Re: Wiki Page on Navigation Tools for Maemo

2009-06-15 Thread COURTAUD Didier
Hi

I am also trying to use Navit on my tablet but I have still some questions :

- GUI

  The GTK one wotkw well but internal although promising is a bit 
disappointing !

  How initiate a roure from that GUI ?

  The menu you can invoke have items that

- either do not work
- or seems to work but do not record the preferences for instance

- Routing

  I have not succeeded to initiate a route : either specifying a location as 
destination
  or trying the destination window does not work

As for the XML file, I find it very useful and clear !

DC

Christoph Eckert a écrit :
 Hi,
 
 http://wiki.maemo.org/Navigation_Tools
 
 concerning Navit, it automatically routes if it has a gps fix and a 
 destination. A destination can either be set by pressing on the map and 
 selecting set as destination from the appearing context menu, or via the 
 address search.
 
 Navit looks promising, but it requires some extra coding for the tablets 
 still. Editing the XML file is not acceptable for the average user, but 
 this theoretically could be solved by providing an adjusted config file via 
 the nightly builds. However, someone then needs to keep the default and the 
 adjusted config file in sync. Or the nightly build must do some sed magic.
 
 The mailing lists are pretty useless, but the main communication channel for 
 navit is on IRC. You will find the core hackers there as well as some users.
 
 HTH,
 
 ce
 
 ___
 maemo-users mailing list
 maemo-users@maemo.org
 https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users
 


___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


BRisa Release 0.10.0

2009-06-15 Thread Leandro Sales
Hi list,
   I'm pleased to announce the release of python-brisa version 0.10.0.
This version contains a lot of improvements and optimizations. Thanks
to all developers who helped us for this release.

Website: http://brisa.garage.maemo.org/
Development: http://garage.maemo.org/projects/brisa/
Download: https://garage.maemo.org/frs/?group_id=138
Mailing list: https://garage.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/brisa-discuss/


What is python-brisa?


Python-brisa is a UPnP framework written in Python provided under MIT
License. It contains facilities for building UPnP devices, services
and control points.

Features:
* Integration with Qt, Gtk, Glib2 and Ecore
* Simple but powerful API for writing devices, services and control points
* Complete UPnP device architecture implementation (SSDP, SOAP,
MSearch, Eventing (GENA))
* Network transport and API facilities (UDP, TCP, HTTP, XML, IP
and network interfaces)
* DIDL/DLNA
* Facilities for logging, configurations, threading, application management


Multiplatform
==

Being a pure python solution, python-brisa is supposed to run on every
platform that enables python. It's been tested with both Python 2.5
and Python 2.6 versions.

We would really appreciate community feedback, bug reports and feature
requests concerning attempts to run it on other platforms.

In this release, we have to highlight our step further on
multiplatform compliance: a WSGI (Web Server Gateway Interface).

The python-brisa framework requires a webserver and we have provided
this feature through WSGI. We have implemented adapters for Cherrypy,
Circuits and Python-Paste WSGI servers, but this is easily extended to
any other WSGI servers.


Requirements
===

- Python 2.5.x, Python 2.5.x-dev (or 2.6) - http://www.python.org

One of the following:
- Python-Cherrypy (= 3.1.1) - http://www.cherrypy.org
- Circuits - http://trac.softcircuit.com.au/circuits/
- Python-paste http://pythonpaste.org/

Contact
===

Our developers are usually at our official channel on freenode.

* IRC Channel: #brisa @ irc.freenode.net
* Mailing List: https://garage.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/brisa-discuss/

Feel free to provide feedbacks, ask questions and so on.


Tasks of the release
===
* Implemented WSGI server adapters for cherrypy, circuits.web and paste
* Webserver is now WSGI with pluggable server adapters
* Implemented ServiceBuilder that builds the service object from a scpd.xml
* Implemented two ways of creating a service: with a scpd.xml file
or by specifying service parameters through code - and the framework
generates the scpd.xml
* Reactor infrastructure added
* Webserver is not a singleton anymore
* Arrangement for device abstracts the user from a lot of things,
such as the webserver
* Implemented Gtk2Reactor, Glib2Reactor, EcoreReactor,
SelectReactor (default)
* Plugin architecture refactored
* Log messages are a bit more cleaner now. Most log messages were
for debug purposes, so, changed most of them to DEBUG. INFO level now
should be only used for informing the user high-level events, such as
New device, Device is gone, Publishing device, and so on.
* Control point objects are now reusable. They can now be stopped,
and started again.
* Closure procedure is now chained. Some classes (such as ssdp
msearch) now have these 3 methods: start(), stop(), destroy(). start()
- starts the class, stop() - stops the class, but it can be start()'ed
again later and destroy() - stops the class DEFINITELY, clean
references to help with garbage collection, makes the class unusable.
For a clearer view, take a look at
upnp/control_point/control_point.py. You will notice that these three
methods are chained.
* Device webserver publishing is now chained and transparent to
the user. Added some options to BRisa for customizing device/service
build (these options have default values for making everything work,
automatic as possible)

