On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:11:59 +0200, Eero Tamminen wrote: [...] (One of the benefits of D-BUS is that other programs don't need to know whether your app is running, they can just send messages to it with D-BUS auto-invocation flag and D-BUS takes care that only one instance of your application is running.) If you call that an advantage... It usually breaks one of the oldest and best UNIX conventions: that the process blocks the caller until the task is done. I usually cite the gedit example: 1. gedit blahblah.c 2. export SVN_EDITOR=gedit 3. svn ci 4. gedit opens a tab for you to enter the commit message, while leaving the tab blahblah.c open 5. you type your commit message 6. you close just the tab with the commit message 7. svn ci STILL hangs 8. you continue editing blahblah.c, hell breaks loose This is one of the most horrible blunders I've ever seen (breaking an _operating system_ behaviour assumption is about as bad as it gets). Then again, maybe its all in my mind :) And I do see that maybe the memory overhead of having a wait-until-master-is-done process that blocks until 6. happens may be too much for an _embedded_ platform. So don't take that as a condemnation, but just a in a perfect world statement. And I also see that win32 users have no problem with this behaviour, since for them it has always been that way (leading to about zero scriptability without resorting to hacks like EnumWindows) cheers, Danny ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
[maemo-developers] Re: VFS and gnome-vfs, the unequal brothers
Hi, My bad, so one actually _can_ access the file manager's Documents folder from within the terminal. /home/user/MyDocs/.documents/ is where the Documents are. Likewise for the Audio clips, Documents, Images, Video clips directories. UNIX-VFS sees them as /home/user/MyDocs/.images etc. (I'm just noting it in that detail in order to document it - the search-the-archives way :)) I decree that whoever called that .documents (hidden from ls by default) won the obfuscation contest, if there was one ;) cheers, Danny ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: [maemo-developers] libosso svn up-to-date?
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 13:01 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 15:04 +0300, Kimmo Hämäläinen wrote: On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 14:58, ext Murray Cumming wrote: ... Could you at least put together a one sentence description of what this module does? Ok, I'll put it to trunk. Damn, had to yield a little... :) Thanks very much. That's usefully informative: https://stage.maemo.org/viewcvs.cgi/maemo/projects/haf/trunk/libosso/README?view=markup I am now one step closer to documenting what the Maemo modules are: http://www.maemo.org/maemowiki/MaemoModules/2.0 I've noticed that it's necessary to call osso_initialize() before using any hildon-fm API. Is it also necessary to call it before using any part of hildon-libs? The README description doesn't really tell me either of these things: Libosso is a wrapper library for user applications for platform-specific, frequently-used D-Bus services. Thus, it should not contain anything that is not platform-specific -- ideally Libosso should not exist. -- Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
[maemo-developers] N770
Hi, is there any Nokia770 to sell? Thanx. ___ Découvrez une nouvelle façon d'obtenir des réponses à toutes vos questions ! Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des expériences des internautes sur Yahoo! Questions/Réponses http://fr.answers.yahoo.com ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: [maemo-developers] N770
Saber wrote: Hi, is there any Nokia770 to sell? Thanx. Yes. Go to: http://europe.nokia.com/770 and hit the Buy now button. ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
[maemo-developers] Re: high speed (52/48Mhz) MMC mode added
Hi, On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 15:25:57 +0200, Armin M. Warda wrote: On Tuesday 03 October 2006 13:18, Sascha Heid wrote: Works great, my 2GB Kingston goes into 4x (15.85s) and my 1GB Extremetech stays at 2x (29.7s). My noname 512MB MMC seems to go into 4x mode now (16.15s with your recent kernel, 30.12s with your previous kernel, 58.47s with the original Nokia kernel: time dd if=/dev/mmcblk0 of=/dev/null bs=8192 count=10240 # read 80MB in 16s = 5MB/s). I did not notice any negative side-effect of this kernel, thus I flashed it after testing. Btw, using swap on a fast MMC is much more fun! Too bad, with the updated IT2006 (the second IT2006), 1) the old kernel and the new root don't boot together (endless restart just after the startup sound) 2) even after I copy+pasted the 2.6.20 high speed MMC patch a bit to backport it to 2.6.16, it doesn't affect anything (boots ok, works ok, but dd is as slow as it was in the beginning) Too bad :) What I have so far is: http://www.scratchpost.org/weitw/mmc4-but-doesnt-do-anything.patch For now excuse me, I need sleeep :) cheers, Danny ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
[maemo-developers] xournal mime-type
hi all, i'm trying to define application/xoj so xournal can open *.xoj files from file manager. i've the following /usr/share/applications/hildon/xournal.desktop : [Desktop Entry] Encoding=UTF-8 Version=0.3.1 Type=Application Name=Xournal Comment=Notetaking tool Exec=/usr/bin/xournal Icon=xournal Terminal=false X-Window-Icon=xournal X-Window-Icon-Dimmed=xournal X-Osso-Service=xournal X-HildonDesk-ShowInToolbar=true X-Osso-Type=application/x-executable StartupWMClass=xournal MimeType=application/xoj; and /usr/share/mime/packages/xournal.xml : ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? mime-info xmlns=http://www.freedesktop.org/standards/shared-mime-info; mime-type type=application/xoj glob pattern=*.xoj/ commentXournal note/comment /mime-type /mime-info then i've done: update-mime-database /usr/share/mime update-desktop-database now when i click on an xoj file, xournal opens but it's shown a new untitled file. do you know what's wrong ? thanks ! ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
