Re: [Mailman-Users] MM lists on Gmane

2006-09-18 Thread Bretton Vine
Brad Knowles said the following on 2006/09/17 07:32 AM:
 By rights, the listowner(s) should have the final say as to who is 
 allowed to see the archives of their list, who is allowed to 
 subscribe to their list, and who is allowed to post.  Period.

In 10 years of being online and being part of list-based communities I've 
gone through all the iterations of questioning the point above from the same 
perspective as the original poster for this thread to Brad's comments above 
and I can say without doubt now that the above is not merely an 
opinion-based point of view but a fundamental standard and policy guide for 
the successful use and growth of list-based communities.

Even the most open of lists require one or more parties to adopt the 
list-owner role and make decisions for the whole of the list that not 
everyone will like or agree with.

But continued use of a list (and associated growth in members) requires some 
semblance of order from a benevolent administrator role. In my experience to 
date what Brad's saying above is by far the most successful means of 
operating a list despite it's unpopularity at times. :-)

 In commercial circles, the kind of thing that they're doing is called 
 piracy -- they take someone else's content and repurpose that for 
 their own benefit and for the benefit of their customers.

And that's different from most newspapers how? evil grin Or any media 
enterprise for that matter. Piracy is one freedom you cannot curtail. But at 
the same time as mentioned above there are reasons for controlling who 
contributes and how content is managed.

 Okay, so Lars does not today make a profit running Gmane.  That 
 doesn't mean that tomorrow he won't change his mind, or sell the 
 business to someone else who will.

We have a problem here in terms of Data Retention laws. The only privacy 
protection we have is a clause in our constitution. We have no privacy laws 
or regulations to properly protect content or archived information -- 
legally required otherwise.

The only protection we have is the policies implemented by list-owners and 
the abiding by them of list members. In the truest sense, people governing 
themselves, assuming no bad apples involved. Exploitation of the system 
offers no recourse for when things go sour.

Netiquette is covered by some RFCs but list-etiquette is mostly a word of 
mouth exercise. It's best taught by example.

-- 
| Bretton Vine | 083 633 8475 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| GPG: http://bretton.hivemind.net/bretton_vine.asc  |

It is important to go through the steps to appreciate the impending 
apocalypse. - Astronomy Prof Balbus, discussing supernovas

--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: 
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showamp;file=faq01.027.htp


Re: [Mailman-Users] MM lists on Gmane

2006-09-18 Thread Bretton Vine
Jason R. Mastaler said the following on 2006/09/17 08:10 AM:
 If Gmane allows me and others to keep up with Barry's release
  announcements for example in a convenient manner, I think that's a good 
thing.

What's preventing you from just subscribing to the announce list?


-- 
| Bretton Vine | 083 633 8475 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| GPG: http://bretton.hivemind.net/bretton_vine.asc  |

Historically speaking, the presence of wheels in Unix has never precluded 
their reinvention. - Larry Wall

--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: 
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showamp;file=faq01.027.htp


Re: [Mailman-Users] MM lists on Gmane

2006-09-18 Thread Bretton Vine
Brad Knowles said the following on 2006/09/16 09:07 PM:
 The reason that they were removed from Gmane is that they tell us 
 they have a policy of always contacting the listowner to see if it's 
 okay for them to carry the list on their site

This is not the case with some lists on the server I admin. Industry 
specific lists were added without the consent of the domain owner or 
list-owner.

Additionally mail-archive.com has archived other lists without list-owner 
consent as well. Additionally their terms of service do not allow you to 
request the removal of the list only to prevent further archival by removing 
their archive address from the subscribers.

I'm making no comment on the ppl behind gmane etc as I don't know them 
personally enough to comment, and I applaud efforts at making archives of 
useful lists available in a standards compliant, easily-searchable format.

However I have nothing but criticism for the practise of making lists 
available online without list-owner's consent. It's as bad as forwarding 
posts from someone to a third-party list without the posters permission. 
Earlier this year this happened when someone's comments (said somewhat in 
jest) for forwarded to an enthusiasts forum as an example of hate speech 
type behaviour. This led to intimidating phone calls and allegedly death 
threats to the poster from individuals he didn't know at all who took his 
forwarded comments completely out of context.

It was a very sad week for the community network I look after. We've had 
people meet, get married and have kids because of the lists and the related 
communities. To see that abused in a negative manner was unacceptable and 
led to a lack of openness in new subscriptions meaning that now for some 
lists people have to be vetted and archives are completely banned.

Online means of archiving lists are useful -- don't get me wrong -- but some 
sense of polite protocol must be observed to prevent abuse. Besides, doesn't 
the mailman list already have an web-accessible archive front-end?

-- 
| Bretton Vine | 083 633 8475 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| GPG: http://bretton.hivemind.net/bretton_vine.asc  |

I want to suck the marrow from life. As a writer, experience is a feast you 
can gorge yourself on. Every moment is a kaliedascope of full-colour, 
surround-sound, haptic exposure to raw reality. Life V2.0 ... now with added 
zing (tm) - BV

--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: 
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showamp;file=faq01.027.htp


Re: [Mailman-Users] MM lists on Gmane

2006-09-18 Thread JC Dill
Barry Warsaw wrote:

 If I was aware of such problems in the past, I honestly don't  
 remember -- I'll place the blame squarely on my overloaded brain, and  
 age. :)   Taking a fresh look at this, I say let's do what we can to  
 get the lists on Gmane, including any back archives.

The problem is that Gmane violated both their own policies (to contact 
list owners before adding lists) and their agreement with us to not 
archive mailman lists.

I simply don't trust them.

This problem surfaced when I found a virgin address of mine receiving 
spam.  I had just that newly created address to subscribe and post to a 
mailman list.  How had spammers found it so fast?  A quick google found 
that my address had been leaked straight to usenet by gmane.

1)  They didn't contact the list owner for permission before archiving 
the list.

2)  They didn't munge email addresses before posting the list messages 
to usenet.

They seem to have fixed problem #2, but problem #1 remains.  How hard is 
it to follow their OWN policy and contact a list's owner before adding 
it to their gateway?  This is basic netiquette.  Yet they don't seem 
able to comply with it.

Taking a fresh look, it looks like they are STILL unable (or unwilling) 
to comply with this.  And that's the crux of the matter.

Ask me if you can borrow my car, and I might say yes and give you the 
keys.  Take my car without asking, that's theft.

Ask me if I want to have sex, and I might say yes!  Try to have sex with 
me without my permission, that's rape.

Ask me if you can mirror/gateway a list I administer, I might say yes. 
Mirror or gateway it without permission (especially when your OWN policy 
says you ask first) and it is a netiquette violation and a copyright 
violation.  Not as bad as car theft or rape, but it's still a matter of 
taking something without permission, and it's still wrong.

IMHO we should not let Gmane mirror the mailman lists until they FIX 
their subscription process to ensure that they have the list owner's 
permission *before* they add the list to their gateway.  If we don't 
maintain this policy, we are endorsing what they do (adding without 
getting permission) and that's just wrong.

jc


--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: 
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showamp;file=faq01.027.htp


Re: [Mailman-Users] MM lists on Gmane

2006-09-18 Thread JC Dill
Brad Knowles wrote:

 I try very hard to never say never, but I cannot imagine a 
 circumstance were we would possibly ever trust them to carry any 
 Mailman or Python-related content.

I *can* imagine - it could (perhaps) happen when they actually follow 
their stated policy and contact a list owner to confirm that the list 
owner approved of the list being mirrored on gmane.  Something that has 
not happened even ONCE WRT the mailman lists.

Until gmane starts following their own rules, we can't trust them.

jc

--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: 
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showamp;file=faq01.027.htp


Re: [Mailman-Users] MM lists on Gmane

2006-09-18 Thread Jason R. Mastaler
On 9/18/06 10:26 AM, JC Dill wrote:
 If Barry wants to let the list be gatewayed to gmane and usenet over our 
 objections, he is certainly entitled to do that.  It will also mean that 
 he will need new people to help manage the various lists that Brad and I 
 help manage because I'm with Brad on this - gateway to gmane without 
 even asking my opinion and I'm no longer interested in helping manage 
 the list.  We (the people on mailman-users-owner who do the lion's share 
 of the work in managing the lists) deserve to be consulted and have our 
 opinions heard on this matter.

For now, what about mailman-announce?  Since it's a read-only list, it 
doesn't pose any of the problems you've brought up with non-subscribers 
and the like.  Until you guys and Barry work out what you want to do 
with mailman-uses and the other lists, is it okay if mailman-announce is 
added to Gmane?
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: 
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showamp;file=faq01.027.htp


[Mailman-Users] Restrict subsribers to my.domain.com

2006-09-18 Thread Tom Kavanaugh
Hello folks,

Is it possible to restrict subsribers to only those with email my.domain.com
?
I have am maintaining a company internal mail-list, and do not want to allow
subscibers outside the company.

Please let me know how this can be done in mailman.

Thanks
Tom
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: 
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showamp;file=faq01.027.htp


Re: [Mailman-Users] MM lists on Gmane

2006-09-18 Thread Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sep 18, 2006, at 12:26 PM, JC Dill wrote:

 If Barry wants to let the list be gatewayed to gmane and usenet  
 over our objections, he is certainly entitled to do that.  It will  
 also mean that he will need new people to help manage the various  
 lists that Brad and I help manage because I'm with Brad on this -  
 gateway to gmane without even asking my opinion and I'm no longer  
 interested in helping manage the list.  We (the people on mailman- 
 users-owner who do the lion's share of the work in managing the  
 lists) deserve to be consulted and have our opinions heard on this  
 matter.

JC (and Brad) are absolutely right, and I hereby publicly apologize  
for usurping their roles.  I highly value both their contributions as  
list managers, and since both are opposed to gatewaying to Gmane  
under the current conditions, I retract my earlier endorsement.

I think that if Gmane were to address the issues that Brad and JC  
have raised about their operations, then it would be worth  
reconsidering.  I'll leave the final decision up to them and won't  
stick my nose in unless specifically asked to (and even then, not  
until the current bleeding stops :).  I don't expect them to lobby  
Gmane to address their complaints, but perhaps those of you who would  
like to see Gmane gateways for the Mailman lists can forward those  
concerns on to Lars and company.

On a personal note, I've re-enabled my subscription to mailman-users  
after a very long hiatus.  I still don't expect to be able to keep up  
with the traffic, so I'll mostly lurk unless there's some specific  
issue that I think needs a definitive pronouncement.  And next time,  
I'll try harder not to be a dumbass. ;)

- -Barry

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iQCVAwUBRQ7eoXEjvBPtnXfVAQI1gAP+L6Gv2uDAlT8ht83UqXUTaNo8JwW5A2uo
ExEpm2qNNRDCdmiHd7S0nMAdLCByAkjaErpWL0kmQFfPqJB5h/XvUmgQvStXfMIb
lry5BCANTa0SBE6b+xVHpBm6LqfeD93jFP5sm+NndWyx+/NLAsdwIffozYalzt/e
q0UBXvYz3bA=
=cjOq
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: 
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showamp;file=faq01.027.htp


Re: [Mailman-Users] Bug in Mailman version 2.1.5

2006-09-18 Thread Mark Sapiro
Stefan Grote wrote:

okay, but my Mailman error log is empty and my apache logs are empty too.


This can happen for a few reasons, but the most likely is a syntax
error in mm_cfg.py.

-- 
Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]   The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan

--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: 
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showamp;file=faq01.027.htp


Re: [Mailman-Users] Different URL PATTERNS per virtual host?

2006-09-18 Thread Benjamin Donnachie
Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
Not without running a different copy of Mailman for the different hosts.

I thought that might be the case.  Guess I'll just move back to http:// 
globally.

Thanks for your help! :)


-- 
Benjamin


--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: 
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showamp;file=faq01.027.htp


Re: [Mailman-Users] Different URL PATTERNS per virtual host?

2006-09-18 Thread Jeffrey Goldberg
On Sep 18, 2006, at 1:24 PM, Dragon wrote:

 Is there some reason you would not want to run https on all of the  
 lists?

I can't speak for the original poster, but in my case it is a  
question of which domains I'm willing to get site certificates for.

-j


--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: 
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showamp;file=faq01.027.htp


[Mailman-Users] can't call command line functions from php

2006-09-18 Thread Anne Ramey
I have my php script running as a user in the mailman group, but when I 
try to do:
   //add user to Admin email list
   $command = /usr/local/mailman/bin/add_members -r .$Filename. admins;
   system($command, $status);

I get a status of 1 returned to me and it doesn't add the users.  I've 
tried:
   shell_exec($command);
as well but it didn't work either.  I can successfully call these 
functions from my old perl scripts, so I don't think it's a permissions 
issue.  I think I must be missing something in the php.  This may be a 
little out of the scope of this list, but any help would be appreciated.

-- 
Anne 

--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: 
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showamp;file=faq01.027.htp


Re: [Mailman-Users] MM lists on Gmane

2006-09-18 Thread JC Dill
Barry Warsaw wrote:
  
 I think that if Gmane were to address the issues that Brad and JC have 
 raised about their operations, then it would be worth reconsidering.
+1

:-)

jc
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: 
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showamp;file=faq01.027.htp


Re: [Mailman-Users] can't call command line functions from php

2006-09-18 Thread Dragon
Anne Ramey wrote:
I have my php script running as a user in the mailman group, but when I
try to do:
//add user to Admin email list
$command = /usr/local/mailman/bin/add_members -r .$Filename. admins;
system($command, $status);

I get a status of 1 returned to me and it doesn't add the users.  I've
tried:
shell_exec($command);
as well but it didn't work either.  I can successfully call these
functions from my old perl scripts, so I don't think it's a permissions
issue.  I think I must be missing something in the php.  This may be a
little out of the scope of this list, but any help would be appreciated.
 End original message. -

This is slightly off-topic but I am sure there are other users out 
there who also use PHP for web scripting to interface to mailman (I 
do on my system, I am far more comfortable with it than Python).

This sounds like PHP is being run in safe mode and the scripts you 
are trying to run are not allowed under the permitted safe-mode 
commands. Safe mode is often enabled by ISPs running servers that 
host virtual domains to prevent users from doing malicious and/or 
negligent things that can damage the file hierarchy or compromise 
sensitive system information. Chapter 9 of the PHP manual describes 
safe mode and how it works.

If you have error reporting to the browser turned off, you will need 
to look in the HTTP server error log to see if PHP is complaining 
about something. You might have to boost the error-reporting level in 
your PHP script using the error_reporting function in your script to 
get the level of detail you need.

Dragon

~~~
  Venimus, Saltavimus, Bibimus (et naribus canium capti sumus)
~~~

--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: 
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showamp;file=faq01.027.htp


Re: [Mailman-Users] Extract members fullname

2006-09-18 Thread Mark Sapiro
Hung Phan wrote:

Is there a way to extract members list with their fullname?
Used /usr/share/mailman/bin/list_members to extract the list of  
emails, but would like to know how to extract with fullnames.


Yes.

See

/usr/share/mailman/bin/list_members --help

to find out how.

-- 
Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]   The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan

--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: 
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showamp;file=faq01.027.htp


Re: [Mailman-Users] Topics regex

2006-09-18 Thread Mark Sapiro
Tobey Wheelock wrote: 
Subject: Loc: Test

This is my regex:
^(Re: \[Rappnet\] )?Loc(al)?[:.]

It catches the initial posts but not the replies.

It's not documented, but Topic regexps are compiled in VERBOSE mode
which means that unescaped whitespace outside of character classes is
ignored. This and other issues with Topic regexps are fixed for
Mailman 2.2, but for now, you need your regexp to be

^(Re:\ \[Rappnet\]\ )?Loc(al)?[:.]

however you will still have issues with subjects like

Re: Re: [Rappnet] Local: something

Re: Fwd: [Rappnet] Local: something

Re(2): [Rappnet] Local: something

and so forth.

-- 
Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]   The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan

--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: 
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showamp;file=faq01.027.htp


Re: [Mailman-Users] Topics regex

2006-09-18 Thread David Dyer-Bennet
On 9/18/06, Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 It's not documented, but Topic regexps are compiled in VERBOSE mode
 which means that unescaped whitespace outside of character classes is
 ignored. This and other issues with Topic regexps are fixed for
 Mailman 2.2,

By fixed, do you mean the behavior is now documented?  Or that they
won't be compiled in VERBOSE mode?  (Off-hand either seems reasonable,
though I suspect most people are more used to the mode where
whitespace is treated verbatim.)
-- 
David Dyer-Bennet, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/
RKBA: http://www.dd-b.net/carry/
Pics: http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/
Dragaera/Steven Brust: http://dragaera.info/
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: 
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showamp;file=faq01.027.htp


Re: [Mailman-Users] can't call command line functions from php

2006-09-18 Thread Anne Ramey


Dragon wrote:
 Anne Ramey wrote:
 I have my php script running as a user in the mailman group, but when I
 try to do:
//add user to Admin email list
$command = /usr/local/mailman/bin/add_members -r .$Filename. 
 admins;
system($command, $status);

 I get a status of 1 returned to me and it doesn't add the users.  I've
 tried:
shell_exec($command);
 as well but it didn't work either.  I can successfully call these
 functions from my old perl scripts, so I don't think it's a permissions
 issue.  I think I must be missing something in the php.  This may be a
 little out of the scope of this list, but any help would be appreciated.
  End original message. -

 This is slightly off-topic but I am sure there are other users out 
 there who also use PHP for web scripting to interface to mailman (I do 
 on my system, I am far more comfortable with it than Python).

 This sounds like PHP is being run in safe mode and the scripts you are 
 trying to run are not allowed under the permitted safe-mode commands. 
 Safe mode is often enabled by ISPs running servers that host virtual 
 domains to prevent users from doing malicious and/or negligent things 
 that can damage the file hierarchy or compromise sensitive system 
 information. Chapter 9 of the PHP manual describes safe mode and how 
 it works.

 If you have error reporting to the browser turned off, you will need 
 to look in the HTTP server error log to see if PHP is complaining 
 about something. You might have to boost the error-reporting level in 
 your PHP script using the error_reporting function in your script to 
 get the level of detail you need.

 Dragon

My safe_mode is Off.  There are no errors in my http log and none output 
to the screen.  I can run other commands with system and 
shell_exec...just not any mailman commands.

Anne
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: 
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showamp;file=faq01.027.htp


[Mailman-Users] Bounce scores

2006-09-18 Thread Lindsay Haisley
I just received a message via one of my list admins from a subscriber who was 
unsubscribed from a list based on a bounce from last year.  The subscriber got 
a message with the following:

 Your membership in the mailing list . has been disabled
 due to excessive bounces The last bounce received from you was dated
 12-Mar-2005.  You will not get any more messages from this list until
 you re-enable your membership.

Indeed, if I use dbdump to look at the config.pck for the list I see _many_ 
entries such as the following:

   '[address_redacted]': bounce info for member 
[address_redacted]
current score: 2.0
last bounce date: (2005, 2, 17)
email notices left: 3
last notice date: (1970, 1, 1)
confirmation cookie: None


I notice two things about these.  First, the last bounce date is _way_ in the 
past, even though bounce_info_stale_after is set to 12 days.  The second is 
that the last notice date is bogus.  Mailman _is_ resetting bounce information 
since I get many notices such as the following in my mailman logs:

Sep 18 12:05:24 2006 (17300) listname: [address_redacted] has stale bounce 
info, resetting
Sep 18 13:15:55 2006 (17300) listname: [address_redacted] has stale bounce 
info, resetting
Sep 18 13:32:43 2006 (17300) listname: [address_redacted] has stale bounce 
info, resetting

... so it looks as if bounce counts _are_ getting reset.

This list has been ongoing for a long time, and the entire list was moved to a 
new server early this year and has been functioning normally otherwise.  I 
suspect that these database entries may have gotten crosswise of a mailman 
version upgrade, of which there have been several since the list was moved to 
mailman.

Can anyone tell me how I can straighten this out and get the mechanics of 
bounce processing working properly?

-- 
Lindsay Haisley   | Fighting against human | PGP public key
FMP Computer Services |creativity is like   |  available at
512-259-1190  |trying to eradicate  | http://pubkeys.fmp.com
http://www.fmp.com|dandelions  |
  |  (Pamela Jones) |
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: 
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showamp;file=faq01.027.htp


Re: [Mailman-Users] can't call command line functions from php

2006-09-18 Thread Mark Sapiro
Anne Ramey wrote:

 I have my php script running as a user in the mailman group, but when I
 try to do:
//add user to Admin email list
$command = /usr/local/mailman/bin/add_members -r .$Filename. 
 admins;
system($command, $status);

 I get a status of 1 returned to me and it doesn't add the users.  
and:

My safe_mode is Off.  There are no errors in my http log and none output 
to the screen.  I can run other commands with system and 
shell_exec...just not any mailman commands.


Are you sure you're executing the command as the mailman group?

Try

chmod g+s /usr/local/mailman/bin/add_members

and see if that helps. If it does, the problem is with the group
executing the command.

You don't want to leave add_members as SETGID if non Mailman admins
have shell access to your box as SETGID will allow anyone to
successfully run the command.