* Packages created:
  - core: framework core stuff
  - core.reactors: reactors implementations
  - upnp.control_point: API for writing control points
  - upnp.device: API for writing devices
  - upnp.services: general services implemented by us
(ConnectionManager, ContentDirectory)
  - upnp.services.xmls: XML folder for the services of the item above

* Removed lots of threads: most are now integrated with the main
loop (fd's and sleeps)
* Implemented UPnP eventing API on the device side
* Removed deprecated modules: utils.sqlite, threading
* Packages moves (from - to):
  - utils.network - core.network
  - utils.network_listeners - core.network_listeners
  - utils.network_senders - core.network_senders
  - utils.system - core.system
  - utils.failure - core.failure
  - threading.threaded_call - core.threaded_call
  - log - core.log
  - config - 

FYI

2009-06-15 Thread Valentin Chopov
http://www.buy.com/prod/nokia-n810-internet-tablet-full-pull-out-qwerty-keyboard-810/q/loc/101/206228943.html?adid=17070dcaid=17070
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Good deal for N810 @ buy.com - Re: FYI

2009-06-15 Thread Valentin Chopov
Corrected subject ;)

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Valentin Chopovval...@gmail.com wrote:
 http://www.buy.com/prod/nokia-n810-internet-tablet-full-pull-out-qwerty-keyboard-810/q/loc/101/206228943.html?adid=17070dcaid=17070

___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


N810 for $180

2009-06-15 Thread Lake Stevens Dental




FYI, Buy.com
has the n810 for $180. 

Which is another way of saying, the end of the n810 series is near...
It's still a great little unit, as is the n800.

Wouldn't take a trip without it. 

Always, Fred Chittenden


___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: Good deal for N810 @ buy.com - Re: FYI

2009-06-15 Thread Mark
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Valentin Chopovval...@gmail.com wrote:
 Corrected subject ;)

 On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Valentin Chopovval...@gmail.com wrote:
 http://www.buy.com/prod/nokia-n810-internet-tablet-full-pull-out-qwerty-keyboard-810/q/loc/101/206228943.html?adid=17070dcaid=17070


...provided you're still interested in an orphaned product... (Sorry,
folks, but as great as the Maemo community is, it's far from the same
thing as support from the original manufacturer.)

The recent developments on Maemo and statements by Nokia clearly
indicate that not only does Nokia have no intention of ever making the
ITs a commercially viable product (and never did), but they also have
the same attitude toward all future Maemo devices. They'll continue
throwing out the hardware and hoping there will be enough early
adopters and *unpaid* open-source developers to keep taking the bait
and giving them money and making their devices useable.

I was cautious enough to avoid the OpenMoko trap because their device
was clearly not ready for prime time, but I made the mistake of
believing that a 3rd generation Maemo device meant that Nokia was
serious about their devices. Lesson learned...

Mark
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: Good deal for N810 @ buy.com - Re: FYI

2009-06-15 Thread Samer Azmy
Hello Mark,

You have a valid point, but what I know as a matter of fact that Nokia has
developers working on Maemo and they are paid developers, I still agree with
you that they are not that many and no lots of applications are out from
them but I see that is normal because that is the target group of such a
device GEEKS
so, we buy it to work on it and pay Nokia in sense of time

Regards
Samer

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 9:50 PM, Mark wolfm...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Valentin Chopovval...@gmail.com wrote:
  Corrected subject ;)
 
  On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Valentin Chopovval...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
 http://www.buy.com/prod/nokia-n810-internet-tablet-full-pull-out-qwerty-keyboard-810/q/loc/101/206228943.html?adid=17070dcaid=17070
 

 ...provided you're still interested in an orphaned product... (Sorry,
 folks, but as great as the Maemo community is, it's far from the same
 thing as support from the original manufacturer.)

 The recent developments on Maemo and statements by Nokia clearly
 indicate that not only does Nokia have no intention of ever making the
 ITs a commercially viable product (and never did), but they also have
 the same attitude toward all future Maemo devices. They'll continue
 throwing out the hardware and hoping there will be enough early
 adopters and *unpaid* open-source developers to keep taking the bait
 and giving them money and making their devices useable.

 I was cautious enough to avoid the OpenMoko trap because their device
 was clearly not ready for prime time, but I made the mistake of
 believing that a 3rd generation Maemo device meant that Nokia was
 serious about their devices. Lesson learned...

 Mark
 ___
 maemo-users mailing list
 maemo-users@maemo.org
 https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users




-- 
__
http://geek2live.blogspot.com/
http://www.siteheed.com
- You pick the level of your suffering yourself - Budha-
- There is nothing noble in being superior to some other man.  The true
nobility is in being superior to your previous self.-- Hindu proverb
- Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's
character, give him power.-Abraham Lincoln
- Live Free or Die-Kernel The Canine-
- Without music, life would be a mistake.- Nietzsche
- He who reigns within himself and rules his passions, desires, and fears is
more than a king.-- John Milton
- The best portion of a good man's life is the little, nameless,unremembered
acts of kindness and love.-- William Wordsworth (1770-1850) English poet --
- The higher type of man clings to virtue, the lower type of man clings to
material comfort.  The higher type of man cherishes justice, the lower type
of man cherishes the hope of favors to  be received.-- Confucius (551-479
BC) Chinese Philosopher
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: N810 for $180

2009-06-15 Thread Peter Flynn
 Lake Stevens Dental wrote:
 FYI, Buy.com has the n810 for $180. 
 
 Which is another way of saying, the end of the n810 series is near...   
 It's still a great little unit, as is the n800.

What's the replacement for the N810? My N800 is still going fine, but if 
I was in the market for a new equivalent, what's the model, and are 
there any nasty gotchas?

///Peter

___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: N810 for $180

2009-06-15 Thread Mark
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Peter Flynnpeter.fl...@mars.ucc.ie wrote:
 Lake Stevens Dental wrote:
 FYI, Buy.com has the n810 for $180.

 Which is another way of saying, the end of the n810 series is near...
 It's still a great little unit, as is the n800.

 What's the replacement for the N810? My N800 is still going fine, but if
 I was in the market for a new equivalent, what's the model, and are
 there any nasty gotchas?

 ///Peter


There is none. From the details they've given thus far, the next
generation of Maemo devices are going to be completely different than
the current tablets, with incompatible hardware therefore software/OS.
They also won't be out for probably at least another year.

R.I.P. Internet Tablets...

Mark
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: N810 for $180

2009-06-15 Thread Jamie Bennett




On 15 Jun 2009, at 21:41, Mark wolfm...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Peter  
 Flynnpeter.fl...@mars.ucc.ie wrote:
 Lake Stevens Dental wrote:
 FYI, Buy.com has the n810 for $180.

 Which is another way of saying, the end of the n810 series is  
 near...
 It's still a great little unit, as is the n800.

 What's the replacement for the N810? My N800 is still going fine,  
 but if
 I was in the market for a new equivalent, what's the model, and are
 there any nasty gotchas?

 ///Peter


 There is none. From the details they've given thus far, the next
 generation of Maemo devices are going to be completely different than
 the current tablets, with incompatible hardware therefore software/OS.
 They also won't be out for probably at least another year.

Another year? What is this based on?From the information that is  
currently available your 'guess' seem way off to me.

 R.I.P. Internet Tablets...

 Mark

Regards,
Jamie.
--
http://www.linuxuk.org
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: N810 for $180

2009-06-15 Thread Mark
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Jamie Bennettja...@linuxuk.org wrote:

 On 15 Jun 2009, at 21:41, Mark wolfm...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Peter Flynnpeter.fl...@mars.ucc.ie
 wrote:

 Lake Stevens Dental wrote:

 FYI, Buy.com has the n810 for $180.

 Which is another way of saying, the end of the n810 series is near...
 It's still a great little unit, as is the n800.

 What's the replacement for the N810? My N800 is still going fine, but if
 I was in the market for a new equivalent, what's the model, and are
 there any nasty gotchas?

 ///Peter


 There is none. From the details they've given thus far, the next
 generation of Maemo devices are going to be completely different than
 the current tablets, with incompatible hardware therefore software/OS.
 They also won't be out for probably at least another year.

 Another year? What is this based on?From the information that is currently
 available your 'guess' seem way off to me.

 R.I.P. Internet Tablets...

 Mark

 Regards,
 Jamie.

If you have something better, let's have it. Otherwise, people in
glass houses shouldn't be throwing stones. My guess is based on
posts to this list from people directly employed by Nokia.

Mark
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: N810 for $180

2009-06-15 Thread Andre Klapper
Am Montag, den 15.06.2009, 15:00 -0600 schrieb Mark:
  Another year? What is this based on?From the information that is currently
  available your 'guess' seem way off to me.

 If you have something better, let's have it. Otherwise, people in
 glass houses shouldn't be throwing stones. My guess is based on
 posts to this list from people directly employed by Nokia.

Please provide references (URLs). The mailing list archives are public:
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman//listinfo

Thanks.
andre
-- 
Andre Klapper (maemo.org bugmaster)

___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: N810 for $180

2009-06-15 Thread Jamie Bennett

On 15 Jun 2009, at 22:00, Mark wolfm...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Jamie Bennettja...@linuxuk.org  
 wrote:

 On 15 Jun 2009, at 21:41, Mark wolfm...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Peter  
 Flynnpeter.fl...@mars.ucc.ie
 wrote:

 Lake Stevens Dental wrote:

 FYI, Buy.com has the n810 for $180.

 Which is another way of saying, the end of the n810 series is  
 near...
 It's still a great little unit, as is the n800.

 What's the replacement for the N810? My N800 is still going fine,  
 but if
 I was in the market for a new equivalent, what's the model, and are
 there any nasty gotchas?

 ///Peter


 There is none. From the details they've given thus far, the next
 generation of Maemo devices are going to be completely different  
 than
 the current tablets, with incompatible hardware therefore software/ 
 OS.
 They also won't be out for probably at least another year.

 Another year? What is this based on?From the information that is  
 currently
 available your 'guess' seem way off to me.

 R.I.P. Internet Tablets...

 Mark

 Regards,
 Jamie.

 If you have something better, let's have it. Otherwise, people in
 glass houses shouldn't be throwing stones.

Not sure where both your tone and the use of that quote fits in with  
anything being said on this thread.

 My guess is based on
 posts to this list from people directly employed by Nokia.

I must of missed where 'Nokia Employees' hinted at June next year.

I base my guess on a _beta_ SDK in practical feature freeze, an  
October summit with high levels of device information expectations,  
various community projects maturing on the Fremantle SDK and the fact  
that Nokia employees have been working on the new device for quite  
some time now.

Why would Nokia announce at OSiM last year a device that wouldn't be  
available for 20+ months later? It's not in their interests to have a  
device development in public that long. Also why would they effectivly  
freeze the new software a year before it is released? Doesn't make  
sense does it.

 Mark

Regards,
Jamie
--
http://www.linuxuk.org
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: Wiki Page on Navigation Tools for Maemo

2009-06-15 Thread Rainer Dorsch
Hi Courtaud,

Am Montag, 15. Juni 2009 schrieb COURTAUD Didier:
 Hi

 I am also trying to use Navit on my tablet but I have still some questions
 :

 - GUI

   The GTK one wotkw well but internal although promising is a bit
 disappointing !

Interesting. I had more trouble with the GTK interface and liked the internal 
one.

   How initiate a roure from that GUI ?

I assume you mean a route?

You need to set a position and a destination. You can click the map and then 
in the menu select actions and then you can use the world icon to use the 
location you clicked at.


   The menu you can invoke have items that

 - either do not work
 - or seems to work but do not record the preferences for instance

Do you have examples?

 - Routing

   I have not succeeded to initiate a route : either specifying a location
 as destination or trying the destination window does not work

see above.

Rainer

 As for the XML file, I find it very useful and clear !

 DC

 Christoph Eckert a écrit :
  Hi,
 
  http://wiki.maemo.org/Navigation_Tools
 
  concerning Navit, it automatically routes if it has a gps fix and a
  destination. A destination can either be set by pressing on the map and
  selecting set as destination from the appearing context menu, or via
  the address search.
 
  Navit looks promising, but it requires some extra coding for the tablets
  still. Editing the XML file is not acceptable for the average user, but
  this theoretically could be solved by providing an adjusted config file
  via the nightly builds. However, someone then needs to keep the default
  and the adjusted config file in sync. Or the nightly build must do some
  sed magic.
 
  The mailing lists are pretty useless, but the main communication channel
  for navit is on IRC. You will find the core hackers there as well as some
  users.
 
  HTH,
 
  ce
 
  ___
  maemo-users mailing list
  maemo-users@maemo.org
  https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users

 ___
 maemo-users mailing list
 maemo-users@maemo.org
 https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users



-- 
Rainer Dorsch
Lärchenstr. 6
D-72135 Dettenhausen
07157-734133
email: rdor...@web.de
jabber: rdor...@jabber.org
GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F  8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E
Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: N810 for $180

2009-06-15 Thread Mark
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Jamie Bennettja...@linuxuk.org wrote:


 I must of missed where 'Nokia Employees' hinted at June next year.


Apparently so...

 I base my guess on a _beta_ SDK in practical feature freeze, an October
 summit with high levels of device information expectations, various
 community projects maturing on the Fremantle SDK and the fact that Nokia
 employees have been working on the new device for quite some time now.


OK, so you're saying that a beta SDK means impending device release?
Doesn't seem likely to me...


 Why would Nokia announce at OSiM last year a device that wouldn't be
 available for 20+ months later?

For the same reason that OpenMoko announced a device to be released in
2007 that _still_ doesn't exist...

 It's not in their interests to have a device
 development in public that long. Also why would they effectivly freeze the
 new software a year before it is released? Doesn't make sense does it.


They aren't freezing the software, they're freezing the *development
environment* that is needed to create the software. What part of that
do you not understand?

Mark
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: N810 for $180

2009-06-15 Thread Valerio Valerio
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Mark wolfm...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Jamie Bennettja...@linuxuk.org wrote:
 
 
  I must of missed where 'Nokia Employees' hinted at June next year.
 

 Apparently so...

  I base my guess on a _beta_ SDK in practical feature freeze, an October
  summit with high levels of device information expectations, various
  community projects maturing on the Fremantle SDK and the fact that Nokia
  employees have been working on the new device for quite some time now.
 

 OK, so you're saying that a beta SDK means impending device release?
 Doesn't seem likely to me...

 
  Why would Nokia announce at OSiM last year a device that wouldn't be
  available for 20+ months later?

