Re: Future development
On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 20:02 +, ext Richard Booth wrote: > It would be ironic for Nokia to be > successful with tablets using unlocked devices running Linux, Maemo > etc, then go and lock the platform down and take away everything that > made it. These could have been my own words. I'm glad you wrote them yourself. :) -- Quim Gil - http://maemo.org ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: Future development
Hi Ok. I just thought including a SIM slot, means more restrictions, otherwise if there was no disadvantage to the openness of the device, there would be a SIM slot already? Hopefully I've misunderstood. It would be ironic for Nokia to be successful with tablets using unlocked devices running Linux, Maemo etc, then go and lock the platform down and take away everything that made it. Rich On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 03:17:43 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi, > > I think you are reading Ari incorrectly, if you imply from his blog > post that just including a SIM in a device makes it more restricted. > I think the difference does not lie in between the devices that have > SIMs and the devices that do not have SIMs, but rather between the > people that wish to put Linux to existing devices with SIMs and > people that want to build new devices that are based on Linux and may > or may not have SIMs. > > Veikko > > > -Original Message- > From: Richard Booth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: maemo-developers@maemo.org > Sent: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 9:29 pm > Subject: Future development > Hi > > I read a reasonable review of the N810 here, > http://stuff.tv/blogs/future/archive/2007/10/17/hands-on-with-the-nokia-n810.aspx > > I'm about to have a go at maemo development, but I have question about > the future and openness to develop. The review linked above, touches > on the possibility of a SIM version in the future. Hypothetically > speaking, if Nokia go down the road of a SIM version, does this mean > development and use of a tablet would become restricted, as blogged by > Ari Jaaksi, http://jaaksi.blogspot.com/2006_11_01_archive.html > > Or does it mean the 3G bit would be sand boxed with an interface to > use it, and everything else would be open as it is now on the N800/ > N810? > > Rich ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: Future development
Richard, I'm sorry, but I don't comment Nokia development in any way. I do advice you to rely only the official information about nokia devices. There is a lot of rumors going around. About open development platforms. We continue the platform work with ARM and it will be available to everybody. Not only on Nokia devices on TI hardware. Also we provide the open source replacements to the components that Nokia has kept propriatary. Br, Sampo > Hi > > I read a reasonable review of the N810 here, > http://stuff.tv/blogs/future/archive/2007/10/17/hands-on-with-the-nokia-n810.aspx > > I'm about to have a go at maemo development, but I have question about > the future and openness to develop. The review linked above, touches on > the possibility of a SIM version in the future. Hypothetically > speaking, if Nokia go down the road of a SIM version, does this mean > development and use of a tablet would become restricted, as blogged by > Ari Jaaksi, http://jaaksi.blogspot.com/2006_11_01_archive.html > > Or does it mean the 3G bit would be sand boxed with an interface to > use it, and everything else would be open as it is now on the N800/ > N810? > > Rich > > > ___ > maemo-developers mailing list > maemo-developers@maemo.org > https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers > ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers