Re: [maemo-developers] defective memory? (was: problem with dspmp3sink)
On 9/19/06, Frantisek Dufka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Just few ideas: software - bug is swapping/pagefault code?, bad ram timings?, too high CPU clock? That's an interesting idea, It seems to be worth trying to downclock the device and check if it improves stability. Does anybody know how to do this? hardware - high power requirements - does it happen more when brightness is high or mem tester is run in ssh over wi-fi? I run all my tests from ssh run over wi-fi. Will try some other combinations later. Just tried with no application running, 20MB run fine, 30MB run very slow so it was probably swapping to card a lot. Turned off swap and could go only to 25MB. The test locks memory immediately after allocation (man mlock), so it should not swap pages out of RAM, and that's why it requires to be run as root. As for memory limits, I tried to explain in one of the prevoious posts, initially the tester can't allocate more than ~20MB of memory. But the next time you launch memtester, it can allocate 25MB, so increasing memory allocation size in small steps allows it to allocate up to 40MB in the end with swap turned off! Probably the system sees that more memory is required and begins to stop some of the unneeded services to free memory (that's just only a guess, did not do much experiments here yet). It can't do that fast, so if you request 40MB too early, it will fail. Did you run memtester with my last patch? It contains this gradually increasing allocation size trick automatically, so you don't need to run memtester many times and can specify 40MB at once. Of course you should not run any other application at the same time :) Test went fine, no errors. Done over bluetooth connection with full brightess on, battery almost full. Will try when battery is low (over wi-fi at home). In my tests this error is also not always reproducible. If I could identify physical address of a bad page (the system should have properly working /dev/mem for this), I could collect some statistics. For example I could check if its physical location is always the same and whether supposedly successful tests did actually allocate this part of memory. Surely it would be much better if memtester could access (almost) all the physical memory at once. Otherwise it can't provide reliable and trustworthy results. Probably boot time memtester similar to memtest86 that runs before the system loads can do this work best, but I wonder if it is easy to access framebuffer to print some results from it. One more (weird) idea is to try adding some syscall for allocation of physical memory at any address (moving its original content to some other place if it is occupied), so it would be able to access and test (almost) all the physical memory while running the system at the same time. ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: [maemo-developers] defective memory? (was: problem with dspmp3sink)
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 03:06:47AM +0300, Siarhei Siamashka wrote: > I would really like to hear something from Nokia regarding this problem. There > may be a few other devices with faulty memory considering some browser crash > reports, reboots and instability for some people, a possible example can be > seen here (though the reporter did not run the memory test as adviced): > https://garage.maemo.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=84&group_id=54&atid=269 I have experienced a nondeterministic segfault of a command-line application once: http://maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-developers/2006-August/005370.html Also, maemo_af_desktop crashes every now and then (/var/lib/dsme/lifeguard-resets tells me it crashed 35 times already), but this may be the fault of a buggy statusbar applet (I've osso-statusbar-cpu installed) rather than bad RAM. I'll try to find some time to run your version of memtester. Marius Gedminas -- This sentence does in fact not have the property it claims not to have. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: [maemo-developers] defective memory? (was: problem with dspmp3sink)