 For the same reason that OpenMoko announced a device to be released in
 2007 that _still_ doesn't exist...


Funny, so I have a non-existent OpenMoko[1] device :)

[1] - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neo_FreeRunner

Best,

-- 
Valério Valério

http://www.valeriovalerio.org




  It's not in their interests to have a device
  development in public that long. Also why would they effectivly freeze
 the
  new software a year before it is released? Doesn't make sense does it.
 

 They aren't freezing the software, they're freezing the *development
 environment* that is needed to create the software. What part of that
 do you not understand?

 Mark
 ___
 maemo-users mailing list
 maemo-users@maemo.org
 https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users

___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: N810 for $180

2009-06-15 Thread Jamie Bennett

On 15 Jun 2009, at 22:30, Mark wolfm...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Jamie Bennettja...@linuxuk.org  
 wrote:


 I must of missed where 'Nokia Employees' hinted at June next year.


 Apparently so...

Care to share some links?


 I base my guess on a _beta_ SDK in practical feature freeze, an  
 October
 summit with high levels of device information expectations, various
 community projects maturing on the Fremantle SDK and the fact that  
 Nokia
 employees have been working on the new device for quite some time  
 now.


 OK, so you're saying that a beta SDK means impending device release?
 Doesn't seem likely to me...


 Why would Nokia announce at OSiM last year a device that wouldn't be
 available for 20+ months later?

 For the same reason that OpenMoko announced a device to be released in
 2007 that _still_ doesn't exist...

I don't think you can compare OpenMoko to Nokia.


 It's not in their interests to have a device
 development in public that long. Also why would they effectivly  
 freeze the
 new software a year before it is released? Doesn't make sense does  
 it.


 They aren't freezing the software, they're freezing the *development
 environment* that is needed to create the software.

Effectivly freezing what third-party developers, which Nokia rely  
heailu on for these devices, can do with the API's.

 What part of that
 do you not understand?

Why such juvenile comments are on this list?

 Mark

Regards,
Jamie
--
http://www.linuxuk.org
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: N810 for $180

2009-06-15 Thread Mark
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Valerio Valeriovdv...@gmail.com wrote:


 Funny, so I have a non-existent OpenMoko[1] device :)

 [1] - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neo_FreeRunner

 Best,

 --
 Valério Valério

 http://www.valeriovalerio.org

Yes, you do, in the sense that they still have a long way to go before
the OS is even to the state of that of the N770. It's a developer's
plaything, not a serious, usable device.

Mark
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: N810 for $180

2009-06-15 Thread Kevin T. Neely
Note that the Palm Pre came out before the SDK was even readily available.
I'm not sure the SDK is a good metric.

Also, most of Mark's arguments tend toward the Internet Tablet is not ready
for end users.  Taking that as a fact (for sake of argument) then the
freezing of the SDK would be the best time to release a device.

K

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Mark wolfm...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Jamie Bennettja...@linuxuk.org wrote:
 
 OK, so you're saying that a beta SDK means impending device release?
 Doesn't seem likely to me...


-- 
In Vino Veritas
http://rubbernecking.info
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: N810 for $180

2009-06-15 Thread Mark
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Jamie Bennettja...@linuxuk.org wrote:


 I don't think you can compare OpenMoko to Nokia.


Not until now, but they're headed that direction fast.


 They aren't freezing the software, they're freezing the *development
 environment* that is needed to create the software.

 Effectively freezing what third-party developers, which Nokia rely heavily on
 for these devices, can do with the API's.


Exactly. A device, even with a complete OS, that has no usable apps is
not releasable. Not even OpenMoko was that removed from reality. Their
OS is still far from finished (actually never will be, as they're
moving to other OSes now), but at least at this point there are some
useful apps. ...And that's on a device that once they finally admitted
the fact have been very strenuously and repeatedly been saying is
*not* ready for anybody but developers.

Mark
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: N810 for $180

2009-06-15 Thread Mark
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Kevin T.
Neelyktne...@astroturfgarden.com wrote:
 Note that the Palm Pre came out before the SDK was even readily available.
 I'm not sure the SDK is a good metric.

 Also, most of Mark's arguments tend toward the Internet Tablet is not ready
 for end users.  Taking that as a fact (for sake of argument) then the
 freezing of the SDK would be the best time to release a device.

 K

You're comparing apples with oranges. The Palm Pre already has a
complete PIM etc. as well as a suite of other finished apps right out
of the box, and is intended specifically for consumers, not
developers. Therefore, it will sell and is useful right out of the
box. That is in sharp contrast to a device that needs to have a stable
SDK well before its release in order to generate hype with the
developers who will be buying it.

Mark
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: N810 for $180

2009-06-15 Thread Kevin T. Neely
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Mark wolfm...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Kevin T.
 Neelyktne...@astroturfgarden.com wrote:
  Note that the Palm Pre came out before the SDK was even readily
 available.
  I'm not sure the SDK is a good metric.
 
