Re: [Mageia-dev] Updates process is now available

2011-07-21 Thread Samuel Verschelde
Le mardi 19 juillet 2011 11:49:24, Samuel Verschelde a écrit :
 Le mardi 19 juillet 2011 11:38:01, Manuel Hiebel a écrit :
Could we add a keyword validated_update to bugs that are ready to
be moved to updates, so they can be found easily ?
   
   That would be useful indeed, the number of update candidates is growing
   and it's not easy to differentiate those who need testing and those who
   need to be pushed.
   
   Samuel
  
  Yep, can we add this ?
 
 No one said no, I'd say let's go :)
 

I added the validated_update keyword to several update requests. We need to 
add also sysadm-b...@ml.mageia.org in CC, but there's an extension being set 
so that it's automatic when you add the validated_update keyword.

So now we can differentiate 2 lists :
- updates that need testing : http://petitlien.fr/qa-testing
- updates that have been validated and need to be pushed : 
http://petitlien.fr/updates-push

I don't think I can save and share the searches in bugzilla (or don't know how 
to do) so I haven't done it for now.

Samuel


Re: [Mageia-dev] Updates process is now available

2011-07-21 Thread Manuel Hiebel
Le jeudi 21 juillet 2011 à 14:47 +0200, Samuel Verschelde a écrit :
 I don't think I can save and share the searches in bugzilla (or don't know 
 how 
 to do) so I haven't done it for now.
 
 Samuel
You can go https://bugs.mageia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=saved-searches
I have created updates-push and waiting for qa test.

-- 
Manuel Hiebel (leuhmanu)



Re: [Mageia-dev] Updates process is now available

2011-07-19 Thread Manuel Hiebel

  Could we add a keyword validated_update to bugs that are ready to be
  moved to updates, so they can be found easily ?
 
 That would be useful indeed, the number of update candidates is growing and 
 it's not easy to differentiate those who need testing and those who need to 
 be 
 pushed.
 
 Samuel

Yep, can we add this ?
-- 
Manuel Hiebel (leuhmanu)



Re: [Mageia-dev] Updates process is now available

2011-07-18 Thread Samuel Verschelde
Le jeudi 7 juillet 2011 14:42:18, nicolas vigier a écrit :
 On Tue, 21 Jun 2011, Damien Lallement wrote:
  Hello all,
  
  security, qa and sysadmin team worked on the qa/updates process to
  provide updates as soon as possible.
  All is now ready (boklm is finalizing a scrip to move updates from
  testing to updates). This script will be uses by security team
  members and a few QA people to push updates.
  
  You can now read:
  - http://www.mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=updates_policy
  - http://www.mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=qa_updates
 
 I have some questions about updates process :
 
 The page says to assign bug after validation :
 Assign the bug to secur...@groups.mageia.org if it's a security update
 (check that qa-b...@ml.mageia.org is in 'CC')
 Let it assigned to qa-b...@ml.mageia.org if it's a standard update
 
 Is it usefull to assign differently for security and non-security
 updates ?
 
 Could we add a keyword validated_update to bugs that are ready to be
 moved to updates, so they can be found easily ?

That would be useful indeed, the number of update candidates is growing and 
it's not easy to differentiate those who need testing and those who need to be 
pushed.

Samuel


Re: [Mageia-dev] Updates process is now available

2011-07-07 Thread nicolas vigier
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011, Damien Lallement wrote:

 Hello all,

 security, qa and sysadmin team worked on the qa/updates process to provide 
 updates as soon as possible.
 All is now ready (boklm is finalizing a scrip to move updates from 
 testing to updates). This script will be uses by security team members 
 and a few QA people to push updates.

 You can now read:
 - http://www.mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=updates_policy
 - http://www.mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=qa_updates

I have some questions about updates process :

The page says to assign bug after validation :
Assign the bug to secur...@groups.mageia.org if it's a security update
(check that qa-b...@ml.mageia.org is in 'CC')
Let it assigned to qa-b...@ml.mageia.org if it's a standard update

Is it usefull to assign differently for security and non-security
updates ?

Could we add a keyword validated_update to bugs that are ready to be
moved to updates, so they can be found easily ?



Re: [Mageia-dev] Updates process is now available

2011-07-07 Thread Damien Lallement

Le 07/07/2011 14:42, nicolas vigier a écrit :

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011, Damien Lallement wrote:


Hello all,

security, qa and sysadmin team worked on the qa/updates process to provide
updates as soon as possible.
All is now ready (boklm is finalizing a scrip to move updates from
testing to updates). This script will be uses by security team members
and a few QA people to push updates.