On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 11:47, ext Frantisek Dufka wrote: > Kimmo Hämäläinen wrote: > > So, it's unclear yet if it is a software or hardware > > problem. > > Just few ideas: > software - bug is swapping/pagefault code?, bad ram timings?, too high > CPU clock? > hardware - high power requirements - does it happen more when brightness > is high or mem tester is run in ssh over wi-fi? > > Just tried with no application running, 20MB run fine, 30MB run very > slow so it was probably swapping to card a lot. Turned off swap and > could go only to 25MB. Test went fine, no errors. Done over bluetooth > connection with full brightess on, battery almost full. Will try when > battery is low (over wi-fi at home). Yes, it would need to be reproducible in several different devices. The guy here that tried to reproduce it currently thinks that Siarhei's unit is broken. BR; Kimmo > > Frantisek ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: [maemo-developers] defective memory? (was: problem with dspmp3sink)
Kimmo Hämäläinen wrote: So, it's unclear yet if it is a software or hardware problem. Just few ideas: software - bug is swapping/pagefault code?, bad ram timings?, too high CPU clock? hardware - high power requirements - does it happen more when brightness is high or mem tester is run in ssh over wi-fi? Just tried with no application running, 20MB run fine, 30MB run very slow so it was probably swapping to card a lot. Turned off swap and could go only to 25MB. Test went fine, no errors. Done over bluetooth connection with full brightess on, battery almost full. Will try when battery is low (over wi-fi at home). Frantisek ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: [maemo-developers] defective memory? (was: problem with dspmp3sink)
On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 03:06, ext Siarhei Siamashka wrote: ... > I would really like to hear something from Nokia regarding this problem. There > may be a few other devices with faulty memory considering some browser crash > reports, reboots and instability for some people, a possible example can be > seen here (though the reporter did not run the memory test as adviced): > https://garage.maemo.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=84&group_id=54&atid=269 > > That's not a tragedy and software solution can probably resolve this problem. > As you know, bad blocks are common for flash and jffs2 file system handles > this issue. RAM can be probably treated in a similar way by using something > like BadRAM kernel patch [2] We have noticed your e-mail and tried to reproduce the corruption, but still without success. I myself have noticed an apparent JFFS2 corruption once, but that too was not reproducible (and could have been caused by RAM). So, it's unclear yet if it is a software or hardware problem. BR, Kimmo > > [1] http://www.arm.com/pdfs/DDI0198D_926_TRM.pdf > [2] http://rick.vanrein.org/linux/badram/ > ___ > maemo-developers mailing list > maemo-developers@maemo.org > https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: [maemo-developers] defective memory? (was: problem with dspmp3sink)
On Tuesday 19 September 2006 00:03, you wrote: [...] > An interesting observation is that you need to gradually increase the size > of tested memory block. You need to start with testing 20MB first, then you > can try 25MB and so on up to 43MB. If you try to allocate and test a large > block of memory too early, memtester will just get killed. > > As for the failures, only the last two hex digits of faulty address always > contain 'a5' and it is a bit strange. I expected that offset within a page > would remain the same (I changed malloc to mmap in order to always allocate > memory buffer at a page boundary ) and unless pages have size equal to 256 > bytes, it is inconsistent. A small update. As I checked manual [1], a minimal page size for arm926ej-s cpu is in fact 1KB (tiny page). So inconsistency is now resolved. I have patched memtester to gradually allocate memory starting from 20MB to the size specified in a command line, so it is possible to check larger blocks without any extra tricks, you can download this modified memtester here: http://ufo2000.xcomufo.com/files/memtester-n770.tar.gz If you are going to try it (and it may be a really good idea), it should be run as root. The first argument is the size of memory block to be tested (in megabytes), the second optional argument is the number of passes. Here is a result of running it on my device: Nokia770-26:/media/mmc1# ./memtester 40 1 memtester version 4.0.5 (32-bit) Copyright (C) 2005 Charles Cazabon. Licensed under the GNU General Public License version 2 (only). pagesize is 4096 pagesizemask is 0xf000 want 40MB (41943040 bytes) got 40MB (41943040 bytes), virtual address=0x40128000, trying mlock ...locked. Loop 1/1: Stuck Address : testing 0FAILURE: possible bad address line at offset 0x009899a5 (page offset 1a5). Skipping to next test... Random Value: FAILURE: 0x3f770c1e != 0x3f77 at offset 0x004899a5 (page offset 1a5). FAILURE: 0xc50dee8d != 0xc50d at offset 0x004899a5 (page offset 1a5). Compare XOR : FAILURE: 0x0e119ff2 != 0x0e10 at offset 0x004899a5 (page offset 1a5). Compare SUB : FAILURE: 0x7d558974 != 0x5ca0 at offset 0x004899a5 (page offset 1a5). Compare MUL : Compare DIV : ok FAILURE: 0x7febf0e8 != 0x7feb at offset 0x004899a5 (page offset 1a5). Compare OR : FAILURE: 0x7b69b068 != 0x7b69 at offset 0x004899a5 (page offset 1a5). Compare AND : Sequential Increment: ok Solid Bits : testing 1FAILURE: 0x != 0x at offset 0x004899a5 (page offset 1a5). Block Sequential: testing 1FAILURE: 0x01010101 != 0x0101 at offset 0x004899a5 (page offset 1a5). Checkerboard: testing 0FAILURE: 0x != 0x at offset 0x004899a5 (page offset 1a5). Bit Spread : testing 0FAILURE: 0xfffa != 0x at offset 0x004899a5 (page offset 1a5). Bit Flip: testing 0FAILURE: 0x0001 != 0x at offset 0x004899a5 (page offset 1a5). Walking Ones: testing 0FAILURE: 0xfffe != 0x at offset 0x004899a5 (page offset 1a5). Walking Zeroes : testing 0FAILURE: 0x0001 != 0x at offset 0x004899a5 (page offset 1a5). So faulty address is always reported to have offset 1a5 within a page on every run. Now the next thing to do is to identify physical address for use with BadRAM kernel patch. > I also wanted to detect physical address of a faulty memory region. I tried > to open '/dev/mem', read it one page at a time and compare its content with > the data from a faulty page. Unfortunately this does not work on Nokia 770 > and segfaults on reading from '/dev/mem'. The same code works fine on > desktop x86 pc and has no problems identifying physical address for any > page. Test programs were always run as root. I would really like to hear something from Nokia regarding this problem. There may be a few other devices with faulty memory considering some browser crash reports, reboots and instability for some people, a possible example can be seen here (though the reporter did not run the memory test as adviced): https://garage.maemo.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=84&group_id=54&atid=269 That's not a tragedy and software solution can probably resolve this problem. As you know, bad blocks are common for flash and jffs2 file system handles this issue. RAM can be probably treated in a similar way by using something like BadRAM kernel patch [2] [1] http://www.arm.com/pdfs/DDI0198D_926_TRM.pdf [2] http://rick.vanrein.org/linux/badram/ ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: [maemo-developers] defective memory? (was: problem with dspmp3sink)
On Monday 11 September 2006 00:34, Olivier ROLAND wrote: > > After playing with the device for some time, I got the same problem with > > lzma program this evening. And memtester also confirms that the memory is > > really defective :( > > > > # ./memtester 20 > > memtester version 4.0.5 (32-bit) > > Copyright (C) 2005 Charles Cazabon. > > Licensed under the GNU General Public License version 2 (only). > > > > pagesize is 4096 > > pagesizemask is 0xf000 > > want 20MB (20971520 bytes) > > got 20MB (20971520 bytes), trying mlock ...locked. > > Loop 1: > > Stuck Address : testing 0FAILURE: possible bad address line at > > offset 0x0037e9a5. > > Skipping to next test... > > Random Value: FAILURE: 0xdeb98374 != 0xdeb9 at offset > > 0x000fe9a4. > > FAILURE: 0xd04629fc != 0xd046aa88 at offset 0x000fe9a4. > > Compare XOR : FAILURE: 0x50467c54 != 0x5046 at offset > > 0x000fe9a4. > > Compare SUB : FAILURE: 0xb069e1c0 != 0xdc20 at offset > > 0x000fe9a4. > > ... [...] > Hum ... very interesting memtester give non reproductible result on my > device. > and now lzma test failed also ... > Battery is low. We definitively need to investigate this a little more. > The good news is that your device is probably not broken. (or mine is > also ;-) ) > All this should definitively interest Nokia people ... Well, for the last days I tested memory occasionally and observed problem also with a fully recharged battery at least once :( An interesting observation is that you need to gradually increase the size of tested memory block. You need to start with testing 20MB first, then you can try 25MB and so on up to 43MB. If you try to allocate and test a large block of memory too early, memtester will just get killed. As for the failures, only the last two hex digits of faulty address always contain 'a5' and it is a bit strange. I expected that offset within a page would remain the same (I changed malloc to mmap in order to always allocate memory buffer at a page boundary ) and unless pages have size equal to 256 bytes, it is inconsistent. I also wanted to detect physical address of a faulty memory region. I tried to open '/dev/mem', read it one page at a time and compare its content with the data from a faulty page. Unfortunately this does not work on Nokia 770 and segfaults on reading from '/dev/mem'. The same code works fine on desktop x86 pc and has no problems identifying physical address for any page. Test programs were always run as root. Any other ideas? ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: [maemo-developers] defective memory? (was: problem with dspmp3sink)