 You're comparing apples with oranges. The Palm Pre already has a
 complete PIM etc. as well as a suite of other finished apps right out
 of the box, and is intended specifically for consumers, not
 developers. Therefore, it will sell and is useful right out of the
 box. That is in sharp contrast to a device that needs to have a stable
 SDK well before its release in order to generate hype with the
 developers who will be buying it.



I'm doing nothing of the kind.  I took your metric: the SDK and simply
compared the two of them. Also, Mark is once again doing his famous argument
which is bring up one thing and then ignore it later.  He says the IT is not
for the end user and only for developers, then complains that it does not
have a mature and robust PIM system (something I have yet to be convinced
that it needs, but that is another discussion).

You can place one in the 'cons' column, but not both.  No double-dipping
allowed!

K

-- 
In Vino Veritas
http://rubbernecking.info
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Default Contact Application

2009-06-15 Thread sean
Is there a way to change the default Contact application from the built 
in one to something else, in this case I am trying out GPE Contacts?

While here, can you somehow change the default application for any need?

By default I would look to the Filemanager, but it does not appear to be 
able fill the demand, either does the control panel.

Thanks
Sean
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: N810 for $180

2009-06-15 Thread Mark
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Kevin T.
Neelyktne...@astroturfgarden.com wrote:

 I'm doing nothing of the kind.  I took your metric: the SDK and simply
 compared the two of them.

You certainly are: I'm not using the SDK as a metric, Jamie is. I was
discounting that as a reliable metric.

 Also, Mark is once again doing his famous argument
 which is bring up one thing and then ignore it later.  He says the IT is not
 for the end user and only for developers, then complains that it does not
 have a mature and robust PIM system (something I have yet to be convinced
 that it needs, but that is another discussion).


Once again, you totally misunderstand and misrepresent my arguments.
What I'm saying is that the ITs are marketed to anybody who will buy
them, including clueless consumers. (Buy.com is a huge
consumer-oriented site, not an obscure company catering to
developers...) But Nokia treats them like developer's toys, and
doesn't support them the way they should. Nokia is the one that is
speaking with forked tongue.

I bought my N800 because I took the bait and thought it was a
consumer-level device because of everything I saw in the sales
material. I was duped. I like my tablet, but it's turned out to be
nothing but a toy. It can do lots of neat things, but in every area it
falls just short of fulfilling its potential: it can display moving
maps, but can't actually navigate; it can do PIM-like things (after
installing third-party apps), but can't easily and reliably sync all
of that data; it can do basic text files, but the shipped app uses a
proprietary format and it can't open or edit any actual office
documents; it can be a media player, but is limited as to the formats
and especially video resolution/bitrates (it can't even do native
screen resolution, only a quarter of screen resolution); the list goes
on and on...

Maybe *you* are never offline, but anybody who needs offline access to
their complete contact database/schedule/etc. *does* need a PIM. And
who wants to carry around multiple devices when one is enough?

 You can place one in the 'cons' column, but not both.  No double-dipping
 allowed!

 K


I give up. You people and your straw-man arguments will never be convinced.

Mark
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: N810 for $180

2009-06-15 Thread Peter Flynn
Mark wrote:
  What's the replacement for the N810?

 There is none. From the details they've given thus far, the next 
 generation of Maemo devices are going to be completely different than
 the current tablets, with incompatible hardware therefore
 software/OS.

I don't care if they are different inside and run a different OS 
(assuming they are still Unix-based and not Microsoft :-)  What I want 
is a pocket computer the approximate size and weight of the N800 which 
does the same stuff, but a bit faster and a bit higher rez and more 
flexible memory/disk.

 Once again, you totally misunderstand and misrepresent my arguments. 
 What I'm saying is that the ITs are marketed to anybody who will buy 
 them, including clueless consumers. (Buy.com is a huge 
 consumer-oriented site, not an obscure company catering to 
 developers...) But Nokia treats them like developer's toys, and 
 doesn't support them the way they should. Nokia is the one that is 
 speaking with forked tongue.

I think that's too harsh. I just think Nokia's management was badly 
misled by Marketing into believing that ITs were a viable concept. 
Perhaps they were for a brief time. What they missed was the vastly 
bigger market for pocket computers.

 I bought my N800 because I took the bait and thought it was a 
 consumer-level device because of everything I saw in the sales 
 material. I was duped.

I'm sorry to hear that, but caveat emptor. I'm afraid that after 30 
years in IT I never believe a word of the sales material, even if it's 
written by the engineers (the only people you can actually trust).