You can now read:
- http://www.mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=updates_policy
- http://www.mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=qa_updates


I have some questions about updates process :

The page says to assign bug after validation :
Assign the bug to secur...@groups.mageia.org if it's a security update
(check that qa-b...@ml.mageia.org is in 'CC')
Let it assigned to qa-b...@ml.mageia.org if it's a standard update

Is it usefull to assign differently for security and non-security
updates ?

Could we add a keyword validated_update to bugs that are ready to be
moved to updates, so they can be found easily ?


I just write this because that's what was discuss on the meeting at this 
time with misc, ennael, stew and I (you were here too IIRC).

We can discuss this point again if needed. :-)

The idea was just not to assign package to secteam if not a secteam 
update (not to distrub them for standard packages).

--
Damien Lallement
Treasurer of Mageia.Org

twitter: damsweb - IRC: damsweb/coincoin


Re: [Mageia-dev] Updates process is now available

2011-07-07 Thread nicolas vigier
On Thu, 07 Jul 2011, Damien Lallement wrote:

 Le 07/07/2011 14:42, nicolas vigier a écrit :
 On Tue, 21 Jun 2011, Damien Lallement wrote:

 Hello all,

 security, qa and sysadmin team worked on the qa/updates process to provide
 updates as soon as possible.
 All is now ready (boklm is finalizing a scrip to move updates from
 testing to updates). This script will be uses by security team members
 and a few QA people to push updates.

 You can now read:
 - http://www.mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=updates_policy
 - http://www.mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=qa_updates

 I have some questions about updates process :

 The page says to assign bug after validation :
 Assign the bug to secur...@groups.mageia.org if it's a security update
 (check that qa-b...@ml.mageia.org is in 'CC')
 Let it assigned to qa-b...@ml.mageia.org if it's a standard update

 Is it usefull to assign differently for security and non-security
 updates ?

 Could we add a keyword validated_update to bugs that are ready to be
 moved to updates, so they can be found easily ?

 I just write this because that's what was discuss on the meeting at this 
 time with misc, ennael, stew and I (you were here too IIRC).
 We can discuss this point again if needed. :-)

 The idea was just not to assign package to secteam if not a secteam update 
 (not to distrub them for standard packages).

Yes, but what is the difference between pushing standard update, and
security update, after qa is done, and why should we disturb them for
security updates, and not for standard updates ?



Re: [Mageia-dev] Updates process is now available

2011-06-26 Thread Thomas Spuhler
On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 09:57:22 am Damien Lallement wrote:
 Hello all,
 
 security, qa and sysadmin team worked on the qa/updates process to
 provide updates as soon as possible.
 All is now ready (boklm is finalizing a scrip to move updates from
 testing to updates). This script will be uses by security team
 members and a few QA people to push updates.
 
 You can now read:
 - http://www.mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=updates_policy
 - http://www.mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=qa_updates
 
 A new ML has been created: qa-b...@ml.mageia.org. It will receive all
 the updates requests and will be the main QA contact for bugzilla.
 You can join it if you want to be part of the QA people working on
 updates (security or not).
 
 A saved search has been added to bugzilla to catch all updates waiting
 for QA validation:
 https://bugs.mageia.org/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamednamedcmd=Updates%20wai
 ting%20for%20QA
 
 For more info, please ask here on on #mageia-dev or #mageia-qa
 Let's go to work on updates!

This seems not to be working for me. I am getting an error:

error: command failed: ssh pkgsubmit.mageia.org /usr/local/bin/submit_package 
-t 1 --define sid=9ed21bb1-462a-4c5b-9fa3-78e433ccc363 --define 
section=core/updates_testing -r 114150 
svn+ssh://svn.mageia.org/svn/packages/cauldron/kolab-webadmin
error: svn+ssh://svn.mageia.org/svn/packages/cauldron/kolab-webadmin is not 
allowed for this target

(BTW on the web page it shows as -define section = instead of --define section)

-- 
Thomas


Re: [Mageia-dev] Updates process is now available

2011-06-26 Thread Dexter Morgan
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Thomas Spuhler tho...@btspuhler.com wrote:
 On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 09:57:22 am Damien Lallement wrote:
 Hello all,

 security, qa and sysadmin team worked on the qa/updates process to
 provide updates as soon as possible.
 All is now ready (boklm is finalizing a scrip to move updates from
 testing to updates). This script will be uses by security team
 members and a few QA people to push updates.

 You can now read:
 - http://www.mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=updates_policy
 - http://www.mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=qa_updates

 A new ML has been created: qa-b...@ml.mageia.org. It will receive all
 the updates requests and will be the main QA contact for bugzilla.
 You can join it if you want to be part of the QA people working on
 updates (security or not).