-- 
Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]   The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan

--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: 
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showamp;file=faq01.027.htp


Re: [Mailman-Users] Topics regex

2006-09-18 Thread Mark Sapiro
David Dyer-Bennet wrote:

By fixed, do you mean the behavior is now documented?  Or that they
won't be compiled in VERBOSE mode?  (Off-hand either seems reasonable,
though I suspect most people are more used to the mode where
whitespace is treated verbatim.)


I mean (from the 2.2 NEWS file)
quote
The processing of Topics regular expressions has changed. Previously
the Topics regexp was compiled in verbose mode but not documented as
such which caused some confusion.  Also, the documentation indicated
that topic keywords could be entered one per line, but these entries
were not handled properly.  Topics regexps are now compiled in
non-verbose mode and multi-line entries are 'ored'.  Existing Topics
regexps will be converted when the list is updated so they will
continue to work.
/quote

-- 
Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]   The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan

--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: 
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showamp;file=faq01.027.htp


Re: [Mailman-Users] Restrict subsribers to my.domain.com

2006-09-18 Thread Tom Kavanaugh
Mark,

Sweer! It works very well.

Thanks
Tom

On 9/18/06, Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Tom Kavanaugh wrote:
 
 Is it possible to restrict subsribers to only those with email
 my.domain.com


 You can't do it completely automatically, but you can do it.

 You first need to patch Mailman with the patch at
 
 http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=403066group_id=103atid=350103
 
 (possibly modified for your installed version). This patch adds a
 subscribe_auto_approval list to the Privacy options...-Subscription
 rules page. (Or you can waiut for Mailman 2.2 which will contain this
 feature.)

 Then you set subscribe_policy to Require approval and put the reqular
 expression

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 in the subscribe_auto_approval list. Then subscription requests from
 the my.example.com domain will all be automatically approved and those
 from other domains will be held and can be rejected by the moderator.

 --
 Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]   The highway is for gamblers,
 San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan


--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: 
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showamp;file=faq01.027.htp


Re: [Mailman-Users] can't call command line functions from php

2006-09-18 Thread Lindsay Haisley
Thus spake Anne Ramey on Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 03:06:37PM CDT
 
 
 Dragon wrote:
  Anne Ramey wrote:
  I have my php script running as a user in the mailman group, but when I
  try to do:
 //add user to Admin email list
 $command = /usr/local/mailman/bin/add_members -r .$Filename. 
  admins;
 system($command, $status);
 
  I get a status of 1 returned to me and it doesn't add the users.  I've
  tried:
 shell_exec($command);
  as well but it didn't work either.  I can successfully call these
  functions from my old perl scripts, so I don't think it's a permissions
  issue.

A better look at the permissions issue here would be helpful, since that's the 
first thing one ought to eliminate.  I guess that we can assume you're running 
this on a 'nix-like OS since you mention permissions.  Make sure that 
/usr/local/mailman/bin/add_members has either world read and execute 
permissions, or group read and execute permissions (dicey from a security 
standpoint) or that the web server user is a member of group mailman (or 
whatever group your mailman is installed as) and that group read and execute 
permissions are turned on.  

If permissions are an issue, there may be other mailman components called into 
the process by add_members which may also need permissions adjusted.  If I run 
system executables from a web page using PHP I generally do so via a compiled 
setuid wrapper script which allows execution of the system command as a 
priveleged user, or in your case as the mailman user.  This avoids all such 
problems.  My wrapper program is written in C and has a bunch of security 
checks built into it, and you can obfusticate it in a number of ways so that 
it's pretty well inaccessable to a would-be troublemaker.

Another possible tool here would be to use passthru() instead of system() which 
will allow any output from $command to be displayed.  Another might be to set 
$command to point to a shell script which will run add_members, which will 
allow you to redirect stdout and stderr appropriately.

  I think I must be missing something in the php.  This may be a
  little out of the scope of this list, but any help would be appreciated.
   End original message. -
 
  This is slightly off-topic but I am sure there are other users out 
  there who also use PHP for web scripting to interface to mailman (I do 
  on my system, I am far more comfortable with it than Python).
 
  This sounds like PHP is being run in safe mode and the scripts you are 
  trying to run are not allowed under the permitted safe-mode commands. 
  Safe mode is often enabled by ISPs running servers that host virtual 
  domains to prevent users from doing malicious and/or negligent things 
  that can damage the file hierarchy or compromise sensitive system 
  information. Chapter 9 of the PHP manual describes safe mode and how 
  it works.
 