Siarhei Siamashka a écrit : On Sunday 10 September 2006 11:36, Olivier ROLAND wrote: Your test work fine on my device. I see that you run it from /media/mmc1so I guess you format your memory card with ext2. Mine still vfat so I can't. If you got same error when running from internal memory then your device is broken. Thanks a lot for finding time and running the test. Today in the morning I could not reproduce this bug. The device battery just was recharged during night. As nothing else was changed (I checked uptime to be sure that it did not reboot or something), I see three possible explanations (may be wrong, I'm not hardware expert): * page with the faulty memory bit was allocated to some other process * cpu or memory chip was just overheated because of heavy use and the bug disappeared as the temperature got back to normal * maybe the bug is somewhat related to low battery charge level, maybe the battery was unable to provide enough voltage or something for reliable operation I did some search and found this utility for testing memory on non-x86 hardware: http://pyropus.ca/software/memtester/ For those who are lazy to compile it, the binary is here: http://ufo2000.xcomufo.com/files/memtester.gz After playing with the device for some time, I got the same problem with lzma program this evening. And memtester also confirms that the memory is really defective :( # ./memtester 20 memtester version 4.0.5 (32-bit) Copyright (C) 2005 Charles Cazabon. Licensed under the GNU General Public License version 2 (only). pagesize is 4096 pagesizemask is 0xf000 want 20MB (20971520 bytes) got 20MB (20971520 bytes), trying mlock ...locked. Loop 1: Stuck Address : testing 0FAILURE: possible bad address line at offset 0x0037e9a5. Skipping to next test... Random Value: FAILURE: 0xdeb98374 != 0xdeb9 at offset 0x000fe9a4. FAILURE: 0xd04629fc != 0xd046aa88 at offset 0x000fe9a4. Compare XOR : FAILURE: 0x50467c54 != 0x5046 at offset 0x000fe9a4. Compare SUB : FAILURE: 0xb069e1c0 != 0xdc20 at offset 0x000fe9a4. ... By the way, I have seen some reports about random device reboots, maybe these people also suffer from defective memory problem. So maybe it is a good idea for everyone to test their memory. Though use it at your own risk, I can't be sure that this test program is working correctly and always provides valid results (I only found it today). Well, as now the problem is identified, it is time to think how to solve it. The first task is making a proper memory testing utility. As memtester needs to allocate memory for testing and lots of memory is already taken by IT OS software and libraries, we can only test a small part of memory (only ~1/3 in the test above). Maybe it is possible to patch kernel (or it already provides such functionality) to allocate any physical memory page for us (relocating its data to some other place if it is already occupied by some other process). If it is possible, we would be able to check all the physical memory except for probably the part occupied by the kernel itself. The next task would be to make some way to use BadRAM kernel patch on Nokia 770: http://rick.vanrein.org/linux/badram/ Preferably physical addresses of the defective parts of memory should be stored somewhere so that they survive reflashing (r&d mode and other flags are stored in such a way, right?). If BadRAM patch becomes a part of standard Nokia 770 kernel, it can help to make use of the memory chips that otherwise would have to be replaced. I wonder how much does Nokia 770 memory chip cost? By the way, maybe Nokia already has some utility for hardware diagnistics and it could become available for download? There would be no need to reinvent the wheel in this case. ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers Hum ... very interesting memtester give non reproductible result on my device. and now lzma test failed also ... Battery is low. We definitively need to investigate this a little more. The good news is that your device is probably not broken. (or mine is also ;-) ) All this should definitively interest Nokia people ... ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: [maemo-developers] defective memory? (was: problem with dspmp3sink)