 A saved search has been added to bugzilla to catch all updates waiting
 for QA validation:
 https://bugs.mageia.org/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamednamedcmd=Updates%20wai
 ting%20for%20QA

 For more info, please ask here on on #mageia-dev or #mageia-qa
 Let's go to work on updates!

 This seems not to be working for me. I am getting an error:

 error: command failed: ssh pkgsubmit.mageia.org /usr/local/bin/submit_package
 -t 1 --define sid=9ed21bb1-462a-4c5b-9fa3-78e433ccc363 --define
 section=core/updates_testing -r 114150
 svn+ssh://svn.mageia.org/svn/packages/cauldron/kolab-webadmin
 error: svn+ssh://svn.mageia.org/svn/packages/cauldron/kolab-webadmin is not
 allowed for this target

 (BTW on the web page it shows as -define section = instead of --define 
 section)

 --
 Thomas


because you need to modify on the update branch of the SVN

mgarepo -d 1 kolab-webadmin


[Mageia-dev] Updates process is now available

2011-06-21 Thread Damien Lallement

Hello all,

security, qa and sysadmin team worked on the qa/updates process to 
provide updates as soon as possible.
All is now ready (boklm is finalizing a scrip to move updates from 
testing to updates). This script will be uses by security team 
members and a few QA people to push updates.


You can now read:
- http://www.mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=updates_policy
- http://www.mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=qa_updates

A new ML has been created: qa-b...@ml.mageia.org. It will receive all 
the updates requests and will be the main QA contact for bugzilla.
You can join it if you want to be part of the QA people working on 
updates (security or not).


A saved search has been added to bugzilla to catch all updates waiting 
for QA validation: 
https://bugs.mageia.org/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamednamedcmd=Updates%20waiting%20for%20QA


For more info, please ask here on on #mageia-dev or #mageia-qa
Let's go to work on updates!
--
Damien Lallement
Treasurer of Mageia.Org

twitter: damsweb - IRC: damsweb/coincoin


Re: [Mageia-dev] Updates process is now available

2011-06-21 Thread Remco Rijnders

On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 06:57:22PM +0200, Damien Lallement wrote:

Hello all,

security, qa and sysadmin team worked on the qa/updates process to 
provide updates as soon as possible.
All is now ready (boklm is finalizing a scrip to move updates from 
testing to updates). This script will be uses by security team 
members and a few QA people to push updates.


Awesome news!

A saved search has been added to bugzilla to catch all updates 
waiting for QA validation: https://bugs.mageia.org/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamednamedcmd=Updates%20waiting%20for%20QA


That link isn't working for me :-(

Thanks and regards,

Remmy


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: [Mageia-dev] Updates process is now available

2011-06-21 Thread Cazzaniga Sandro
Le 21/06/2011 20:19, Remco Rijnders a écrit :
 On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 06:57:22PM +0200, Damien Lallement wrote:
 Hello all,

 security, qa and sysadmin team worked on the qa/updates process to
 provide updates as soon as possible.

Thanks to them and congrats!

-- 
Sandro Cazzaniga - https://lederniercoupdarchet.wordpress.com
IRC: Kharec (irc.freenode.net)
Software/Hardware geek
Conceptor
Magnum's Coordinator/editor (http://magnum.tuxfamily.org)
Mageia contributor


Re: [Mageia-dev] Updates process is now available

2011-06-21 Thread Michael Scherer
Le mardi 21 juin 2011 à 18:57 +0200, Damien Lallement a écrit :
 Hello all,
 
 security, qa and sysadmin team worked on the qa/updates process to 
 provide updates as soon as possible.
 All is now ready (boklm is finalizing a scrip to move updates from 
 testing to updates). This script will be uses by security team 
 members and a few QA people to push updates.
 
 You can now read:
 - http://www.mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=updates_policy
 - http://www.mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=qa_updates

I have some questions about the page 
http://www.mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=qa_updates

It's a new package fixing a bug (security or not) or adding a missing
feature.

Adding a missing feature is not part of a update as we defined it so
this part seems strange to me, could this one be clarified ?


Don't forget to enable the i586 medias on x86_64 systems 

I do not understand why is should be needed ( except for nspluginwrapper
). Is there something to watch for when doing this ?

Write an validation message

I do not understand what is the validation message about, could we
clarify the goal of the message, or add a example ? 

Rewrite the advisory for the secteam (ask the developper to provide the
advisory if missing)

IIRC, the advisory should have been provided by the packager ( according
to the others page ), so why rewrite it ? Isn't it a left over ?
Unless what it mean check that the packager said something that normal
people will understand ? 
Also, on the page, developer, is upstream developer, or packager
who take care of the update ?


-- 
Michael Scherer