  If you have error reporting to the browser turned off, you will need 
  to look in the HTTP server error log to see if PHP is complaining 
  about something. You might have to boost the error-reporting level in 
  your PHP script using the error_reporting function in your script to 
  get the level of detail you need.
 
  Dragon
 
 My safe_mode is Off.  There are no errors in my http log and none output 
 to the screen.  I can run other commands with system and 
 shell_exec...just not any mailman commands.
 
 Anne
 --
 Mailman-Users mailing list
 Mailman-Users@python.org
 http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
 Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
 Unsubscribe: 
 http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/fmouse-mailman%40fmp.com
 
 Security Policy: 
 http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showamp;file=faq01.027.htp

-- 
Lindsay Haisley   | Fighting against human | PGP public key
FMP Computer Services |creativity is like   |  available at
512-259-1190  |trying to eradicate  | http://pubkeys.fmp.com
http://www.fmp.com|dandelions  |
  |  (Pamela Jones) |
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: 
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showamp;file=faq01.027.htp


[Mailman-Users] Announce ONLY list

2006-09-18 Thread Rob Jackson
I need to create an announce only list, where people can subscribe, but they
cannot post.  I also have other lists that I will need to create continually
that will not be this way.
 
Is there a bit I can set for this list only so the subscribers cannot post.
 
Thanks
-Rob
 
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: 
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showamp;file=faq01.027.htp


Re: [Mailman-Users] Bounce scores

2006-09-18 Thread Mark Sapiro
Lindsay Haisley wrote:

Well, I found 
http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers@python.org/msg09827.html which 
rather explains this, and identifies it as a mailman bug.

Does anyone know if this has been addressed, or will be addressed in new 
versions of mailman?


It's on my ToDo list, but it hasn't been done.

-- 
Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]   The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan

--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: 
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showamp;file=faq01.027.htp


[Mailman-Users] posting to any list also gets posted to local mailman list (v 2.1.2)

2006-09-18 Thread Paul Waterstraat - UC Davis Geology

Greetings,

For the last week or so it seems that messages posted to any of my  
lists also get posted to local mailman list. (Version 2.1.2)


Any ideas or pointers?


 --Paul.

Trust no one; and be careful out there.
--
Paul maddog WaterstraatInternet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Department of Geologyhttp://www.geology.ucdavis.edu/~waterstraat
University of California Voice: (530) 752-7421
One Shields Avenue   FAX:   (530) 752-0951
Davis, CA  95616-8605 USA

   If encryption is outlawed, then bayl bhgynjf jvyy hfr rapelcgvba.


--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: 
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showamp;file=faq01.027.htp

Re: [Mailman-Users] Different URL PATTERNS per virtual host?

2006-09-18 Thread Benjamin Donnachie
Dragon wrote:
 Is there some reason you would not want to run https on all of the lists?

I host a number of sites free of charge.  While I don't mind offering
Mailman FoC, I feel that there are somethings users should pay for and
https is one of them!

Take care,

Ben
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: 
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showamp;file=faq01.027.htp


Re: [Mailman-Users] Different URL PATTERNS per virtual host?

2006-09-18 Thread Dragon
Benjamin Donnachie sent the message below at 15:22 9/18/2006:
Dragon wrote:
  Is there some reason you would not want to run https on all of the lists?

I host a number of sites free of charge.  While I don't mind offering
Mailman FoC, I feel that there are somethings users should pay for and
https is one of them!

Take care,

Ben
 End original message. -

Fair enough, I can understand that the cost of getting an SSL 
certificate can be a problem. Especially in a case like this.

Dragon

~~~
  Venimus, Saltavimus, Bibimus (et naribus canium capti sumus)
~~~

--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: 
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showamp;file=faq01.027.htp


Re: [Mailman-Users] posting to any list also gets posted to localmailman list (v 2.1.2)

2006-09-18 Thread Mark Sapiro
Paul Waterstraat wrote:

For the last week or so it seems that messages posted to any of my  
lists also get posted to local mailman list. (Version 2.1.2)


Assuming [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not a member of your other lists, I
think the most likely explaination is that there has been some change
in the incoming MTA which is causing it to deliver incoming messages
for [EMAIL PROTECTED] to both 'list' and 'mailman'.

Check the MTA's logs.

-- 
Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]   The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan

--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: 
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showamp;file=faq01.027.htp


Re: [Mailman-Users] [Fwd: archive emails are garbled]

2006-09-18 Thread Justin Zygmont
Is one of the other lists a better place to ask this?
 