On Sunday 10 September 2006 11:36, Olivier ROLAND wrote: > Your test work fine on my device. > I see that you run it from /media/mmc1so I guess you format your memory > card with ext2. > Mine still vfat so I can't. If you got same error when running from > internal memory then your device is broken. Thanks a lot for finding time and running the test. Today in the morning I could not reproduce this bug. The device battery just was recharged during night. As nothing else was changed (I checked uptime to be sure that it did not reboot or something), I see three possible explanations (may be wrong, I'm not hardware expert): * page with the faulty memory bit was allocated to some other process * cpu or memory chip was just overheated because of heavy use and the bug disappeared as the temperature got back to normal * maybe the bug is somewhat related to low battery charge level, maybe the battery was unable to provide enough voltage or something for reliable operation I did some search and found this utility for testing memory on non-x86 hardware: http://pyropus.ca/software/memtester/ For those who are lazy to compile it, the binary is here: http://ufo2000.xcomufo.com/files/memtester.gz After playing with the device for some time, I got the same problem with lzma program this evening. And memtester also confirms that the memory is really defective :( # ./memtester 20 memtester version 4.0.5 (32-bit) Copyright (C) 2005 Charles Cazabon. Licensed under the GNU General Public License version 2 (only). pagesize is 4096 pagesizemask is 0xf000 want 20MB (20971520 bytes) got 20MB (20971520 bytes), trying mlock ...locked. Loop 1: Stuck Address : testing 0FAILURE: possible bad address line at offset 0x0037e9a5. Skipping to next test... Random Value: FAILURE: 0xdeb98374 != 0xdeb9 at offset 0x000fe9a4. FAILURE: 0xd04629fc != 0xd046aa88 at offset 0x000fe9a4. Compare XOR : FAILURE: 0x50467c54 != 0x5046 at offset 0x000fe9a4. Compare SUB : FAILURE: 0xb069e1c0 != 0xdc20 at offset 0x000fe9a4. ... By the way, I have seen some reports about random device reboots, maybe these people also suffer from defective memory problem. So maybe it is a good idea for everyone to test their memory. Though use it at your own risk, I can't be sure that this test program is working correctly and always provides valid results (I only found it today). Well, as now the problem is identified, it is time to think how to solve it. The first task is making a proper memory testing utility. As memtester needs to allocate memory for testing and lots of memory is already taken by IT OS software and libraries, we can only test a small part of memory (only ~1/3 in the test above). Maybe it is possible to patch kernel (or it already provides such functionality) to allocate any physical memory page for us (relocating its data to some other place if it is already occupied by some other process). If it is possible, we would be able to check all the physical memory except for probably the part occupied by the kernel itself. The next task would be to make some way to use BadRAM kernel patch on Nokia 770: http://rick.vanrein.org/linux/badram/ Preferably physical addresses of the defective parts of memory should be stored somewhere so that they survive reflashing (r&d mode and other flags are stored in such a way, right?). If BadRAM patch becomes a part of standard Nokia 770 kernel, it can help to make use of the memory chips that otherwise would have to be replaced. I wonder how much does Nokia 770 memory chip cost? By the way, maybe Nokia already has some utility for hardware diagnistics and it could become available for download? There would be no need to reinvent the wheel in this case. ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: [maemo-developers] defective memory? (was: problem with dspmp3sink)