 I like my tablet, but it's turned out to be nothing but a toy. It can
 do lots of neat things, but in every area it falls just short of
 fulfilling its potential: 

I think you said you have an N810. I can't compare directly because I 
have an N800, and I've never even seen an N810 (and unlikely to here 
[Ireland] because Nokia just closed down their local store, and they had 
never seen an N800 until I brought mine in to show them).

 it can display moving maps, but can't actually navigate; 

I never expected mine to do that anyway. I knew it was theoretically 
possible, but the processor is wy too slow for mapping apps, the 
BT-connected satellite receivers are way too expensive, and the data 
quality of the free maps, even OpenStreetMap, is hopelessly inadequate. 
I have a perfectly-working TomTom, anyway.

 it can do PIM-like things (after installing third-party apps), 

I've already described elsewhere the errors made in selecting that 
particular set of built-ins. But the GPE apps are adequate, although no 
more than that (the authors need some more experience with usability 
criteria).

 but can't easily and reliably sync all of that data; 

I don't keep my PIM data anywhere else but the N800 (and backup) so that 
isn't an issue for me. In nearly three decades of using pocket devices I 
have never needed or wanted to synch the PIM data with anything else.

 it can do basic text files, 

It wouldn't be worth using if it didn't.

 but the shipped app uses a proprietary format and it can't open or
 edit any actual office documents;

Same answer as for PIMs: the shipped apps were worthless. AbiWord 
provides all this and more. It's not the world's most wonderful 
interface, and it's got bits missing, but it's fine to open and save all 
the formats I have fed it so far.

 it can be a media player, but is limited as to the formats
 and especially video resolution/bitrates (it can't even do native 
 screen resolution, only a quarter of screen resolution);

With Andrew Flegg's tablet-encode script I have plenty of perfectly 
working pr0^H^H^Hmovies (enough for two transatlantic flights and two 
long car/train journeys and a couple of boring hotel evenings) within 
the limits of whatever brain-dead DRM it can work around.

Plus I can do my email, news, blog, tweet, chat, manage my servers, run 
Emacs and Saxon and XSLT and LaTeX, wordprocess, spreadsheet, Skype, 
Gizmo, and that's about all I need right now.

 Maybe *you* are never offline, but anybody who needs offline access to
 their complete contact database/schedule/etc. *does* need a PIM. And
 who wants to carry around multiple devices when one is enough?

I just carry the whole damn lot on the N800. Online or offline, I'm 
sorted. But I'm lucky -- I don't have to share my calendar with others 
(and I would refuse to do so if asked, anyway).

 I give up. You people and your straw-man arguments will never be convinced.

The tension seems to be between developers, who want a toy they can hone 
their skills on, and users, who just want a computer that works. These 
are two separate products.

So maybe I should have been more precise in my original question: Is 
there (or will there be soon) a pocket computer from some manufacturer 
(not necessarily Nokia) running a Unix-type OS of some description (not 
necessarily Maemo) that is broadly speaking a suitable replacement 
device for 

Re: Default Contact Application

2009-06-15 Thread Peter Flynn
sean wrote:
 Is there a way to change the default Contact application from the built 
 in one to something else, in this case I am trying out GPE Contacts?

I don't think it's possible, but I have a dim recollection of someone 
posting a long time ago to say it *was* possible, just difficult.

 While here, can you somehow change the default application for any need?

I wish.

 By default I would look to the Filemanager, but it does not appear to be 
 able fill the demand, either does the control panel.

FileManager as shipped is brain-dead.

///Peter
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: N810 for $180

2009-06-15 Thread Luca Olivetti
En/na Peter Flynn ha escrit:

 
 So maybe I should have been more precise in my original question: Is 
 there (or will there be soon) a pocket computer from some manufacturer 
 (not necessarily Nokia) running a Unix-type OS of some description (not 
 necessarily Maemo) that is broadly speaking a suitable replacement 
 device for an N800/N810 user wanting an upgrade?

I'm not sure it's more powerful than the n800 but it seems nice:
http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=27433

Bye
-- 
Luca
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: N810 for $180

2009-06-15 Thread Mark Haury
Peter Flynn wrote:
 Mark wrote:
   What's the replacement for the N810?

   
 There is none. From the details they've given thus far, the next 
 generation of Maemo devices are going to be completely different than
 the current tablets, with incompatible hardware therefore
 software/OS.
 

 I don't care if they are different inside and run a different OS 
 (assuming they are still Unix-based and not Microsoft :-)  What I want 
 is a pocket computer the approximate size and weight of the N800 which 
 does the same stuff, but a bit faster and a bit higher rez and more 
 flexible memory/disk.

   
 From what they were saying, they are not going to be *anything* like 
the current tablets: the form factor is going to be different, and they 
may even be phones. Don't hold your breath for an updated tablet.
 Once again, you totally misunderstand and misrepresent my arguments. 
 What I'm saying is that the ITs are marketed to anybody who will buy 
 them, including clueless consumers. (Buy.com is a huge 
 consumer-oriented site, not an obscure company catering to 
 developers...) But Nokia treats them like developer's toys, and 
 doesn't support them the way they should. Nokia is the one that is 
 speaking with forked tongue.
 

 I think that's too harsh. I just think Nokia's management was badly 
 misled by Marketing into believing that ITs were a viable concept. 
 Perhaps they were for a brief time. What they missed was the vastly 
 bigger market for pocket computers.
   