 
 Probably not. Did you see the reply to your original post at
 http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2006-September/053291.html?

I must have missed your message somehow, thanks a lot for the reply.


Justin Zygmont wrote:

 I have a noticed a problem with emails stored in the list archives if
 they have been uuencoded.  When HTML emails are distributed to all the
 list members they just show the raw HTML code,


 Messages as sent to message subscribers or messages in the archives?
 You should be able to send HTML to individual subscribers if you don't
 filter content or if you allow the appropriate MIME types in content
 filtering. How such messages appear in archives depends on sitewide
 archiving options set in mm_cfg.py.


 so I used uuencode and it
 fixed that, but when I take a look at the message in the archives it
 looks mostly garbled.  Here's an example:
 
 begin 644 AgentCommissions.html
 M/%$3T-465!%($A434P at 4%53$E#((M+R]7,T,O+T141!(5$U,(#0N,#$@
 M5')A;G-I=EO;F%L+R]%3B(^#0H\:'1M;#X-CQH96%D/@T*/'1I=QE/D-I
 M='EF;VYE($-O;6UIW-I;VX at 0F%N:SPO=ET;4^#0H\W1Y;4^#0H\(2TM
 M#0IT9YL:71T;5T97AT(![(9O;G0M9F%M:6QY.B!!FEA;#L at 9F]N=US
 M:7IE.B X'[EMAIL PROTECTED]:#$@( @( @( @( @R!F;VYT+69A;6EL3H at 07)I
 M86P[(9O;G0MVEZ93H@,31P=!]#0IH,B @( @( @( @(![(9O;G0M
 M9F%M:6QY.B!!FEA;#L at 9F]N=US:7IE.B Q,G!T('T-G1D+F)I9W1E'0@
 M( @('L at 9F]N=UF86UI;'DZ($%R:6%L.R!F;VYT+7-IF4Z(#$T'[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 This is not garbled. It is the uuencoded AgentCommissions.html file. A
 uuencoded file is not human readable, but as far as mail agents are
 concerned, it is plain text and will be archived in its raw form. Some
 MUAs see a uuencoded file in an email and call it an 'attachment' and
 render it as such, but this is non-standard. Also some MUAs when
 composing will put uuencoded data in a separate MIME part with
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: uuencode, x-uuencode, uue or x-uue, but
 this to is non-standard.


 Anyone know if there is a better way to deal with this?


 You should be able to send HTML messages to your list members.

 What Mailman version is this? What are your content filtering settings?
 Can you provide a sample of a message as sent to Mailman and as
 received from Mailman?

The messages appear as HTML code, and do not display an HTML looking 
email when it arrives to the subscribers.  This was one of the reasons 
why I tried using uuencode, but in the list archives, they show in their 
uuencoded form which is useless.  I wanted it to appear as HTML in 
thunderbird, and include it as an attachment also.

I'm using mailman-2.1.5.1-34.rhel4.3 and tried different content 
filering options, it didn't seem to help though.  Here is a sample of 
part of an email:


!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN
html
head
titleMobility Points Report/title
style
!--
td.littletext  { font-family: Arial; font-size: 10pt }
h1 { font-family: Arial; font-size: 14pt }
h2 { font-family: Arial; font-size: 12pt }
td.bigtext { font-family: Arial; font-size: 14pt }
--
/style
/head
body



Thanks,




--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: 
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showamp;file=faq01.027.htp


Re: [Mailman-Users] [Fwd: archive emails are garbled]

2006-09-18 Thread Mark Sapiro
Justin Zygmont wrote:

The messages appear as HTML code, and do not display an HTML looking 
email when it arrives to the subscribers.


This indicates that the MIME structure of the message has somehow been
corrupted or you are looking at a 'plain' format digest as opposed to
a 'mime' digest or an individual message from the list.


I'm using mailman-2.1.5.1-34.rhel4.3 and tried different content 
filering options, it didn't seem to help though.  Here is a sample of 
part of an email:


The sample doesn't help. What we need to see is the headers of the
message and it's subparts. Ideally, both what you send to the list and
what you get back.

Send a very short, HTML message to the list with a Bcc: to yourself.
Then view the message source of both the Bcc: and the message from the
list. If you want help, you can copy and paste these message sources
into a post to this list.

-- 
Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]   The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan

--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: 
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showamp;file=faq01.027.htp