Your test work fine on my device. I see that you run it from /media/mmc1so I guess you format your memory card with ext2. Mine still vfat so I can't. If you got same error when running from internal memory then your device is broken. Siarhei Siamashka a écrit : Hello All, I'm sorry for a long chunk of quoted text at the end of this message (it describes the sympthoms of the problem), but looks like I got an almost reliable proof that there is something wrong with the hardware of my device :( I tried to find some software that could be used for benchmarking and LZMA SDK (http://www.7-zip.org/sdk.html) looked like an interesting option for doing it. But when run on Nokia 770, it sometimes works normally and sometimes fails with the following error message: /media/mmc1 $ time ./lzma b -d19 LZMA 4.43 Copyright (c) 1999-2006 Igor Pavlov 2006-06-04 CompressingDecompressing Error: CRC Error Command exited with non-zero status 1 real1m 37.14s user1m 36.10s sys 0m 0.74s As you see, it failed internal test and was unable to decompress data back correctly. LZMA is an advanced compression algorithm and uses quite a lot of memory (it shows ~20MB memory usage in top with '-d19' option). If any of the bits within this memory block has problems, it can affect data integrity and cause incorrect compression or decompression. So probably lzma can be also used as some kind of memory checker. But it may be also some problem in LZMA code and not in my Nokia 770 hardware, so I would like to ask somebody to run the same test and check if the same problem can be reproduced. You can download the sources of LZMA SDK using this link: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/sevenzip/lzma443.tar.bz2?download Decompress this archive, change to 'C/7zip/Compress/LZMA_Alone' directory and run 'make -f makefile.gcc' to compile it. Alternatively you can use my compiled binary: http://ufo2000.xcomufo.com/files/lzma.gz Considering that this test program works fine in scratchbox with qemu, LZMA SDK page mentions performance on ARM and the existence of LZMA debian package for ARM, I think that software bug theory is not very relevant, but it still needs to be confirmed. I will wait for feedback in order to confirm if the problem really exists in my hardware. But looks like it is a high probability that I will have to make some kind of more advanced memory checker, try to identify faulty memory physical address and experiment with badram kernel patch. On Wednesday 23 August 2006 23:09, you wrote: Also I noticed that gstreamer is not very reliable, at least when using it from mplayer. It can freeze or reboot the device sometimes. That's not something that should be expected from high level API. If I detect some reliable pattern in reproducing these bugs, I'll report it to bugzilla for sure. But right now just using mplayer and lots of seeking in video can cause these bugs reasonably fast. ... Earlier I noticed problems with sound output getting blocked that could be fixed by bult-in audio or video player. When trying to play anything it first shows error message. After the second attempt either the sound got fixed or the device rebooted. I suspected that something could get wrong with dsp and standard audio player is able to reset it. That was observed when using fdsrc element for feeding data to the decoder in mplayer. On stopping/resuming playback, probably partial audio frames could be feeded to mp3 decoder and that might result in its misbehaviour. ... Now only complete mp3 audio frames can be sent to dspmp3sink. Anyway, first everything was ok and I even suspected that I will not encounter any problems at all. But after a few hours I got several reboots. After the last reboot even wifi started working strange (could not connect using ssh, it just showed various errors). Turning the device off, waiting for a few minutes and turning it on again got everything back to normal. Now I suspect that it could probably be overheating or some other hardware problem (the device worked with wifi on and heavy cpu usage because of decoding video for a long time). I'll keep an eye on it and will report again if the problems keep showing up and if their source becomes more clear. ... I tried swap a long time ago on IT2005, that was done in order to make gcc work on Nokia 770 to try compiling something before I installed scratchbox :) Anyway, I did not like the stability as gcc started to fail with internal compiler errors. So I decided not to use swap as long as it is enough memory for what I need. Also there was some swap related report about the problem with mplayer: http://www.internettablettalk.com/forums/showpost.php?p=20068&postcount=96 But maybe I should give swap another try on IT2006 and see if it helps to improve stability. By the way, I already asked this question in the mail
Re: [maemo-developers] defective memory? (was: problem with dspmp3sink)