That's been my point all along.

 I bought my N800 because I took the bait and thought it was a 
 consumer-level device because of everything I saw in the sales 
 material. I was duped.
 

 I'm sorry to hear that, but caveat emptor. I'm afraid that after 30 
 years in IT I never believe a word of the sales material, even if it's 
 written by the engineers (the only people you can actually trust).
   
Nokia was for me a trusted name. It's a sad world when you can't trust 
*anybody*... :-(
 I like my tablet, but it's turned out to be nothing but a toy. It can
 do lots of neat things, but in every area it falls just short of
 fulfilling its potential: 
 

 I think you said you have an N810. I can't compare directly because I 
 have an N800, and I've never even seen an N810 (and unlikely to here 
 [Ireland] because Nokia just closed down their local store, and they had 
 never seen an N800 until I brought mine in to show them).

   
No, I have an N800. The compromises the N810 made in order to add the 
keyboard are all showstoppers for me. Unfortunately, I think the 
upcoming devices are going to be even less what I want.
 it can display moving maps, but can't actually navigate; 
 

 I never expected mine to do that anyway. I knew it was theoretically 
 possible, but the processor is wy too slow for mapping apps, the 
 BT-connected satellite receivers are way too expensive, and the data 
 quality of the free maps, even OpenStreetMap, is hopelessly inadequate. 
 I have a perfectly-working TomTom, anyway.

   
Not true. Most dedicated GPSrs have much less powerful hardware than 
even the N770, and the mapping applications available for the tablets do 
just fine, they just aren't finished.

 it can do PIM-like things (after installing third-party apps), 
 

 I've already described elsewhere the errors made in selecting that 
 particular set of built-ins. But the GPE apps are adequate, although no 
 more than that (the authors need some more experience with usability 
 criteria).

   
I'm using GPE myself, but I've spent 6 months trying to fix the botched 
data import. There's just no way to reliably import data or specify 
corresponding data fields.
 but can't easily and reliably sync all of that data; 
 

 I don't keep my PIM data anywhere else but the N800 (and backup) so that 
 isn't an issue for me. In nearly three decades of using pocket devices I 
 have never needed or wanted to synch the PIM data with anything else.
   
I have always needed to sync, import and export the PIM data for various 
mailing lists, etc. Keeping completely separate databases is a huge pain 
in the keester to manually keep everything in sync.
 it can do basic text files, 
 

 It wouldn't be worth using if it didn't.

   
Leafpad is a great replacement for the built-in text editor.

 but the shipped app uses a proprietary format and it can't open or
 edit any actual office documents;
 

 Same answer as for PIMs: the shipped apps were worthless. AbiWord 
 provides all this and more. It's not the world's most wonderful 
 interface, and it's got bits missing, but it's fine to open and save all 
 the formats I have fed it so far.
   
I have yet to get Abiword to import or export Word or OpenOffice files; 
all I get is garbage. That's true not only on the tablet but in the 
desktop versions. Years ago when I first tried Abiword it was much 
better at that than it is now. Their insistence on using their own 
unique file format, together 

Re: Default Contact Application

2009-06-15 Thread Mark
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Peter Flynnpeter.fl...@mars.ucc.ie wrote:
 sean wrote:
 Is there a way to change the default Contact application from the built
 in one to something else, in this case I am trying out GPE Contacts?

 I don't think it's possible, but I have a dim recollection of someone
 posting a long time ago to say it *was* possible, just difficult.

 While here, can you somehow change the default application for any need?


I vaguely remember some talk about mime-types and being able to
specify apps to open different types of files, but don't know the
details or have that particular need myself. I don't think the default
apps can be changed because it's hardcoded into the OS. I'm really
fuzzy on that stuff, though. You might want to search the Internet
Tablet Talk forums. There's some really good stuff on there, and the
Maemo wiki as well.

Mark
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: Default Contact Application

2009-06-15 Thread Mark
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:06 PM, Markwolfm...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Peter Flynnpeter.fl...@mars.ucc.ie wrote:
 sean wrote:
 Is there a way to change the default Contact application from the built
 in one to something else, in this case I am trying out GPE Contacts?

 I don't think it's possible, but I have a dim recollection of someone
 posting a long time ago to say it *was* possible, just difficult.

 While here, can you somehow change the default application for any need?


 I vaguely remember some talk about mime-types and being able to
 specify apps to open different types of files, but don't know the
 details or have that particular need myself. I don't think the default
 apps can be changed because it's hardcoded into the OS. I'm really
 fuzzy on that stuff, though. You might want to search the Internet
 Tablet Talk forums. There's some really good stuff on there, and the
 Maemo wiki as well.

 Mark


I wasn't very clear: what I meant to say was that IIRC the built-in
apps can't be defeated as the defaults for their particular actions,
but there may be hope for some types of files that aren't already
associated with the as-shipped apps. Or maybe they all can be changed.
Surely someone knows.

Mark
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users