Hello All, I'm sorry for a long chunk of quoted text at the end of this message (it describes the sympthoms of the problem), but looks like I got an almost reliable proof that there is something wrong with the hardware of my device :( I tried to find some software that could be used for benchmarking and LZMA SDK (http://www.7-zip.org/sdk.html) looked like an interesting option for doing it. But when run on Nokia 770, it sometimes works normally and sometimes fails with the following error message: /media/mmc1 $ time ./lzma b -d19 LZMA 4.43 Copyright (c) 1999-2006 Igor Pavlov 2006-06-04 CompressingDecompressing Error: CRC Error Command exited with non-zero status 1 real1m 37.14s user1m 36.10s sys 0m 0.74s As you see, it failed internal test and was unable to decompress data back correctly. LZMA is an advanced compression algorithm and uses quite a lot of memory (it shows ~20MB memory usage in top with '-d19' option). If any of the bits within this memory block has problems, it can affect data integrity and cause incorrect compression or decompression. So probably lzma can be also used as some kind of memory checker. But it may be also some problem in LZMA code and not in my Nokia 770 hardware, so I would like to ask somebody to run the same test and check if the same problem can be reproduced. You can download the sources of LZMA SDK using this link: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/sevenzip/lzma443.tar.bz2?download Decompress this archive, change to 'C/7zip/Compress/LZMA_Alone' directory and run 'make -f makefile.gcc' to compile it. Alternatively you can use my compiled binary: http://ufo2000.xcomufo.com/files/lzma.gz Considering that this test program works fine in scratchbox with qemu, LZMA SDK page mentions performance on ARM and the existence of LZMA debian package for ARM, I think that software bug theory is not very relevant, but it still needs to be confirmed. I will wait for feedback in order to confirm if the problem really exists in my hardware. But looks like it is a high probability that I will have to make some kind of more advanced memory checker, try to identify faulty memory physical address and experiment with badram kernel patch. On Wednesday 23 August 2006 23:09, you wrote: > > > Also I noticed that gstreamer is not very reliable, at least when using > > > it from mplayer. It can freeze or reboot the device sometimes. That's > > > not something that should be expected from high level API. If I detect > > > some reliable pattern in reproducing these bugs, I'll report it to > > > bugzilla for sure. But right now just using mplayer and lots of seeking > > > in video can cause these bugs reasonably fast. ... > Earlier I noticed problems with sound output getting blocked that could be > fixed by bult-in audio or video player. When trying to play anything it > first shows error message. After the second attempt either the sound got > fixed or the device rebooted. I suspected that something could get wrong > with dsp and standard audio player is able to reset it. That was observed > when using fdsrc element for feeding data to the decoder in mplayer. On > stopping/resuming playback, probably partial audio frames could be feeded > to mp3 decoder and that might result in its misbehaviour. ... > Now only complete mp3 audio frames can be sent to dspmp3sink. Anyway, first > everything was ok and I even suspected that I will not encounter any > problems at all. But after a few hours I got several reboots. After the > last reboot even wifi started working strange (could not connect using ssh, > it just showed various errors). Turning the device off, waiting for a few > minutes and turning it on again got everything back to normal. Now I > suspect that it could probably be overheating or some other hardware > problem (the device worked with wifi on and heavy cpu usage because of > decoding video for a long time). I'll keep an eye on it and will report > again if the problems keep showing up and if their source becomes more > clear. ... > I tried swap a long time ago on IT2005, that was done in order to make gcc > work on Nokia 770 to try compiling something before I installed > scratchbox :) Anyway, I did not like the stability as gcc started to fail > with internal compiler errors. So I decided not to use swap as long as it is > enough memory for what I need. > > Also there was some swap related report about the problem with mplayer: > http://www.internettablettalk.com/forums/showpost.php?p=20068&postcount=96 > > But maybe I should give swap another try on IT2006 and see if it helps to > improve stability. > > By the way, I already asked this question in the mailing list long time > ago, but are there any tools for hardware diagnostics on Nokia 770? > Something like memtest86 could probably be very useful. > > Though availablility of hardware diagnostics tools could probably result in > more devices getting returned for replacement w
